[U-Boot] difference between V_PROMPT and CONFIG_SYS_PROMPT?

2009-11-19 Thread Robert P. J. Day
another beginner-level question, i'm sure, but what's the distinction between V_PROMPT and CONFIG_SYS_PROMPT for customizing the u-boot prompt? based on the output from a straightforward grep, it appears that every example of customizing the prompt has the form: #define V_PROMPT

Re: [U-Boot] help on a compiler error in include/asm/system.h

2009-11-19 Thread Stefan Roese
On Thursday 19 November 2009 you write: Now our arm board is based on u-boot v2009.08 and I need to use bifs. So I replace some files from u-boot's latest version. They are: fs/ubifs/ubifs.c fs/ubifs/ubifs.h include/asm-arm/bitops.h include/linux/bitops.h

Re: [U-Boot] [u-boot] [PATCH] imx27: make 26MHz clock input value selectable from config files.

2009-11-19 Thread javier Martin
I think Fred Fan is currently responsible of acking this patch if there are no objections, but he seems missing since some weeks. Couldn't the patch be reviewed by a higher level maintainer? Thanks. -- Javier Martin Vista Silicon S.L. CDTUC - FASE C - Oficina S-345 Avda de los Castros s/n

[U-Boot] Problem in Building the Bootloader for the NAND Flash MPC8313ERDB Board

2009-11-19 Thread Balu V
Hi all I am Working on the MPC 8313 ERDREVA4 Board. I need to boot the board from the NAND flash. Hence i have down loaded the copy of the u-boot-1.1.6 (the version was selected based on the LTIB configuration) and then issued the following commands from the u-boot directory as per the guidelines

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Davinci: Configurable NAND chip selects

2009-11-19 Thread Nick Thompson
On 18/11/09 20:22, Scott Wood wrote: On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 05:49:55PM +, Nick Thompson wrote: static void nand_davinci_enable_hwecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, int mode) { -int dummy; +u_int32_t val; -dummy = emif_regs-NANDF1ECC; +val =

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc4xx: alpr: Remove some not needed commands to make image fit again

2009-11-19 Thread Stefan Roese
On Tuesday 17 November 2009 15:54:03 Stefan Roese wrote: The latest changes in the u-boot/next branch increased the size of the alpr image a bit more. Now it doesn't fit into the 256k reserved for it. This patch now removes the commands askenv and irq which are not needed in the production

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3 v2] ppc4xx: Consolidate pci_target_init() function

2009-11-19 Thread Stefan Roese
On Tuesday 17 November 2009 11:11:52 Stefan Roese wrote: This patch removes the duplicted implementations of the pci_target_init() function by introducing a weak default function for it. This weak default has a different implementation for 440EP(x)/GR(x) PPC's. It can be overridden by a board

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] ppc4xx: Consolidate pci_pre_init() function

2009-11-19 Thread Stefan Roese
On Friday 13 November 2009 11:24:06 Stefan Roese wrote: This patch removes the duplicted implementations of the pci_pre_init() function by introducing a weak default function for it. This weak default has a different implementation for some PPC variants. It can be overridden by a board

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] ppc4xx: Consolidate pci_master_init() function

2009-11-19 Thread Stefan Roese
On Friday 13 November 2009 11:24:21 Stefan Roese wrote: This patch removes the duplicted implementations of the pci_master_init() function by introducing a weak default function for it. It can be overridden by a board specific version. Applied to u-boot-ppc4xx/next. Thanks. Cheers, Stefan

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Remove confusing comment

2009-11-19 Thread Stefan Roese
On Wednesday 18 November 2009 16:28:42 Matthias Fuchs wrote: This is not the sequoia board. Applied to u-boot-ppc4xx/next. Thanks. Cheers, Stefan -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Remove unused features from PMC440 board support

2009-11-19 Thread Stefan Roese
On Wednesday 18 November 2009 16:29:29 Matthias Fuchs wrote: This patch shrinks the PMC440 u-boot binary (from next branch) to fit into 384kB again. Applied to u-boot-ppc4xx/next. Thanks. Cheers, Stefan -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk Detlev Zundel HRB 165235

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Davinci: Configurable NAND chip selects

2009-11-19 Thread Nick Thompson
Davinci: Configurable NAND chip selects Add a CONFIG_SYS_NAND_CS setting to all davinci configs and use it to setup the NAND controller in the davinci_nand mtd driver. Signed-off-by: Nick Thompson nick.thomp...@gefanuc.com --- This config item is already used on many other platforms so is not a

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] usb: write command for RAW partition.

2009-11-19 Thread Mahavir Jain
Hi Remy, This patch looks straight forward to me as it would be useful for generic USB file system write support in future (FYI i was able to write kernel image to raw partition boot from it). I would really appreciate any feedback or suggestions on this. Thanks Mahavir On Mon, 2009-11-02 at

[U-Boot] Please pull u-boot-ppc4xx/next

2009-11-19 Thread Stefan Roese
Hi Wolfgang, please pull some changes for next. Thanks. The following changes since commit 06f43286c6354aaab0103615e83893512f86eee7: Wolfgang Denk (1): Merge branch 'master' into next are available in the git repository at: git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ppc4xx.git next Matthias

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Remove some testing code from 4xx_pcie.c

2009-11-19 Thread Stefan Roese
This code got included accidentally. Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese s...@denx.de --- cpu/ppc4xx/4xx_pcie.c |4 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/cpu/ppc4xx/4xx_pcie.c b/cpu/ppc4xx/4xx_pcie.c index c4d9cfe..d9605c3 100644 --- a/cpu/ppc4xx/4xx_pcie.c +++

[U-Boot] [PATCH] add lzop decompression support

2009-11-19 Thread Peter Korsgaard
Add lzop decompression support to the existing lzo bitstream handling (think gzip versus zlib), and support it for uImage decompression if CONFIG_LZO is enabled. Lzop doesn't compress as good as gzip (~10% worse), but decompression is very fast (~0.7s faster here on a slow ppc). The lzop

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] [OneNAND] Flex-OneNAND boundary settings

2009-11-19 Thread Amul Kumar Saha
Hi Wolfgang Denk, Sorry for the late reply. How many versions of these patches did you post so far? You are supposed to use [PATCH 3/3 v5] or similar in the Subject: line to mark the Nth re-submission of the patch. I'll make sure that versions are properly displayed with each patch, from

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Remove entirely superfluous preprocessor tests from cmd_*.c files.

2009-11-19 Thread Robert P. J. Day
A small number of common/cmd_*.c files contain preprocessor tests that are apparently superfluous since those same tests are used in the Makefile to control the compilation of those files. Those tests are clearly redundant as long as they surround the entirety of the source in those files.

[U-Boot] [PATCH RFC] zlib: Optimize decompression

2009-11-19 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
This patch optimizes the direct copy procedure. Uses get_unaligned() but only in one place. The copy loop just above this one can also use this optimization, but I havn't done so as I have not tested if it is a win there too. On my MPC8321 this is about 17% faster on my JFFS2 root FS than the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] add lzop decompression support

2009-11-19 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Add lzop decompression support to the existing lzo bitstream handling (think gzip versus zlib), and support it for uImage decompression if CONFIG_LZO is enabled. Lzop doesn't compress as good as gzip (~10% worse), but decompression is very fast (~0.7s faster here on a slow ppc). The lzop

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] crc32: Impl. linux optimized crc32()

2009-11-19 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote on 17/11/2009 05:06:02: On Monday 16 November 2009 23:01:59 Mike Frysinger wrote: On Friday 13 November 2009 03:52:05 Joakim Tjernlund wrote: --- a/lib_generic/crc32.c +++ b/lib_generic/crc32.c @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ #else #include stdint.h

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] add lzop decompression support

2009-11-19 Thread Peter Korsgaard
Joakim == Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se writes: Hi, Lzop doesn't compress as good as gzip (~10% worse), but decompression is very fast (~0.7s faster here on a slow ppc). The lzop decompression code is based on Albin Tonnerre's recent ARM Linux lzo support patch.

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3] crc32: Impl. linux optimized crc32()

2009-11-19 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Ported over the more efficient linux crc32() function. A quick comparsion on ppc: After changing the old crc32 to do 4 bytes in the inner loop to be able to compare with new version one can note: - old inner loop has 61 insn, new has 19 insn. - new crc32 does one 32 bit load of data to crc while

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 3/3] Add support for the LaCie ED Mini V2 board

2009-11-19 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Stefan Roese a écrit : Hi Albert, On Wednesday 18 November 2009 23:21:58 Wolfgang Denk wrote: This board is based on the Marvell Orion5x SoC. Current support is limited to console and Flash. Flash support uses LEGACY as the Macronix 29LV400 used on ED Mini V2 is not 100% CFI compliant.

Re: [U-Boot] mtest issue

2009-11-19 Thread Jerry Van Baren
Alexey Goncharov wrote: Hello everyone, I have a LPC2468 board and currently play with u-boot. U-boot version is 1.1.6 from Embedded Artists. I've already made u-boot loading and 1.1.6 is really old. executing user commands. Everything seems works fine, except the memory test (mtest)

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc4xx: Cleanup PPC4xx I2C infrastructure

2009-11-19 Thread Stefan Roese
This patch cleans up the PPC4xx I2C intrastructure: - Use C struct to describe the I2C registers instead of defines - Coding style cleanup (braces, whitespace, comments, line length) - Extract common code from i2c_read() and i2c_write() - Remove unneeded IIC defines from ppc405.h ppc440.h

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 3/3] Add support for the LaCie ED Mini V2 board

2009-11-19 Thread Stefan Roese
On Thursday 19 November 2009 13:48:15 Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Your board config header would need something like this: /* Use common CFI driver */ #define CONFIG_SYS_FLASH_CFI #define CONFIG_FLASH_CFI_DRIVER /* board provides its own flash_init code */ #define CONFIG_FLASH_CFI_LEGACY

Re: [U-Boot] Problem in Building the Bootloader for the NAND Flash MPC8313ERDB Board

2009-11-19 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Balu V, In message 916b8fbd0911190121o7729bbc4ke7e9562779c91...@mail.gmail.com you wrote: I am Working on the MPC 8313 ERDREVA4 Board. I need to boot the board from the NAND flash. Hence i have down loaded the copy of the u-boot-1.1.6 (the version was selected based on the LTIB

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH RFC] zlib: Optimize decompression

2009-11-19 Thread Peter Korsgaard
Joakim == Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se writes: Joakim This patch optimizes the direct copy procedure. Joakim Uses get_unaligned() but only in one place. Joakim The copy loop just above this one can also use this Joakim optimization, but I havn't done so as I have not tested

[U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc83xx: Add NAND boot support for MPC8315E-RDB boards

2009-11-19 Thread Anton Vorontsov
The core support for NAND booting is there already, so this patch is pretty straightforward. There is one trick though: top level Makefile expects nand_spl to be in nand_spl/board/$(BOARDDIR), but we can fully reuse the code from mpc8313erdb boards, and so to not duplicate the code we just

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH RFC] zlib: Optimize decompression

2009-11-19 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Peter Korsgaard jac...@gmail.com wrote on 19/11/2009 15:07:12: Joakim == Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se writes: Joakim This patch optimizes the direct copy procedure. Joakim Uses get_unaligned() but only in one place. Joakim The copy loop just above this one can also use

[U-Boot] omap3 and get_board_rev

2009-11-19 Thread Mike Rapoport
Hi all, In current omap3 implementation get_board_rev function is defined in cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3/sys_info.c. The function returns some magic constant and that's it. I wonder what would be the best way to fix it: either make the get_board_rev in cpu/arm_cortexa8/omap3/sys_info.c weak, or copy

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] crc32: Impl. linux optimized crc32()

2009-11-19 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 19 November 2009 07:31:18 Joakim Tjernlund wrote: Perhaps you can take a look at getting X_unaligned definitions into compiler.h too? that would be much trickier i think ... I use get_unaligned() in the zlib patch I just sent: [PATCH RFC] zlib: Optimize decompression Not sure

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ppc: Added macro to test for specific SVR revision

2009-11-19 Thread Kumar Gala
Various SoC errata are specific to a given revision of silicon this gives us a simple macro to use when doing such tests. Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org --- include/asm-ppc/processor.h |4 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH RFC] zlib: Optimize decompression

2009-11-19 Thread Peter Korsgaard
Joakim == Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se writes: Hi, On a mpc8347 board it's ~12% faster at decompressing the uImage (165ms). Joakim Signed-off-by: Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se Acked-by: Peter Korsgaard jac...@sunsite.dk Joakim Thanks, question:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Remove entirely superfluous preprocessor tests from cmd_*.c files.

2009-11-19 Thread Peter Tyser
-#if defined(CONFIG_CMD_LICENSE) - /* COPYING is currently 15951 bytes in size */ #define LICENSE_MAX 20480 @@ -56,5 +54,3 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(license, 1, 1, do_license, print GPL license text, ); - -#endif /* CONFIG_CMD_LICENSE */ Hi Robert, Thanks for the cleanup. The

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] crc32: Impl. linux optimized crc32()

2009-11-19 Thread Thiago A . Corrêa
Hi, On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se wrote: +#define tole(x) cpu_to_le32(x) + This define is only used once and at the constants table, after that, cpu_to_le32 is called directly. Perhaps this could be removed and cpu_to_le32 used instead, or

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] crc32: Impl. linux optimized crc32()

2009-11-19 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Thiago A. Corrêa thiago.cor...@gmail.com wrote on 19/11/2009 16:41:05: Hi, On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se wrote: +#define tole(x) cpu_to_le32(x) + This define is only used once and at the constants table, after that, cpu_to_le32 is

[U-Boot] Urgent Order

2009-11-19 Thread jim wilson
Hello Good Day This is MISS WILSON , With regards to your Company i am sending this email Regards to order some( CORDLESS DRILL) ,i will like to know the type and sizes you have in stock and get me the sales price of one so that i will tell you the quantity i will be ordering, and also if you

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Remove entirely superfluous preprocessor tests from cmd_*.c files.

2009-11-19 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, Peter Tyser wrote: -#if defined(CONFIG_CMD_LICENSE) - /* COPYING is currently 15951 bytes in size */ #define LICENSE_MAX20480 @@ -56,5 +54,3 @@ U_BOOT_CMD(license, 1, 1, do_license, print GPL license text, ); - -#endif /*

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Remove entirely superfluous preprocessor tests from some cmd_*.c files.

2009-11-19 Thread Robert P. J. Day
A small number of common/cmd_*.c files contain preprocessor tests that are apparently superfluous since those same tests are used in the Makefile to control the compilation of those files. Those tests are clearly redundant as long as they surround the entirety of the source in those files.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] crc32: Impl. linux optimized crc32()

2009-11-19 Thread Joakim Tjernlund
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote on 19/11/2009 15:49:55: On Thursday 19 November 2009 07:31:18 Joakim Tjernlund wrote: Perhaps you can take a look at getting X_unaligned definitions into compiler.h too? that would be much trickier i think ... I use get_unaligned() in the zlib

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Move preprocessor test for cmd_nand.c to Makefile

2009-11-19 Thread Robert P. J. Day
Move the CONFIG_CMD_NAND preprocessor test out of common/cmd_nand.c and into the Makefile for consistency with other commands. Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca --- AFAICT, this doesn't affect any functionality, right? diff --git a/common/Makefile b/common/Makefile index

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Move preprocessor test for cmd_nand.c to Makefile

2009-11-19 Thread Peter Tyser
On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 11:08 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: Move the CONFIG_CMD_NAND preprocessor test out of common/cmd_nand.c and into the Makefile for consistency with other commands. This change has already been submitted by 2 different people and I believe is in the u-boot-nand-flash/next

[U-Boot] MAKE MONEY FAST!!

2009-11-19 Thread info
CHECK IT OUT !! http://WWW.MAKEMONEYWITHGOLD.CO.UK http://www.makemoneywithgold.co.uk a subsidiary of http://www.geniedream.com World Class Series . A Genie Dream Product www.geniedream.com http://www.geniedream.com/ -- If you do not want to receive any more newsletters,

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Move the preprocessor test for building flash.c to the Makefile.

2009-11-19 Thread Robert P. J. Day
Move the preprocessor test of CONFIG_SYS_NO_FLASH out of flash.c and back to the Makefile, for readability. Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca --- this one is a little uglier since it adds an #ifndef check to the Makefile, but i still consider this to be more readable

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Move the preprocessor test for building flash.c to the Makefile.

2009-11-19 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 19 November 2009 12:38:42 Robert P. J. Day wrote: --- a/common/Makefile +++ b/common/Makefile @@ -152,7 +152,9 @@ COBJS-$(CONFIG_VFD) += cmd_vfd.o COBJS-$(CONFIG_DDR_SPD) += ddr_spd.o COBJS-$(CONFIG_HWCONFIG) += hwconfig.o COBJS-$(CONFIG_CONSOLE_MUX) += iomux.o +#ifndef

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Move the preprocessor test for building flash.c to the Makefile.

2009-11-19 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Thursday 19 November 2009 12:38:42 Robert P. J. Day wrote: --- a/common/Makefile +++ b/common/Makefile @@ -152,7 +152,9 @@ COBJS-$(CONFIG_VFD) += cmd_vfd.o COBJS-$(CONFIG_DDR_SPD) += ddr_spd.o COBJS-$(CONFIG_HWCONFIG) += hwconfig.o

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] crc32: Impl. linux optimized crc32()

2009-11-19 Thread Thiago A . Corrêa
Hi, 2009/11/19 Joakim Tjernlund joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se: The whole point of the tole define is to make the table more readable. Try and replace tole in the table and then look at it. Ah, ok. Then I think this one at make_crc_table should use the __cpu_to_le32() as tole only porpuse is

[U-Boot] Freescale ECC capture question

2009-11-19 Thread Peter Tyser
Looking over Freescale's Manuals for a few different CPUs (8572, 8641, 8548, P2020, P4080, 8349) I'm see very different definitions of the CAPTURE_ECC register. I assume these parts all share the same intellectual property, so had expected the CAPTURE_ECC definition to be similar between parts.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Move preprocessor test for cmd_nand.c to Makefile

2009-11-19 Thread Scott Wood
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 10:15:44AM -0600, Peter Tyser wrote: On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 11:08 -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote: Move the CONFIG_CMD_NAND preprocessor test out of common/cmd_nand.c and into the Makefile for consistency with other commands. This change has already been submitted by 2

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] crc32: Impl. linux optimized crc32()

2009-11-19 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 19 November 2009 13:22:43 Thiago A. Corrêa wrote: 2009/11/19 Joakim Tjernlund wrote: The whole point of the tole define is to make the table more readable. Try and replace tole in the table and then look at it. Ah, ok. Then I think this one at make_crc_table should use the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc83xx: Add NAND boot support for MPC8315E-RDB boards

2009-11-19 Thread Kumar Gala
On Nov 19, 2009, at 8:34 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote: The core support for NAND booting is there already, so this patch is pretty straightforward. There is one trick though: top level Makefile expects nand_spl to be in nand_spl/board/$(BOARDDIR), but we can fully reuse the code from

[U-Boot] [PATCH] BeagleBoard: Add a comment explaining the use of OMAP34XX macros.

2009-11-19 Thread Robert P. J. Day
Make it clear to a reader that the user of OMAP34XX macros in the (OMAP 3530-based) beagle config file is just fine. Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca --- i'll let dirk be the judge as to whether this is worth adding, or if he'd prefer a different phrasing. diff --git

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] BeagleBoard: Add a comment explaining the use of OMAP34XX macros.

2009-11-19 Thread Måns Rullgård
Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca writes: Make it clear to a reader that the user of OMAP34XX macros in the (OMAP 3530-based) beagle config file is just fine. Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca --- i'll let dirk be the judge as to whether this is worth adding, or

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] BeagleBoard: Add a comment explaining the use of OMAP34XX macros.

2009-11-19 Thread Nishanth Menon
2009/11/19 Måns Rullgård m...@mansr.com: Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca writes: Make it clear to a reader that the user of OMAP34XX macros in the (OMAP 3530-based) beagle config file is just fine. Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca ---   i'll let dirk be the

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Remove superfluous use of V_PROMPT macros in config files.

2009-11-19 Thread Robert P. J. Day
Remove the use of the V_PROMPT macro in a number of config files, whose only use seems to be to subsequently set the CONFIG_SYS_PROMPT macro, after which it's never used again. Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca --- as far as i can tell, there's no compelling reason to

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] BeagleBoard: Add a comment explaining the use of OMAP34XX macros.

2009-11-19 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote: Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca writes: Make it clear to a reader that the user of OMAP34XX macros in the (OMAP 3530-based) beagle config file is just fine. Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca --- i'll let dirk

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] BeagleBoard: Add a comment explaining the use of OMAP34XX macros.

2009-11-19 Thread Robert P. J. Day
Make it clear to the reader that, since OMAP 34XX and 35XX are the same silicon, the BeagleBoard can use the OMAP34XX macros. Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca --- diff --git a/include/configs/omap3_beagle.h b/include/configs/omap3_beagle.h index 19a5ec9..59b7edc 100644 ---

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] BeagleBoard: Add a comment explaining the use of OMAP34XX macros.

2009-11-19 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Thu, 19 Nov 2009, Nishanth Menon wrote: I agree - I do not think there are any such plans. NAK to the patch. Regards, Nishanth Menon fair enough. but i think a two-line comment is still useful for people new to ARM who know the beagle is a 3530 and wonder why all the macros use 34XX.

[U-Boot] [PATCH] NAND: Add Support for 4K page size in DaVinci NAND driver

2009-11-19 Thread s-paulraj
From: Sandeep Paulraj s-paul...@ti.com This patch adds support for NAND devices with a page size of 4K in the DaVinci NAND driver. The layout matches the layout that TI uses for 4K page size NAND devices in the kernel NAND driver. Signed-off-by: Sandeep Paulraj s-paul...@ti.com --- patch applies

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] omap3evm: Add board revision function

2009-11-19 Thread Gupta, Ajay Kumar
Hi, -Original Message- From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Gupta, Ajay Kumar Sent: Friday, November 13, 2009 3:31 PM To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Cc: Hiremath, Vaibhav Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] omap3evm: Add board revision function

[U-Boot] [PATCH] omap3evm: Add board revision function

2009-11-19 Thread Ajay Kumar Gupta
Added function to differentiate between the OMAP3EVM revisions. The chip-id of the ethernet PHY is being used for this purpose. Rev A to D : 0x0115 Rev = E : 0x9220 Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath hvaib...@ti.com Signed-off-by: Sanjeev Premi pr...@ti.com Signed-off-by: Ajay Kumar Gupta