Re: [U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

2009-09-06 Thread Dirk Behme
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: On 07:37 Sat 05 Sep , Dirk Behme wrote: Dear Jean-Christophe, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: Hi, Please pull The following changes since commit 3aa8b68d80dbcb6829af60485c1e388b39af793d: Wolfgang Denk (1): Merge branch 'next' of

[U-Boot] Warning in omap3_mmc.c

2009-09-06 Thread Dirk Behme
Recent U-Boot head gives (e.g. for omap3_beagle_config) omap3_mmc.c: In function 'mmc_detect_card': omap3_mmc.c:279: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules omap3_mmc.c:292: warning: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH][v1] mpc8260: move FDT memory node fixup into common CPU code.

2009-09-06 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Marcel, Marcel ziswiler wrote: Move the memory node fixup of the MPC8260ADS, ids8247 and muas3001 boards into common mpc8260 CPU code. Remove Ethernet node fixup from muas3001 board and modify its config for the common mpc8260 code to use generic Ethernet fixup. Thanks for cleaning up,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Reset i2c slave devices during init on mpc5xxx cpus

2009-09-06 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Eric, Eric Millbrandt wrote: Reset any i2c devices that may have been interrupted during a system reset. Normally this would be accomplished by clocking the line until SCL and SDA are released and then sending a start condtiion (From an Atmel datasheet). There is no direct access to the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fsl_i2c: increase I2C timeout values and make them configurable

2009-09-06 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Timur, Timur Tabi wrote: The value of I2C_TIMEOUT in fsl_i2c.c has several problems. First, it is defined as CONFIG_HZ/4, but it is used as a count of microseconds, so it makes no sense to derive it from a clock rate. Second, the current value (250) is too low for some boards, so it

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 8/8] OMAP3 zoom2 Use usbtty if the debug board is not connected.

2009-09-06 Thread Tom
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: On 15:12 Fri 04 Sep , Tom Rix wrote: The preferred serial output comes from the debug board. When the debug board is disconnected, fall back on using usbtty from the usb connector on the Zoom2 board. This shows up as /dev/ttyACM0 in a linux

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add support for Eukrea CPU9260/CPU9G20 SBC

2009-09-06 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 18:15 Sat 05 Sep , Eric Benard wrote: these boards are built around Atmel's AT91SAM9260/9G20 and have up to 64MB of NOR flash, up to 128MB of SDRAM, up to 2GB of NAND and include a 10/100 Ethernet PHY in RMII mode. Signed-off-by: Eric Benard e...@eukrea.com --- MAINTAINERS

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/8] OMAP3 Add usb device support

2009-09-06 Thread Tom
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: Hi, please be carefull you have a lot's of ligne which exceed 80 chars limit Yes I saw these from check_patch. I will try to reduce these. + +/* Define MUSB_DEBUG before including this file to get debug macros */ +#ifdef MUSB_DEBUG +

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/8] TWL4030 Add usb PHY support

2009-09-06 Thread Tom
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: On 15:12 Fri 04 Sep , Tom Rix wrote: snip please add an empty line I will take care of all the empty lines. +if (ret == 0) +ret = data; +else +printf(TWL4030:USB:Read[0x%x] Error %d\n, address, ret);

Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload

2009-09-06 Thread Tom
Paulraj, Sandeep wrote: Wolfgang, Dirk, I can take responsibility for TI DaVinci SOCs. This means an omap/davinci split ? u-boot-arm-omap u-boot-arm-davinci This is ok with me Tom Thanks, Sandeep From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de

Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload

2009-09-06 Thread Paulraj, Sandeep
Tom, This is also what we have been discussing internally within TI to have an omap/davinci split. BTW there are SOC's which have an OMAP part number but are actually very similar to DaVinci's. Since i am quite familiar with the RBLs of all these devices and i have all the EVMs for the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/8] TWL4030 Add usb PHY support

2009-09-06 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 08:46 Sun 06 Sep , Tom wrote: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: On 15:12 Fri 04 Sep , Tom Rix wrote: snip please add an empty line I will take care of all the empty lines. + if (ret == 0) + ret = data; + else + printf(TWL4030:USB:Read[0x%x] Error

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 4/4]: arm: Define test_and_set_bit and test_and_clear bit for ARM

2009-09-06 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 17:27 Fri 04 Sep , Justin Waters wrote: Simon, I found a slight problem with this section of the patch: On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 03:10 -0400, Simon Kagstrom wrote: diff --git a/include/asm-arm/bitops.h b/include/asm-arm/bitops.h index 854e225..3c7b00c 100644 ---

Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload

2009-09-06 Thread Tom
And of course the omap / davinci repos should be sync-ed up regularly so they do not drift too much. Tom Paulraj, Sandeep wrote: Tom, This is also what we have been discussing internally within TI to have an omap/davinci split. BTW there are SOC's which have an OMAP part number but are

Re: [U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

2009-09-06 Thread Dirk Behme
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: On 09:12 Sun 06 Sep , Dirk Behme wrote: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: On 07:37 Sat 05 Sep , Dirk Behme wrote: Dear Jean-Christophe, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: Hi, Please pull The following changes since commit

Re: [U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

2009-09-06 Thread Peter Tyser
On Sun, 2009-09-06 at 19:59 +0200, Dirk Behme wrote: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: On 09:12 Sun 06 Sep , Dirk Behme wrote: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: On 07:37 Sat 05 Sep , Dirk Behme wrote: Dear Jean-Christophe, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:

Re: [U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

2009-09-06 Thread Dirk Behme
Peter Tyser wrote: On Sun, 2009-09-06 at 19:59 +0200, Dirk Behme wrote: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: On 09:12 Sun 06 Sep , Dirk Behme wrote: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: On 07:37 Sat 05 Sep , Dirk Behme wrote: Dear Jean-Christophe, Jean-Christophe

Re: [U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

2009-09-06 Thread Peter Tyser
On Sun, 2009-09-06 at 20:40 +0200, Dirk Behme wrote: Peter Tyser wrote: On Sun, 2009-09-06 at 19:59 +0200, Dirk Behme wrote: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: On 09:12 Sun 06 Sep , Dirk Behme wrote: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: On 07:37 Sat 05 Sep , Dirk Behme

Re: [U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

2009-09-06 Thread Tom
Dirk Behme wrote: Peter Tyser wrote: On Sun, 2009-09-06 at 19:59 +0200, Dirk Behme wrote: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: On 09:12 Sun 06 Sep , Dirk Behme wrote: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: On 07:37 Sat 05 Sep , Dirk Behme

Re: [U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

2009-09-06 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Jean-Christophe: In http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-August/059087.html we agreed on omap3_devkit8000. in v4 the author prefer it devkit8000 so I respect it You missed v5 and v6, no? no I did not as Frederik Kriewitz said this 'Oh yes, do we really need a v7? Or is v4 (with

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 0/4]: bitops cleanup and fixes

2009-09-06 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, In message 20090905113728.gn30...@game.jcrosoft.org you wrote: Sorry to ping you all, but are there any more comments on work to be done before this patch series can be accepted? The patches were these: [PATCH v4 1/4]: Move __set/clear_bit

Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload

2009-09-06 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Sandeep, In message 0554bef07d437848af01b9c9b5f0bc5d91e07...@dlee01.ent.ti.com you wrote: This is also what we have been discussing internally within TI to have an omap/davinci split. I'm not happy about the idea. If there really is need (or reason) to split these, I would prefer to

Re: [U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

2009-09-06 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Dirk Behme, In message 4aa4020c.8080...@googlemail.com you wrote: My vote is for keeping the board config file named devkit8000.h - that's U-Boot's current, standard naming convention and it matches up with the board name under board/. ACK. And I vote (as agreed like mentioned

Re: [U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

2009-09-06 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Tom, In message 4aa419d7.2010...@windriver.com you wrote: I know i may be muddying this up but.. The devkit8000 looks a lot like the beagle. Have you already thought of just rolling devkit8000 into beagle? That's actually a good idea, if possible. My opinion on naming is to keep

Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload

2009-09-06 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Tom, In message 4aa3bf2f.3080...@windriver.com you wrote: This means an omap/davinci split ? u-boot-arm-omap u-boot-arm-davinci This is ok with me I would like to avoid this, at least for now. Let's do a first step now (split into vendor based sub-repos), and stabilize that. Then we

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] omap: move TI's boards to board/ti/

2009-09-06 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, In message 1251037960-17063-1-git-send-email-plagn...@jcrosoft.com you wrote: Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagn...@jcrosoft.com --- Sorry for the late comment, but I hust notice that this patch (and the two following ones) moves the

Re: [U-Boot] reloacting uboot

2009-09-06 Thread Ulf Samuelsson
Wolfgang Denk skrev: Dear E Robertson, In message 200908251428.55255.e.robertson@gmail.com you wrote: In message 200908251403.20809.e.robertson@gmail.com you wrote: I am using the at91sam9263 device from which the bootstrap code load u-boot to the desired ram address. However, I

Re: [U-Boot] ARM Pull Request

2009-09-06 Thread Tom
Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Tom, In message 4aa419d7.2010...@windriver.com you wrote: I know i may be muddying this up but.. The devkit8000 looks a lot like the beagle. Have you already thought of just rolling devkit8000 into beagle? That's actually a good idea, if possible.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] omap: move TI's boards to board/ti/

2009-09-06 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 23:43 Sun 06 Sep , Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, In message 1251037960-17063-1-git-send-email-plagn...@jcrosoft.com you wrote: Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD plagn...@jcrosoft.com --- Sorry for the late comment, but I hust notice

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 0/4]: bitops cleanup and fixes

2009-09-06 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 22:50 Sun 06 Sep , Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, In message 20090905113728.gn30...@game.jcrosoft.org you wrote: Sorry to ping you all, but are there any more comments on work to be done before this patch series can be accepted? The patches were

[U-Boot] [PATCH-ARM 4/4] Clean-up of s3c24x0 nand driver

2009-09-06 Thread kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk
This patch re-formats the arm920t s3c24x0 nand driver in preparation for changes to add support for the Embest SBC2440-II Board. The changes are as follows: - re-indent the code using Lindent - make sure register layouts are defined using a C struct - replace the upper-case typedef'ed C struct

Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload

2009-09-06 Thread Kyungmin Park
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Wolfgang Denkw...@denx.de wrote: Hello everybody, ARM has always been one of the architectures that generated a big number of different processors and SoCs, but recently the activitiy in this area is literally exploding.  This is partially due to the fact that

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] arm_cortexa8: support cache flush to other soc

2009-09-06 Thread Minkyu Kang
Dear Dirk, 2009/9/5 Dirk Behme dirk.be...@googlemail.com Minkyu Kang wrote: Dear, Dirk 2009/9/4 Dirk Behme dirk.be...@googlemail.com Kyungmin Park wrote: On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Dirk Behmedirk.be...@googlemail.com wrote: Kyungmin Park wrote: ... + if

Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and distribute workload

2009-09-06 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
-Original Message- From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Kyungmin Park Sent: Monday, September 07, 2009 6:36 AM To: Wolfgang Denk Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Magnus Lilja; Minkyu Kang Subject: Re: [U-Boot] RFC: split ARM repo and

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/5] tools: mkimage: Include default/fit_image.o in the build dependency calculations

2009-09-06 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
This makes sure it gets rebuilt if any of the headers it includes are modified Signed-off-by: Prafulla Wadaskar prafu...@marvell.com Acked-by: Ron Lee r...@debian.org --- tools/Makefile |2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/Makefile b/tools/Makefile

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/5][repost] tools: mkimage: Making table_entry code global

2009-09-06 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
1. get_table_entry_id API made global 2. get_table_entry_name API made global 3. struct table_entry moved to image.h Currently it is used by image.c only These APIs are very usefull and can be used by other part of code This patch makes these APIs and struct global Signed-off-by: Prafulla

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5] Kirkwood: Sheevaplug: kwimage configuration

2009-09-06 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
Signed-off-by: Prafulla Wadaskar prafu...@marvell.com --- board/Marvell/sheevaplug/config.mk|3 + board/Marvell/sheevaplug/kwbimage.cfg | 162 + 2 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 board/Marvell/sheevaplug/kwbimage.cfg

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5][repost] tools: mkimage: Making genimg_print_size API global

2009-09-06 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
Currently it is used by image.c only This API can be used by additional mkimage types supports for ex. kwbimage, to use it the API is made global Signed-off-by: Prafulla Wadaskar prafu...@marvell.com --- common/image.c |3 +-- include/image.h |1 + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 5/5] tools: mkimage: Add: Kirkwood Boot Image support (kwbimage)

2009-09-06 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
This patch adds type kwbimabe support for new mkimage core For more details refer docs/README.kwbimage This patch is tested with Sheevaplug board Signed-off-by: Prafulla Wadaskar prafu...@marvell.com Acked-by: Ron Lee r...@debian.org Signed-off-by: Prafulla Wadaskar prafu...@marvell.com --- v2:

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 5/5][repost] tools: mkimage: Add: Kirkwood Boot Image support (kwbimage)

2009-09-06 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
This patch adds type kwbimage support for new mkimage core For more details refer docs/README.kwbimage This patch is tested with Sheevaplug board Signed-off-by: Prafulla Wadaskar prafu...@marvell.com Acked-by: Ron Lee r...@debian.org Signed-off-by: Prafulla Wadaskar prafu...@marvell.com --- v2: