[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 02/19] dm: timer: uclass: add timer init to add timer device

Adding timer_init function to create and initialize the timer device on platforms where u-boot,dm-pre-reloc is not used. Since there will be multiple timer devices in the system, adding a tick-timer node in chosen node to know which timer device to be used as tick timer in u-boot. Signed-off-by:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 8/9] efi_loader: Add "bootefi" command

2015-12-25 12:25 GMT+03:00 Andreas Färber : > Am 25.12.2015 um 10:02 schrieb Alexander Graf: > [snip] >> The reason I implemented "bootefi" was really because it's the natural >> fit into how U-Boot handles all other formats today. I don't think this >> is going to be the last

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5] altera_qspi: show erase progress

Hi Marek, On 2015年12月25日 12:08, Marek Vasut wrote: Well, it is only a putc() which is plain and simple. Sure, but then I still don't understand why this cannot be in the common code. Yes, it can be in the common code. Do you have an idea how should it look like? Best regards, Thomas

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/5] altera_qspi: show erase progress

On Friday, December 25, 2015 at 09:33:52 AM, Thomas Chou wrote: > Hi Marek, > > On 2015年12月25日 12:08, Marek Vasut wrote: > >> Well, it is only a putc() which is plain and simple. > > > > Sure, but then I still don't understand why this cannot be in the common > > code. > > Yes, it can be in the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 8/9] efi_loader: Add "bootefi" command

Am 25.12.2015 um 10:02 schrieb Alexander Graf: [snip] > The reason I implemented "bootefi" was really because it's the natural > fit into how U-Boot handles all other formats today. I don't think this > is going to be the last patch set around EFI support. I think what Matwey was suggesting is

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 02/19] dm: timer: uclass: add timer init to add timer device

On Friday 25 December 2015 05:43 PM, Bin Meng wrote: > Hi Mugunthan, > > On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Mugunthan V N wrote: >> Adding timer_init function to create and initialize the timer >> device on platforms where u-boot,dm-pre-reloc is not used. Since >> there will

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] EFI payload / application support

2015-12-25 19:50 GMT+03:00 Tom Rini : > On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 09:53:22AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: >> >> >> On 25.12.15 04:29, Tom Rini wrote: >> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 02:57:47PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: >> > >> >> This is my Christmas present for my openSUSE

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 04/10] drivers/pci/pci_mvebu: Fix for boards with X4 lanes

Armada XP has support for X4 lanes, boards specify this in their serdes_cfg. During PEX init in high_speed_env_lib.c, the configuration is stored in GEN_PURP_RES_2_REG. When enumerating PEX, subsequent interfaces of an X4 lane must be skipped. Otherwise the enumeration hangs up the board. The

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 03/10] axp: Fix debugging support in DDR3 write leveling

If MV_DEBUG_WL is defined, DEBUG_WL_S and DEBUG_WL_D macros are missing. In addition to that, get rid of debug output printing non-existent counter variable. Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter --- drivers/ddr/marvell/axp/ddr3_write_leveling.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] EFI payload / application support

On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 09:53:22AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > > > On 25.12.15 04:29, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 02:57:47PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > > > >> This is my Christmas present for my openSUSE friends :). > >> > >> U-Boot is a great project for embedded

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] EFI payload / application support

On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 07:53:24PM +0300, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote: > 2015-12-25 19:50 GMT+03:00 Tom Rini : > > On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 09:53:22AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 25.12.15 04:29, Tom Rini wrote: > >> > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 02:57:47PM +0100,

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 3/8] mips: add base support for atheros ath79 based SOCs

This patch enable work for ar933x SOC, tested on ar9331 board. Signed-off-by: Wills Wang --- Changes in v4: None Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: None arch/mips/Makefile |1 + arch/mips/include/asm/global_data.h |5 +

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 4/8] mips: ath79: add serial driver for ar933x SOC

Signed-off-by: Wills Wang --- Changes in v4: None Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: None drivers/serial/Makefile| 1 + drivers/serial/serial_ar933x.c | 225 + 2 files changed, 226 insertions(+) create mode 100644

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 6/8] mips: ath79: add AP121 reference board

Signed-off-by: Wills Wang --- Changes in v4: None Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: None arch/mips/Kconfig | 8 + arch/mips/dts/Makefile| 2 +- arch/mips/dts/ap121.dts | 37 +++ arch/mips/dts/ar933x.dtsi | 64

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 2/8] mips: implement to access the KSEG0/1 memory range in map_physmem

U-boot just use the no MMU virtual address segment(KSEG0/1), this patch enable access the uncached memory range(KSEG1) by flag "MAP_NOCACHE", other flag for KSEG0 access. Signed-off-by: Wills Wang --- Changes in v4: None Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: None

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/8] include: Add support for "do_div" macro

Use the div64 header files from the kernel. Signed-off-by: Wills Wang --- Changes in v4: None Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: None arch/mips/include/asm/div64.h | 68 +++ include/asm-generic/div64.h | 59

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 0/8] add support for atheros ath79 based SOCs

These series of patch add support for atheros ath79 based SOCs in u-boot, at the present moment it's just available for ar933x chip. Changes in v4: - Add div64 macro for MIPS - Convert physical address to uncached and cached(KSEG0/1) memory range in map_physmem - Auto calculate baudrate for

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 7/8] mips: support optimize tuning for same common processor cores

Signed-off-by: Wills Wang --- Changes in v4: None Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: None arch/mips/Makefile | 7 +++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/mips/Makefile b/arch/mips/Makefile index da5fa72..0be5e64 100644 --- a/arch/mips/Makefile +++

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 08/10] mvebu: Add rudimental MV78230 support

This adds basic support for Marvell's MV78230 SoC which belongs to the Armada XP series. Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter --- arch/arm/mach-mvebu/cpu.c | 16 +++- arch/arm/mach-mvebu/include/mach/soc.h | 1 +

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 06/10] mvebu: Introduce kconfig symbols for SoC variants

This patch adds intermediate kconfig symbols which select their SoC family. Boards then select them instead of the family symbol directly. Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter --- arch/arm/mach-mvebu/Kconfig | 24 include/configs/clearfog.h | 1 -

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 5/8] mips: ath79: add spi driver

Signed-off-by: Wills Wang --- Changes in v4: None Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: None drivers/spi/Kconfig | 8 ++ drivers/spi/Makefile| 1 + drivers/spi/ath79_spi.c | 211 3 files changed, 220 insertions(+)

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4 8/8] mips: move optimize tuning option from deprecated config.mk to Kconfig

config.mk files in mach-xxx directory are deprecated, this patch move the processor tuning option of compiler into Kconfig Signed-off-by: Wills Wang --- Changes in v4: - Add div64 macro for MIPS - Convert physical address to uncached and cached(KSEG0/1) memory range in

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 05/10] mvebu: axp: refactor board_sat_r_get() and caller

Instead of calling board_sat_r_get() only for those boards providing the satr11 value via I2C, call it for all boards and return static values for those not using I2C. In addition to that, make this a weak function to allow for board code to override it. Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 01/10] drivers/pci: Fix for debug builds without CONFIG_PCI_ENUM_ONLY

The debug printing references bar_res, which exists only if CONFIG_PCI_ENUM_ONLY is not defined. Therefore move it into the ifdef'd area. Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter --- drivers/pci/pci_auto_old.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 8/9] efi_loader: Add "bootefi" command

On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 02:15:52PM +0300, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote: > Why just not to implement standard EFI behaviour when EFI looks for > boot-efi partition and proceed? > > If ARM board developers will enable EFI support in the future, we can > have single one JeOS having all possible dtb in

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 8/9] efi_loader: Add "bootefi" command

On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 12:40:25PM +0300, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote: > 2015-12-25 12:25 GMT+03:00 Andreas Färber : > > Am 25.12.2015 um 10:02 schrieb Alexander Graf: > > [snip] > >> The reason I implemented "bootefi" was really because it's the natural > >> fit into how U-Boot

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 00/10] Add support for Synology DS414 and some related fixes

This is version 3 of my patch series to support Synology DS414 NAS after rebasing it onto mvebu-dm-spl-2015-12-14 branch of u-boot-a38x.git plus the following four patches: * arm: mvebu: Print CPU and SDRAM frequency upon startup * arm: mvebu: Consolidate board Kconfig options into one file * arm:

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 10/10] mvebu: ds414: Implement Synology specific command set

Synology keeps per item configuration in a dedicated 'partition' in SPI flash, namely the one named 'vendor' in DTS file. It contains the two NICs MAC addresses as well as the item's serial number. I didn't find a way to have this information extracted automatically, therefore implemented 'syno

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 09/10] mvebu: Support Synology DS414

This adds support for the MV78230 based DS414 NAS by Synology. The relevant bits have been extracted from the 'synogpl-5004-armadaxp' package Synology kindly published, garnished with a fair amount of trial-and-error. Sadly, support is far from perfect. The major parts I have failed in are SATA

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 02/19] dm: timer: uclass: add timer init to add timer device

Hi Mugunthan, On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Mugunthan V N wrote: > Adding timer_init function to create and initialize the timer > device on platforms where u-boot,dm-pre-reloc is not used. Since > there will be multiple timer devices in the system, adding a > tick-timer

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] EFI payload / application support

On 12/22/2015 05:57 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: > This is my Christmas present for my openSUSE friends :). > > U-Boot is a great project for embedded devices. However, convincing > everyone involved that only for "a few oddball ARM devices" we need to > support different configuration formats from

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 3/8] mips: add base support for atheros ath79 based SOCs

On Friday, December 25, 2015 at 07:56:23 PM, Wills Wang wrote: > This patch enable work for ar933x SOC, tested on ar9331 board. > > Signed-off-by: Wills Wang > --- [...] > +int arch_cpu_init(void) > +{ > + u32 val; > + > + /* > + * Set GPIO10 (UART_SO) as

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 8/8] mips: move optimize tuning option from deprecated config.mk to Kconfig

On Friday, December 25, 2015 at 07:56:28 PM, Wills Wang wrote: > config.mk files in mach-xxx directory are deprecated, this patch move > the processor tuning option of compiler into Kconfig > > Signed-off-by: Wills Wang > --- > > Changes in v4: > - Add div64 macro for MIPS

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/8] include: Add support for "do_div" macro

On Friday, December 25, 2015 at 07:56:21 PM, Wills Wang wrote: > Use the div64 header files from the kernel. > > Signed-off-by: Wills Wang > --- We already have include/div64.h , is that what you're after ? Best regards, Marek Vasut

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 7/8] mips: support optimize tuning for same common processor cores

On Friday, December 25, 2015 at 07:56:27 PM, Wills Wang wrote: Missing commit message. There is exactly zero explanation why this patch is necessary/beneficial/whatever . I just do not understand why we should pick this patch. > Signed-off-by: Wills Wang > --- > > Changes

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 2/8] mips: implement to access the KSEG0/1 memory range in map_physmem

On Friday, December 25, 2015 at 07:56:22 PM, Wills Wang wrote: > U-boot just use the no MMU virtual address segment(KSEG0/1), this > patch enable access the uncached memory range(KSEG1) by flag > "MAP_NOCACHE", other flag for KSEG0 access. > > Signed-off-by: Wills Wang > ---

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 8/9] efi_loader: Add "bootefi" command

On 24.12.15 12:15, Matwey V. Kornilov wrote: > Why just not to implement standard EFI behaviour when EFI looks for > boot-efi partition and proceed? Well, what is "standard EFI behavior"? There are 2 standard ways I'm aware of: 1) NVRAM The default case for 99.9% of the boots on normal EFI

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] EFI payload / application support

On 25.12.15 04:29, Tom Rini wrote: > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 02:57:47PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > >> This is my Christmas present for my openSUSE friends :). >> >> U-Boot is a great project for embedded devices. However, convincing >> everyone involved that only for "a few oddball ARM

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/4] mips: add base support for atheros ath79 based SOCs

On Friday, December 25, 2015 at 12:38:39 PM, Wills Wang wrote: > On 12/24/2015 11:12 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > > On Thursday, December 24, 2015 at 02:51:06 PM, Wills Wang wrote: > > > > [...] > > > +LEAF(lowlevel_init) > + /* These three WLAN_RESET will avoid original issue */ >