The memory controller could already be enabled, when spd_sdram() is
called. This could be the case for example, when the SDRAM is initialized
by the JTAG debugger.
The sync after the register access via the accessor function is
still needed, because the macro uses the sync before the real write
From: Reinhard Arlt reinhard.a...@esd.eu
The caddy2 is a variant of the already supported vme8349. So we just
add the differences to this board port. To better support those two
boards we switched from fixed SDRAM configuration to usage of
spd_sdram(). This is done by providing a board specific
From: Reinhard Arlt reinhard.a...@esd.eu
Remove PCI reset, if there is a monarch PMC module.
Signed-off-by: Reinhard Arlt reinhard.a...@esd.eu
Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese s...@denx.de
---
board/esd/vme8349/pci.c| 35 +++
board/esd/vme8349/vme8349pin.h |
Hi Graeme,
Graeme Smecher wrote:
From: Graeme Smecher gsmec...@tonka.atlantic.home
A typo caused the stack and malloc regions to overlap, which prevented
mem_malloc_init() from returning. This commit makes the memory layout match
the example described in include/configs/microblaze-generic.h
Hi Wolfgang,
Currently is merge window closed and it is RC2 but I think that will be
good to add these two minor changes to mainline repo.
First patch fix stack and malloc region overlap and the second remove
compilation warning. (I sent this patch to mailing list some minutes ago).
Can you
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Robert P. J. Day,
In message alpine.lfd.2.00.0911190255590.29...@localhost you wrote:
another beginner-level question, i'm sure, but what's the
distinction between V_PROMPT and CONFIG_SYS_PROMPT for customizing
the u-boot prompt?
The
From: Michal Simek mon...@monstr.eu
We are using generic implementation of ffs. This should
be part of Simon's commit 0413cfecea35eab5e591a0965c3e3ee0ff00
Here is warning message which this patch removes.
In file included from /tmp/u-boot-microblaze/include/common.h:38,
On Mon, 7 Dec 2009, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Robert P. J. Day,
In message alpine.lfd.2.00.0911180156580.16...@localhost you wrote:
never afraid to embarrass myself, is the config option
CONFIG_DATAFLASH_MMC_SELECT actually doing anything useful?
Not in any mainline code, it seems.
Dear wolfking,
In message snt125-w25df8afd3fe0e46d1813b3de...@phx.gbl you wrote:
1. Can I use the ICE SX emulator to burn the bin file?
I have no idea.
2. If I can't use ICE SX to burn file, What tool or
method can be used to burn the file?
I highly recommend the BDI3000 by
Hello Wolfgang,
El Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 12:51:47AM +0100 Wolfgang Denk ha dit:
U-Boot uses assembler only when ther eis no reasonable way to
implement the code in C, and I don't see any such justification here.
Please rewrite all this in C.
i'm just starting to get my feet wet with
Improve read performance from Large Page NAND devices.
This patch produces a ~31% improvement in oob_first read speed (on a
300MHz ARM9). The time for a mid-buffer 2k page read is now 293us,
6.99MB/s (was 385us, 5.31MB/s). oob_first is probably the best case
improvement.
Signed-off-by: Nick
Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
Hello Wolfgang,
El Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 12:51:47AM +0100 Wolfgang Denk ha dit:
U-Boot uses assembler only when ther eis no reasonable way to
implement the code in C, and I don't see any such justification here.
Please rewrite all this in C.
i'm just starting to
Hi Michal,
Michal Simek wrote:
Hi Graeme,
Graeme Smecher wrote:
From: Graeme Smecher gsmec...@tonka.atlantic.home
A typo caused the stack and malloc regions to overlap, which prevented
mem_malloc_init() from returning. This commit makes the memory layout match
the example described in
Graeme Smecher wrote:
Hi Michal,
Michal Simek wrote:
Hi Graeme,
Graeme Smecher wrote:
From: Graeme Smecher gsmec...@tonka.atlantic.home
A typo caused the stack and malloc regions to overlap, which prevented
mem_malloc_init() from returning. This commit makes the memory layout
match
Prototype for gunzip was only in lib_generic/gunzip.c and thus repeated
in every file using it. This patch moves the prototype to common.h and
removes all prototypes distributed anywhere else.
Singed-off-by: Wolfgang Wegner w.weg...@astro-kom.de
---
board/bf527-ezkit/video.c |
Hi,
sorry I did not know where to put additional comments...
I tested this patch for compile-cleanness with a powerpc toolchain
(CodeSourcery freescale-4.4-78-powerpc-linux-gnu-i686-pc-linux-gnu.tar.bz2
to be exact). The warnings and errors were not significantly different
with and without this
Dear Matthias Kaehlcke,
In message 20091208151358.gd31...@darwin you wrote:
i am starting to look at this issue and it seems i need some more guidance:
before relocating U-Boot to RAM for ARM920T processors a jump to the
label *lowlevel_init* is performed, where RAM timings are supposed to
Wolfgang Denk schrieb:
Dear Thomas Weber,
In message 4b1cfef3.7080...@corscience.de you wrote:
Which problem is this supposed to fix?
...
In commit 60f61e6d7655400bb785a2ef637581679941f6d1 the following calls
where changed.
- DM9000_DMP_PACKET(eth_send, packet,
Dear kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk,
In message 4b1e76e9.2050...@fearnside-systems.co.uk you wrote:
I would've thought that you need a working stack before you can run
'C' code so you'd need the RAM timing set up before you could run
In general this is correct, but then - what does a
Dear Thomas Weber,
In message 4b1eb952.1070...@gmx.li you wrote:
should I resend the better formatted patch with a proper subject line
and a more detailed comment? How to name the patch? [Patch V2] ?
2 x yes, please.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD:
Dear Michal Simek,
In message 4b1e0ed8.1040...@monstr.eu you wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
Currently is merge window closed and it is RC2 but I think that will be
good to add these two minor changes to mainline repo.
First patch fix stack and malloc region overlap and the second remove
compilation
Dear Wolfgang Wegner,
In message 20091208172555.gf16...@leila.ping.de you wrote:
sorry I did not know where to put additional comments...
Comments go below the --- line, i. e.:
...
Singed-off-by: Wolfgang Wegner w.weg...@astro-kom.de
---
===
Add comments here.
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message 4b1df9b6.3040...@denx.de you wrote:
May I suggest to add the same error checking in these two files, then?
Hmm.. fdt_fixup_memory() does this error checking (Also in a much
stricter way, than in the board code). So I think, this is not
necessary here ...
hi wolfgang,
El Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 09:33:18PM +0100 Wolfgang Denk ha dit:
In message 20091208151358.gd31...@darwin you wrote:
i am starting to look at this issue and it seems i need some more guidance:
before relocating U-Boot to RAM for ARM920T processors a jump to the
label
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message 4b1790d6.6030...@denx.de you wrote:
u-boot updates, before starting Linux, the memory node in the
DTS. As this is a standard feature, move this functionality
to the cpu.c file for mpc5xxx and mpc512x processors.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher h...@denx.de
---
Dear Heiko Schocher,
In message 4b179121.40...@denx.de you wrote:
There is more and more usage of printing 64bit values,
so enable this feature generally, and delete the
CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_VSPRINTF and CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_STRTOUL
defines.
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher h...@denx.de
---
based
Dear Howard Wang,
In message 1f9c78fa-be25-4bdf-8a02-3b2ebb48b...@dsirf.com you wrote:
Hi,
I have some problems with using u-boot writing to flash: ( arm 920
processor )
first I use tftp to download the kernel to memory and was successful:
tftp 0x80 mImage
OK
then I try
Dear Robert P. J. Day,
In message alpine.lfd.2.00.0912071945100.4...@localhost you wrote:
A number of config files define the V_PROMPT macro for the
command-line prompt, only to immediately use that macro to define
CONFIG_SYS_PROMPT, making V_PROMPT entirely superfluous.
Signed-off-by:
Commit c7190f02 (retain POR values of non-configured ACR, SPCR, SCCR,
and LCRR bitfields) moved the LCRR assignment to after relocation
to RAM because of the potential problem with changing the local bus
clock while executing from flash.
This change unfortunately adversely affects the boot time,
Dear Wolfgang Wegner,
In message 1260292862-30403-1-git-send-email-w.weg...@astro-kom.de you wrote:
Prototype for gunzip was only in lib_generic/gunzip.c and thus repeated
in every file using it. This patch moves the prototype to common.h and
removes all prototypes distributed anywhere else.
Hi Stefan,
it seems there is a problem with NAND on Sequoia:
U-Boot 2009.11-rc2 (Dec 08 2009 - 22:52:34)
...
NAND: 32 MiB
...
= nand read 20 0 200
NAND read: device 0 whole chip
Attempt to read outside the flash area
Dear Nick Thompson,
In message 4b1e71d9.6080...@ge.com you wrote:
Improve read performance from Large Page NAND devices.
This patch produces a ~31% improvement in oob_first read speed (on a
300MHz ARM9). The time for a mid-buffer 2k page read is now 293us,
6.99MB/s (was 385us, 5.31MB/s).
hi,
i'm writing low-level setup code in C that is executed before the
stack is initialized. this code needs to delay execution at several
points.
it seems to me that the use of udelay() is out of question cause there
is no stack to pass the parameter, besides the timer subsystem udelay()
depends
Ah. I just realize that the endianess can be supported as simple as:
In stead of this:
xsum += (*p 0xff00);
Use this:
xsum += (*p ntohs(0xff00));
Greg Ren
-Original Message-
From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:w...@denx.de]
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 3:31
Ah. I just realize that the endianess can be supported as simple as:
In stead of this:
xsum += (*p 0xff00);
Use this:
xsum += (*p ntohs(0xff00));
Did you look at the suggestion I sent you?
I know it works because I use in ospf.
Jocke
I must have missed it. The only suggestion that I remember was referring
to how to generate patch using git email. As for technical discussion,
it was ended as not endianess clean.
Greg Ren
-Original Message-
From: Joakim Tjernlund [mailto:joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se]
Sent: Tuesday,
Hi Greg,
Greg Ren wrote:
I must have missed it. The only suggestion that I remember was referring
to how to generate patch using git email. As for technical discussion,
it was ended as not endianess clean.
Please don't top post.
While I agree that the network code should handle this
Hi Ben:
Ben Warren wrote:
Please don't top post.
While I agree that the network code should handle this properly, how
do
you end up with odd-length packets? U-boot's been around for years
and
nobody else has had this problem...
I simply ping it with odd length. I also checked the latest
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Hi Wolfgang,
[Added Scott to Cc]
On Tuesday 08 December 2009 23:03:28 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
it seems there is a problem with NAND on Sequoia:
U-Boot 2009.11-rc2 (Dec 08 2009 - 22:52:34)
...
NAND: 32 MiB
...
= nand read 20 0 200
NAND read:
Signed-off-by: Li Yang le...@freescale.com
---
Makefile |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index bcb3fe9..4d71366 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -406,6 +406,8 @@ TAG_SUBDIRS += include
TAG_SUBDIRS += lib_generic
Signed-off-by: Li Yang le...@freescale.com
---
include/asm-ppc/fsl_law.h |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/asm-ppc/fsl_law.h b/include/asm-ppc/fsl_law.h
index 31bb754..34c56a2 100644
--- a/include/asm-ppc/fsl_law.h
+++ b/include/asm-ppc/fsl_law.h
For removing node easily by path or alias.
Signed-off-by: Li Yang le...@freescale.com
---
common/fdt_support.c | 10 ++
include/fdt_support.h |1 +
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/fdt_support.c b/common/fdt_support.c
index f89a3ee..8f1186e
43 matches
Mail list logo
