On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 02:29:32PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
[stupid attempt of a flame war deleted]
For the audience which is wondering about what's going on here, I have
no idea.
The idea behind B-Boot-v2 is: U-Boot itself is a *great* bootloader from
the user's poing of view. It is the
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009, Robert Schwebel wrote:
What ever will happen - I don't see *any* reason for whatever Mike is trying
to enforce here.
I don't see how Mike is trying to nor can enforce anything like that. He's a
single person expressing his views.
But I do second the notion that good
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 20 April 2009 11:46:22 Gerrit Van Damme wrote:
I've copied a flash image of one board to another one and changed the
ethaddr (environment variable)
of course when I start Uboot now the system says: CRC bad, using default
environment variables.
Now what I would
Hello Drasko,
Great. Maybe you want to post your patches so others can benefit from
that acchievement, too?
It will be my pleasure, so I will take a look how can I make a usefull patch
as soon as I clean the code.
I am very interested in your work on this subject. If you want, I can
help you
Dear Sir/Madam
My regard to you, Well am Larry Bills and i will like to know if
you do have
plywood box in stock for sale or may i know if i can place and order for me
newly company
in Ghana which is Macdan wood shop 0233 Nima Ghana and also i will like to know
the method of payment
Hi eija_flight,
I am using GCC inline assembly in standalone applications to access my cpu
(ppc) internal registers. And it seems some of the registers were needed by
U-boot to run, because when I am accessing some of these registers via
standalone applications, the board will go reset or
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 01:23:37PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack dan...@caiaq.de
Cc: Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de
ping.
---
drivers/net/smc911x.c |9 +++--
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/smc911x.c
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 11:57:37PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
Not if the MAC is stored in the volatile smc911x registers. Issuing a
soft reset flushes these values - if U-Boot does that, the OS has no
change getting them.
then either your u-boot or your OS is misconfigured and you need
Hi Sascha,
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 01:38:23PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 01:23:37PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
If the MAX address is given by the environment, write it back to the
hardware.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack dan...@caiaq.de
Cc: Sascha Hauer
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Jon Smirl jonsm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
wrote:
On Apr 20, 2009, at 5:01 PM, Jon Smirl wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
wrote:
In
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 01:23:37PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
If the MAX address is given by the environment, write it back to the
hardware.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Mack dan...@caiaq.de
Cc: Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de
Acked-by: Sascha Hauer s.ha...@pengutronix.de
Anyway, you shouldn't
Hi
I am using Atmel AT91SAM9263-EK and running u-boot 1.1.5, it fails to
recognize a USB key of size 1GB and formatted in FAT.
This is what is happening:
U-boot usb start
(Re)start USB...
USB: scanning bus for devices...
USB device not responding, giving up (status=20)
2 USB Device(s)
The size of U-Boot binary for MPC8360ERDK increased
( 2 flash sectors now), so 'saveenv' will partially
overwrite U-Boot in flash and will brick the board.
This patch moves environment offset to fourth flash
sector.
Signed-off-by: Anatolij Gustschin ag...@denx.de
---
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:44 AM, Daniel Mack dan...@caiaq.de wrote:
Hi Sascha,
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 01:38:23PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 01:23:37PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote:
If the MAX address is given by the environment, write it back to the
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 06:28:34AM -0700, Ben Warren wrote:
Anyway, you shouldn't rely on this. I'm the original author of this
driver, but I do not use U-Boot-v1 anymore, so I can't tell if this
breaks something or not.
No problem. I just Cc'ed all email addresses I could find in the
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message 9e4733910904201706u58387d5fod231dd4b8ac88...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
Everyone will know the vendor of their board. You could alphabetize
Really? So who is the board vendor for the MPC8360 board? Freescale or
Logic PD? And who is the vendor for the ADS5121?
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message 9e4733910904201712x68658ddfk3c18298deb82b...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
There are a lot of boards that could be moved into a vendor subdirs. I
suspect we have less than 100 vendors. Maybe as few as 60.
There is many vendors which have just a single board; also,
-Original Message-
From: saschaha...@web.de [mailto:saschaha...@web.de]on Behalf Of Sascha
Hauer
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 12:57 PM
To: Bill Cook
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Build errors u-boot-v2 iMX27
Hi Bill,
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:57:49AM -0400,
Dear Robert,
just to put a few points right:
In message 20090421070431.gx5...@pengutronix.de you wrote:
So our intention was and is:
1. Wolfgang has a focus on stability and gradual changes. We respect this
political position because it is a *good* one.
This is not quite correct. What
Dear Gerrit Van Damme,
In message 49ed809d.5030...@mgb-tech.com you wrote:
The saveenv command doesn't work for me because then the default env
variables are stored and this is what I want to avoid.
Then change the environment before running saveenv? Or even better -
adjust the default
There is many vendors which have just a single board;
Like the ST nomadik8815 I maintain.
Just adding an additional directory level for a single entry does
not make much sense to me.
So should we leave the nomadik as a single-entry vendor board
or leave it as is? (more nomadik boards will be
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 04:40:04PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
1. Wolfgang has a focus on stability and gradual changes. We respect this
political position because it is a *good* one.
This is not quite correct. What I consider important is an evo-
lutionary path - this may include
Dear Wolgang Denk,
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Gerrit Van Damme,
In message 49ed809d.5030...@mgb-tech.com you wrote:
The saveenv command doesn't work for me because then the default env
variables are stored and this is what I want to avoid.
Then change the environment before running
I'm attempting to enable the smc911x driver for the overo omap3 board.
Looking at the README and a couple of board config files, it seems
that defining CONFIG_DRIVER_SMC911X, CONFIG_DRIVER_SMC911X_16_BIT (or
32_BIT), and CONFIG_DRIVER_SMC911X_BASE is all that is required. I
have also enabled
So should we leave the nomadik as a single-entry vendor board
or leave it as is?
Argh!
I mean: leave it alone in its own vendor-dir or move it up one level?
I got the idea vendor dirs were preferred anyway (as suggested by JC),
but Wolfgang's last message suggests the opposite.
Sorry for
From: Manikandan Pillai mani.pil...@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme dirk.be...@googlemail.com
Signed-off-by: Manikandan Pillai mani.pil...@ti.com
---
Changes in v3 which replaces previous version [3]:
* Fix udelay(), too
* Fix and use TIMER_LOAD_VAL macro
* Rebase against mainline
In recent U-Boot mmcinit changed to mmc init.
Signed-off-by: Steve Sakoman st...@sakoman.com
Signed-off-by: Dirk Behme dirk.be...@googlemail.com
---
include/configs/omap3_beagle.h |2 +-
include/configs/omap3_evm.h |2 +-
include/configs/omap3_overo.h |2 +-
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message 9e4733910904201706u58387d5fod231dd4b8ac88...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
Everyone will know the vendor of their board. You could alphabetize
Really? So who is the board vendor for the MPC8360
Dear Ladis,
Ladislav Michl wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 08:27:34PM +0200, Dirk Behme wrote:
Dear Ladis,
ah, and some remarks on the patch itself ;)
Thanks, I'm glad someone still cares about ancient stuff.
Ladislav Michl wrote:
Let CONFIG_SYS_HZ to have value of 1000 effectively
Jon Smirl wrote:
My vote would be to require all boards in the board/ directory to be
in a vendor directory. When you buy the board it is pretty obvious
from the accompanying packaging/manuals who the vendor is.
Companies and product lines get bought, names change...
IMHO, architecture
The function display_board_info() displays the silicon
revision as 2 - based on the return value from get_cpu_rev().
This is incorrect as the current Si version is 3.1
This patch displays the correct version; but does not
change get_cpu_rev() to minimize the code impact.
Signed-off-by: Sanjeev
Steve,
Steve Sakoman wrote:
I'm attempting to enable the smc911x driver for the overo omap3 board.
Looking at the README and a couple of board config files, it seems
that defining CONFIG_DRIVER_SMC911X, CONFIG_DRIVER_SMC911X_16_BIT (or
32_BIT), and CONFIG_DRIVER_SMC911X_BASE is all that is
Dear Premi,
Sanjeev Premi wrote:
The function display_board_info() displays the silicon
revision as 2 - based on the return value from get_cpu_rev().
This is incorrect as the current Si version is 3.1
Thanks for the patch and fixing this!
This patch displays the correct version; but does
-Original Message-
From: Dirk Behme [mailto:dirk.be...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 10:26 PM
To: Premi, Sanjeev
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OMAP3: Print correct silicon revision
Dear Premi,
Sanjeev Premi wrote:
The function
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 04:40:04PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Robert,
just to put a few points right:
In message 20090421070431.gx5...@pengutronix.de you wrote:
So our intention was and is:
1. Wolfgang has a focus on stability and gradual changes. We respect this
Premi, Sanjeev wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Dirk Behme [mailto:dirk.be...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 10:26 PM
To: Premi, Sanjeev
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OMAP3: Print correct silicon revision
Dear Premi,
Sanjeev Premi wrote:
Hello,
I am using Atmel AT91SAM9263-EK and running u-boot 1.1.5, it fails to
recognize a USB key of size 1GB and formatted in FAT.
Yep, known problem.
This is what is happening:
U-boot usb start
(Re)start USB...
USB: scanning bus for devices...
USB device not responding, giving up
-Original Message-
From: Premi, Sanjeev
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 11:37 PM
To: 'Dirk Behme'
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: RE: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OMAP3: Print correct silicon revision
-Original Message-
From: Dirk Behme [mailto:dirk.be...@googlemail.com]
Thanks for replying, Remy. I appreciate it. I just downloaded, built and
used U-boot version 2009.03. It does see the USB key now.
U-Boot usb start
(Re)start USB...
USB: scanning bus for devices... 2 USB Device(s) found
scanning bus for storage devices... 1 Storage Device(s) found
Dear Premi,
Premi, Sanjeev wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Premi, Sanjeev
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 11:37 PM
To: 'Dirk Behme'
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: RE: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OMAP3: Print correct silicon revision
-Original Message-
From: Dirk Behme
-Original Message-
From: Dirk Behme [mailto:dirk.be...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 1:04 AM
To: Premi, Sanjeev
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] OMAP3: Print correct silicon revision
Dear Premi,
Premi, Sanjeev wrote:
-Original
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message 9e4733910904210833u79f3d4dfv2db7449162462...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message 9e4733910904201706u58387d5fod231dd4b8ac88...@mail.gmail.com
you wrote:
Everyone will know
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message 9e4733910904210841n6c7f0db5s57eee23520dc...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
My vote would be to require all boards in the board/ directory to be
in a vendor directory. When you buy the board it is pretty obvious
from the accompanying packaging/manuals who the vendor is.
Dear Sascha,
In message 20090421182102.gz21...@pengutronix.de you wrote:
This is not quite correct. What I consider important is an evo-
lutionary path - this may include bigger changes and reorganizations,
but I consider it a bad idea to not provide a reasonable migration
path
On Apr 21, 2009, at 3:02 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message
9e4733910904210841n6c7f0db5s57eee23520dc...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
My vote would be to require all boards in the board/ directory to be
in a vendor directory. When you buy the board it is pretty obvious
Hello,
2009/4/21 Amandeep Bhullar arm.deb...@gmail.com:
Thanks for replying, Remy. I appreciate it. I just downloaded, built and
used U-boot version 2009.03. It does see the USB key now.
as expected ;-)
U-Boot usb start
(Re)start USB...
USB: scanning bus for devices... 2 USB Device(s)
Hi,
I am having a hard time understanding how the uboot relocation from flash to
RAM happens. I'm trying to follow the code flow. I think I understand it,
but wanted to run it by you experts to confirm.
The flow starts in cpu/arm926ejs/start.s. In the reset function, after
cpu_init_crit, u_boot
Dear Kumar Gala,
In message 93a8f58d-8c13-4f72-aff3-cf4fdf9a3...@kernel.crashing.org you wrote:
In my experience, I tend to search for board names first.
So back to the root of my question, do we just have one really long
list of board names?
I'm not an expert for the capabilities of
Dear Amandeep,
In message 3d083b80904211200h413b85dfv253e4990b9456...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
Another question - How can I boot from this USB key. Can I put Debian 5.0
Lenny image on USB key and boot AT91SAM9263-EK from there? If yes, how would
I do it? I am new to Linux. Many thanks for
Let CONFIG_SYS_HZ to have value of 1000 effectively fixing all users of
get_timer.
Changes since original version:
* Set PTV=2 (divisor 8) for boards using 12MHz timer clock source to
improve timer resolution.
Signed-off-by: Ladislav Michl la...@linux-mips.org
diff --git
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 05:38:21PM +0200, Dirk Behme wrote:
Ladislav Michl wrote:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 08:27:34PM +0200, Dirk Behme wrote:
Just to get an idea of the math:
CONFIG_SYS_CLK_FREQ is 1200 (12MHz)? This is divided by 256, so
TIMER_CLOCK is 46875Hz? A free running 32-bit
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:08:38PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Sascha,
In message 20090421182102.gz21...@pengutronix.de you wrote:
This is not quite correct. What I consider important is an evo-
lutionary path - this may include bigger changes and reorganizations,
but I
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:08:38PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Sascha,
In message 20090421182102.gz21...@pengutronix.de you wrote:
This is not quite correct. What I consider important is an evo-
lutionary path - this may include bigger changes and reorganizations,
but I
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Apr 21, 2009, at 3:52 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Kumar Gala,
In message 93a8f58d-8c13-4f72-aff3-cf4fdf9a3...@kernel.crashing.org you
wrote:
In my experience, I tend to search for board names first.
So
Dear Kumar,
In message aea791b2-2bc0-49f7-9152-acf6ca567...@kernel.crashing.org you wrote:
I'm not an expert for the capabilities of Kconfig, but one looong list
with hundrets of entries clearly makes no sense. We obviously need sum
grouping / structuring.
IMHO there should be several
On Apr 21, 2009, at 5:59 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Kumar,
In message AEA791B2-2BC0-49F7-9152-
acf6ca567...@kernel.crashing.org you wrote:
I'm not an expert for the capabilities of Kconfig, but one looong
list
with hundrets of entries clearly makes no sense. We obviously need
Dear Sascha,
In message 20090421223025.ga21...@pengutronix.de you wrote:
s...@octopus:~/octopus/u-boot/u-boot find board -name flash.c | wc -l
201
s...@octopus:~/octopus/u-boot/u-boot find board -name config.mk| wc -l
411
So nearly half of the boards in U-Boot seem to be unmaintained
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message 9e4733910904211533s58df5764na715986b36824...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
- for those who look for a board name, we should support this,
probably wih an initial selection by the first letter (case
insensitive) of the board name.
like this: = board name =
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message 9e4733910904211533s58df5764na715986b36824...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
- for those who look for a board name, we should support this,
probably wih an initial selection by the first letter (case
Jon Smirl wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 7:14 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Jon Smirl,
In message 9e4733910904211533s58df5764na715986b36824...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
- for those who look for a board name, we should support this,
probably wih an initial selection
I was hoping that I could use that to test some NAND code, but
then I noticed it wasn't implemented. I would have expected that
U-Boot command wouldn't exist until they're implemented...
I'm hoping someone has an implementation. With at least these
characteristics:
- Doesn't toggle the same
hi remy
with your help, i have add my code to uboot and the probe can work. but
i still have some questions.
1. After probe, in kernel, i will wait the interrupt generated by insert
usb cable , but in uboot, we don`t have interrupt, so how do you deal with
it.
2009/4/18 Remy Bohmer
+#define CONFIG_IPADDR192.168.5.44
+#define CONFIG_SERVERIP 192.168.5.30
+#define CONFIG_NETMASK 255.255.255.0
please remove the IP params
Why ?
Because these values are only relevant to your lab network,
not anybody else who's
63 matches
Mail list logo
