[U-Boot] [PATCH V3 2/4] FAT: make use of disk_partition_t.part

2012-10-11 Thread Stephen Warren
From: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com This removes the standalone cur_part_nr variable, opening the way to replacing fat_register_device() with fat_set_blk_dev(). Note that when get_partition_info() fails and we use the entire disk, the correct partition number is 0 (whole disk) not 1 (first

[U-Boot] [PATCH V3 4/4] FAT: implement fat_set_blk_dev(), convert cmd_fat.c

2012-10-11 Thread Stephen Warren
From: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com This makes the FAT filesystem API more consistent with other block-based filesystems. If in the future standard multi-filesystem commands such as ls or load are implemented, having FAT work the same way as other filesystems will be necessary. Convert

[U-Boot] [PATCH V3 3/4] FAT: initialize all fields in cur_part_info, simplify init

2012-10-11 Thread Stephen Warren
From: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com cur_part_info.{name,type} are strings. So, we don't need to memset() the entire thing, just put the NULL-termination in the first byte. Add missing initialization of the bootable and uuid fields. None of these fields are actually used by fat.c. However,

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 1/2] fs: delete unused Makefile

2012-10-11 Thread Stephen Warren
From: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com fs/Makefile is unused. The top-level Makefile sets LIBS-y += fs/xxx and hence causes make to directly descend two directory levels into each individual filesystem, and it never descends into fs/ itself. So, delete this useless file. Signed-off-by: Stephen

[U-Boot] [PATCH V3 1/4] part: add partition number to disk_partition_t

2012-10-11 Thread Stephen Warren
From: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com The FAT filesystem code knows which partition ID it is operating on. Currently, this is passed to fat_register_device() as a parameter. In order to convert FAT to the more standardized fat_set_blk_dev(), the information needs to come from somewhere else,

[U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 2/2] fs: add partition switch libary, implement ls and fsload commands

2012-10-11 Thread Stephen Warren
From: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com Implement ls and fsload commands that act like {fat,ext2}{ls,load}, and transparently handle either file-system. This scheme could easily be extended to other filesystem types; I only didn't do it for zfs because I don't have any filesystems of that type.

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 06/10] x86: coreboot: Tell u-boot about PCI bus 0 when initializing

2012-10-11 Thread Simon Glass
From: Gabe Black gabebl...@chromium.org U-boot needs a host controller or hose to interact with the PCI busses behind them. This change installs a host controller during initialization of the coreboot board which implements some of X86's basic PCI semantics. This relies on some existing generic

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 05/10] x86: coreboot: Move non-board specific files to coreboot arch directory

2012-10-11 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Simon, On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: From: Stefan Reinauer reina...@chromium.org coreboot.c and coreboot_pci.c don't contain board specific but only coreboot specific code. Hence move it to the coreboot directory in arch/x86/cpu (which should

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 02/10] x86: Add initial memory barrier macros

2012-10-11 Thread Simon Glass
These are available on other architectures, so add them on x86. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass s...@chromium.org --- arch/x86/include/asm/io.h |8 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/io.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/io.h index 9b757d4..b12bdd8

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] add nand spl boot for qi_lb60 board

2012-10-11 Thread Xiangfu Liu
Hi Thanks for feedback. PATVH v4 will coming soon. about 'CONFIG_SPL_FRAMEWORK' I don't know this when I working on ben nanonote spl. I think I will stick with this spl for awhile. is there a plan remove drivers/mtd/nand/nand_spl_*.c? Xiangfu On 10/10/2012 05:27 AM, Daniel Schwierzeck

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 04/10] x86: Add some missing includes.

2012-10-11 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Simon, On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: From: Gabe Black gabebl...@chromium.org I suspect these includes were usually available because something else included them earlier or because they were brought in transitively. Signed-off-by: Gabe Black

[U-Boot] u-boot on my board freescale P1010RDB is erased

2012-10-11 Thread randriamanjaka franky
Hi, The u-boot on my board freescale P1010RDB is erased.There was a problem when i want to reflash it. Is there a tool from freescale to put the first u-boot from nand on my board freescale P1010RDB ? Thanks. Best regards. RANDRIAMANJAKA FRANKY Tél. 0033634259173

[U-Boot] mpc85xx debug TLB entry

2012-10-11 Thread Scott Wood
I'm debugging some SPL changes and am still having a hard time following the initial TLB flow. We seem to be creating an entry in AS0 -- how is that not conflicting with the TLB entry we're running from? Why is the debug TLB 256K? Why is it not aligned to 256K? How do you know that

Re: [U-Boot] I2C on mx25

2012-10-11 Thread Fabio Estevam
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:28 PM, Fabio Estevam feste...@gmail.com wrote: Ok, thanks. I will debug more. If you have a chance to test mx25 FEC with 2012.10-rc3, just let me know. Nevermind. Problem solved. It was a config file issue I had. Will submit the patches soon. Thanks for your help,

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot git usage model

2012-10-11 Thread Stephen Warren
On 10/10/2012 12:15 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Hi Stephen, On Tue, 09 Oct 2012 17:04:06 -0600, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote: On 10/09/2012 04:19 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Apart from this, I'm not sure why forbidding fast-forward is a good thing, but if there are benefits,

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 07/10] x86: coreboot: Modify u-boot code to allow building coreboot payload

2012-10-11 Thread Simon Glass
From: Vadim Bendebury vben...@chromium.org This prevents the preprocessor from complaining when processing variadic macros Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury vben...@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Simon Glass s...@chromium.org --- board/chromebook-x86/coreboot/config.mk | 37

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] add nand spl boot for qi_lb60 board

2012-10-11 Thread Xiangfu Liu
Hi Tom Rini I cannot easy find a way to use 'puts' instead 'serial_puts' in my code. any advise will be great. Thanks Xiangfu On 10/10/2012 05:27 AM, Daniel Schwierzeck wrote: I'm happy you've moved to the new SPL infrastructure. A few comments: In general, please check for checkpatch.pl

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 05/10] x86: coreboot: Move non-board specific files to coreboot arch directory

2012-10-11 Thread Simon Glass
From: Stefan Reinauer reina...@chromium.org coreboot.c and coreboot_pci.c don't contain board specific but only coreboot specific code. Hence move it to the coreboot directory in arch/x86/cpu (which should probably be moved out of cpu/ in another commit) Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/10] x86: Patches to enable running U-Boot from coreboot

2012-10-11 Thread Simon Glass
This series carries on from Gabe Black's work to upstream support for running U-Boot from coreboot. Aditional follow-on patches are also required, depending on feedback here. Changes in v2: - Put CONFIG_NO_RESET_CODE into Makefile instead of source files - Add new patch to remove coreboot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/5] EXYNOS4: Enable I2C support

2012-10-11 Thread Piotr Wilczek
Dear Minkyu Kang, The reason I didn't provide the last patch to use the hardware I2C is that on Trats board a software I2C is used to communicate with Fuel Gage. Unfortunately in u-boot soft_i2c and hardware I2C cannot be used at the same time. The patchset was tested on Trats board and it worked

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 08/10] x86: coreboot: Implement recursively scanning PCI busses

2012-10-11 Thread Simon Glass
From: Gabe Black gabebl...@chromium.org A hook is installed to configure PCI bus bridges as they encountered by u-boot. The hook extracts the secondary bus number from the bridge's config space and then recursively scans that bus. On Coreboot, the PCI bus address space has identity mapping with

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] disk: initialize name/part fields when returning a whole disk

2012-10-11 Thread Benoît Thébaudeau
On Wednesday, October 10, 2012 7:57:51 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: When get_device_and_partition() finds a disk without a partition table, under some conditions, it returns a disk_partition_t that describes the entire raw disk. Make sure to initialize all fields in the partition descriptor in

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 4/4] FAT: implement fat_set_blk_dev(), convert cmd_fat.c

2012-10-11 Thread Benoît Thébaudeau
On Wednesday, October 10, 2012 8:14:02 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: This makes the FAT filesystem API more consistent with other block-based filesystems. If in the future standard multi-filesystem commands such as ls or load are implemented, having FAT work the same way as other filesystems

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 09/10] x86: coreboot: Enable LPC TPM and CONFIG_NO_RESET_CODE

2012-10-11 Thread Simon Glass
Coreboot boards have an LPC TPM connected, so enable this. We also need to skip the reset code. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass s...@chromium.org --- include/configs/coreboot.h |6 +- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/coreboot.h

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 01/10] x86: Change board baud_rate to ulong

2012-10-11 Thread Simon Glass
This is a ulong for some architectures and just unsigned for others. Change x86 to be consistent. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass s...@chromium.org --- arch/x86/include/asm/u-boot.h |2 +- common/cmd_bdinfo.c |2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot git usage model

2012-10-11 Thread Stephen Warren
On 10/10/2012 04:02 PM, Scott Wood wrote: ... Ideally once a pull request happens the pull happens quickly. If that doesn't happen, you could reply to the pull request asking that it be ignored in favor of a new pull request, or create a new temporary branch. IMHO pull requests ought to

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 10/10] x86: Remove coreboot start16 code

2012-10-11 Thread Simon Glass
Now that coreboot doesn't need the start16 code, remove it. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass s...@chromium.org --- Changes in v2: - Add new patch to remove coreboot start16 code. board/chromebook-x86/coreboot/coreboot_start16.S | 13 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 03/10] x86: Allow excluding reset vector code from u-boot

2012-10-11 Thread Simon Glass
From: Gabe Black gabebl...@chromium.org When running from coreboot we don't want this code. This version works by ifdef-ing out all of the code that would go into those sections and all the code that refers to it. The sections are then empty, and the linker will either leave them empty for the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 09/10] x86: coreboot: Enable LPC TPM and CONFIG_NO_RESET_CODE

2012-10-11 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Graeme Russ, Hi Simon, On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: Coreboot boards have an LPC TPM connected, so enable this. We also need to skip the reset code. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass s...@chromium.org --- include/configs/coreboot.h |

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot git usage model

2012-10-11 Thread Stephen Warren
On 10/09/2012 06:20 PM, Scott Wood wrote: On 10/09/2012 06:25:47 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: On 10/09/2012 05:00 PM, Scott Wood wrote: On 10/09/2012 05:14:23 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: I don't quite follow that; linux-next is also purely merge-based. Are you referring to the fact that it's

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 04/10] x86: Add some missing includes.

2012-10-11 Thread Simon Glass
From: Gabe Black gabebl...@chromium.org I suspect these includes were usually available because something else included them earlier or because they were brought in transitively. Signed-off-by: Gabe Black gabebl...@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Simon Glass s...@chromium.org ---

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] EXYNOS: Add Exynos4 I2C spacing

2012-10-11 Thread Joonyoung Shim
Hi, Protr. 2012/9/24 Piotr Wilczek p.wilc...@samsung.com: This patch add the spacing for i2c for Exynos4 Signed-off-by: Piotr Wilczek p.wilc...@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com CC: Minkyu Kang mk7.k...@samsung.com ---

Re: [U-Boot] I2C on mx25

2012-10-11 Thread Fabio Estevam
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Fabio Estevam feste...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Has anyone managed to get i2c to work on mx25? I am using the latest u-boot.imx tree and I noticed that i2c_write always returns error. Ok, i2c_write does work now. This recent commit fixed it: commit

Re: [U-Boot] I2C on mx25

2012-10-11 Thread Fabio Estevam
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Benoît Thébaudeau benoit.thebaud...@advansee.com wrote: Or for the Eth PHY connected to the FEC? Yes, for the DP83640 PHY connected to the FEC. The Ethernet PHY is powered now. Still not able to get FEC to work on mx25pdk, but it seems to be another problem

[U-Boot] I2C on mx25

2012-10-11 Thread Fabio Estevam
Hi, Has anyone managed to get i2c to work on mx25? I am using the latest u-boot.imx tree and I noticed that i2c_write always returns error. Thanks, Fabio Estevam ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de

[U-Boot] [PATCH] net: Add tftp speed indication

2012-10-11 Thread Simon Glass
This prints a tftp speed indication after the download completes. This is the 3.6 MiB/s indicator below. To enable this, define CONFIG_TFTP_SPEED in your board config. Tegra2 (SeaBoard) # tftp ... Using asx0 device TFTP from server 172.22.72.144; our IP address is 172.22.73.81 Filename

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 01/10] x86: Change board baud_rate to ulong

2012-10-11 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Simon, Let's do it by the book this time :) On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: This is a ulong for some architectures and just unsigned for others. Change x86 to be consistent. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass s...@chromium.org ---

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/6] Added SPL for MX35 boards

2012-10-11 Thread Stefano Babic
In this patchset, a new i.MX35 board is added implementing the internal boot mode and using the general SPL Framework. To fix that relocation should not happen in SPL, the following patch is also required: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/181166/ Because the woodburn can boot from

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/6] ARM: Fix start.S when used with SPL in arm1136

2012-10-11 Thread Stefano Babic
This patch modifies start.S for the arm1136 to make it conform to start.S in armv7 architecture, to make it usable if the SPL framework is used. Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de --- arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/start.S | 31 --- 1 file changed, 20

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/6] MX35: add LOW_LEVEL_SRAM_STACK to use SPL_FRAMEWORK

2012-10-11 Thread Stefano Babic
Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de --- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx35/imx-regs.h |2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx35/imx-regs.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-mx35/imx-regs.h index 7b09809..7b6475a 100644 ---

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/6] SPL: Added SPL target for mx35 SOC to SPL Makefile

2012-10-11 Thread Stefano Babic
Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de --- spl/Makefile |6 ++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/spl/Makefile b/spl/Makefile index d9b1c2f..fab953a 100644 --- a/spl/Makefile +++ b/spl/Makefile @@ -118,6 +118,12 @@ $(OBJTREE)/MLO:$(obj)u-boot-spl.bin

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/6] MX35: Add soc_boot_mode and soc_boot_device to MX35

2012-10-11 Thread Stefano Babic
The functions are required to use the generic SPL Framework. Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de --- arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/mx35/generic.c | 75 + arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/u-boot-spl.lds | 62

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 5/6] ARM: Add SPL target to arm1136

2012-10-11 Thread Stefano Babic
Signed-off-by: Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de --- Makefile |1 + arch/arm/cpu/arm1136/config.mk |3 +++ 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index a40d4cc..072bf66 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -819,6 +819,7 @@ clobber:tidy

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 6/6] MX35: add support for woodburn board

2012-10-11 Thread Stefano Babic
The woodburn board is based on the MX35 SOC. Support for both external (NOR) and internal (SD Card) boot mode are added. It uses the generic SPL framework to implement the internal boot mode. The following peripherals are supported: - Ethernet (FEC) - SD Card - NAND (512 MB) - NOR Flash In the

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot git usage model

2012-10-11 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Stephen Warren, In message 50759c8c.3030...@wwwdotorg.org you wrote: The documentation of merge commits seems good to me just in an of itself. Linus has commented a lot about this for Linux in the past. You may want to dig this out from the archives. In general, we should always

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] mx25pdk: Add esdhc support

2012-10-11 Thread Stefano Babic
Am 11/10/2012 05:58, schrieb Fabio Estevam: From: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com mx25pdk has a SD/MMC slot connected to esdhc1. Add support for it and allow the environment variables to be saved into SD/MMC. Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com --- Hi

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot git usage model

2012-10-11 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Stephen Warren, In message 5075f48a.2080...@wwwdotorg.org you wrote: I believe that's (part of) why Linux is tending towards pull requests of a (signed) tag rather than a branch, since the tag always points at a specific commit, and incremental pull requests can just create a new tag

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] mx25pdk: Add FEC support

2012-10-11 Thread Stefano Babic
Am 11/10/2012 05:58, schrieb Fabio Estevam: From: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com mx25pdk has a Ethernet port that is connected to its internal FEC controller. In order to power up the Ethernet PHY (DP83640) it is necessary to communicate with the PMIC via I2C. Make FEC

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot git usage model

2012-10-11 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Stephen Warren, In message 50759a75.8060...@wwwdotorg.org you wrote: Do note that linux-next doesn't become the next Linux kernel version either; it's just a preview of the merges Linus will do. Linus re-does all the merges based on the pull requests people actually send him. So, the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] net: Add tftp speed indication

2012-10-11 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Simon Glass, In message 1349913791-10564-1-git-send-email-...@chromium.org you wrote: This prints a tftp speed indication after the download completes. This is the 3.6 MiB/s indicator below. To enable this, define CONFIG_TFTP_SPEED in your board config. Tegra2 (SeaBoard) # tftp ...

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 01/10] x86: Change board baud_rate to ulong

2012-10-11 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Simon Glass, In message 1349910781-32088-2-git-send-email-...@chromium.org you wrote: This is a ulong for some architectures and just unsigned for others. Change x86 to be consistent. Given the limited range for this variable it makes no sense to use a long for this. Please fix this the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 06/10] x86: coreboot: Tell u-boot about PCI bus 0 when initializing

2012-10-11 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Simon, On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: From: Gabe Black gabebl...@chromium.org U-boot needs a host controller or hose to interact with the PCI busses behind them. This change installs a host controller during initialization of the coreboot board

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 07/10] x86: coreboot: Modify u-boot code to allow building coreboot payload

2012-10-11 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Simon, On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Simon Glass s...@chromium.org wrote: From: Vadim Bendebury vben...@chromium.org This prevents the preprocessor from complaining when processing variadic macros Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury vben...@chromium.org Signed-off-by: Simon Glass

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 09/21] pmic: Extend struct pmic to support battery and charger related operations

2012-10-11 Thread Stefano Babic
Am 05/10/2012 10:16, schrieb Lukasz Majewski: Now it is possible to provide specific function per PMIC/power device instance. Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski l.majew...@samsung.com Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park kyungmin.p...@samsung.com --- Changes for v2: - New at patch v2 --- Hi Lucasz,

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 0/6] introducing vect1: mpc8309 keymile board

2012-10-11 Thread Gerlando Falauto
This patch series adds support for VECT1, an mpc8309-powered Keymile board. MPC8309 is not currently supported by u-boot, so we first add support for this processor. VECT1 is somewhat similar to suvd3, albeit powered by a different processor, so we use its config file as opposed to introducing a

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 3/6] cleanup: introduce CONFIG_MPC830x

2012-10-11 Thread Gerlando Falauto
Introduce a new configuration token CONFIG_MPC830x to be shared among mpc8308 and mpc8309. Define it for existing 8308 boards, and refactor existing common code so to make future introduction of 8309 simpler. Signed-off-by: Gerlando Falauto gerlando.fala...@keymile.com ---

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/6] cosmetic: suvd3: align #defines

2012-10-11 Thread Gerlando Falauto
Signed-off-by: Gerlando Falauto gerlando.fala...@keymile.com --- include/configs/km/km8321-common.h |2 +- include/configs/suvd3.h|4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/km/km8321-common.h b/include/configs/km/km8321-common.h

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/6] cleanup: use CONFIG_QE instead of CONFIG_MPC8360 || CONFIG_MPC832x

2012-10-11 Thread Gerlando Falauto
simplify #if defined(CONFIG_MPC8360) || defined(CONFIG_MPC832x) for qe variables with #if defined(CONFIG_QE) Signed-off-by: Gerlando Falauto gerlando.fala...@keymile.com --- arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/speed.c |8 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 5/6] km83xx: add common support for km8309 boards

2012-10-11 Thread Gerlando Falauto
Add support for Keymile boards based on mpc8309 (it would be only kmvect1 for now) Signed-off-by: Gerlando Falauto gerlando.fala...@keymile.com --- board/keymile/km83xx/km83xx.c |2 +- include/configs/km/km8309-common.h | 176

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 6/6] km83xx: add kmvect1 board

2012-10-11 Thread Gerlando Falauto
Add support for the new kmvect1 board powered by the mpc8309 processor. As this board is very similar to the existing suvd3, instead of adding a new config header file, just add a new config option to suvd3.h Signed-off-by: Gerlando Falauto gerlando.fala...@keymile.com --- boards.cfg

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/6] mpc83xx: add support for mpc8309

2012-10-11 Thread Gerlando Falauto
This processor, though very similar to other members of the PowerQUICC II Pro family (namely 8308, 8360 and 832x), provides yet another feature set than any supported sibling. Signed-off-by: Gerlando Falauto gerlando.fala...@keymile.com --- arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc83xx/cpu.c |1 +

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] EXYNOS: Add Exynos4 I2C spacing

2012-10-11 Thread Piotr Wilczek
Hi Joonyoung, -Original Message- From: Joonyoung Shim [mailto:dofm...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 3:11 AM To: Piotr Wilczek Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Kyungmin Park Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/5] EXYNOS: Add Exynos4 I2C spacing Hi, Protr. 2012/9/24 Piotr

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 01/10] x86: Change board baud_rate to ulong

2012-10-11 Thread Graeme Russ
Hi Wolfgang, On Oct 11, 2012 6:32 PM, Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de wrote: Dear Simon Glass, In message 1349910781-32088-2-git-send-email-...@chromium.org you wrote: This is a ulong for some architectures and just unsigned for others. Change x86 to be consistent. Given the limited range

Re: [U-Boot] mpc85xx debug TLB entry

2012-10-11 Thread Prabhakar Kushwaha
On 10/11/2012 05:51 AM, Scott Wood wrote: I'm debugging some SPL changes and am still having a hard time following the initial TLB flow. We seem to be creating an entry in AS0 -- how is that not conflicting with the TLB entry we're running from? The behaviour of overlapping TLB entries is

Re: [U-Boot] mpc85xx debug TLB entry

2012-10-11 Thread Prabhakar Kushwaha
On 10/11/2012 05:51 AM, Scott Wood wrote: I'm debugging some SPL changes and am still having a hard time following the initial TLB flow. We seem to be creating an entry in AS0 -- how is that not conflicting with the TLB entry we're running from? The behaviour of overlapping TLB entries is

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot git usage model

2012-10-11 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Stephen, It provides documentation in the git history of when merges were made, and what the source of the merge was (at least using the remote name that the merger has configured, which is better than nothing). This is what it provides, but this does not tell me why it is a good

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] mx25pdk: Add esdhc support

2012-10-11 Thread Benoît Thébaudeau
On Thursday, October 11, 2012 9:17:46 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: Am 11/10/2012 05:58, schrieb Fabio Estevam: From: Fabio Estevam fabio.este...@freescale.com mx25pdk has a SD/MMC slot connected to esdhc1. Add support for it and allow the environment variables to be saved into SD/MMC.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] net: Add tftp speed indication

2012-10-11 Thread Igor Grinberg
On 10/11/12 02:03, Simon Glass wrote: This prints a tftp speed indication after the download completes. This is the 3.6 MiB/s indicator below. To enable this, define CONFIG_TFTP_SPEED in your board config. This is relatively small (and nice) addition to the tftpboot command. Do we really

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V3 17/32] imximage.cfg: run files through C preprocessor

2012-10-11 Thread Stefano Babic
Am 10/10/2012 04:03, schrieb Troy Kisky: On 10/8/2012 6:38 AM, Stefano Babic wrote: On 04/10/2012 03:47, Troy Kisky wrote: The '#' used as comments in the files cause the preprocessor trouble, so change to /* */. Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky troy.ki...@boundarydevices.com --- Hi Troy,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM926: Add mb to the cache invalidate/flush

2012-10-11 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Albert ARIBAUD, Hi Marek, On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 00:44:29 +0200, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote: Add memory barrier to cache invalidate and flush calls. Memory barrier... You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. :) A memory barrier's effect is

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot git usage model

2012-10-11 Thread Jason Cooper
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 09:19:22AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Stephen Warren, In message 5075f48a.2080...@wwwdotorg.org you wrote: I believe that's (part of) why Linux is tending towards pull requests of a (signed) tag rather than a branch, since the tag always points at a

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 2/2] fs: add partition switch libary, implement ls and fsload commands

2012-10-11 Thread Benoît Thébaudeau
Hi Stephen, On Thursday, October 11, 2012 2:05:07 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: Implement ls and fsload commands that act like {fat,ext2}{ls,load}, and transparently handle either file-system. This scheme could easily be extended to other filesystem types; I only didn't do it for zfs because I

Re: [U-Boot] mpc85xx debug TLB entry

2012-10-11 Thread Scott Wood
On 10/11/2012 04:01:27 AM, Prabhakar Kushwaha wrote: On 10/11/2012 05:51 AM, Scott Wood wrote: I'm debugging some SPL changes and am still having a hard time following the initial TLB flow. We seem to be creating an entry in AS0 -- how is that not conflicting with the TLB entry we're

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot git usage model

2012-10-11 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Scott, On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 17:02:18 -0500, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote: Ideally once a pull request happens the pull happens quickly. If that doesn't happen, you could reply to the pull request asking that it be ignored in favor of a new pull request, or create a new

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot git usage model (was: Re: [PULL] u-boot-usb/next)

2012-10-11 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 02:32:08PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 03:03:28PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: [snip] The problem with rebasing when pulling is that git commit IDs change, so it's much more difficult to determine when a commit is merged into a parent tree; one has

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 2/2] fs: add partition switch libary, implement ls and fsload commands

2012-10-11 Thread Tom Rini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/10/12 17:05, Stephen Warren wrote: From: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com Implement ls and fsload commands that act like {fat,ext2}{ls,load}, and transparently handle either file-system. This scheme could easily be extended to other

Re: [U-Boot] please pull u-boot-samsung master

2012-10-11 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Minkyu, On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 21:16:16 +0900, Minkyu Kang proms...@gmail.com wrote: Dear Albert, The following changes since commit 28e5ac2d974547bde0c72aa0c1d66fd22c6ef3ad: arm: armv7: temporarily set -mno-unaligned-access (2012-10-05 21:24:22 +0200) are available in the git

[U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-arm/master to u-boot/master

2012-10-11 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Tom, The following changes since commit 28e5ac2d974547bde0c72aa0c1d66fd22c6ef3ad: arm: armv7: temporarily set -mno-unaligned-access (2012-10-05 21:24:22 +0200) are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx.de/u-boot-arm master for you to fetch changes up to

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot git usage model

2012-10-11 Thread Stephen Warren
On 10/11/2012 01:28 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Stephen Warren, In message 50759a75.8060...@wwwdotorg.org you wrote: Do note that linux-next doesn't become the next Linux kernel version either; it's just a preview of the merges Linus will do. Linus re-does all the merges based on the

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot git usage model

2012-10-11 Thread Scott Wood
On 10/10/2012 01:40:54 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Re committer identity, I don't see the relationship with by tags, and especially with Singed-off-by, since the sign-off is not and must not be related to the committer of the patch, but to its author(s). At least the way the Linux

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 2/2] fs: add partition switch libary, implement ls and fsload commands

2012-10-11 Thread Stephen Warren
On 10/11/2012 10:47 AM, Tom Rini wrote: On 10/10/12 17:05, Stephen Warren wrote: From: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com Implement ls and fsload commands that act like {fat,ext2}{ls,load}, and transparently handle either file-system. This scheme could easily be extended to other

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot git usage model

2012-10-11 Thread Stephen Warren
On 10/11/2012 01:19 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Stephen Warren, In message 5075f48a.2080...@wwwdotorg.org you wrote: I believe that's (part of) why Linux is tending towards pull requests of a (signed) tag rather than a branch, since the tag always points at a specific commit, and

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 2/2] fs: add partition switch libary, implement ls and fsload commands

2012-10-11 Thread Tom Rini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/11/12 09:57, Stephen Warren wrote: On 10/11/2012 10:47 AM, Tom Rini wrote: On 10/10/12 17:05, Stephen Warren wrote: From: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com Implement ls and fsload commands that act like {fat,ext2}{ls,load}, and

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] mpc85xx/portals: Add qman and bman ip_cfg field into portal info

2012-10-11 Thread York Sun
From: Haiying Wang haiying.w...@freescale.com Because QMan3.0 and BMan2.1 used ip_cfg in ip_rev_2 register to differ the total portal number, buffer pool number etc, we can use this info to limit those resources in kernel driver. Signed-off-by: Haiying Wang haiying.w...@freescale.com ---

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] poweprc/85xx: add QMan frequency info and fdt fixup.

2012-10-11 Thread York Sun
From: Haiying Wang haiying.w...@freescale.com Starting from QMan3.0, the QMan clock cycle needs be exposed so that the kernel driver can use it to calculate the shaper prescaler and rate. Signed-off-by: Haiying Wang haiying.w...@freescale.com --- arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cpu.c |4

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot git usage model (was: Re: [PULL] u-boot-usb/next)

2012-10-11 Thread Scott Wood
On 10/11/2012 11:38:00 AM, Tom Rini wrote: On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 02:32:08PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 03:03:28PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: [snip] The problem with rebasing when pulling is that git commit IDs change, so it's much more difficult to determine when a

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot git usage model

2012-10-11 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Scott, On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:54:46 -0500, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote: On 10/10/2012 01:40:54 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Re committer identity, I don't see the relationship with by tags, and especially with Singed-off-by, since the sign-off is not and must not

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot git usage model

2012-10-11 Thread Stephen Warren
On 10/11/2012 11:16 AM, Scott Wood wrote: On 10/11/2012 11:38:00 AM, Tom Rini wrote: On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 02:32:08PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: ... In the case of post-v2012.10, it will be rebased as we want the commit to change how ARM and unaligned accesses are handled to be the first thing.

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot git usage model

2012-10-11 Thread Stephen Warren
On 10/11/2012 11:16 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Hi Scott, On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:54:46 -0500, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote: On 10/10/2012 01:40:54 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Re committer identity, I don't see the relationship with by tags, and especially with Singed-off-by,

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot git usage model

2012-10-11 Thread Tom Rini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/11/12 10:16, Scott Wood wrote: On 10/11/2012 11:38:00 AM, Tom Rini wrote: On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 02:32:08PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 03:03:28PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote: [snip] The problem with rebasing when

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] h2200: Make use of default_serial_console

2012-10-11 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Lukasz, On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 02:09:59 +0200, Lukasz Dalek luk0...@gmail.com wrote: Define CONFIG_CONS_INDEX to use ffuart as default console and fix compilation error related to undefined CONFIG_CONS_INDEX. Signed-off-by: Lukasz Dalek luk0...@gmail.com --- include/configs/h2200.h |

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH 2/2] fs: add partition switch libary, implement ls and fsload commands

2012-10-11 Thread Benoît Thébaudeau
On Thursday, October 11, 2012 7:05:37 PM, Tom Rini wrote: On 10/11/12 09:57, Stephen Warren wrote: On 10/11/2012 10:47 AM, Tom Rini wrote: On 10/10/12 17:05, Stephen Warren wrote: From: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com Implement ls and fsload commands that act like

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] h2200: Make use of default_serial_console

2012-10-11 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 19:40:08 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.b...@aribaud.net wrote: Hi Lukasz, On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 02:09:59 +0200, Lukasz Dalek luk0...@gmail.com wrote: Define CONFIG_CONS_INDEX to use ffuart as default console and fix compilation error related to undefined

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot on my board freescale P1010RDB is erased

2012-10-11 Thread Scott Wood
On 10/10/2012 07:26:50 AM, randriamanjaka franky wrote: Hi, The u-boot on my board freescale P1010RDB is erased.There was a problem when i want to reflash it. Is there a tool from freescale to put the first u-boot from nand on my board freescale P1010RDB ? Is there a bootable image in

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM926: Add mb to the cache invalidate/flush

2012-10-11 Thread Scott Wood
On 10/11/2012 12:31:46 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Hi Marek, On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 00:44:29 +0200, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote: Add memory barrier to cache invalidate and flush calls. Memory barrier... You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means. :) Could we

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot git usage model

2012-10-11 Thread Scott Wood
On 10/11/2012 12:16:58 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Hi Scott, On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:54:46 -0500, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote: On 10/10/2012 01:40:54 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Re committer identity, I don't see the relationship with by tags, and especially with

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot git usage model

2012-10-11 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Stephen, On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:26:45 -0600, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote: On 10/11/2012 11:16 AM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Hi Scott, On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 11:54:46 -0500, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote: On 10/10/2012 01:40:54 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Re

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot git usage model

2012-10-11 Thread Scott Wood
On 10/11/2012 12:27:57 PM, Tom Rini wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/11/12 10:16, Scott Wood wrote: On 10/11/2012 11:38:00 AM, Tom Rini wrote: On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 02:32:08PM -0700, Tom Rini wrote: On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 03:03:28PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot git usage model

2012-10-11 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Hi Scott, On Thu, 11 Oct 2012 13:13:33 -0500, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote: FWIW I think putting policy documents in a wiki, without any guidance on who's supposed to edit it or how changes get approved, is a bad idea. Why not put policy documents in the git-managed source

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-arm/master to u-boot/master

2012-10-11 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 06:51:30PM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Hi Tom, The following changes since commit 28e5ac2d974547bde0c72aa0c1d66fd22c6ef3ad: arm: armv7: temporarily set -mno-unaligned-access (2012-10-05 21:24:22 +0200) are available in the git repository at:

  1   2   >