[U-Boot] is any bug in cp?

2011-04-15 Thread hacklu.uboot
hi,in my uboot. there is some bugs when I cp to flash like this: cp.b addr1 addr2 0x100 when the two addr in the same bank of a flash. it go wrongs finally the date of addr2 is 0x8080808080... cp to another bank of flash is work correctly. cp from mem to flash or from flash to mem also

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] S5PC2XX: GPIO Macro Values Corrected.

2011-04-15 Thread Minkyu Kang
Dear Chander Kashyap, On 14 April 2011 18:17, Chander Kashyap chander.kash...@linaro.org wrote: Macro values for Pull Up and Driver Strength were wrong. Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap chander.kash...@linaro.org ---  arch/arm/include/asm/arch-s5pc2xx/gpio.h |    6 +++---  1 files changed, 3

[U-Boot] [PATCH V3 1/2] MX5: factor out boot cause funciton to common code

2011-04-15 Thread Jason Liu
From: Liu Hui-R64343 r64...@freescale.com factor out boot cause funciton to common code to avoid the duplicate code in each board support package Signed-off-by: Jason Liu r64...@freescale.com --- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5/soc.c | 18 ++

[U-Boot] [PATCH V3 2/2] MX53: support for freescale MX53LOCO board

2011-04-15 Thread Jason Liu
From: Liu Hui-R64343 r64...@freescale.com This patch add initial support for freescale MX53LOCO board. Network(FEC),SD/MMC, UART have been supported by this patch. Signed-off-by: Jason Liu r64...@freescale.com --- changes since V2: -factor out the boot cause function to common code, -fix

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/9] cmd_sf: add handler for +len arg for erase command

2011-04-15 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 16:52:36 Richard Retanubun wrote: On 04/12/11 02:35, Mike Frysinger wrote: This patch adds [+]len handler for the erase command that will automatically round up the requested erase length to the flash's sector_size. --- Richard: I noticed some issues in your

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/5] Add Ethernet hardware MAC address framework to usbnet

2011-04-15 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday, April 14, 2011 02:51:42 Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Le 14/04/2011 08:12, Mike Frysinger a écrit : so i stand by my statement that checkpatch is a tool and does *not* get the final say. blindly following a tool is good -- if you're blind. When it emits warnings, the C toolchain is

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] lib/hashtable: fix env var autocompletion

2011-04-15 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday, April 05, 2011 13:14:50 Kim Phillips wrote: commit c81c1222427f268d29ba999c82e2477c428e7bab Fix hash table deletion to prevent lost entries broke environment variable autocompletion by accidentally inverting the condition for 'used' in hmatch_r(). 'used' is 0 if the hash table

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] cmd_nvedit.c: clean up with checkpatch

2011-04-15 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday, April 15, 2011 03:02:58 Macpaul Lin wrote: #if !defined(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_EEPROM) \ -!defined(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_FLASH) \ + !defined(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_FLASH) \ not sure this one hunk is desirable, but the rest are fine -mike signature.asc Description: This is

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/5] Add Ethernet hardware MAC address framework to usbnet

2011-04-15 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Le 15/04/2011 09:56, Mike Frysinger a écrit : On Thursday, April 14, 2011 02:51:42 Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Le 14/04/2011 08:12, Mike Frysinger a écrit : so i stand by my statement that checkpatch is a tool and does *not* get the final say. blindly following a tool is good -- if you're blind.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/5] Add Ethernet hardware MAC address framework to usbnet

2011-04-15 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday, April 15, 2011 04:13:11 Albert ARIBAUD wrote: What I disagree upon is that just because they're tools we should disregard their warnings i never said any such thing -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] cmd_nvedit.c: clean up with checkpatch

2011-04-15 Thread Macpaul Lin
Hi Mike, 2011/4/15 Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org: On Friday, April 15, 2011 03:02:58 Macpaul Lin wrote:  #if !defined(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_EEPROM)         \ -    !defined(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_FLASH) \ +     !defined(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_FLASH)         \ not sure this one hunk is desirable, but the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: fix stack pointer adjustment in board_init_f()

2011-04-15 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Eric Cooper, In message 1302820357-30318-1-git-send-email-...@cmu.edu you wrote: Since addr_sp is a byte address, it should be adjusted by 12 here. Signed-off-by: Eric Cooper e...@cmu.edu Cc: Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.b...@aribaud.net --- arch/arm/lib/board.c |2 +- 1 files

Re: [U-Boot] is any bug in cp?

2011-04-15 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear hacklu.uboot, In message 201104151401034442...@gmail.com you wrote: there is some bugs when I cp to flash like this: cp.b addr1 addr2 0x100 when the two addr in the same bank of a flash. it go wrongs finally the date of addr2 is 0x8080808080... cp to another bank of flash is

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] cmd_nvedit.c: clean up with checkpatch

2011-04-15 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday, April 15, 2011 04:25:58 Macpaul Lin wrote: 2011/4/15 Mike Frysinger: On Friday, April 15, 2011 03:02:58 Macpaul Lin wrote: #if !defined(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_EEPROM) \ -!defined(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_FLASH) \ + !defined(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_FLASH) \ not sure

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] cmd_nvedit.c: clean up with checkpatch

2011-04-15 Thread Macpaul Lin
Hi Mike, 2011/4/15 Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org: Do you mean the replacement with space to ident? According to the 2.6.38.1's checkpatch, it reported: WARNING: please, no spaces at the start of a line this particular check has already been posted upstream as generally causing more harm

Re: [U-Boot] is any bug in cp?

2011-04-15 Thread hacklu.uboot
em.. how linux does that? does linux read the data to mem first before it write to the same bank of a nor flash? thanks much~ -- hacklu.uboot 2011-04-15 - 发件人:Wolfgang Denk

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/5] Add Ethernet hardware MAC address framework to usbnet

2011-04-15 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Le 15/04/2011 10:25, Mike Frysinger a écrit : On Friday, April 15, 2011 04:13:11 Albert ARIBAUD wrote: What I disagree upon is that just because they're tools we should disregard their warnings i never said any such thing -mike My bad. What I disagree upon is that just because they're tools

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] cmd_nvedit.c: clean up with checkpatch

2011-04-15 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Mike Frysinger, In message 201104150453.21441.vap...@gentoo.org you wrote: On Friday, April 15, 2011 03:02:58 Macpaul Lin wrote: #if !defined(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_EEPROM) \ -!defined(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_FLASH) \ + !defined(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_FLASH) \ not

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] cmd_nvedit.c: clean up with checkpatch

2011-04-15 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday, April 15, 2011 06:09:12 Wolfgang Denk wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: On Friday, April 15, 2011 03:02:58 Macpaul Lin wrote: #if !defined(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_EEPROM) \ -!defined(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_FLASH) \ + !defined(CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_FLASH) \

Re: [U-Boot] is any bug in cp?

2011-04-15 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear =?utf-8?B?aGFja2x1LnVib290?=, In message 201104151715238470...@gmail.com you wrote: em.. how linux does that? What exactly are you doing in Linux? Are we talking about user-space access through a file sytem (and thus block devices) based on the MTD layer? Or about raw access to the flash

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] xilinx_emaclite.c ping-pong macro names

2011-04-15 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear alain.pet...@space.unibe.ch, In message 20110415124815.1253591nkjx5a...@mail.unibe.ch you wrote: The macro name configuring Ping/Pong didn't match. It has been checked on a Spartan3e Starterkit. This should probably be part of the commit message. Your patch has a number of coding

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] xilinx_emaclite.c ping-pong macro names

2011-04-15 Thread alain . peteut
Please find attached the checked patch. Sorry for the inconvenience. Kind regards, Alain Quoting Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de: Dear alain.pet...@space.unibe.ch, In message 20110415124815.1253591nkjx5a...@mail.unibe.ch you wrote: The macro name configuring Ping/Pong didn't match. It has been

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4] Add DIG297 board and OMAP3 fixes

2011-04-15 Thread Luca Ceresoli
Hi all, this patch series cleans up some OMAP3 stuff and adds DIG297 board support. New in v4: - patch 2 gets rid of some ugly extern variables in mem.c; - patch 3 creates a new file for register definitions (inspired by the pxa and imx code base), and defines GPMC_CONFIGx register values.

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] ARMV7: OMAP3: Fix preprocessor check for CONFIG_OMAP34XX

2011-04-15 Thread Luca Ceresoli
CONFIG_OMAP34XX must be checked for existence, not value. Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli luca.ceres...@comelit.it Cc: Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de Cc: Albert Aribaud albert.arib...@free.fr Cc: Sandeep Paulraj s-paul...@ti.com --- Changes in v2: - this patch is new in v2. Changes in v3: none.

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] ARMV7: OMAP3: Cleanup extern variables in mem.c

2011-04-15 Thread Luca Ceresoli
Removed boot_flash_* extern variables. boot_flash_type was totally unused. The other ones were actually constants, so they have been replaced with #defines in the board config files. Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli luca.ceres...@comelit.it Cc: Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de Cc: Albert Aribaud

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] ARMV7: OMAP3: Add GPMC_CONFIGx register value definitions

2011-04-15 Thread Luca Ceresoli
Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli luca.ceres...@comelit.it --- Changes in v4: - this patch is new in v4. arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap3/omap3-regs.h | 95 ++ 1 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap3/omap3-regs.h

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/4] ARMV7: OMAP3: Fix preprocessor check for CONFIG_OMAP34XX

2011-04-15 Thread Luca Ceresoli
CONFIG_OMAP34XX must be checked for existence, not value. Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli luca.ceres...@comelit.it Cc: Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de Cc: Albert Aribaud albert.arib...@free.fr Cc: Sandeep Paulraj s-paul...@ti.com --- Changes in v2: - this patch is new in v2. Changes in v3: none.

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 0/4] Add DIG297 board and OMAP3 fixes

2011-04-15 Thread Luca Ceresoli
Hi all, this patch series cleans up some OMAP3 stuff and adds DIG297 board support. New in v4: - patch 2 gets rid of some ugly extern variables in mem.c; - patch 3 creates a new file for register definitions (inspired by the pxa and imx code base), and defines GPMC_CONFIGx register values.

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] ARMV7: OMAP3: Add support for Comelit DIG297 board

2011-04-15 Thread Luca Ceresoli
Board support for the DIG297 board manufactured by Comelit Group SpA. It is a custom board based on the BeagleBoard http://beagleboard.org/ by Texas Instruments. The board support is based on the BeagleBoard implementation. Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli luca.ceres...@comelit.it Cc: Wolfgang Denk

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 4/4] ARMV7: OMAP3: Add support for Comelit DIG297 board

2011-04-15 Thread Luca Ceresoli
Board support for the DIG297 board manufactured by Comelit Group SpA. It is a custom board based on the BeagleBoard http://beagleboard.org/ by Texas Instruments. The board support is based on the BeagleBoard implementation. Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli luca.ceres...@comelit.it Cc: Wolfgang Denk

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 3/4] ARMV7: OMAP3: Add GPMC_CONFIGx register value definitions

2011-04-15 Thread Luca Ceresoli
Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli luca.ceres...@comelit.it --- Changes in v4: - this patch is new in v4. arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap3/omap3-regs.h | 95 ++ 1 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/asm/arch-omap3/omap3-regs.h

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 2/4] ARMV7: OMAP3: Cleanup extern variables in mem.c

2011-04-15 Thread Luca Ceresoli
Removed boot_flash_* extern variables. boot_flash_type was totally unused. The other ones were actually constants, so they have been replaced with #defines in the board config files. Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli luca.ceres...@comelit.it Cc: Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de Cc: Albert Aribaud

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] at91: reworked support for otc570 board

2011-04-15 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
After relocation rework, the meesc and otc570 board support was broken. This patch will fix the otc570 board. Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski daniel.gorsulow...@esd.eu --- This patch is based on u-boot-atmel/rework101229 branch (minus the last 5 patches) plus the 'at91: fixed at91sam9263

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] cpu9260: update board support

2011-04-15 Thread Eric Bénard
Hi, On 03/04/2011 18:35, Eric Bénard wrote: - update to new relocation code - switch to boards.cfg - get rid of LEGACY (still a little hack in .h to compile) - add nand boot configuration - boot tested for the following configurations : 9260 (64MB RAM nor boot) 9260_nand (64MB

Re: [U-Boot] is any bug in cp?

2011-04-15 Thread Charles Krinke
This makes sense as one should *not* copy from one sector in a flash to the same sector in a flash. Flash is erased in sectors, usually 128K and should be treated as a complete sector. The cp command is usually used to copy from RAM to FLASH or from FLASH to RAM. What you are doing seems

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V1 1/1] MX5: Keep L2 cache enabled before jump to kernel

2011-04-15 Thread Stefano Babic
On 04/13/2011 03:25 PM, Jason Liu wrote: Hi Jason, Currently, Linux kernel does not do any L2 cache enable Operation.So,Keep L2 cache enabled(L2EN=1) in the u-boot before Jump to the Linux Kernel and thus L2 cache can be effectively used in Linux Kernel. If the cache is not active in the

[U-Boot] [PATCH] MIPS: Introduce --gc-sections for MIPS

2011-04-15 Thread daniel . schwierzeck
All architectures but MIPS are using --gc-sections on final linking. This patch introduces that feature for MIPS to reduce the memory and flash footprint. Signed-off-by: Daniel Schwierzeck daniel.schwierz...@googlemail.com Cc: Shinya Kuribayashi skuri...@pobox.com Cc: Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] MIPS: Introduce --gc-sections for MIPS

2011-04-15 Thread Shinya Kuribayashi
On 04/16/2011 12:16 AM, daniel.schwierz...@googlemail.com wrote: All architectures but MIPS are using --gc-sections on final linking. This patch introduces that feature for MIPS to reduce the memory and flash footprint. Signed-off-by: Daniel Schwierzeck daniel.schwierz...@googlemail.com Cc:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V1 1/1] MX5: Keep L2 cache enabled before jump to kernel

2011-04-15 Thread Jason Liu
Hi, Stefano, 2011/4/15 Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de: On 04/13/2011 03:25 PM, Jason Liu wrote: Hi Jason, Currently, Linux kernel does not do any L2 cache enable Operation.So,Keep L2 cache enabled(L2EN=1) in the u-boot before Jump to the Linux Kernel and thus L2 cache can be effectively

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] MX5:MX53: support for freescale MX53LOCO board

2011-04-15 Thread Stefano Babic
On 04/14/2011 10:12 AM, Jason Liu wrote: Hi, Stefano, Hi Jason, Please drop the mx53loco board support patch from u-boot-imx master branch and I will resubmit the following patches soon since the merge window will be closed soon. Ok - I'll do it. (1) clean-up patch:factor out the boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] MX5:MX53: support for freescale MX53LOCO board

2011-04-15 Thread Jason Liu
Hi, Stefano, 2011/4/16 Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de: On 04/14/2011 10:12 AM, Jason Liu wrote: Hi, Stefano, Hi Jason, Please drop the mx53loco board support patch from u-boot-imx master branch and I will resubmit the following patches soon since the merge window will be closed soon. Ok -

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/6] EA20: do not use subpage write for NAND

2011-04-15 Thread Stefano Babic
On 04/13/2011 06:24 PM, Scott Wood wrote: Hi Scott, Davinci-specific #defines do not belong in nand_base.c[1]. The controller driver should be able to set this isn't supported options just as well as the chip data -- I just don't think it should be limited to this specific one. surely, but

[U-Boot] [PATCH V4 1/2] MX5: factor out boot cause funciton to common code

2011-04-15 Thread Jason Liu
From: Liu Hui-R64343 r64...@freescale.com factor out boot cause funciton to common code to avoid the duplicate code in each board support package Signed-off-by: Jason Liu r64...@freescale.com --- changes since v3: - add full boot reset cause --- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/mx5/soc.c | 27

[U-Boot] [PATCH V4 2/2] MX53: support for freescale MX53LOCO board

2011-04-15 Thread Jason Liu
From: Liu Hui-R64343 r64...@freescale.com This patch add initial support for freescale MX53LOCO board. Network(FEC),SD/MMC, UART have been supported by this patch. Signed-off-by: Jason Liu r64...@freescale.com --- changes since v3: - include other two small patch into this commit, mx53loco: set

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc83xx fdt: do not adjust clock frequency of external UARTs

2011-04-15 Thread Timur Tabi
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 7:30 AM, David Müller d.muel...@elsoft.ch wrote: The current 83xx FDT implementation adjusts the clock frequency of all 16550 UARTs found in the device tree. This behaviour is ok for the UARTs which are part of the SoC, but wrong for any additional external UART. Just

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] ARM: mx31: Print the silicon version

2011-04-15 Thread Stefano Babic
On 04/12/2011 04:18 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote: Use the same method of the Linux kernel to print the MX31 silicon version on boot. Tested on a MX31PDK with a 2.0 silicon, where it shows: CPU: Freescale i.MX31 rev 2.0 at 531 MHz Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/3] MX31: Introduce get_reset_cause()

2011-04-15 Thread Stefano Babic
On 04/15/2011 04:21 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote: Introduce get_reset_cause() function to indicate the source of the reset. Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com --- arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/mx31/generic.c | 26 ++

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 1/2] MX5: factor out boot cause funciton to common code

2011-04-15 Thread Stefano Babic
On 04/15/2011 02:47 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote: +char *get_reset_cause(void) +{ +u32 cause; +struct src *src_regs = (struct src *)SRC_BASE_ADDR; + +cause = readl(src_regs-srsr); You need to mask the 7 LSB of SRSR register. If you don´t bit 16 can still affect its result. Why

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 6/6] EA20: do not use subpage write for NAND

2011-04-15 Thread Scott Wood
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:34:48 +0200 Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de wrote: On 04/13/2011 06:24 PM, Scott Wood wrote: Hi Scott, Davinci-specific #defines do not belong in nand_base.c[1]. The controller driver should be able to set this isn't supported options just as well as the chip data

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Modify NAND loader makefiles to compile NAND_SPL linker script

2011-04-15 Thread Scott Wood
On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 12:52:32PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: From: Dipen Dudhat dipen.dud...@freescale.com Modify eLBC based platform's NAND loader Makefile to preprocess nand loader linker script and then use it. Signed-off-by: Dipen Dudhat dipen.dud...@freescale.com CC: Scott Wood

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] powerpc/85xx: Integrated Flash Controller NAND support

2011-04-15 Thread Scott Wood
On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 12:59:04PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: From: Dipen Dudhat dipen.dud...@freescale.com Add nand_spl and 8-bit NAND support on IFC controller. Signed-off-by: Dipen Dudhat dipen.dud...@freescale.com CC: Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com ---

[U-Boot] Pull request: nand flash

2011-04-15 Thread Scott Wood
The following changes since commit 73e5476e1edf1b860dbd9b5fc21ef32ac1b551ba: MAINTAINERS: fix email address case (2011-04-13 22:40:51 +0200) are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx.de/u-boot-nand-flash.git master Alex Waterman (1): nand_spl: Fix large page

[U-Boot] [PATCH] sf: kick watchdog when polling

2011-04-15 Thread Mike Frysinger
From: Patrick Sestier psest...@mircom.com The status polling can take a while, so make sure we kick the watchdog after each successful poll. Signed-off-by: Patrick Sestier psest...@mircom.com Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org --- drivers/mtd/spi/spi_flash.c |3 +++ 1 files

[U-Boot] [PATCH V2 0/2] mmc: add partition support

2011-04-15 Thread Lei Wen
V2: use the mmc_cur_dev to replace explicitly specify the dev num in mmc command. change the switch parittion command per Wolfgang's suggestion Lei Wen (2): cmd_mmc: eliminate device num in the mmc command mmc: enable partition switch fucntion for emmc common/cmd_mmc.c | 198

[U-Boot] [PATCH V2 1/2] cmd_mmc: eliminate device num in the mmc command

2011-04-15 Thread Lei Wen
From now on, follow the general rule mmc dev [dev] to change the mmc command applied device, like ide and usb... Signed-off-by: Lei Wen lei...@marvell.com --- Changelog: V2: use the mmc_cur_dev to replace explicitly specify the dev num in mmc command. common/cmd_mmc.c | 173

[U-Boot] [PATCH V2 2/2] mmc: enable partition switch fucntion for emmc

2011-04-15 Thread Lei Wen
For emmc, it may has upto 7 partitions: two boot partitions, one user partition, one RPMB partition and four general purpose partitions. (Refer to JESD84-A44.pdf/page 154) As bootloader may need to read out or reflashing images on those different partitions, it is better to enable the partition

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/3] ARM: MX31: Fix file name label

2011-04-15 Thread Fabio Estevam
Commit 5d2c154 (IMX: MX31: Cleanup include files and drop nasty #ifdef in drivers) renamed mx31-imx-regs.h to imx-regs.h. Change the file label accordingly. Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com --- This patch series should were applied in the u-boot-arm tree. It also needs

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 2/3] MX31: Introduce get_reset_cause()

2011-04-15 Thread Fabio Estevam
Introduce get_reset_cause() function to indicate the source of the reset. Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com --- arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/mx31/generic.c| 26 + arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx31/sys_proto.h | 29 2

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 3/3] MX31: mx31pdk: Print the cause of reset

2011-04-15 Thread Fabio Estevam
Print the cause of reset and also change the board name to only 'MX31PDK'. Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com --- board/freescale/mx31pdk/mx31pdk.c |3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/board/freescale/mx31pdk/mx31pdk.c

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/3] ARM: MX31: Fix file name label

2011-04-15 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Fabio, Le 16/04/2011 04:54, Fabio Estevam a écrit : Commit 5d2c154 (IMX: MX31: Cleanup include files and drop nasty #ifdef in drivers) renamed mx31-imx-regs.h to imx-regs.h. Change the file label accordingly. Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevamfabio.este...@freescale.com --- This patch

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/3] ARM: MX31: Fix file name label

2011-04-15 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Le 16/04/2011 04:54, Fabio Estevam a écrit : Commit 5d2c154 (IMX: MX31: Cleanup include files and drop nasty #ifdef in drivers) renamed mx31-imx-regs.h to imx-regs.h. Change the file label accordingly. Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevamfabio.este...@freescale.com --- This patch series should

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 3/3] MX31: mx31pdk: Print the cause of reset

2011-04-15 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Le 16/04/2011 04:54, Fabio Estevam a écrit : Print the cause of reset and also change the board name to only 'MX31PDK'. Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevamfabio.este...@freescale.com --- board/freescale/mx31pdk/mx31pdk.c |3 ++- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Replace obsolete e-mail address

2011-04-15 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Le 13/04/2011 21:42, Albert Aribaud a écrit : From: Albert (U-Boot)albert.u.b...@aribaud.net Signed-off-by: Albert (U-Boot)albert.u.b...@aribaud.net --- Shamelessly applied to u-boot-arm. Amicalement, -- Albert. ___ U-Boot mailing list

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/4] ftsdmc020: move ftsdmc020.h to include/faraday

2011-04-15 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi MacPaul Lin, Le 22/03/2011 06:01, Macpaul Lin a écrit : Move the header file ftsdmc020.h (SDRAM Controller) to include/faraday folder. This change will let other SoC which also use ftsdmc020 could share the same header file. Signed-off-by: Macpaul Linmacp...@andestech.com --- Changes

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/4] ftsmc020: move ftsmc020 static mem controller to driver/mtd

2011-04-15 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi MacMaul Lin, Le 22/03/2011 06:01, Macpaul Lin a écrit : Move the header file and definitions of ftsmc020 static memory control unit from a320 SoC folder to drivers/mtd folder. This change will let other SoC which also use ftsmc020 could share the same header file. Signed-off-by:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] mpc83xx fdt: do not adjust clock frequency of external UARTs

2011-04-15 Thread David Müller (ELSOFT AG)
Hello Timur Tabi wrote: Just out of curiosity -- do you have an example of a device tree with an external UART? Yes. Dave ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot