Hi Kumar,
I have tried using fsl_ddr_set_memctl_regs().
But this can't get fit into 4K NAND_SPL Loader.
Regards,
Dipen
On Oct 9, 2009, at 12:42 PM, Dipen Dudhat wrote:
+void initsdram(void)
+{
+
+volatile ccsr_ddr_t *ddr= (ccsr_ddr_t
*)CONFIG_SYS_MPC85xx_DDR_ADDR;
+int
Now OneNAND handles block operation only.
With this patch OneNAND handles all read/write size.
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com
---
diff --git a/common/cmd_onenand.c b/common/cmd_onenand.c
index 9090940..2b8f01b 100644
--- a/common/cmd_onenand.c
+++ b/common/cmd_onenand.c
@@
On Sun, 11 Oct 2009 14:00:15 -0500
Tom Rix t...@bumblecow.com wrote:
I have merged arm/next into arm/master.
There are new warnings in
CPU9260 , CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_VSPRINTF
CPU9G20 , CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_VSPRINTF
GPUAT91 , CONFIG_NET_MULTI,
davinci_dm355evm , CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_VSPRINTF,
Hi Alemao,
Alemao schrieb:
Hi all,
I have used UPM in a MPC83xx with LBC running at 64MHz.
Now I have a MPC85xx, with LBC at 41MHz.
It only works if I put a delay in drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_upm.c :
nand_write_buf(), otherwise I lost one byte. But it takes t long
writing, which makes
Dear Tom,
The following changes since commit 617da90c1dcf65428ddfb63fef897439950bc915:
Tom Rix (1):
Merge branch 't-next-marvell' into t-next-at91
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-samsung master
Minkyu Kang (5):
s5pc1xx: support Samsung s5pc1xx
Signed-off-by: Eric Benard e...@eukrea.com
---
board/eukrea/cpu9260/cpu9260.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/eukrea/cpu9260/cpu9260.c b/board/eukrea/cpu9260/cpu9260.c
index 0b4f0d4..af8a4a2 100644
--- a/board/eukrea/cpu9260/cpu9260.c
+++
nand_util.c:45:2: warning: #warning Please define CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_VSPRINTF for
correct output!
Signed-off-by: Eric Benard e...@eukrea.com
---
include/configs/cpu9260.h |1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/cpu9260.h b/include/configs/cpu9260.h
main.c: In function 'abortboot':
main.c:122: warning: too few arguments for format
Signed-off-by: Eric Benard e...@eukrea.com
---
include/configs/cpuat91.h |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/cpuat91.h b/include/configs/cpuat91.h
index
Hi, Kyungmin Park!
Thank you for patch!
But I have a question - how should I apply it?
Sorry, I'm not very skilled in UNIX/Linux.
I've saved all code from:
diff --git a/common/cmd_onenand.c b/common/cmd_onenand.c
index 9090940..2b8f01b 100644
to:
if (arg_off_size(argc -
Minkyu Kang wrote:
Dear Tom,
The following changes since commit 617da90c1dcf65428ddfb63fef897439950bc915:
Tom Rix (1):
Merge branch 't-next-marvell' into t-next-at91
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.denx.de/u-boot-samsung master
I will merge this in
Eric Benard wrote:
Signed-off-by: Eric Benard e...@eukrea.com
---
board/eukrea/cpu9260/cpu9260.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/board/eukrea/cpu9260/cpu9260.c b/board/eukrea/cpu9260/cpu9260.c
index 0b4f0d4..af8a4a2 100644
---
Eric Benard wrote:
main.c: In function 'abortboot':
main.c:122: warning: too few arguments for format
Signed-off-by: Eric Benard e...@eukrea.com
---
include/configs/cpuat91.h |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/configs/cpuat91.h
Hi all,
we've been working on a PPC512x board booting with u-boot + linux
2.6.24.6, and one major issue for our application is boot time.
Right now, we went down to less than 6s boot time (i.e. time from power
off to launch of the user app), even with some drivers installed, i.e.:
* CAN
Hi,
I want to know what is the instruction for sleeping in ARM Cortex A8.
I did execute a WFI instruction seems to be a NOP.
void cpu_idle()
{
unsigned long tmp = 0;
asm(b 1f\n\t
.align 5\n\t
1:\n\t
mcr p15, 0, %0, c7, c10, 5\n\t
mcr p15, 0,
Hi
2009/10/12 akshay ts taksh...@yahoo.co.in:
Hi,
I want to know what is the instruction for sleeping in ARM Cortex A8.
I did execute a WFI instruction seems to be a NOP.
void cpu_idle()
{
unsigned long tmp = 0;
asm(b 1f\n\t
.align 5\n\t
1:\n\t
mcr
Did you try setenv bootdelay 0 in uboot?
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 7:07 AM, Fortini Matteo matteo.fort...@mta.it wrote:
Hi all,
we've been working on a PPC512x board booting with u-boot + linux 2.6.24.6,
and one major issue for our application is boot time.
Right now, we went down to less than
Steve Sakoman wrote:
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Steve Sakoman sako...@gmail.com wrote:
Compile and run test of the Overo build was fine with Tobi card.
Later today I will try some of the other daughter cards to make sure
it works with all of them.
Heh, I spoke too soon!
U-boot
On Sat, 10 Oct 2009 15:47 -0500, Andrew Dyer amd...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 12:27 PM, myub...@fastmail.fm wrote:
On Fri, 09 Oct 2009 12:16 -0500, Andrew Dyer amd...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 11:21 AM, myub...@fastmail.fm wrote:
I think I found a problem
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:01:32 +0530
Dudhat Dipen-B09055 dipen.dud...@freescale.com wrote:
On Oct 9, 2009, at 12:42 PM, Dipen Dudhat wrote:
+void initsdram(void)
+{
+
+ volatile ccsr_ddr_t *ddr= (ccsr_ddr_t
*)CONFIG_SYS_MPC85xx_DDR_ADDR;
+ int d_init, dbw;
+ volatile
On Wed, 9 Sep 2009 15:28:01 -0500
Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Sep 9, 2009, at 1:22 PM, Scott Wood wrote:
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 12:31:25PM +0200, Roland Lezuo wrote:
The following patch is needed to correctly assign the IRQs for the
gianfar driver on the
Paulraj, Sandeep wrote:
The offset to the chip select is incorrect.
The change 187af954cf7958c24efcf0fd62289bbdb4f1f24e,
omap3: embedd gpmc_cs into gpmc config struct
introduced a problem with the serial gpmc setup.
This patch reverts the chip select to its previous value.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Dirk Behme dirk.be...@googlemail.com wrote:
Steve Sakoman wrote:
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Steve Sakoman sako...@gmail.com wrote:
Compile and run test of the Overo build was fine with Tobi card.
Later today I will try some of the other daughter cards
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 09:17:49AM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
After OneNAND IPL updated, apollon boot code exceeds 1KiB size,
This patch reduces the apollon boot code
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com
Should this go through NAND or ARM?
-Scott
Hello
A question regarding the next u-boot -rc.
What is the approximate time frame when the next u-boot -rc is expected
to be released?
Kind Regards
Poonam
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:17:04PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
[...]
+/* Chip select 3 - NAND */
+#define CONFIG_SYS_NAND_BASE0xFC00
Is it possible to have it at 0xffa0 so we match other FSL boards?
No, not without reshuffling all the mappings. On MPC8569E-MDS NOR
flash
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:18:16PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Aug 19, 2009, at 1:37 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
This patch sets memory window for Serial RapidIO on MPC8569E-MDS
boards.
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov avoront...@ru.mvista.com
---
board/freescale/mpc8569mds/law.c |1 +
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 11:15:51PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
[...]
#ifdef CONFIG_PCIE1
ft_fsl_pci_setup(blob, pci1, pcie1_hose);
#endif
+fdt_fixup_esdhc(blob, bd);
ft_cpu_setup() calls fdt_fixup_esdhc() for us now.
Fixed, thanks.
+fdt_board_fixup_esdhc(blob, bd);
}
#endif
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 11:30 -0700, Swarthout Edward L-SWARTHOU wrote:
From: Edward
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 11:05 AM
To: Wolfgang Denk; Peter Tyser
With -m relocatable, x86emu crashes because the op codes
tables are forced to GOT2 section:
Video: ATI Radeon video card
From: Peter Tyser
From: Edward
This patch fixes it:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/48103
I still get this crash with latest head (u-boot
2009.08-00338-gcd77dd1).
Thanks Ed,
To clarify, you're saying that the patch linked above
just needs to be
commit 0e870980a64584a591af775bb9c9fe9450124df9 (8xxx: Removed
CONFIG_NUM_CPUS from 85xx/86xx) breaks U-Boot on various boards,
namely the ones that call get_sys_info() from board_early_init_f().
get_sys_info() calls cpu_numcores(), which depends on probecpu()
being called before. But probecpu()
Dear Swarthout Edward L-SWARTHOU,
In message
b52955765c54604cb1a62a9967f22c730499f...@az33exm20.fsl.freescale.net you
wrote:
To clarify, you're saying that the patch linked above
just needs to be applied, right?
Yes, I applied it asis.
I tested it on mpc8572ds with ATI Radeon video
Dear Ben Warren,
In message 4ad18093.3070...@gmail.com you wrote:
Wolfgang,
With this pull, I believe all net-related changes for 2009.11 are in.
The following changes since commit cd77dd109c4a439519a78c32eddc42bdebc7a61f:
Wolfgang Denk (1):
Merge branch 'reloc'
are
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Andrew Dyer amd...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:10 AM, myub...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Thanks for 1) and 2).
For 3), both results show GP register is modified.
the result of ${CROSS_COMPILE}objdump --source cpu.o is:
void flush_cache(ulong
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 10:10 AM, myub...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Thanks for 1) and 2).
For 3), both results show GP register is modified.
the result of ${CROSS_COMPILE}objdump --source cpu.o is:
void flush_cache(ulong start_addr, ulong size)
{
7c: 3c1c lui gp,0x0
80:
Hi,
I am a rookie as far as NAND boot debugging is concerned. I have
remote gdb working just fine. I wish to single step from the point the
macro for nand load starts(assembly code). (nand_load).
To do that, i set a instruction breakpoint on BDI3000 using the BI
command. looks like the cpu
Hi
why the line 354 not include by ifndef CONFIG_SYS_NO_FLASH.
I defined CONFIG_SYS_NO_FLASH in my board head file (qi_lb60.h).
this line make compile error.
thanks for help.
in the lib_mips/board.c
--
347 #ifndef CONFIG_SYS_NO_FLASH
348 /* configure available FLASH banks */
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:48 AM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 09:17:49AM +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
After OneNAND IPL updated, apollon boot code exceeds 1KiB size,
This patch reduces the apollon boot code
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park
Hi,
If you use the gmail, Select the raw message, and copy and paste
Others are similar.
Don't copy html format to your text file.
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:51 PM, Tuma chernigovs...@spb.gs.ru wrote:
Hi, Kyungmin Park!
Thank you for patch!
But I have a question - how
Hi denx,
Is there any support for LM90 temperature sensor on u-boot? Any
patches
Regards,
T.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Hi kumar,
We are having QUAD MPC8640D based System on which all the
processors are sharing the same boot code which is residing on the 32bit
boot flash memory. i don't find any problem with this. But i just want to
know whether it will create any problem. My configuration is
40 matches
Mail list logo
