Re: [U-Boot] Boot from USB support for Kirkwood SOC

2009-06-11 Thread xiangfu
Prafulla Wadaskar wrote: Dear Remy Bohmer I am going to start boot from USB Support development for kirkwood. what this boot from USB Support means? I know boot from nand, and I know that the Ingenic CPU, support boot from USB. is the same meaning? here is part of JZ4740 cpu data sheet [1]

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH/next] Blackfin: bfin_mac: do portmuxing earlier to allow board override

2009-06-11 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 01 June 2009 00:06:43 Ben Warren wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: Some boards may want to undo some pin muxing for the EMAC (like when a board doesn't have the RX error interrupt hooked up), but in order to do that, we need to do portmuxing during the eth init step. Signed-off-by:

Re: [U-Boot] Boot from USB support for Kirkwood SOC

2009-06-11 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
-Original Message- From: xiangfu [mailto:xiangf...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2009 12:50 PM To: Prafulla Wadaskar Cc: li...@bohmer.net; U-Boot Subject: Re: [U-Boot] Boot from USB support for Kirkwood SOC Prafulla Wadaskar wrote: Dear Remy Bohmer I am going to

Re: [U-Boot] Boot from USB support for Kirkwood SOC

2009-06-11 Thread xiangfu
Hi Prafulla Wadashar Prafulla Wadaskar wrote: I am going to start boot from USB Support development for kirkwood. what this boot from USB Support means? Dear Xiangfu Liu To my development Boot from USB Support means, fetching kernel and rfs binaries from the file system/partition on

Re: [U-Boot] Building U-Boot under Ubuntu 8.10

2009-06-11 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear cmfai...@rockwellcollins.com, In message of8e7a40dc.a763cf10-on852575d2.2464-852575d2.5...@rockwellcollins.com you wrote: Sorry. I should've mentioned that I installed the ELDK 4.2 for ppc-linux-x86. Im using powerpc-linux-gcc for cross-compiling. Did you also enable it by

Re: [U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

2009-06-11 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Prafulla Wadaskar, In message 73173d32e9439e4abb5151606c3e19e201d4a0e...@sc-vexch1.marvell.com you wrote: I don't see the kirkwood support patches (which are on arm/next) in the pull request Did you missed them? It seems you missed the fact thatthis was a pull request for the master

Re: [U-Boot] Boot from USB support for Kirkwood SOC

2009-06-11 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear xiangfu, In message 4a30b020.7080...@gmail.com you wrote: here is part of JZ4740 cpu data sheet [1] -- 3.7.3 BOOT Jz4740 support 3 different boot sources depending on BOOT_SEL0 and BOOT_SEL1 pin values. Table 3-29 lists them. Table 3-29 Boot from 3

Re: [U-Boot] Boot from USB support for Kirkwood SOC

2009-06-11 Thread xiangfu
Hi Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear xiangfu, In message 4a30b020.7080...@gmail.com you wrote: here is part of JZ4740 cpu data sheet [1] -- 3.7.3 BOOT Jz4740 support 3 different boot sources depending on BOOT_SEL0 and BOOT_SEL1 pin values. Table 3-29 lists them.

Re: [U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

2009-06-11 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
-Original Message- From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:w...@denx.de] I don't see the kirkwood support patches (which are on arm/next) in the pull request Did you missed them? It seems you missed the fact thatthis was a pull request for the master branch only, not for next.

[U-Boot] NAND FDT mapping on Canyonlands

2009-06-11 Thread Felix Radensky
Hi, Canyonlands board port has its own version of ft_board_setup(), overriding the generic one from cpu/ppc4xx/fdt.c. Canyonlands version is missing the code that sets OPB/PLB mappings in device tree. As a result, Linux NAND driver is unusable on this board, as it fails to find a relevant NAND

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] OMAP3 I2C Fix the sampling clock.

2009-06-11 Thread Tom
Menon, Nishanth wrote: -Original Message- From: Tom [mailto:tom@windriver.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 9:44 PM This is a repeat story of what happened in linux-omap and kernel. We had a similar discussion in [1] and related patch [2] to change equations. I have

Re: [U-Boot] Building U-Boot under Ubuntu 8.10

2009-06-11 Thread cmfairfa
ARCH and CROSS_COMPILE are set and exported (ARCH=ppc, CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc-linux-) The problem appears to be with the assembler (as). The as: unrecognized option -mppc is what's killing me. I get through the compilation of make -C tools all The error happens during compilation of

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/8] hwconfig and some its users

2009-06-11 Thread Kim Phillips
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:23:28 +0400 Anton Vorontsov avoront...@ru.mvista.com wrote: On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 12:31:54AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Anton, In message 20090429215000.ga1...@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru you wrote: This patch implements simple hwconfig infrastructure: an

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/8] hwconfig and some its users

2009-06-11 Thread Anton Vorontsov
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 09:09:56AM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote: [...] Suggestion: instead of set hwconfig dr_usb,dr_usb_mode:peripheral,dr_usb_phy_type:ulpi use: set hwconfig dr_usb:mode=peripheral,phy_type=ulpi What do you think? Sorry for the delay. Done.

Re: [U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

2009-06-11 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Prafulla Wadaskar, In message 73173d32e9439e4abb5151606c3e19e201d4a0e...@sc-vexch1.marvell.com you wrote: master is for the upcoming (this Sunday, iuf everything goes OK) release; next is for the next release (August?). My pleasure is getting delayed by two months to see my stuff in

Re: [U-Boot] Building U-Boot under Ubuntu 8.10

2009-06-11 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear cmfai...@rockwellcollins.com, In message of8fd4848e.6ec6cc4f-on852575d2.004c617a-852575d2.004d5...@rockwellcollins.com you wrote: ARCH and CROSS_COMPILE are set and exported (ARCH=ppc, CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc-linux-) ...which is plain wrong. powerpc-linux- is NOIT a legal setting for

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc83xx: Add esd VME8349 board support

2009-06-11 Thread Kim Phillips
On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:09:48 +0200 Stefan Roese s...@denx.de wrote: From: Reinhard Arlt reinhard.a...@esd-electronics.com From: Reinhard Arlt reinhard.a...@esd-electronics.com This patch adds support for the esd VME8349 board equipped with the MPC8349. It's a VME PMC carrier board

Re: [U-Boot] Building U-Boot under Ubuntu 8.10

2009-06-11 Thread Kenneth Johansson
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 17:04 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear cmfai...@rockwellcollins.com, In message of8fd4848e.6ec6cc4f-on852575d2.004c617a-852575d2.004d5...@rockwellcollins.com you wrote: ARCH and CROSS_COMPILE are set and exported (ARCH=ppc, CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc-linux-)

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/8] hwconfig and some its users

2009-06-11 Thread Kim Phillips
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:39:43 +0400 Anton Vorontsov avoront...@ru.mvista.com wrote: On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 09:09:56AM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote: [...] Suggestion: instead of set hwconfig dr_usb,dr_usb_mode:peripheral,dr_usb_phy_type:ulpi use: set

Re: [U-Boot] Building U-Boot under Ubuntu 8.10

2009-06-11 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kenneth Johansson, In message 1244733541.4182.81.ca...@localhost.localdomain you wrote: ARCH and CROSS_COMPILE are set and exported (ARCH=ppc, CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc-linux-) ...which is plain wrong. powerpc-linux- is NOIT a legal setting for CROSS_COMPILE. why is that ?

[U-Boot] Flash Errors in Building u-boot.2009.03 for mx31ads

2009-06-11 Thread Yong Yang
I ran into a bunch of errors related to Flash and Net (e.g. undefined reference to 'flash_init'), when building u-boot for mx31ads. lib_arm/libarm.a(board.o)(.text+0x1d8): In function `start_armboot': /home/yong/cross-compile/u-boot-2009.03/lib_arm/board.c:211: undefined reference to `flash_init'

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/8] hwconfig and some its users

2009-06-11 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kim Phillips, In message 20090611105533.7aeec1ee.kim.phill...@freescale.com you wrote: The separator between options is ';', between sub-options is ','. So that would be 'dr_usb:mode=host,phy_type=ulpi; esdhc. ...and that's still what I like most of the differnet formats discussed

Re: [U-Boot] Building U-Boot under Ubuntu 8.10

2009-06-11 Thread Kenneth Johansson
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 17:59 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Kenneth Johansson, In message 1244733541.4182.81.ca...@localhost.localdomain you wrote: ARCH and CROSS_COMPILE are set and exported (ARCH=ppc, CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc-linux-) ...which is plain wrong. powerpc-linux- is

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH/next] Blackfin: bfin_mac: do portmuxing earlier to allow board override

2009-06-11 Thread Ben Warren
Mike Frysinger wrote: On Monday 01 June 2009 00:06:43 Ben Warren wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: Some boards may want to undo some pin muxing for the EMAC (like when a board doesn't have the RX error interrupt hooked up), but in order to do that, we need to do portmuxing during the eth

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/8] hwconfig and some its users

2009-06-11 Thread Kim Phillips
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:03:51 +0200 Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote: Dear Kim Phillips, In message 20090611105533.7aeec1ee.kim.phill...@freescale.com you wrote: The separator between options is ';', between sub-options is ','. So that would be 'dr_usb:mode=host,phy_type=ulpi;

Re: [U-Boot] Building U-Boot under Ubuntu 8.10

2009-06-11 Thread Ben Warren
Hi Wolfgang, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear cmfai...@rockwellcollins.com, In message of8fd4848e.6ec6cc4f-on852575d2.004c617a-852575d2.004d5...@rockwellcollins.com you wrote: ARCH and CROSS_COMPILE are set and exported (ARCH=ppc, CROSS_COMPILE=powerpc-linux-) ...which is plain

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/8] hwconfig and some its users

2009-06-11 Thread Anton Vorontsov
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 10:55:33AM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote: [...] if you don't want to type, things like this are possible but they have to depend on the order given: dr_usb.mode = host; .phy_type = ulpi; esdhc; however when automating/scripting concatenation of them, it's useful to not

Re: [U-Boot] Building U-Boot under Ubuntu 8.10

2009-06-11 Thread Ben Warren
Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Ben Warren, In message 4a3136e6.9000...@gmail.com you wrote: Based on my limited understanding, it seems this should be a valid prefix. If you have a moment, can you explain why it's not? In my installation everything seems to point to 'powerpc-linux-*':

[U-Boot] there is no need for uboot to use linux's mtd driver!

2009-06-11 Thread liu . yaojin
i am porting uboot to our board.and i am a fresh man to the uboot. after several days on studying uboot.i found uboot's mtd drvier framework for nand is very foolish! i think uboot should just have some api,such as read/write_page,oob,crc,but let them be null functions. !!!because!!! the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2 v4] KB9202: Add NAND support

2009-06-11 Thread Matthias Kaehlcke
Add NAND support for the KwikByte KB9202 Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke matth...@kaehlcke.net -- Changes: - moved driver to drivers/mtd/nand/ - use i/o accessors - don't check for ATL custom board - removed unnecessary cast - don't use magic numbers drivers/mtd/nand/Makefile

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] OMAP3 I2C Fix the sampling clock.

2009-06-11 Thread Tom Rix
This problem is seen on Zoom1 and Zoom2 in the startup and when i2c probe is used Before : In:serial Out: serial Err: serial timed out in wait_for_bb: I2C_STAT=1000 timed out in wait_for_bb: I2C_STAT=1000 timed out in wait_for_bb: I2C_STAT=1000 timed out in wait_for_pin: I2C_STAT=1000

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] OMAP3 I2C Fix the sampling clock.

2009-06-11 Thread Tom
Forgot the --compose.. This is the formal patch for the solution I posted earlier for making the i2c setup more flexible. Retested as per original commit message. Tom ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de

Re: [U-Boot] there is no need for uboot to use linux's mtd driver!

2009-06-11 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear liu.yao...@zte.com.cn, In message 200906111737.n5bhbllo059...@mse1.zte.com.cn you wrote: i am porting uboot to our board.and i am a fresh man to the uboot. after several days on studying uboot.i found uboot's mtd drvier framework for nand is very foolish! You are welcome to provide a

[U-Boot] V3 OMAP3 I2C Fix the sampling clock

2009-06-11 Thread Tom Rix
Fixed unused variable iclk ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] OMAP3 I2C Fix the sampling clock.

2009-06-11 Thread Tom Rix
This problem is seen on Zoom1 and Zoom2 in the startup and when i2c probe is used Before : In:serial Out: serial Err: serial timed out in wait_for_bb: I2C_STAT=1000 timed out in wait_for_bb: I2C_STAT=1000 timed out in wait_for_bb: I2C_STAT=1000 timed out in wait_for_pin: I2C_STAT=1000

[U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-mpc83xx - master branch

2009-06-11 Thread Kim Phillips
The following changes since commit a53c997dd7fc858f2a27f5a47b200567b9343ae5: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD (1): at91/cpu.c: add missing Copyright GPL header are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx.de/u-boot-mpc83xx.git master Kim Phillips (1): mpc83xx: don't

[U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-mpc83xx - next branch

2009-06-11 Thread Kim Phillips
The following changes since commit af7ffac4bacbacbd5d4b9d1db38bd983d5c13c38: Stefan Roese (1): UBI: Add compile-time check for correct malloc area configuration are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx.de/u-boot-mpc83xx.git next Peter Tyser (2): 83xx: Replace

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/8] hwconfig and some its users

2009-06-11 Thread Kim Phillips
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:01:23 +0400 Anton Vorontsov avoront...@ru.mvista.com wrote: dr_usb.mode = host; .phy_type = ulpi; esdhc; - that isn't obvious that .phy_type is a continuation of dr_usb. :-/ It's kind of more special format then the original... special, eh? ;) Wolfgang replied that

Re: [U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-mpc83xx - master branch

2009-06-11 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kim Phillips, In message 20090611164901.83414242.kim.phill...@freescale.com you wrote: The following changes since commit a53c997dd7fc858f2a27f5a47b200567b9343ae5: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD (1): at91/cpu.c: add missing Copyright GPL header are available in the git

Re: [U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-mpc83xx - next branch

2009-06-11 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kim Phillips, In message 20090611164909.ba5cd069.kim.phill...@freescale.com you wrote: The following changes since commit af7ffac4bacbacbd5d4b9d1db38bd983d5c13c38: Stefan Roese (1): UBI: Add compile-time check for correct malloc area configuration are available in the git

[U-Boot] Reprogramming Flash on GDATech 8540 EVAL board

2009-06-11 Thread Nikhil Gupta
Hi U-Boot users, I need to reprogram the Flash device on my GDATech 8540 EVAL board. I installed a non-working u-boot image on to the flash, so I cannot use u-boot anymore to update the bootloader. Please advise me on what is the best way to get u-boot working again. Thanks, Nikhil Gupta.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/10] imx27lite: add support for imx27lite board from LogicPD

2009-06-11 Thread Paul Thomas
Note that the old version of that code is available in the imx27lite branch of the u-boot-testing repository; see http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-testing.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/imx27lite Is this still the best branch for imx27lite? I'm not getting anything on the serial port when I

[U-Boot] De'ntists Listing in the US

2009-06-11 Thread Newton R Sonia
2008 Edition Contact List of Dentists in America == 164,585 D e ntists with City, State, Zip == 158,281 Physical Addresses == 163,453 Tel Nos == 77,369 Fax Numbers == 45,601 E-Mail Addresses Until June 12th a special price reduction is in effect - REG PRICE: $390 SALE PRICE: $294 Write an

[U-Boot] 34704 PMIC

2009-06-11 Thread Paul Thomas
Well, I finally have u-boot-v2 booting on my open source imx27 board. This brings me to the next step of enabling the 3.3v supply on the freescale mc34704 power management IC. I see that there is an SPI driver for the mc13783 PMIC. One big difference is that the mc34704 communicates with i2c

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 02/15] MPC85xx: Fix MURAM size for MPC8569

2009-06-11 Thread Kumar Gala
On May 20, 2009, at 11:30 AM, Haiying Wang wrote: MPC8569 has 128K bytes MURAM. Signed-off-by: Haiying Wang haiying.w...@freescale.com --- include/asm-ppc/immap_qe.h |9 +++-- 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) applied - k

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 03/14 v2] MPC85xx: Fix some settings for MPC8569MDS board

2009-06-11 Thread Kumar Gala
On Jun 4, 2009, at 3:12 PM, Haiying Wang wrote: - Increase the size of malloc to 512KB because MPC8569MDS needs more memory for malloc to support up to eight Ethernet interfaces. - Move Environment address out of uboot thus the saved environment variables will not be erased after

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 04/15] MPC85xx: Add PIB support at CS4/CS5 for MPC8569MDS

2009-06-11 Thread Kumar Gala
On May 20, 2009, at 11:30 AM, Haiying Wang wrote: Signed-off-by: Haiying Wang haiying.w...@freescale.com Signed-off-by: Yu Liu yu@freescale.com --- include/configs/MPC8569MDS.h | 10 +- 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) applied - k

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 05/15] MPC85xx: Add UART1 support for MPC8569MDS

2009-06-11 Thread Kumar Gala
On May 20, 2009, at 11:30 AM, Haiying Wang wrote: MPC8569 UART1 signals are muxed with PortF bit[9-12], we need to define those pins before using UART1. Signed-off-by: Haiying Wang haiying.w...@freescale.com --- board/freescale/mpc8569mds/mpc8569mds.c |6 ++ 1 files changed, 6

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] 85xx: Use print_size to report amount of memory not mapped by TLBs

2009-06-11 Thread Kumar Gala
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org --- cpu/mpc85xx/tlb.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpu/mpc85xx/tlb.c b/cpu/mpc85xx/tlb.c index 8304ffe..46925f1 100644 --- a/cpu/mpc85xx/tlb.c +++ b/cpu/mpc85xx/tlb.c @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ unsigned int

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] fsl-ddr: Fix handling of 4G of memory when !CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT

2009-06-11 Thread Kumar Gala
The ddr code computes most things as 64-bit quantities and had some places in the middle that it was using phy_addr_t and phys_size_t. Instead we use unsigned long long through out and only at the last stage of setting the LAWs and reporting the amount of memory to the board code do we truncate