On 04/21/11 02:52, Jason Kridner wrote:
Based on patches from Syed Mohammed Khasim (kha...@ti.com).
Configures the output of the BeagleBoard DVI to be orange.
Configures the output of the BeagleBoard S-Video to be a colorbar.
---
Updates for this version
* Rebased on u-boot-ti.
On 04/21/11 02:52, Jason Kridner wrote:
Remove __attribute__ ((packed)) to prevent byte access to soc
registers in some gcc versions.
Having patches to enable ehci for the BeagleBoard lying around for
several month, this one was the show-stopper.
Credits have to go to Laine Walker-Avina
From: Mingkai Hu mingkai...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Mingkai Hu mingkai...@freescale.com
Singed-off-by: Jerry Huang chang-ming.hu...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Shaohui Xie b21...@freescale.com
Cc: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
---
changes for v2:
remove #ifdef wrapper and refactor
espi flash read returns invalid data if the read length is more than 0xFFFA
bytes, it supports maximum transaction of 2^16 bytes at a time, resister
spcom[TRANLEN] is 16 bits. If the transaction length is greater than 0x,
it need to be split into multiple transactions.
Signed-off-by: Shaohui
Hi Simon, Wolfgang,
On Thursday 21 April 2011 12:04 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Albert ARIBAUDalbert.arib...@free.fr
wrote:
Le 25/03/2011 17:12, Aneesh V a écrit :
Another problem I have with relocation is that it makes debugging with
JTAG debugers more
Hi,
This patchset adds support for a new board SMDKV310, based on S5PV310 SOC.
This SOC is very similar to S5PC210 SOC, hence we are re-using this SOC code.
Specific changes in PATCH v2 are mention in specific patch files.
Chander Kashyap (2):
ARMV7: Add support for Samsung SMDKV310 Board
SMDKV310 board is based on Samsung S5PV310 SOC. This SOC is very much
similar to S5PC210.
Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap chander.kash...@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Tushar Behera tushar.beh...@linaro.org
---
Changes for v2:
- Coding Style Cleanup
- Removed unwanted macros from board
Added MMC SPL boot support for SMDKV310. This framework design is
based on nand_spl support.
Signed-off-by: Chander Kashyap chander.kash...@linaro.org
---
Makefile|9 ++
spl/board/samsung/smdkv310/Makefile | 103 +++
Signed-off-by: Shaohui Xie b21...@freescale.com
Cc: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
---
drivers/mtd/spi/spansion.c |9 +
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/spansion.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/spansion.c
index a3401b3..8835e96 100644
---
Hi all,
Call it a detail, but I see that get_ram_size() calls sometime qualify
their argument as volatile and sometimes not, and this makes checkpatch
complain that volatiles are Bad(tm), which I would like to get fixed.
The prototype for get_ram_size() in is
longget_ram_size
Hello Sir,
Good day to you.
This is May from DesirePower International Group in Shenzhen, China, which is
specialized in LED lighting for several years.
Top quality with low price of LED lights for you. E-catalogue is free for your
learning if you are in need.
Would you just take several
On Wednesday 12 January 2011 10:14:42 Ricardo Ribalda Delgado wrote:
Old address of RESET_VECTOR were overwritten by the bss sector, making
impossible its run from xmd.
Applied to u-boot-ppc4xx/master. Thanks.
Cheers,
Stefan
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk Detlev
On Wednesday 06 April 2011 13:53:42 Dirk Eibach wrote:
Dirk Eibach (8):
ppc4xx: Improve DLVision-10G PLL setup
ppc4xx: Improve video board detection
hwmon: Extend lm63.c to support LM64
ppc4xx: Adapt DLVision 10G to new FPGA firmware
ppc4xx: Set DLVision 10G osd position to linux
Hi Wolfgang,
please pull the following ppc4xx patches:
The following changes since commit 735eb0f0e66b544b1dfaf6c43ce6e4bd9ae64b5e:
tools/env: fix redundant env flag comparison (2011-04-21 00:25:08 +0200)
are available in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-ppc4xx.git
Hi MacPaul,
Le 21/04/2011 04:57, Macpaul Lin a écrit :
HI Albert,
2011/4/16 Albert ARIBAUDalbert.u.b...@aribaud.net:
Please resend a V3 patch set of the four patches, even if two of them are
unchanged. Make sure all patches have their history updated, even the
unchanged patches ('V3: no
Le 20/04/2011 21:26, Michael Schwingen a écrit :
On 04/20/2011 07:49 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Le 20/04/2011 19:15, Michael Schwingen a écrit :
Why don't we pull the original master mach-types file, and generate the
required .h file(s) during make using the same (or a similar) script
Linux
Hi Albert,
2011/4/21 Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.b...@aribaud.net:
91478 and 91479, though, I don't see their point: they are adding a file
that obviously no one used before it was added, but that no one uses now.
These header files are dead code, and should only be added in a patch where
other
Hi there,
I just started to work with the u-boot sources for my bachelor thesis.
There was a part in the source which irritated me a bit.
I talk about ./arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/timer.c
It's about that part of code:
#define TIMER_LOAD_VAL 0x
int timer_init(void)
{
/*
Adding u-boot list seem to have missed it in my reply.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Jason Kridner jkrid...@beagleboard.orgwrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Jason Kridner,
In message
On Thursday, April 21, 2011 5:44 PM, Simon Schwarz wrote:
Hi there,
[...]
It's about that part of code:
#define TIMER_LOAD_VAL 0x
IIRC there was a patch which corrected this reload value to 0.
Regards,
Vaibhav
___
U-Boot mailing list
On Sunday 10 April 2011 22:06:29 Mike Frysinger wrote:
The M29W800DT parts also report their geometry with the sector layout
reversed. So add that ID to the flash_fixup_stm function.
Otherwise, we get:
bfin flinfo
Bank # 1: CFI conformant FLASH (16 x 16) Size: 1 MB in 19 Sectors
AMD
On Monday 11 April 2011 14:16:19 Heiko Schocher wrote:
tested on the a4m072 board with a S29GL512P flash.
flinfo without this patch
Bank # 1: CFI conformant flash (16 x 16) Size: 32 MB in 256 Sectors
AMD Standard command set, Manufacturer ID: 0x01, Device ID: 0x227E
Erase timeout:
On Tuesday 12 April 2011 09:59:04 Aaron Williams wrote:
I ran into a problem where the reset was failing except when I enabled
debugging support. After talking with Garret Swalling at Spansion I
was told that the GL-N series of devices require a 500ns wait for the
reset to complete. The
Hi Wolfgang,
please pull the following patches:
The following changes since commit 735eb0f0e66b544b1dfaf6c43ce6e4bd9ae64b5e:
tools/env: fix redundant env flag comparison (2011-04-21 00:25:08 +0200)
are available in the git repository at:
git://www.denx.de/git/u-boot-cfi-flash.git master
Hi Wolfgang,
Dear Graeme Russ,
In message BANLkTimdJkETWEOrJFuxq4hN8gG+DvY=-a...@mail.gmail.com you wrote:
What about my other suggestion - A checkpatch summary with an expalation
for any warnings or errors? See for example my heads-up for checkpatch
warnings -
Hi Scott,
I vote for checkpatch is a tool that can help you find some style problems,
but is imperfect, and the things it complains about are of varying
importance. If you insist on zero warnings, what's the difference between
a warning and an error? And will there then be a U-Boot-specific
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 04:29:17PM +0200, Detlev Zundel wrote:
What about the problem with checkpatch errors in current code, i.e. the
origin of this sentence:
Also warnings produced for context lines (i.e. existing code) rather
than actual changes can also be ignored.
How about
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Jason Kridner jkrid...@beagleboard.orgwrote:
Adding u-boot list seem to have missed it in my reply.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Jason Kridner
jkrid...@beagleboard.orgwrote:
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 6:04 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear
At 10:49 21.04.2011 -0400, Eric Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 04:29:17PM +0200, Detlev Zundel wrote:
What about the problem with checkpatch errors in current code, i.e. the
origin of this sentence:
Also warnings produced for context lines (i.e. existing code) rather
than actual
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 04:56:36PM +0200, Fabian Cenedese wrote:
Is that even possible? The cosmetic patch itself will be surrounded
by context lines which may fire up a warning. So these lines need
to be changed as well to satisy checkpatch. But this new patch
will again include several
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Aneesh V ane...@ti.com wrote:
Hi Simon, Wolfgang,
On Thursday 21 April 2011 12:04 AM, Simon Glass wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Albert ARIBAUDalbert.arib...@free.fr
wrote:
Le 25/03/2011 17:12, Aneesh V a écrit :
Another problem I have with
Confirm the receipt of $50,000 from western
union by filling the details to the Transfer
Manager Mr.Eddy James:
WESTERN UNION WINNER BIODATAS Form
1. Name:
2. Address
3. Country :
4. Phone Number
5. Occupation:
6. Sex :..
7. Age
___
U-Boot mailing
Hi Fabi,
At 10:49 21.04.2011 -0400, Eric Cooper wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 04:29:17PM +0200, Detlev Zundel wrote:
What about the problem with checkpatch errors in current code, i.e. the
origin of this sentence:
Also warnings produced for context lines (i.e. existing code) rather
Hi Eric,
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 04:56:36PM +0200, Fabian Cenedese wrote:
Is that even possible? The cosmetic patch itself will be surrounded
by context lines which may fire up a warning. So these lines need
to be changed as well to satisy checkpatch. But this new patch
will again include
Hi Eric,
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 04:29:17PM +0200, Detlev Zundel wrote:
What about the problem with checkpatch errors in current code, i.e. the
origin of this sentence:
Also warnings produced for context lines (i.e. existing code) rather
than actual changes can also be ignored.
How
On 04/15/2011 08:07 PM, Stefano Babic wrote:
On 04/12/2011 04:18 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Use the same method of the Linux kernel to print the MX31 silicon version on
boot.
Tested on a MX31PDK with a 2.0 silicon, where it shows:
CPU: Freescale i.MX31 rev 2.0 at 531 MHz
Signed-off-by:
Drop warnings due to recent commit
ARM: mx31: Print the silicon version
Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de
CC: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com
---
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx31/imx-regs.h |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:29:17 +0200
Detlev Zundel d...@denx.de wrote:
Hi Scott,
I vote for checkpatch is a tool that can help you find some style problems,
but is imperfect, and the things it complains about are of varying
importance. If you insist on zero warnings, what's the difference
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 10:51 PM, Macpaul Lin wrote:
Add support of MX25L4005 and MX25L8005 according to the datasheet
http://www.mct.net/download/macronix/mx25l8005.pdf
This patch has been tested with MX25L4005 and MX25L8005
thanks, added to my sf branch
-mike
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Call it a detail, but I see that get_ram_size() calls sometime qualify
their argument as volatile and sometimes not, and this makes checkpatch
complain that volatiles are Bad(tm), which I would like to get fixed.
The prototype for
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Shaohui Xie wrote:
--- a/include/spi.h
+++ b/include/spi.h
/* Controller-specific definitions: */
/* CONFIG_HARD_SPI triggers SPI bus initialization in PowerPC */
-#ifdef CONFIG_MPC8XXX_SPI
+#if defined(CONFIG_MPC8XXX_SPI) || defined(CONFIG_FSL_ESPI)
#
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 2:05 AM, Shaohui Xie wrote:
espi flash read returns invalid data if the read length is more than 0xFFFA
bytes, it supports maximum transaction of 2^16 bytes at a time, resister
spcom[TRANLEN] is 16 bits. If the transaction length is greater than 0x,
it need to be
On 04/20/2011 12:47 PM, Jason Liu wrote:
The boot cause code has been factor out to soc common
code,we need drop the part from the board support code
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu jason@linaro.org
Hi Jason,
---
board/efikamx/efikamx.c | 30 ++
On 04/20/2011 12:47 PM, Jason Liu wrote:
+int board_mmc_getcd(u8 *cd, struct mmc *mmc)
+{
+ struct fsl_esdhc_cfg *cfg = (struct fsl_esdhc_cfg *)mmc-priv;
+
+ if (cfg-esdhc_base == MMC_SDHC1_BASE_ADDR)
+ *cd = mxc_gpio_get(77); /*GPIO3_13*/
+ else
+ *cd
On 04/16/2011 04:54 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Commit 5d2c154 (IMX: MX31: Cleanup include files and drop nasty #ifdef in
drivers)
renamed mx31-imx-regs.h to imx-regs.h.
Change the file label accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com
---
Applied to u-boot-imx,
Le 21/04/2011 19:02, Mike Frysinger a écrit :
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Call it a detail, but I see that get_ram_size() calls sometime qualify
their argument as volatile and sometimes not, and this makes checkpatch
complain that volatiles are Bad(tm), which I would
On 04/20/2011 12:47 PM, Jason Liu wrote:
factor out boot cause funciton to common code to avoid
the duplicate code in each board support package
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu jason@linaro.org
---
change since v4:
- make common code soc specific
changes since v3:
- add full boot reset
On 04/21/2011 06:09 PM, Stefano Babic wrote:
Drop warnings due to recent commit
ARM: mx31: Print the silicon version
Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de
CC: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com
---
Applied directly to u-boot-imx, as fix.
regards,
Stefano Babic
--
On Apr 21, 2011, at 12:10 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Shaohui Xie wrote:
--- a/include/spi.h
+++ b/include/spi.h
/* Controller-specific definitions: */
/* CONFIG_HARD_SPI triggers SPI bus initialization in PowerPC */
-#ifdef CONFIG_MPC8XXX_SPI
+#if
From: Kim Phillips kim.phill...@freescale.com
versioned SEC properties changed names during development, so
for now search and update LIODNs for both secX.Y and
sec-vX.Y based properties.
Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips kim.phill...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
From: Lei Xu b33...@freescale.com
The workaround for ESDHC111 should also be applied on
P2040/P3041/P5010/P5020 SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Lei Xu b33...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Roy Zang tie-fei.z...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
---
From: Jerry Huang chang-ming.hu...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Jerry Huang chang-ming.hu...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Zhao Chenhui b35...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
---
boards.cfg|1 +
include/configs/P2020DS.h | 28
From: Priyanka Jain priyanka.j...@freescale.com
Also added support to save env to spi flash in case of SPIBOOT.
Signed-off-by: Priyanka Jain priyanka.j...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
---
include/configs/P1_P2_RDB.h | 18 --
1 files
Introduce new CONFIG_SYS_FSL_TBCLK_DIV on 85xx platforms because
different SoCs have different divisor amounts. All the PQ3 parts are
/8, the P4080/P4080 is /16, and P2040/P3041/P5020 are /32.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
---
arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cpu.c|
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 13:54:01 -0500
Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
From: Jerry Huang chang-ming.hu...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Jerry Huang chang-ming.hu...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Zhao Chenhui b35...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
---
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com
---
arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/mx31/generic.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/mx31/generic.c
b/arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/mx31/generic.c
index 18572b9..c17c738 100644
---
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Apr 21, 2011, at 12:10 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Shaohui Xie wrote:
--- a/include/spi.h
+++ b/include/spi.h
/* Controller-specific definitions: */
/* CONFIG_HARD_SPI triggers SPI bus initialization in
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Shaohui Xie wrote:
+struct spi_slave *spi_setup_slave(unsigned int bus, unsigned int cs,
+ unsigned int max_hz, unsigned int mode)
+{
+ ccsr_espi_t *espi = (void *)(CONFIG_SYS_MPC85xx_ESPI_ADDR);
you support just one bus ? that's no fun
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Le 21/04/2011 19:02, Mike Frysinger a écrit :
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Call it a detail, but I see that get_ram_size() calls sometime qualify
their argument as volatile and sometimes not, and this makes
Dear John Rigby,
In message banlktikmfdknysqnoe6kvgjpdk2buxt...@mail.gmail.com you wrote:
If you are discussing requirements for U-Boot, and plan to get these
merged in to mainlineU-Boot one day, it would probably be a good idea
to discuss these plans on the U-Boot mailing list as well -
Dear Stefano Babic,
In message 4db06cbe.8050...@denx.de you wrote:
On 04/20/2011 12:47 PM, Jason Liu wrote:
+int board_mmc_getcd(u8 *cd, struct mmc *mmc)
+{
+ struct fsl_esdhc_cfg *cfg = (struct fsl_esdhc_cfg *)mmc-priv;
+
+ if (cfg-esdhc_base == MMC_SDHC1_BASE_ADDR)
+
Dear =?iso-8859-1?Q?Lo=EFc?= Minier,
In message 20110418094025.gc11...@bee.dooz.org you wrote:
Would it be possible to introduce a QEMU Versatile board in U-Boot
derived from the regular Versatile board's config? It would disable
the things that aren't (yet) supported in QEMU or too
Dear Simon Glass,
In message banlktikgucjpun2rhs2t2nyq4_kb9gk...@mail.gmail.com you wrote:
+ eth = usb_eth[usb_max_eth_dev].eth_dev;
Index for eth is usb_max_eth_dev.
@@ -100,7 +102,10 @@ static void probe_valid_drivers(struct usb_device *
dev)
*
Dear Simon Glass,
In message BANLkTin=5wsszPvwDW_q=Vb44ep0zmP=k...@mail.gmail.com you wrote:
Thanks, yes - have done a better rebase so can test properly now.
(where do I get ppc_8xx-gcc so I can use MAKEALL?)
ELDK is your friend.
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering
On 22/04/11 02:10, Scott Wood wrote:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 16:29:17 +0200
Detlev Zundel d...@denx.de wrote:
Hi Scott,
I vote for checkpatch is a tool that can help you find some style problems,
but is imperfect, and the things it complains about are of varying
importance. If you insist on
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Simon Glass,
In message banlktikgucjpun2rhs2t2nyq4_kb9gk...@mail.gmail.com you wrote:
+ eth = usb_eth[usb_max_eth_dev].eth_dev;
Index for eth is usb_max_eth_dev.
@@ -100,7 +102,10 @@ static void
On Apr 21, 2011, at 4:25 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Shaohui Xie wrote:
+struct spi_slave *spi_setup_slave(unsigned int bus, unsigned int cs,
+ unsigned int max_hz, unsigned int mode)
+{
+ ccsr_espi_t *espi = (void
On Apr 21, 2011, at 4:20 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Apr 21, 2011, at 12:10 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 2:04 AM, Shaohui Xie wrote:
--- a/include/spi.h
+++ b/include/spi.h
/* Controller-specific definitions: */
/*
What else? I know one issue maybe why does this need to exist when
other solutions exist. I think that since Android uses it, it is
somewhat of a de facto standard.
Oh. Android uses it. It must be The Right Thing (TM), then, I guess.
Probably like some of the Linux kernel code they use.
Hi, Stefano,
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 1:43 AM, Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de wrote:
On 04/20/2011 12:47 PM, Jason Liu wrote:
+int board_mmc_getcd(u8 *cd, struct mmc *mmc)
+{
+ struct fsl_esdhc_cfg *cfg = (struct fsl_esdhc_cfg *)mmc-priv;
+
+ if (cfg-esdhc_base == MMC_SDHC1_BASE_ADDR)
From: vapierfil...@gmail.com [mailto:vapierfil...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Mike Frysinger
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 5:25 AM
To: Xie Shaohui-B21989
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Gala Kumar-B11780; Zang Roy-R61911; Hu Mingkai-
B21284
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2][v2] powerpc: eSPI and eSPI controller
-Original Message-
From: vapierfil...@gmail.com [mailto:vapierfil...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
Mike Frysinger
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2011 1:10 AM
To: Xie Shaohui-B21989
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Gala Kumar-B11780; Zang Roy-R61911; Hu Mingkai-
B21284
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2][v2] powerpc:
Dear All,
I am presently trying to port UBI filesystem for TQ2440 board, my u-boot do
not support the UBI command.
Please let me wither we can do copy ubi image without u-boot's UBI
support.if there is work around let me know this can be done.
I tried nand write.e command support by my uboot to
Hi, Stefano,
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Jason Hui jason@linaro.org wrote:
Hi, Stefano,
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 1:43 AM, Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de wrote:
On 04/20/2011 12:47 PM, Jason Liu wrote:
+int board_mmc_getcd(u8 *cd, struct mmc *mmc)
+{
+ struct fsl_esdhc_cfg *cfg
Hi, Stefano,
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 1:18 AM, Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de wrote:
On 04/20/2011 12:47 PM, Jason Liu wrote:
The boot cause code has been factor out to soc common
code,we need drop the part from the board support code
Signed-off-by: Jason Liu jason@linaro.org
Hi Jason,
Le 22/04/2011 00:28, Mike Frysinger a écrit :
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Le 21/04/2011 19:02, Mike Frysinger a écrit :
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 3:09 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Call it a detail, but I see that get_ram_size() calls sometime qualify
their argument as
76 matches
Mail list logo
