[U-Boot] Guaranteed loan offer**APPLY NOW**contact via email**bt48hrsfinancerdesk...@gmail.com**

2010-10-01 Thread Kara Duggan
We are currently giving out loans to any part of the world at 2% interest rate. If interested, send your name, Resident country and Phone number to Mr. Bernard Thompson with the email address bellow Email: 48hrsfinancerdesk...@gmail.com or call: +447024053959 Regards B&T 48HRS FINANCE LOAN ___

Re: [U-Boot] x-loader question

2010-10-01 Thread John Tobias
Hi Steve, Thanks for the response. The processor is OMAP4 and I am in the last stage of bringing up the board. I took the source code from the omapzoom git tree. How do I know if pre or post relocation changes? Regards, john On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Steve Sakoman wrote: > On Fri, Oc

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot 1.3.4 CONFIG_SILENT_CONSOLE Doe s Not Work?

2010-10-01 Thread NB
Mike Frysinger gentoo.org> writes: > ive seen issues depending on the env location. if the env cannot be loaded > early, the *default env* is consulted for its silent settings, and then > "work" once the saved env is relocated. > > might also want to check CONSOLE_IS_IN_ENV is enabled. Yeah I

Re: [U-Boot] x-loader question

2010-10-01 Thread Steve Sakoman
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:27 PM, John Tobias wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I have a bit problem here and may be you can help some idea to debug > x-loader (please see the log messages below). I am using a micro-sd card > with FAT16 partition. I boot my board using the the sd card, the  x-loader > execute a

[U-Boot] Guaranteed loan offer**APPLY NOW**contact via email**bt48hrsfinancerdesk...@gmail.com**

2010-10-01 Thread Kara Duggan
We are currently giving out loans to any part of the world at 2% interest rate. If interested, send your name, Resident country and Phone number to Mr. Bernard Thompson with the email address bellow Email: 48hrsfinancerdesk...@gmail.com or call: +447024053959 Regards B&T 48HRS FINANCE LOAN ___

[U-Boot] Guaranteed loan offer**APPLY NOW**contact via email**bt48hrsfinancerdesk...@gmail.com**

2010-10-01 Thread Kara Duggan
We are currently giving out loans to any part of the world at 2% interest rate. If interested, send your name, Resident country and Phone number to Mr. Bernard Thompson with the email address bellow Email: 48hrsfinancerdesk...@gmail.com or call: +447024053959 Regards B&T 48HRS FINANCE LOAN ___

[U-Boot] Guaranteed loan offer**APPLY NOW**contact via email**bt48hrsfinancerdesk...@gmail.com**

2010-10-01 Thread Kara Duggan
We are currently giving out loans to any part of the world at 2% interest rate. If interested, send your name, Resident country and Phone number to Mr. Bernard Thompson with the email address bellow Email: 48hrsfinancerdesk...@gmail.com or call: +447024053959 Regards B&T 48HRS FINANCE LOAN ___

[U-Boot] x-loader question

2010-10-01 Thread John Tobias
Hi Guys, I have a bit problem here and may be you can help some idea to debug x-loader (please see the log messages below). I am using a micro-sd card with FAT16 partition. I boot my board using the the sd card, the x-loader execute and loads the u-boot.bin at address location 0x80e8. But, af

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] lib/hashtable.c: add CONFIG_ENV_MIN_ENTRIES

2010-10-01 Thread Andreas Bießmann
This patch adds a new config parameter for adjusting the calculation of hash table size when importing a buffer. When importing a extremely small buffer (e.g. the default_environment) the old calculation generated a hash table which could hold at most the buffer content but no more entires. The n

Re: [U-Boot] Add new NAND flash

2010-10-01 Thread Scott Wood
On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 16:31:40 +0200 Matthias Weißer wrote: > Hi > > I would like to add a new NAND flash type to u-boot and have some > problems with it. The type is > > MT29F16G08CBABA > – Page size x8: 4320 bytes (4096 + 224 bytes) > – Block size: 256 pages (1024K + 56K bytes) > – Plane size:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] LZO: Add a LZO compression feature

2010-10-01 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Kyungmin Park wrote: > On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Kyungmin Park wrote: >>> There's request from other team. They want to transfer the binary but >>> it's written as ubifs filesystem. >>> So download the binary to RAM and then mkfs.ubifs

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] xyzModem.c Packet buffer dynamic allocate

2010-10-01 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Yoshinori Sato wrote: > At Fri, 01 Oct 2010 09:57:49 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Yoshinori Sato wrote: >> > It changes reduce bss usage. >> >> ... and increases the load on the malloc arean. >> >> > Ymodem receive buffer dinamic allocation. >> >> As far as I can

[U-Boot] SD card on the GuruPlug

2010-10-01 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, The GuruPlug has an internal μSD card reader, which it views as a USB device: --8<---cut here---start->8--- Marvell>> usb start (Re)start USB... USB: Register 10011 NbrPorts 1 USB EHCI 1.00 scanning bus for devices... 3 USB Device(s) found scann

Re: [U-Boot] ARM relocation, probably trivial mistake - back to original problem

2010-10-01 Thread Steve Sakoman
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 5:55 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Reinhard Meyer, > > In message <4ca5d857.5010...@emk-elektronik.de> you wrote: >> >> The environment issues still persist. I am at a loss >> there now. >> >> Observation: the old style commands "setenv", "printenv", etc. >> work, but any

Re: [U-Boot] ppc44x - watchdog timers reboots during the image loading

2010-10-01 Thread ame
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 09:37:55AM -0500, ame wrote: > On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 03:35:14PM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote: > > On Thursday 30 September 2010 22:15:04 ame wrote: > > > On my 460ex board, i've tried to add CONFIG_WATCHDOG to the config and it > > > appears to work until the board tries to b

[U-Boot] [PATCH] board_init_r: Removed unused cmdtp variable

2010-10-01 Thread Richard Retanubun
From 38c6ceb464f63d3705d30d6603624e7d0933f428 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard Retanubun Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 10:17:26 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] board_init_r: Removed unused cmdtp variable Follow up to commit 620f1f6a64095ed558e68d37f1965d015cd49b02 removed compiler warning for (now) unused

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] xyzModem.c Packet buffer dynamic allocate

2010-10-01 Thread Yoshinori Sato
At Fri, 01 Oct 2010 09:57:49 +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > Dear Yoshinori Sato, > > In message <87sk0q1mnf.wl%ys...@users.sourceforge.jp> you wrote: > > > > It changes reduce bss usage. > > ... and increases the load on the malloc arean. > > > Ymodem receive buffer dinamic allocation. > > A

Re: [U-Boot] ARM relocation, probably trivial mistake - back to original problem

2010-10-01 Thread Reinhard Meyer
Dear Wolfgang Denk, >> The environment issues still persist. I am at a loss >> there now. >> >> Observation: the old style commands "setenv", "printenv", etc. >> work, but any "env" command except for "env" alone crashes. > > OK. If "printenv" works and "env print" fails then it has nothing to > d

Re: [U-Boot] ppc44x - watchdog timers reboots during the image loading

2010-10-01 Thread Stefan Roese
On Friday 01 October 2010 16:37:55 ame wrote: > > void reset_4xx_watchdog(void) > > { > > > > /* > > > > * Clear TSR(WIS) bit > > */ > > > > mtspr(SPRN_TSR, 0x4000); > > > > } > > ... > > > > Definitely upper-case here. > > Ok, confirmed the new one has it in the

Re: [U-Boot] ARM relocation, probably trivial mistake - back to original problem

2010-10-01 Thread Reinhard Meyer
Dear Wolfgang Denk, > In message <4ca5d26d.2090...@emk-elektronik.de> you wrote: >>> If this is really for all AT91 SoCs, then please feel free to >>> introduce a common define (CONFIG_SYS_AT91 ?) and use that. Eventually >>> you can clean up some other such #if's on the way. >> That would have to

Re: [U-Boot] ppc44x - watchdog timers reboots during the image loading

2010-10-01 Thread ame
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 03:35:14PM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote: > On Thursday 30 September 2010 22:15:04 ame wrote: > > On my 460ex board, i've tried to add CONFIG_WATCHDOG to the config and it > > appears to work until the board tries to boot. At that point I can count > > down about 10 seconds and

[U-Boot] Add new NAND flash

2010-10-01 Thread Matthias Weißer
Hi I would like to add a new NAND flash type to u-boot and have some problems with it. The type is MT29F16G08CBABA – Page size x8: 4320 bytes (4096 + 224 bytes) – Block size: 256 pages (1024K + 56K bytes) – Plane size: 2 planes x 1024 blocks per plane – Device size: 16Gb: 2048 blocks The NAND s

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] LZO: Add a LZO compression feature

2010-10-01 Thread Kyungmin Park
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Kyungmin Park, > > In message you > wrote: >> >> There's request from other team. They want to transfer the binary but >> it's written as ubifs filesystem. >> So download the binary to RAM and then mkfs.ubifs at this address and >> ubi

[U-Boot] ARMV7: OMAP3: Fix bug in get_sdr_cs_offset()

2010-10-01 Thread Steve Sakoman
This patch fixes a typo in the routine to calculate the cs offset based upon the contents of the SDRC cs_cfg register. This function mistakenly shifts the CS1STARTLOW field 17 bits right instead of 17 bits left. This hasn't been an issue to date because all OMAP3 boards currently are configured t

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] LZO: Add a LZO compression feature

2010-10-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Kyungmin Park, In message you wrote: > > There's request from other team. They want to transfer the binary but > it's written as ubifs filesystem. > So download the binary to RAM and then mkfs.ubifs at this address and > ubinize it finally. > Then write it to flash. > When mkfs.ubifs, it r

Re: [U-Boot] ppc44x - watchdog timers reboots during the image loading

2010-10-01 Thread Stefan Roese
On Thursday 30 September 2010 22:15:04 ame wrote: > On my 460ex board, i've tried to add CONFIG_WATCHDOG to the config and it > appears to work until the board tries to boot. At that point I can count > down about 10 seconds and the reboot happens. The 10s correlates with > what I think the watch

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] LZO: Add a LZO compression feature

2010-10-01 Thread Kyungmin Park
Hi Wolfgang. On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Donggeun Kim, > > In message <4ca5b732.3030...@samsung.com> you wrote: >> In some case, LZO compression function is needed in U-Boot. > > Can you please explain what use cases you have in mind? There's request from other te

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] move nand_init after pci_init in arch/powerpc/lib/board.c ?

2010-10-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9?= Schwarz, In message <1285937418.2597.24.ca...@swa-m460> you wrote: > > Actually I'm trying to implement a simple bitbanged Nand-Flash > device connected to a PCI FPGA. > > I'm running latest U-Boot on mvBL-M7 board (MPC8343). > > Unfortunately nand_init() gets call

Re: [U-Boot] ARM relocation, probably trivial mistake - back to original problem

2010-10-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Reinhard Meyer, In message <4ca5d857.5010...@emk-elektronik.de> you wrote: > > The environment issues still persist. I am at a loss > there now. > > Observation: the old style commands "setenv", "printenv", etc. > work, but any "env" command except for "env" alone crashes. OK. If "printenv"

[U-Boot] [RFC] move nand_init after pci_init in arch/powerpc/lib/board.c ?

2010-10-01 Thread André Schwarz
Actually I'm trying to implement a simple bitbanged Nand-Flash device connected to a PCI FPGA. I'm running latest U-Boot on mvBL-M7 board (MPC8343). Unfortunately nand_init() gets called before pci_init() within arch/powerpc/lib/board.c ? Is there any possibility to defer nand_init after pci_in

Re: [U-Boot] ARM relocation, probably trivial mistake - back to original problem

2010-10-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Reinhard Meyer, In message <4ca5d26d.2090...@emk-elektronik.de> you wrote: > > > If this is really for all AT91 SoCs, then please feel free to > > introduce a common define (CONFIG_SYS_AT91 ?) and use that. Eventually > > you can clean up some other such #if's on the way. > > That would have

Re: [U-Boot] ARM relocation, probably trivial mistake - back to original problem

2010-10-01 Thread Reinhard Meyer
> I did the changes of adding the clock values to gd, and it became somewhat > better, but there are still issues pending: > > 1. NAND accesses cause "raise: Signal # 8 caught" > but still work, kernel boots normally. > 2. environment is still invalid - when I boot the > "CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RE

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot on dockstar problem - ** Bad partition 1 **

2010-10-01 Thread Detlev Zundel
Hi, [...] >> regarding broken gmane search: >> (just wondering, why i did not find that via google and gmane search on the u-boot mailing list archive - i searched for dockstar and for freeagent , but got no hits!) >>> >>> Actually I have no clue. The gmane search seems

Re: [U-Boot] ARM relocation, probably trivial mistake - back to original problem

2010-10-01 Thread Reinhard Meyer
Dear Wolfgang Denk, >> For the fix, I see an ugly multiline >> #if defined(AT91SAM9260) || defined(AT91SAM9G20) || ... >> coming into arch/arm/asm/global_data.h. >> >> There is no common defined value for all AT91 SoCs that could be used. > > If this is really for all AT91 SoCs, then please feel f

Re: [U-Boot] ARM relocation, probably trivial mistake - back to original problem

2010-10-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Reinhard Meyer, In message <4ca5c7de.6010...@emk-elektronik.de> you wrote: > > For the fix, I see an ugly multiline > #if defined(AT91SAM9260) || defined(AT91SAM9G20) || ... > coming into arch/arm/asm/global_data.h. > > There is no common defined value for all AT91 SoCs that could be used.

Re: [U-Boot] ARM relocation, probably trivial mistake - back to original problem

2010-10-01 Thread Reinhard Meyer
Dear Wolfgang Denk, >> >> it became illegal once u-boot for AT91 became required to be relocated >> > > No, it has always been illegal. You might thave been lucky that in > your case the erros did not show up erarlier, but this does not change > anything. Sorry, before recently there was no rel

Re: [U-Boot] ARM relocation, probably trivial mistake - back to original problem

2010-10-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Reinhard Meyer, In message <4ca5bfef.3090...@emk-elektronik.de> you wrote: > > > it became illegal once u-boot for AT91 became required to be relocated > No, it has always been illegal. You might thave been lucky that in your case the erros did not show up erarlier, but this does not chan

Re: [U-Boot] ARM relocation, probably trivial mistake - back to original problem

2010-10-01 Thread Reinhard Meyer
Dear Wolfgang Denk, > ...which is, and always has been, illegal. it became illegal once u-boot for AT91 became required to be relocated > Not bd-> but gd-> which was made for exactly that purpose. typedef struct global_data... I will try that. And fix the whitespace error as well...:) Th

Re: [U-Boot] ARM relocation, probably trivial mistake - back to original problem

2010-10-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Reinhard Meyer, In message <4ca5bb7a.8050...@emk-elektronik.de> you wrote: > > > in "static unsigned long" vars ... as this code > > runs before relocation, this seems to me as it > > could be the reason for your problems ... but I > > can;t try it here ... can you check this? > > Indeed, t

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] LZO: Add a LZO compression feature

2010-10-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Donggeun Kim, In message <4ca5b732.3030...@samsung.com> you wrote: > In some case, LZO compression function is needed in U-Boot. Can you please explain what use cases you have in mind? So far, we provide only uncompression functions, and it seems nobody ever needed compression inside U-Boot

Re: [U-Boot] silencing i2c dev?

2010-10-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Frans Meulenbroeks, In message you wrote: > If I run i2c dev to set the bus it replies what it did: > > => i2c dev 0 > Setting bus to 0 I actually consider thsi somewhat useful, as you are performing a change of the system state, and it is pretty useful to see that it did what you wanted

Re: [U-Boot] ARM relocation, probably trivial mistake - back to original problem

2010-10-01 Thread Reinhard Meyer
Dear Heiko Schocher, > Hmm.. mabe something with at91_clock_init() > > This is called in arch_cpu_init(), and > at the end, clocks are stored in > > arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/clock.c > > in "static unsigned long" vars ... as this code > runs before relocation, this seems to me as it > could be t

[U-Boot] [PATCH] LZO: Add a LZO compression feature

2010-10-01 Thread Donggeun Kim
In some case, LZO compression function is needed in U-Boot. This patch supports LZO compression feature which is originated from Linux kernel. Thanks. -Donggeun Kim Signed-off-by: Donggeun Kim Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park --- lib/lzo/Makefile |2 +- lib/lzo/lzo1x_compress.c | 21

Re: [U-Boot] ARM relocation, probably trivial mistake - back to original problem

2010-10-01 Thread Reinhard Meyer
Dear Wolfgang Denk, > Dear Reinhard Meyer, > > In message <4ca590e6.6070...@emk-elektronik.de> you wrote: >> it seems, that with relocation enabled, some >> data does not seem to get initialized properly: > > I rather suspect you have code running that violates the > pre-relocation restrictions (

[U-Boot] silencing i2c dev?

2010-10-01 Thread Frans Meulenbroeks
If I run i2c dev to set the bus it replies what it did: => i2c dev 0 Setting bus to 0 Other commands do not seem to do that. e.g. mw does not tell it has written a value. Should we make i2c dev silent too? (I'm using this in a script and want to avoid superfluous messages). If desired I can subm

[U-Boot] [PATCH v1] ppc44x: config GPIOs for USB on canyonlands board

2010-10-01 Thread Rupjyoti Sarmah
The GPIO 16 and 19 reconfiguration should be done once USB is initialized. So moved the reconfiguration to the USB init function. Signed-off-by: Rupjyoti Sarmah --- board/amcc/canyonlands/canyonlands.c | 23 +-- 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --g

Re: [U-Boot] ARM relocation, probably trivial mistake - back to original problem

2010-10-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Reinhard Meyer, In message <4ca590e6.6070...@emk-elektronik.de> you wrote: > > it seems, that with relocation enabled, some > data does not seem to get initialized properly: I rather suspect you have code running that violates the pre-relocation restrictions (no bss segment available, read-

Re: [U-Boot] ARM relocation, probably trivial mistake

2010-10-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Heiko Schocher, In message <4ca58665.8080...@denx.de> you wrote: > > > "intended location" == "relocation address based on ram size" ?? > > admitted, just a good idea for boards where ramsize is always fix ... This is _not_ sufficient. Assume PRAM support. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -

Re: [U-Boot] ARM relocation, probably trivial mistake

2010-10-01 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Wolfgang, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Heiko Schocher, > > In message <4ca57762.3000...@denx.de> you wrote: >> If u-boot starts in RAM, then it is the task from the preloader >> where it copies u-boot code, and if there is somewhere in IRAM >> enough room for it, this would be an option. Oth

Re: [U-Boot] ARM relocation, probably trivial mistake - back to original problem

2010-10-01 Thread Heiko Schocher
Hello Reinhard, Reinhard Meyer wrote: > it seems, that with relocation enabled, some > data does not seem to get initialized properly: > > w/o relocation: > > mmci > mci: setting clock 194000 Hz, block size 512 > mci: setting clock 194000 Hz, block size 512 > mci: setting clock 194000 Hz, block s

Re: [U-Boot] ARM relocation, probably trivial mistake

2010-10-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Reinhard Meyer, In message <4ca5821e.3070...@emk-elektronik.de> you wrote: > > I think it would be safe that a preloader loads u-boot to the very > bottom of SDRAM. If the SDRAM is not at least double the size of > u-boot, u-boot needs a diet ;) This may or may not be safe. Some systems (fo

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Kirkwood: dram_init is moved to dram.c

2010-10-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Heiko Schocher, [There is no need to always keep the full quote. Please delete parts that are not interesting for the current diuscussion.] In message <4ca57ce7.1060...@denx.de> you wrote: > > > But one can configure with gaps too, for ex. If any new board uses two > > chips with smaller s

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] xyzModem.c Packet buffer dynamic allocate

2010-10-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Yoshinori Sato, In message <87sk0q1mnf.wl%ys...@users.sourceforge.jp> you wrote: > > It changes reduce bss usage. ... and increases the load on the malloc arean. > Ymodem receive buffer dinamic allocation. As far as I can see we increase the code size, and shift a fixed sized buffer from

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Kirkwood: dram_init is moved to dram.c

2010-10-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Prafulla Wadaskar, In message you wrote: > > > This is only OK, if the memory banks are consecutive without > > gaps ... is this true for all boards? > > Yes, those are consecutive without gaps on all boards so far. > But one can configure with gaps too, for ex. If any new board uses two

Re: [U-Boot] ARM relocation, probably trivial mistake

2010-10-01 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Heiko Schocher, In message <4ca57762.3000...@denx.de> you wrote: > > If u-boot starts in RAM, then it is the task from the preloader > where it copies u-boot code, and if there is somewhere in IRAM > enough room for it, this would be an option. Otherwise it is a > problem if relocation resul

Re: [U-Boot] ARM relocation, probably trivial mistake - back to original problem

2010-10-01 Thread Reinhard Meyer
Hello, it seems, that with relocation enabled, some data does not seem to get initialized properly: w/o relocation: mmci mci: setting clock 194000 Hz, block size 512 mci: setting clock 194000 Hz, block size 512 mci: setting clock 194000 Hz, block size 512 mci: setting clock 194000 Hz, block size

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Kirkwood: dram_init is moved to dram.c

2010-10-01 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
> -Original Message- > From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:w...@denx.de] > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 11:00 PM > To: Prafulla Wadaskar > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Ashish Karkare; Prabhanjan Sarnaik > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Kirkwood: dram_init is moved to dram.c > > Dear Prafulla

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Kirkwood: Changes specific to ARM relocation support

2010-10-01 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
> -Original Message- > From: Heiko Schocher [mailto:h...@denx.de] > Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 9:11 PM > To: Prafulla Wadaskar > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Ashish Karkare; Prabhanjan Sarnaik > Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Kirkwood: Changes specific to > ARM relocation support >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 2/2] [NEXT] arm926ejs: reduce code size with -msingle-pic-base

2010-10-01 Thread Prafulla Wadaskar
> -Original Message- > From: Albert ARIBAUD [mailto:albert.arib...@free.fr] > Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 10:23 AM > To: Wolfgang Denk > Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar; u-boot@lists.denx.de; h...@denx.de > Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] [NEXT] arm926ejs: reduce code > size with -msingle-pic-bas

Re: [U-Boot] ARM relocation, probably trivial mistake

2010-10-01 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Le 01/10/2010 08:39, Reinhard Meyer a écrit : >>> Actually CONFIG_SKIP_RELICATE_UBOOT should become unneeded once all >>> boards which use it are made to support relocation, as the code will >>> always check if it runs at its intended location and relocate only if >>> needed. > > "intended locatio