Re: [U-Boot] [Patch V6 0/4] Add basic NVIDIA Tegra2 SoC support

On 02/02/11 02:09, Tom Warren wrote: > I haven't seen any new feedback on this version (V6) of the patchset > since it was posted. > > Wolfgang, Mike, Peter, et al - are you happy with the current patch? I'm Ok with the current patch. > If so, when can I expect it to be pushed? > > Thanks, > >

[U-Boot] at91sam9263_nandflash build issues

The problem is clear from this IRC log, where "vickylinuxer" described his grief (so I included the log, the board really doesn't build). I also did a quick and dirty patch (follows the log, it might give you an idea where it breaks, but it's a mess -- not all is relevant and it probably breaks

Re: [U-Boot] change email address in MAINTAINERS

Applied, thanks. On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 10:05:39AM +0900, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote: > Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda > --- > This patch depends on "sh: add support for sh7757lcr board". > > MAINTAINERS |2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/MAINTAINER

Re: [U-Boot] spi subystem maintainer?

On Feb 1, 2011, at 1:29 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Kumar Gala, > > In message <9a3702c1-3ed1-4f24-a0bc-ca7daea46...@kernel.crashing.org> you > wrote: >> Do we have one? > > Not yet. Are you volunteering? Nope, too much to do as it stands. Wanted to see if anyone had input on how to dea

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot compilation lowlevel_init.S:619: error: #error "Unknown DDR configuration!!!"

hi, On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Vaishali wrote: > Getting this error with the u-boot compilation > http://pastebin.com/h3x90vHK > u-boot is a git clone of the > git://gitorious.org/hawkboard/u-boot.git > plz help any idea what needs to be done to fix t

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sh: add support the CONFIG_SYS_LDSCRIPT

Applied, thanks. On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:06:14AM +0900, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote: > Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda > --- > arch/sh/config.mk |4 > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/sh/config.mk b/arch/sh/config.mk > index 415c949..b408a44 100644

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot compilation lowlevel_init.S:619: error: #error "Unknown DDR configuration!!!"

hi, On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 9:00 PM, Vaishali wrote: > Getting this error with the u-boot compilation > http://pastebin.com/h3x90vHK > u-boot is a git clone of the > git://gitorious.org/hawkboard/u-boot.git > plz help any idea what needs to be done to fix th

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] mp2usb: remove board support

Hi Eric, Le 25/01/2011 23:31, Eric Bénard a écrit : > this board was cancelled long time ago so remove it as it won't > be maintained anymore > > Signed-off-by: Eric Bénard > --- > board/mp2usb/Makefile| 50 - > board/mp2usb/config.mk |3 - > board/mp2usb/flash.c | 552 >

Re: [U-Boot] Trouble running hello_world

Le 02/02/2011 01:54, Alfred Morgan a écrit : > Hello clueful people, I am new to U-Boot. > > I am having trouble executing anything using U-Boot. I have read the U-Boot > README and Manual. I have also tried to following the steps on > plugcomputer.org's wiki. I was feeling like I was beginnin

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/6] powerpc/85xx: do not initialize QE if QE's firmware is in nand flash

On Jan 31, 2011, at 3:37 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Haiying Wang, > > In message <1296507737.2049.518.camel@haiying-laptop> you wrote: >> On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 21:08 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >>> Dear haiying.w...@freescale.com, >>> >>> In message <1296499317-26616-6-git-send-email-haiyi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/6] p1021mds: add QE and UEC support

On Feb 1, 2011, at 1:46 PM, Haiying Wang wrote: > On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 13:15 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: >> On Feb 1, 2011, at 11:01 AM, Haiying Wang wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 10:50 -0600, Scott Wood wrote: >> > If it is a one time setting, there should be no problem to put it i

Re: [U-Boot] PCIE supported networking cards?

You may want to look at the following patch that adds support for 0x10d3: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/79788/ - k On Feb 1, 2011, at 3:32 PM, Aaron Williams wrote: > This is an Intel EXPI9301 PRO/1000 OEM card, vendor ID 0x8086, device ID > 0x10d3. I added it to the list but I don't know

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3] Add support for Bluewater Systems Snapper 9260 and 9G20 modules

Add support for Bluewater Systems AT91 based Snapper 9260 and 9G20 single board computer modules. Includes NAND flash and Ethernet support. Signed-off-by: Ryan Mallon --- Patches apply against the rework101229 branch of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-atmel.git. Builds and runs. Tested Ethernet and NA

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Fix to make U-Boot work with more USB sticks

Hi Aaron, OK good. Yes I notice ext2 is slow also, but the dcache is still off so I assumed that was it. I have had no hub problems, but have only tried two types. I do recall a LUN patch floating around. I was going to try with an uSD card to see if it is needed there. Regards, Simon On Tue, F

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3] sh: add support for sh7757lcr board

The R0P7757LC0030RL board has SH7757, 256MB DDR3-SDRAM, SPI ROM, Ethernet, and more. This patch supports the following functions: - 256MB DDR3-SDRAM - SPI ROM - Ethernet Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda --- about v3: - change my email address in Makefile and u-boot.lds MAINTAINERS

[U-Boot] change email address in MAINTAINERS

Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda --- This patch depends on "sh: add support for sh7757lcr board". MAINTAINERS |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 7313542..c26c9a7 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -1017,7 +1017,7

[U-Boot] Trouble running hello_world

Hello clueful people, I am new to U-Boot. I am having trouble executing anything using U-Boot. I have read the U-Boot README and Manual. I have also tried to following the steps on plugcomputer.org's wiki. I was feeling like I was beginning to get a clue but then I couldn't get anything to w

Re: [U-Boot] [Patch V6 0/4] Add basic NVIDIA Tegra2 SoC support

I haven't seen any new feedback on this version (V6) of the patchset since it was posted. Wolfgang, Mike, Peter, et al - are you happy with the current patch? If so, when can I expect it to be pushed? Thanks, Tom On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Tom Warren wrote: > This series of patches adds

[U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-arm

Hi Wolfgang, Please pull from u-boot-arm/master to go into rc1 of upcoming release. The following changes since commit 6f918bd46482f889f4d94623b09daf659a1974bd: Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boot-mpc85xx (2011-01-31 23:20:32 +0100) are available in the git repository at:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Fix to make U-Boot work with more USB sticks

I too am interested in this. I am running EHCI and have had problems with a number of USB storage devices, one of which (the SanDisk Cruzer) causes a crash due to it reporting the maximum LUN as 1. I'm also seeing some interesting performance issues with ext2 being extremely slow compared to FA

Re: [U-Boot] [GIT PULL] Pull request: u-boot-imx

Hi Stefano, Le 01/02/2011 19:13, Stefano Babic a écrit : > Hi Albert, > > here my pull request for u-boot-imx. Since my last pull-request, I > rebased my tree to substitute: > > imximage: Add MX53 boot image support > > I fixed the wrong mode,too, and I cherry-picked from u-boot-arm: > >

Re: [U-Boot] PCIE supported networking cards?

This is an Intel EXPI9301 PRO/1000 OEM card, vendor ID 0x8086, device ID 0x10d3. I added it to the list but I don't know what the MAC type is. I'll look into the Linux driver and see if I can see what it is. -Aaron On Tuesday, February 01, 2011 11:19:24 am Scott Wood wrote: > On Tue, 1 Feb 201

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Introduce a new linker flag LDFLAGS_FINAL

On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 21:20:50 +0100 Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Scott Wood, > > In message <20110201135136.0817f...@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net> you wrote: > > > > > > Prior to the introduction of LDFLAGS_u-boot, was LDFLAGS not what was > > > > used? So before, anything that board/cpu code add

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Introduce a new linker flag LDFLAGS_FINAL

Dear Scott Wood, In message <20110201135136.0817f...@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net> you wrote: > > > > Prior to the introduction of LDFLAGS_u-boot, was LDFLAGS not what was > > > used? So before, anything that board/cpu code adds directly to LDFLAGS > > > (maybe they're supposed to use PLATFORM_L

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] at91sam9261ek: make operational again

Dear all, >> /home/toolchain/bin/gcc-4.1.2-glibc-2.5-nptl-3/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/bin/arm-none-linux-gnueabi-ld >> -pie -r -o libat91.o lowlevel_init.o clock.o cpu.o reset.o timer.o >> /home/toolchain/bin/gcc-4.1.2-glibc-2.5-nptl-3/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/bin/arm-none-linux-gnueabi-ld: >> -r an

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Introduce a new linker flag LDFLAGS_FINAL

On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 20:32:29 +0100 Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Scott Wood, > > In message <20110201102446.23b4a...@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net> you wrote: > > > > Prior to the introduction of LDFLAGS_u-boot, was LDFLAGS not what was > > used? So before, anything that board/cpu code adds direct

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/6] p1021mds: add QE and UEC support

On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 13:15 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: > On Feb 1, 2011, at 11:01 AM, Haiying Wang wrote: > > > On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 10:50 -0600, Scott Wood wrote: > > >>> If it is a one time setting, there should be no problem to put it into > >>> board code. But these pin settings need to b

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Fix to make U-Boot work with more USB sticks

Hi, 2011/2/1 Simon Glass : > Hi Remy, > Still waiting on some boards to try, unfortunately. I expect it will happen > in the next 2 weeks though (ARM9 and OMAP4 platforms). Once I get to the > bottom of it I will split the patches as requested. I have not seen reports > from other users of U-Boot.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Introduce a new linker flag LDFLAGS_FINAL

Dear Scott Wood, In message <20110201102446.23b4a...@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net> you wrote: > > Prior to the introduction of LDFLAGS_u-boot, was LDFLAGS not what was > used? So before, anything that board/cpu code adds directly to LDFLAGS > (maybe they're supposed to use PLATFORM_LDFLAGS, but

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] at91sam9261ek: make operational again

Hi, 2011/2/1 Michael Trimarchi : > Hi > > On 02/01/2011 01:16 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >> Le 01/02/2011 11:45, Michael Trimarchi a écrit : >> >>> Hi >>> >>> /home/toolchain/bin/gcc-4.1.2-glibc-2.5-nptl-3/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/bin/arm-none-linux-gnueabi-ld >>>  -pie -r -o libat91.o  lowlevel_ini

Re: [U-Boot] spi subystem maintainer?

Dear Kumar Gala, In message <9a3702c1-3ed1-4f24-a0bc-ca7daea46...@kernel.crashing.org> you wrote: > Do we have one? Not yet. Are you volunteering? Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-8

Re: [U-Boot] PCIE supported networking cards?

On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 13:15:01 -0600 Kumar Gala wrote: > We utilize e1000 PCIe cards all the time Aren't there some versions that work, and some that don't? -Scott > > - k > > On Feb 1, 2011, at 1:10 PM, Aaron Williams wrote: > > > Are there any PCIE networking cards that are supported? So fa

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/6] p1021mds: add QE and UEC support

On Feb 1, 2011, at 11:01 AM, Haiying Wang wrote: > On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 10:50 -0600, Scott Wood wrote: >>> If it is a one time setting, there should be no problem to put it into >>> board code. But these pin settings need to be done before any usage of >>> phy read/write (accessing MDIO/MD

Re: [U-Boot] PCIE supported networking cards?

We utilize e1000 PCIe cards all the time - k On Feb 1, 2011, at 1:10 PM, Aaron Williams wrote: > Are there any PCIE networking cards that are supported? So far I've > tried an Intel card and a Realtek RTL8168 card, but neither is > supported. It looks like the E1000 driver only supports PCI and

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] at91sam9261ek: make operational again

Hi On 02/01/2011 01:16 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Le 01/02/2011 11:45, Michael Trimarchi a écrit : > >> Hi >> >> /home/toolchain/bin/gcc-4.1.2-glibc-2.5-nptl-3/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/bin/arm-none-linux-gnueabi-ld >> -pie -r -o libat91.o lowlevel_init.o clock.o cpu.o reset.o timer.o >> /home/to

[U-Boot] PCIE supported networking cards?

Are there any PCIE networking cards that are supported? So far I've tried an Intel card and a Realtek RTL8168 card, but neither is supported. It looks like the E1000 driver only supports PCI and PCIX based cards (Linux uses the e1000e card for PCIe cards). -Aaron __

[U-Boot] [GIT PULL] Pull request: u-boot-imx

Hi Albert, here my pull request for u-boot-imx. Since my last pull-request, I rebased my tree to substitute: imximage: Add MX53 boot image support I fixed the wrong mode,too, and I cherry-picked from u-boot-arm: ARM: fix broken build of ARM that you have already merged, to avoid

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 09/11] SPI: mxc_spi: add SPI clock calculation and setup to the driver

On 01/20/2011 09:46 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: > From: Anatolij Gustschin > > The MXC SPI driver didn't calculate the SPI clock up to > now and just used highest possible divider 512 for DATA > RATE in the control register. This results in very low > transfer rates. > > The patch adds code to calc

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 08/11] SPI: mxc_spi: fix swapping bug and add missing swapping in unaligned rx case

On 01/20/2011 06:53 PM, Stefano Babic wrote: > From: Anatolij Gustschin > > We need to shift only one time in each cycle in the swapping loop > for unaligned tx case. Currently two byte shift operations are > performed in each loop cycle causing zero gaps in the transmited > data, so not all data

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 11/11] Add support for Freescale's mx35pdk board.

On 01/20/2011 06:53 PM, Stefano Babic wrote: > The patch adds suupport for the Freescale's mx35pdk board > (known as well as mx35_3stack). > > The board boots from the NOR flash. Following devices > are supported: > - two ethernet devices (FEC and SMC911x on debug board) > - I2C > - PMIC (MC138

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V4 11/11] Add support for Freescale's mx35pdk board.

On 01/20/2011 07:05 PM, Stefano Babic wrote: > The patch adds suupport for the Freescale's mx35pdk board > (known as well as mx35_3stack). > > The board boots from the NOR flash. Following devices > are supported: > - two ethernet devices (FEC and SMC911x on debug board) > - I2C > - PMIC (MC138

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 01/11] Add support for MX35 processor

On 01/20/2011 06:49 PM, Stefano Babic wrote: > The patch adds basic support for the Freescale's i.MX35 > (arm1136 based) processor. > > The patch adds also a prototype for the initialization > of the FEC(ethernet controller) to netdev.h to avoid > warnings. > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic Appl

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3 v4] iMX5: EfikaMX: Preliminary board support

On 01/19/2011 03:40 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > Supported: > MMC > IDE > PMIC > SPI flash > LEDs > > I can boot the kernel supplied by freescale/genesi with this from MMC card > and/or PATA disk. > > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut > --- Applied to u-boot-imx, thanks Best regards, Stefano Babic -- =

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3 v2] MX51EVK: Use SWx macros in PMIC init

On 01/19/2011 03:40 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut > --- > v2: Remove stray newline and useless parens > > board/freescale/mx51evk/mx51evk.c |6 +++--- > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Applied to u-boot-imx, thanks Best regards, Stefano Babic -- ===

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3 RESEND] MC13892: Add SWx buck switchers definitions

On 01/19/2011 03:40 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > Define voltages configurable on SWx buck switchers. > > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut > Acked-by: Stefano Babic > --- > include/mc13892.h | 39 +++ > 1 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > Applied to

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 1/1] imximage: Add MX53 boot image support

On 01/19/2011 08:40 PM, Jason Liu wrote: > This patch add the MX53 boot image support. > > This patch has been tested on Freescale MX53EVK board > and MX51EVK board. > > Signed-off-by: Jason Liu > > --- Applied to u-boot-imx, thanks Regards, Stefano Babic --

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] MXC: removed warnings from IMX51 ATA driver

On Tuesday 01 February 2011 18:30:02 Stefano Babic wrote: > Drop warnings due to unused variables. > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic > CC: Marek Vasut > --- > drivers/block/mxc_ata.c |3 --- > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/block/mxc_ata.c b/driver

[U-Boot] [PATCH] MXC: removed warnings from IMX51 ATA driver

Drop warnings due to unused variables. Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic CC: Marek Vasut --- drivers/block/mxc_ata.c |3 --- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/block/mxc_ata.c b/drivers/block/mxc_ata.c index 842a633..f22f4f4 100644 --- a/drivers/block/mxc_ata.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/6] p1021mds: add QE and UEC support

On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 10:50 -0600, Scott Wood wrote: > > > > > If it is a one time setting, there should be no problem to put it into > > board code. But these pin settings need to be done before any usage of > > phy read/write (accessing MDIO/MDC), and need to be released after the > > usage of p

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] BLOCK: Fixup iMX51 ATA driver

On Tuesday 01 February 2011 08:11:51 Stefano Babic wrote: > On 11/29/2010 03:18 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut > > Hi Marek, > > in my regression tests to check if all IMX boards are compiled clean I > found the following warnings (efikamx): > > mxc_ata.c:90: warning: 'pi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/6] p1021mds: add QE and UEC support

On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 22:14:45 -0500 Haiying Wang wrote: > On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 15:28 -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Jan 31, 2011, at 2:50 PM, Haiying Wang wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 21:11 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > >>> > > >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_P1021 > > >>> + ccsr_gur_t *g

[U-Boot] !!! Trouble with u-boot and leon3 !!!!

Hi All, We have built u-boot (from git as suggested by U-Boot SPARC / LEON Port v 1.0.0 April 2009. The building is successfull. I configured for execution in ram (CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE = 0x4000) and the system runs. But nothing I see on the serial console connected to minicom. When I do Crtl+C

Re: [U-Boot] nand commands missing wtchdog reset

On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 10:43:56 +0100 Jaap de Jong wrote: > thanks for your reply. > You are right, the format was totally wrong; I apologize! > Concerning the patch itself: I agree: low-level hangups should trigger > the watchdog although in this specific case the hangups will not occur > due to a

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Introduce a new linker flag LDFLAGS_FINAL

On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 08:34:01 +0100 Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Scott Wood, > > In message <20110131135548.50d65...@udp111988uds.am.freescale.net> you wrote: > > As I understand it, it has only been limited to PLATFORM_LDFLAGS since > > the LDFLAGS_u-boot commit. Was that change intentional, and

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Remove config.mk for nand linker script

On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 22:02:03 -0600 Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Jan 31, 2011, at 4:52 PM, Scott Wood wrote: > > > On Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:37:44 -0600 > > Kumar Gala wrote: > > > >> * fix where we define this, it should !CONFIG_NAND_SPL, read the old > >> config.mk incorrectly. > > > > I don't th

[U-Boot] spi subystem maintainer?

Do we have one? - k ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot compilation lowlevel_init.S:619: error: #error "Unknown DDR configuration!!!"

Dear Vaishali, In message you wrote: > Getting this error with the u-boot compilation http://pastebin.com/h3x90vHK > u-boot is a git clone of the git://gitorious.org/hawkboard/u-boot.git > plz help any idea what needs to be done to fix this . Sorry - please contact the people responsible for th

[U-Boot] u-boot compilation lowlevel_init.S:619: error: #error "Unknown DDR configuration!!!"

Getting this error with the u-boot compilation http://pastebin.com/h3x90vHK u-boot is a git clone of the git://gitorious.org/hawkboard/u-boot.git plz help any idea what needs to be done to fix this . Thanks . ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de h

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Introduce a new linker flag LDFLAGS_FINAL

On Tue, 2011-02-01 at 08:34 +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Can you please be more specific? I don't see where "the > LDFLAGS_u-boot commit" (you mean 8aba9dc ?) would change any related > code. The relevant hunk looks like this: > > @@ -204,9 +204,11 @@ endif > > AFLAGS := $(AFLAGS_DEBUG) -D_

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2 v2] powerpc/8xxx: Refactor fsl_ddr_get_spd into common code from board

On Feb 1, 2011, at 4:08 AM, Timur Tabi wrote: > On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Kumar Gala > wrote: >> +#if defined(SPD_EEPROM_ADDRESS) || \ >> +defined(SPD_EEPROM_ADDRESS1) || defined(SPD_EEPROM_ADDRESS2) || \ >> +defined(SPD_EEPROM_ADDRESS3) || defined(SPD_EEPROM_ADDRESS4) >> +#if (

Re: [U-Boot] MPC8xx malloc failing

Dear saugat mitra, In message you wrote: > > I have moved onto 2009.11, though more new versions are available but still .. Stefano wrote: | > make yourself a favour and upgrade to last U-Boot version... Can you please explain why you stick again with code that is > 1 year old? > I am usin

Re: [U-Boot] BSS footprint of FAT very high - SPL issues

Dear "Bedia, Vaibhav", In message you wrote: > > In that case how can network boot be supported in U-Boot? Is the expectation > that the SPL image which gets downloaded to internal RAM inits SDRAM, > relocates to it and then download any other image like a larger U-Boot or the > OS image? Ca

Re: [U-Boot] MPC8xx malloc failing

Hi I have moved onto 2009.11, though more new versions are available but still .. I am using a MPC8XX based board( as earlier), but now the code is crashing in env_relocate() function. On applying debug prints I found that the code was failing in malloc with a Bus Fault with the following dump -

Re: [U-Boot] BSS footprint of FAT very high - SPL issues

On Tuesday, February 01, 2011 4:19 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: [...] > That would be way outside of how U-Boot is supposed to work: the > assumption is that the SPL and U-Boot itself are present on-board > anyway -- the rationale being that the board should be able to get > to the U-Boot prompt with

[U-Boot] Flashing ubinize image under U-Boot

Hi, I would like to support UBI under U-Boot. I could successfully flash a raw UBIFS image with the "ubi write" command, and also a UBI (ubinize) image with the nand write command. So it's working well. But in the second case, I will loose all existing information (e.g. the erase counters).

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3 v4] iMX5: EfikaMX: Preliminary board support

Le 01/02/2011 08:57, Wolfgang Denk a écrit : > Dear Albert ARIBAUD, > > In message<4d47ad9a.3060...@free.fr> you wrote: >> >> Wolfgang, do we: >> >> - wait for Prafulla's pull, or >> >> - just take Stefano's and move ahead with this release, and Prafulla >> stacks the current changes onto his 'nex

Re: [U-Boot] SPI flash protection

Le 01/02/2011 10:09, Simon Guinot a écrit : >> In this case, a *software* protection mechanism like for NOR flash >> would be a better choice. > > Or no protection at all. After all, there is no such mechanism > implemented for u-boot and Linux... Actually yes, there is, for NOR at least: in U-bo

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/6] mtd: add writebufsize field to mtd_info struct

Hi Stefan, Stefan Roese wrote: > >> as I told in another mail, the min I/O size adaption patch leads to >> incompatibilites for the UBIFS and therefore the similar patch in linux >> kernel was reverted. But anyway the first five patches in the patch serie >> are already part of the mtd layer of t

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] at91sam9261ek: make operational again

Le 01/02/2011 11:45, Michael Trimarchi a écrit : > Hi > > /home/toolchain/bin/gcc-4.1.2-glibc-2.5-nptl-3/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/bin/arm-none-linux-gnueabi-ld > -pie -r -o libat91.o lowlevel_init.o clock.o cpu.o reset.o timer.o > /home/toolchain/bin/gcc-4.1.2-glibc-2.5-nptl-3/arm-none-linux-gnue

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] at91sam9261ek: make operational again

Dear Remy On 01/27/2011 11:46 PM, Remy Bohmer wrote: > Since U-boot v2010.12 the at91sam9261ek board is broken. > This is solved and tested on this board. > > Note: It requires that the 1st stage bootloader (like Atmel at91-bootstrap) > to load U-boot at a different address compared to previous re

Re: [U-Boot] BSS footprint of FAT very high - SPL issues

Le 01/02/2011 09:26, Aneesh V a écrit : > I would prefer to have rest of the BSS in internal RAM itself. In this case, you should define a dedicated output section in your linker file (say, ".ram"), which would locate in DRAM and collect input sections named similarly (".ram" as well would work

Re: [U-Boot] BSS footprint of FAT very high - SPL issues

Le 01/02/2011 11:18, Bedia, Vaibhav a écrit : > On Tuesday, February 01, 2011 3:35 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Dear "Bedia, Vaibhav", >> >> In message >> you >> wrote: >>> Luckily we don't need networking related code in SPL. >>> >>> It might be required later on :) >> >> It makes no sense.

Re: [U-Boot] [U-BOOT PROBLEM] RAM loading RAMdisk addresses

Dear "GRACE, ERWAN (ERWAN)** CTR **", please make sure to keep the mailing list on Cc: Also, please restrict your line length to some 70 characters or so. In message you wrote: > > Thank you for your answer. I'd like to precise that the 2 RAMdisks > weren't built from exactly the same set of

Re: [U-Boot] BSS footprint of FAT very high - SPL issues

On Tuesday, February 01, 2011 3:35 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear "Bedia, Vaibhav", > > In message > you > wrote: >> >>> Luckily we don't need networking related code in SPL. >> >> It might be required later on :) > > It makes no sense. Load and start U-Boot if you need more fancy > feature

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2 v2] powerpc/8xxx: Refactor fsl_ddr_get_spd into common code from board

On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > +#if defined(SPD_EEPROM_ADDRESS) || \ > +    defined(SPD_EEPROM_ADDRESS1) || defined(SPD_EEPROM_ADDRESS2) || \ > +    defined(SPD_EEPROM_ADDRESS3) || defined(SPD_EEPROM_ADDRESS4) > +#if (CONFIG_NUM_DDR_CONTROLLERS == 1) && (CONFIG_DIMM_SLOTS_PE

Re: [U-Boot] BSS footprint of FAT very high - SPL issues

Dear "Bedia, Vaibhav", In message you wrote: > > > Luckily we don't need networking related code in SPL. > > It might be required later on :) It makes no sense. Load and start U-Boot if you need more fancy features. If you need even more complex ones (say, TCP/IP and Java support) then boot an

Re: [U-Boot] BSS footprint of FAT very high - SPL issues

Dear Aneesh V, In message <4d47c1c9.1020...@ti.com> you wrote: > > > Why would that be necessary? Just put the BSS segment in SDRAM, and > > everything is fine, isn't it? > > SDRAM is initialized by the SPL. So, bss can not be initialized and > used until SDRAM initialization is complete. I wou

Re: [U-Boot] nand commands missing wtchdog reset

thanks for your reply. You are right, the format was totally wrong; I apologize! Concerning the patch itself: I agree: low-level hangups should trigger the watchdog although in this specific case the hangups will not occur due to a timeout construction surrounding it. Unfortunately I'm not able t

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/6] mtd: add writebufsize field to mtd_info struct

Hi Holger & Detlev, On Tuesday 01 February 2011 09:26:56 Holger Brunck wrote: > > do you have any comment on this series? I delegated the patches to you > > in patchwork already :) No seriously, the patches look sane and are in > > accordance to what is done in Linux I'm back from vacation

Re: [U-Boot] SPI flash protection

Hi Reinhard, On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 08:17:36AM +0100, Reinhard Meyer wrote: > Dear Albert ARIBAUD, Simon Guinot, > > > Here is the protect area map for a MX25L4005A 4Mb flash: > > bit 2 1 0 | protect level > |___ > 0 0 0 | none >

Re: [U-Boot] BSS footprint of FAT very high - SPL issues

On Tuesday, February 01, 2011 1:48 PM, Aneesh V wrote: > Dear Wolfgang, > > On Tuesday 01 February 2011 01:25 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Dear Aneesh V, >> >> In message<4d4798e2.3050...@ti.com> you wrote: >>> >>> I had been working on creating an MMC SPL for OMAP4. OMAP boards >>> typically su

Re: [U-Boot] BSS footprint of FAT very high - SPL issues

On Tuesday, February 01, 2011 1:57 PM, V, Aneesh wrote: > Hi Vaibhav, > [...] >> >> I guess you will hit a similar issue with the networking related >> code is used (I am not sure if SPL uses it). That also requires a >> decent size of bss. > > Luckily we don't need networking related code in

[U-Boot] [PING] Re: [PATCH V3] update VCMA9 port

Hello Any news? http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2011-January/085072.html ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

[U-Boot] [PING] Re: [PATCH V3] update SMDK2410 port

Hello Any news? http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2011-January/085070.html ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

[U-Boot] [PING] Re: [PATCH] add print_cpuinfo to s3c24x0

Hello Any news? http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-December/083032.html ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] BSS footprint of FAT very high - SPL issues

Hi Albert, On Tuesday 01 February 2011 12:41 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Le 01/02/2011 08:04, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit : > >> I'd like to make sure I understand the issue. Do these three BSS >> variables occupy space in the U-Boot binary? If they do, then *that* >> must be fixed rather than allocati

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/6] mtd: add writebufsize field to mtd_info struct

Hi Detlev, Detlev Zundel wrote: > Hi Stefan, > > do you have any comment on this series? I delegated the patches to you > in patchwork already :) No seriously, the patches look sane and are in > accordance to what is done in Linux > >> This field will be used to indicate the write buffer s

Re: [U-Boot] BSS footprint of FAT very high - SPL issues

Hi Vaibhav, On Tuesday 01 February 2011 12:22 PM, Bedia, Vaibhav wrote: > Hi Aneesh, > > On Tuesday, February 01, 2011 10:54 AM, Aneesh V wrote: >> Dear Wolfgang, >> >> I had been working on creating an MMC SPL for OMAP4. OMAP boards >> typically support booting from the FAT partition of a removab

Re: [U-Boot] BSS footprint of FAT very high - SPL issues

Dear Wolfgang, On Tuesday 01 February 2011 01:25 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Aneesh V, > > In message<4d4798e2.3050...@ti.com> you wrote: >> >> I had been working on creating an MMC SPL for OMAP4. OMAP boards >> typically support booting from the FAT partition of a removable SD/MMC >> card. S

Re: [U-Boot] calling pci_init before relocation?

Hello Michael, Michael Schwingen wrote: > On 01/31/2011 09:45 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote: >> >> I think, on arm plattforms we should move the pci_init as it is >> done on powerpc plattforms, to board_init_r. It seems to me, that >> this is a leftover from introducing relocation to arm. I also just >

Re: [U-Boot] BSS footprint of FAT very high - SPL issues

Dear Albert ARIBAUD, In message <4d47b20b.5040...@free.fr> you wrote: > > > variables occupy space in the U-Boot binary? If they do, then *that* > > must be fixed rather than allocating a fixed address for them. In ARM > > achitectures, the linker file makes sure the BSS is at the end of the > >

Re: [U-Boot] calling pci_init before relocation?

On 01/31/2011 09:45 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote: > > I think, on arm plattforms we should move the pci_init as it is > done on powerpc plattforms, to board_init_r. It seems to me, that > this is a leftover from introducing relocation to arm. I also just > could think of using a "PCI console" before re