On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 8:13 PM, Ben Warren biggerbadder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 4:50 AM, Vipin KUMAR vipin.ku...@st.com wrote:
From: Vipin KUMAR vipin.ku...@st.com
SPEAr310 and SPEAr320 SoCs have an extra ethernet controller. The
driver for this device is already supported
Hello,
is this patch going to be accepted, or is someone insisting that only
my port shall return the number of controllers initialized?
Reinhard Meyer schrieb:
Ben Warren schrieb:
Hello Reinhard,
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 3:41 AM, Reinhard Meyer (-VC)
reinhard.me...@emk-elektronik.de wrote:
Dear Reinhard Meyer (-VC),
In message 4c0b85d8.4070...@emk-elektronik.de you wrote:
is this patch going to be accepted, or is someone insisting that only
my port shall return the number of controllers initialized?
I don't understand what you mean by only my port. Ben's comment that
Minkyu Kang wrote:
Dear Tom,
Please pull u-boot-samsung/master.
Thanks.
The following changes since commit 922d27b596c179c5a7d68abe45ede5adb1b6589c:
Minkyu Kang (1):
Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-arm
are available in the git repository at:
Wolfgang Denk schrieb:
Dear Reinhard Meyer (-VC),
In message 4c0b85d8.4070...@emk-elektronik.de you wrote:
is this patch going to be accepted, or is someone insisting that only
my port shall return the number of controllers initialized?
I don't understand what you mean by only my port.
Wolfgang Denk schrieb:
Dear Reinhard Meyer (-VC),
In message 4c0b85d8.4070...@emk-elektronik.de you wrote:
is this patch going to be accepted, or is someone insisting that only
my port shall return the number of controllers initialized?
I don't understand what you mean by only my port.
Reinhard Meyer (-VC) schrieb:
Wolfgang Denk schrieb:
Dear Reinhard Meyer (-VC),
The second problem is that I cannot seem to undo my previous commit in my
tree, so any changes I do to my source would come out as a second patch.
Would that be accepted?
Or do you know what must be done that
Dear Reinhard Meyer (-VC),
In message 4c0b8be7.7090...@emk-elektronik.de you wrote:
Is that documented somewhere? I see that the calling function in net.c
Probably only in the mailing list archives...
does NOT care about any positive interger result. Will it care sometime
in the future? :)
Hello Reinhard,
On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 4:52 AM, Reinhard Meyer (-VC)
reinhard.me...@emk-elektronik.de wrote:
Wolfgang Denk schrieb:
Dear Reinhard Meyer (-VC),
In message 4c0b85d8.4070...@emk-elektronik.de you wrote:
is this patch going to be accepted, or is someone insisting that only
Add support for EMK TOP7000 CPU Module
Specifics:
1) create subdir board/emk/top7000 and files in it
2) create include/configs/top7000.h
3) update board/emk/common/vpd.c
4) add call to misc_init_r() to arch/avr32/lib/board.c
5) create arch/avr32/include/asm/unaligned.h to
fix zlib.c
Reinhard Meyer (-VC) schrieb:
if anything can go wrong, it will go wrong...
a 0x0d (CR) sneaked into the following line:
hammerhead \
- mimc200 \
+ mimc200 \
+ top7000 \
Please do not try to apply the patch. I will send a new one!
Add support for EMK TOP7000 CPU Module
Specifics:
1) create subdir board/emk/top7000 and files in it
2) create include/configs/top7000.h
3) update board/emk/common/vpd.c
4) add call to misc_init_r() to arch/avr32/lib/board.c
5) create arch/avr32/include/asm/unaligned.h to
fix zlib.c
During ./MAKEALL avr32 at least my toolchain gives the following warnings for
every board:
Configuring for atstk1002 board...
atmel_usart.c:21:2: warning: #warning Please update to use C structur SoC
access !
cmd_bdinfo.c: In function 'do_bdinfo':
cmd_bdinfo.c:295: warning: format '%d' expects
Asen Dimov wrote:
Add the new board PM9G45 from Ronetix GmbH.
* AT91SAM9G45 MCU at 400Mhz.
* 128MB DDR2 SDRAM
* 256MB NAND
* 10/100 MBits Ethernet DP83848
* Serial number chip DS2401
The board is made as SODIMM200 module.
For more info www.ronatix.at or i...@ronetix.at.
Signed-off-by:
How can I use yaffs2 in uboot
I add CONFIG_YAFFS2 in /include/configs/smdk2410.h
my2440 # nand write 0x30008000 8 4
NAND write: device 0 offset 0x8, size 0x4
262144 bytes written: OK
my2440 #
my2440 # ymount /flash
yaffs: Mounting /flash
my2440 # ywrm a 0x30008000
Has anyone come across (or written) a tool/script/makefile target to
pack u-boot into a SPI boot image (i.e. with boot header and config
symbols) to boot directly from SPI on the P2020RDB (or P1020 etc.)
and/or MPC8536DS? Would it be within the scope of u-boot to have such an
option?
Can
16 matches
Mail list logo
