Hi Aneesh,
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Aneesh V ane...@ti.com wrote:
Hi Grame,
On Wednesday 15 June 2011 06:12 PM, Graeme Russ wrote:
On 15/06/11 22:04, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Aneesh V,
In message4df89102.9040...@ti.com you wrote:
Will you accept something like this?
a_val =
Hi Simon,
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Graeme,
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
BTW should the deltas return a signed value?
No - times are unsigned utilising the entire range of the u32 so (to -
Dear Wolfgang,
This is in continuation of our discussion in the following threads:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/99795
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/99785
I think this discussion now needs a dedicated thread.
To make sure I understand your
Dear Graeme Russ,
In message banlktik3cxemzu0qpxdlsqmtk-abeod...@mail.gmail.com you wrote:
Now, that being said, I see no reason not to do the following if I had,
for example, multiple serial port configuration registers which are all
identical:
/* num data bits is stored in bits 2-4 of
For Marvell sheeva 88SV331xV5 core, it has one special cache asm code
to do the clean and valid in one line.
Signed-off-by: Lei Wen lei...@marvell.com
---
arch/arm/lib/cache.c |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/cache.c b/arch/arm/lib/cache.c
-Original Message-
From: Lei Wen [mailto:lei...@marvell.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 2:34 PM
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Prafulla Wadaskar; wadas...@marvell.com;
Prafulla Wadaskar; adrian.w...@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: add marvell specific cache operation
For Marvell
Hi Prafulla,
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Prafulla Wadaskar prafu...@marvell.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Lei Wen [mailto:lei...@marvell.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 2:34 PM
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Prafulla Wadaskar; wadas...@marvell.com;
Prafulla Wadaskar;
Dear Aneesh,
In message 4df9b9e0.8020...@ti.com you wrote:
To make sure I understand your new proposals, let me consolidate them
here. Please correct me if I am wrong. Also, in the end I have some
questions about your new proposal. Some of the questions are getting
into the details. But I
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:10:30 -0700, Prafulla Wadaskar prafu...@marvell.com
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de]
On Behalf Of Philip Hands
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 3:24 PM
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject:
On 15/06/11 22:51, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Graeme Russ,
In message 4df8a8cf.5000...@gmail.com you wrote:
And to set the value then you have:
reg = ~a_mask; /* Clear a_val */
reg |= (a_val a_shift) a_mask; /* Set new a_val */
This could be done
On 16/06/11 18:15, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Graeme Russ,
In message banlktik3cxemzu0qpxdlsqmtk-abeod...@mail.gmail.com you wrote:
Now, that being said, I see no reason not to do the following if I had,
for example, multiple serial port configuration registers which are all
identical:
/*
-Original Message-
From: Holger Brunck [mailto:holger.bru...@keymile.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 1:42 PM
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Cc: Holger Brunck; Valentin Longchamp; Prafulla Wadaskar; Heiko Schocher
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] arm/kirkwood: if CONFIG_SOFT_I2C is set don't
-Original Message-
From: Holger Brunck [mailto:holger.bru...@keymile.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 1:42 PM
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Cc: Holger Brunck; Valentin Longchamp; Prafulla Wadaskar; Heiko Schocher
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm/km: fix u-boot.kwb build breakage
commit
-Original Message-
From: Holger Brunck [mailto:holger.bru...@keymile.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 8:12 PM
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Cc: Valentin Longchamp; Holger Brunck; Prafulla Wadaskar; Heiko Schocher
Subject: [PATCH v3 5/5] arm/km: add support for portl2 board
From:
Hi Albert
Please kindly pull
The following changes since commit 7b2fac7654f7420c2787f74ec3b1540fa3b343e9:
Aneesh V (1):
omap730p2: fix build breaks
are available in the git repository at:
u-boot-marvell.git next branch.
Holger Brunck (4):
arm/kirkwood: if CONFIG_SOFT_I2C is
Attn...
We regret to announce to you that we will be making some vital maintainance on
your email account/general web upgrade. During this process you might have
login problems in signing into your online account, but to prevent this you
have to confirm your account immediately after you
Dear Graeme Russ,
In message 4df9e409.1060...@gmail.com you wrote:
is equivalent except that, as already pointed out, clrsetbits and friends:
a) Are not portable because only ARM and PPC define them which makes
them, by definition, non-standard
They should be added to _any_
Dear Wolfgang,
On Thursday 16 June 2011 04:17 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Aneesh,
In message4df9b9e0.8020...@ti.com you wrote:
To make sure I understand your new proposals, let me consolidate them
here. Please correct me if I am wrong. Also, in the end I have some
questions about your
Dear Aneesh V,
In message 4df9ee03.8010...@ti.com you wrote:
we are also duplicating the structure across different boot media. I
think we should re-organize this as follows:
spl/
spl/common/
spl/mmc/
spl/nand/
spl/onenand/
Can you please extend this to
2011/6/16 Philip Hands p...@hands.com:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:10:30 -0700, Prafulla Wadaskar prafu...@marvell.com
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de]
On Behalf Of Philip Hands
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 3:24 PM
Hi all,
for my MIPS based boards I tested a approach similar to Wolfgang's one
in the last weeks.
My goal was to create a SPL image, that is able to boot from a SPI flash.
The basic idea is to have a spl directory that is used as remote build
directory for all object files
needed for the SPL
Dear all,
Am 16.06.2011 14:55, schrieb Daniel Schwierzeck:
snip
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 12:47 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Aneesh,
snip
We should try to get rid of the need to create symbolic links. If we
use the same source files as for the normal, then we should also
use
On Thursday 16 June 2011 05:45 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Aneesh V,
In message4df9ee03.8010...@ti.com you wrote:
we are also duplicating the structure across different boot media. I
think we should re-organize this as follows:
spl/
spl/common/
spl/mmc/
spl/nand/
Erase is a very basic function since the begin of sd specification is
announced. Although we could write a bulk of full 0xff memory to the
range to take place of erase, it is more convenient and safe to
implement the erase function itself.
Signed-off-by: Lei Wen lei...@marvell.com
---
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:27 PM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Simon,
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Graeme,
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Graeme Russ graeme.r...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
BTW should the deltas return a signed
Hi Daniel,
This looks like an interesting alternative.
On Thursday 16 June 2011 06:25 PM, Daniel Schwierzeck wrote:
Hi all,
for my MIPS based boards I tested a approach similar to Wolfgang's one
in the last weeks.
My goal was to create a SPL image, that is able to boot from a SPI flash.
Hi,
I am picking up on this old thread. My main point is that I think the
armv7 cache implementation is a good start and should go into U-Boot.
Aneesh are you planning another patch set? Also see below:
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:58 AM, Aneesh V ane...@ti.com wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
On Tuesday 17
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Aneesh V ane...@ti.com wrote:
Hi Daniel,
This looks like an interesting alternative.
On Thursday 16 June 2011 06:25 PM, Daniel Schwierzeck wrote:
Hi all,
for my MIPS based boards I tested a approach similar to Wolfgang's one
in the last weeks.
My goal
Hi,
Is it possible for U-Boot to use a system similar to Linux from 2.6
where it prints out the full pathname of each file it is building, and
doesn't change in and out of directories as it builds. Perhaps
including the subdirectory Makefiles instead using make -C? I haven't
looked at how Linux
Nowdays, there are plenty of mmc driver in uboot adopt the sd standard
host design, aka as sdhci. It is better to centralize the common logic
together to better maintenance.
Signed-off-by: Lei Wen lei...@marvell.com
---
drivers/mmc/Makefile |1 +
drivers/mmc/sdhci.c | 433
This could support both armada100 and pantheon serial in the mainline,
while this driver also be tested to support upcoming mg, mmp2 and mmp3
hardware.
Signed-off-by: Lei Wen lei...@marvell.com
---
drivers/mmc/Makefile |1 +
drivers/mmc/sdhci-mv.c | 21 +
2 files
Am 14.06.2011 08:18, schrieb Matthias Weißer:
Hello Wolfgang
Am 23.05.2011 11:03, schrieb Matthias Weisser:
In some cases (e.g. bootm with a elf payload which is already at the right
position) there is a in place copy of data to the same address. Catching this
saves some ms while booting.
On 05/17/11 00:52, r...@efn.org wrote:
Signed-off-by: Rick Bronson r...@efn.org
---
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/timer.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/timer.c
b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/timer.c
index
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 13:38:00 +0530
Aneesh V ane...@ti.com wrote:
New Design Proposed by Wolfgang:
* Have a top-level Makefile in the SPL root-directory - for instance
'nand_spl/Makefile'
* nand_spl/Makefile builds a generic library with the generic source
files at this level.
What is a
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 01:29:12PM -0400, Alex Waterman wrote:
diff --git a/nand_spl/nand_boot.c b/nand_spl/nand_boot.c
index 9545a9a..1d847ef 100644
--- a/nand_spl/nand_boot.c
+++ b/nand_spl/nand_boot.c
@@ -122,10 +122,15 @@ static int nand_is_bad_block(struct mtd_info *mtd, int
block)
I recently dabbled in u-boot and kept track of a few points I found
confusing. I fixed them up to the best of my ability and created some
patches for consideration.
From 9802439149594948e3862b9609ca0e68ab793ecc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christopher Harvey char...@matrox.com
Date: Wed, 15
Hi Igor,
Yes, I have tested this on the AM3715 but not on any other parts.
Cheers,
Rick
On 05/17/11 00:52, r...@efn.org wrote:
Signed-off-by: Rick Bronson r...@efn.org
---
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/timer.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 16:18:46 +0400, Alexei Ozhigov alexei.ozhi...@gmail.com
wrote:
...
I am experiencing the same problem with SATA right now with
v2011.06-rc2 (tried also the latest master). If MVSATA_STATUS_TIMEOUT
in mvsata_ide_initialize_port is ignored, SATA drive is found on the
From 99efc91f7a3d55bcf0e839ae30c286fd08166010 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alex Waterman awater...@dawning.com
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 15:08:36 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] NAND: Add 16bit NAND support for the NDFC
This patch adds support for 16 bit NAND devices attached to the
NDFC on ppc4xx
Dear Daniel Schwierzeck,
In message banlktim9ae2aszklidh53vd+hjpz7gv...@mail.gmail.com you wrote:
The relocate_code and board_init_r functions must not be compiled,
they are not needed anyway. This
can be simply controlled with -DCONFIG_UBOOT_SPL_BUILD.
This is very much wrong. In the
Dear Aneesh V,
In message 4dfa0759.2060...@ti.com you wrote:
Can you please extend this to show the SoC/board directories etc. I
guess they will go under spl/ and not under each media.
Correct, i. e. please add for example:
spl/board/freescale/mx31pdk/
Dear Aneesh V,
In message 4dfa0be1.4060...@ti.com you wrote:
In the last few mails Wolfgang was suggesting re-use of object files
themselves, not the source files. In this respect his approach may be
different from yours. But I think his objective was to avoid the
symbolic link business,
Dear Simon Glass,
In message BANLkTinE=tpvzfdbdje5m79wedznfyv...@mail.gmail.com you wrote:
Is it possible for U-Boot to use a system similar to Linux from 2.6
where it prints out the full pathname of each file it is building, and
doesn't change in and out of directories as it builds. Perhaps
Dear Scott Wood,
In message 20110616114556.7d3c2...@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net you wrote:
What is a generic SPL library, or even a generic NAND SPL library?
There is no code that is shared by all NAND SPLs. The files directly under
nand_spl/ are alternatives that the board makefile can
Dear Christopher Harvey,
In message 4dfa4764.9040...@matrox.com you wrote:
I recently dabbled in u-boot and kept track of a few points I found
confusing. I fixed them up to the best of my ability and created some
patches for consideration.
Please read
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:09:00 +0200
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Scott Wood,
In message 20110616114556.7d3c2...@schlenkerla.am.freescale.net you wrote:
What is a generic SPL library, or even a generic NAND SPL library?
There is no code that is shared by all NAND SPLs. The
Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de writes:
Dear Simon Glass,
In message BANLkTinE=tpvzfdbdje5m79wedznfyv...@mail.gmail.com you wrote:
Is it possible for U-Boot to use a system similar to Linux from 2.6
where it prints out the full pathname of each file it is building, and
doesn't change in and
This patchset adds a GPIO driver for Tegra2 SoC, and enables it for all boards
Changes in V2:
- use 'gpio_pin' enum in gpio.h (Simon Glass review request)
- change 'GPIO_PORT8' to 'GPIO_FULLPORT' (Simon Glass request)
- change 'offset' to 'pin' globally
- enable
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren twar...@nvidia.com
---
Changes in V2:
- enable GPIO for all boards (tegra2-common.h)
Changes in V3:
- enable use of common cmd_gpio
include/configs/tegra2-common.h |2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git
Signed-off-by: Tom Warren twar...@nvidia.com
---
Changes in V2:
- use 'gpio_pin' enum in gpio.h (Simon Glass review request)
- change 'GPIO_PORT8' to 'GPIO_FULLPORT' (Simon Glass request)
- change 'offset' to 'pin' globally
Changes in V3:
- use common cmd_gpio;
Hi Wolfgang,
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote:
Dear Graeme Russ,
In message 4df9e409.1060...@gmail.com you wrote:
is equivalent except that, as already pointed out, clrsetbits and friends:
a) Are not portable because only ARM and PPC define them which
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 19:51:33 Tom Warren wrote:
+int gpio_request(int gp, const char *label)
+{
+ if (gp = MAX_NUM_GPIOS)
+ return -1;
+
+ strncpy(gpio_names[gp].name, label, GPIO_NAME_SIZE);
if the label is =GPIO_NAME_SIZE, the result will not be NUL terminated.
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 18:03:07 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Simon Glass wrote:
Is it possible for U-Boot to use a system similar to Linux from 2.6
where it prints out the full pathname of each file it is building, and
doesn't change in and out of directories as it builds. Perhaps
including
Mike,
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 19:51:33 Tom Warren wrote:
+int gpio_request(int gp, const char *label)
+{
+ if (gp = MAX_NUM_GPIOS)
+ return -1;
+
+ strncpy(gpio_names[gp].name, label,
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 19:03:21 Måns Rullgård wrote:
Aside from the pros and cons of the terse output, getting rid of the
recursive makefiles should speed up the u-boot build dramatically. In a
typical build, it spends a huge amount of time going in and out of
directories only to
All,
Hello again it has been a while since I was here.
I am working on u-boot once again and think I may have found a bug in the
UBIFS sub-system.
The function is ubifs_finddir and the issue is that there seems to be a
free of a pointer in a structure that has already been freed. This is
On Wednesday, June 15, 2011 13:00:32 David Peverley wrote:
I've got an interesting issue with a MIPS board I'm working on. The
uncompressed uImage has been created with a Load Address of 0x8050
and an Entry Point of 0x80504590. This gets TFTP's into RAM at
0x8055b728.
if it's
On Wednesday, June 15, 2011 10:39:53 Simon Guinot wrote:
Hi Prafulla,
please dont top post
It appears that this v10 patch is also wrong. The specified email
encoding is UTF-8. It should be ISO-8859-1 which is the MAINTAINERS file
encoding. It is the reason why the patch is discarded by
On Monday, June 13, 2011 04:11:57 Andreas Bießmann wrote:
The build-timestamp is an quite usable parameter, if it is configurable it
should be opt-out.
goes without saying
When I looked for the char *version_string I found out this is defined in
respective architecture board.c. Shouldn't
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 09:47:56 Lei Wen wrote:
+ } else if (strcmp(argv[1], erase) == 0) {
+ u32 cnt = simple_strtoul(argv[3], NULL, 16);
+ u32 n;
+ struct mmc *mmc = find_mmc_device(dev);
+
+ int blk = simple_strtoul(argv[2], NULL,
Hi Mike,
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 09:47:56 Lei Wen wrote:
+ } else if (strcmp(argv[1], erase) == 0) {
+ u32 cnt = simple_strtoul(argv[3], NULL, 16);
+ u32 n;
+ struct mmc *mmc =
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 23:09:40 Lei Wen wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
this logic really needs to get cleaned up rather than every sub-mmc
command doing the same thing over and over ...
Agree, I would sort it out as a seperate patch.
thanks. this
62 matches
Mail list logo
