[U-Boot] [PATCH] Initial NAND U-Boot update for i.MX6 SOCs

Here is that patch again. Rebased, multiline comments fixed, some whitespace trimmed. One header file with non-SPDX license is not changed because the entire file has been stolen verbatim with no changes at all. No other changes so far... This is against today's git tree. Signed-off-by: Sergey

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: uniphier: reserve memory for DRAM PHY training on PH1-LD20

The DRAM PHY on PH1-LD20 is able to calibrate PHY parameters periodically. This improves PHY adjustment against the voltage and temperature deviation. Instead, it requires 64 byte scratch memory in each DRAM channel for the dynamic training. The memory regions must be reserved in DT before

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: AM57xx: Enable FIT for HS Devices

On Tuesday 14 June 2016 04:55 AM, Andreas Dannenberg wrote: > Enable FIT support for AM57xx platforms using the high-security (HS) > device variant. > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Dannenberg Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla Thanks and regards, Lokesh > --- > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: AM437x: Sync defconfig between GP and HS EVM

On Saturday 11 June 2016 02:02 AM, Madan Srinivas wrote: > Adds missing NAND option to CONFIG_SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS for > AM437x HS EVMs. This syncs up the config options between > GP and HS EVMs. > > Signed-off-by: Madan Srinivas Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] ARM: AM437x: Enable FIT for hs platforms

On Saturday 11 June 2016 02:02 AM, Madan Srinivas wrote: > Adds FIT support to the SPL and u-boot for AM437x HS devices. > > Signed-off-by: Madan Srinivas Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla Thanks and regards, Lokesh > --- > > Changes in v2: >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v6 1/2] common: usb_storage: Make common function for usb_stor_read/usb_stor_write

> -Original Message- > From: Marek Vasut [mailto:ma...@denx.de] > Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 3:33 AM > To: Rajesh Bhagat ; u-boot@lists.denx.de > Cc: s...@chromium.org; york sun ; Sriram Dash > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v6

[U-Boot] [PATCH] pico-imx6ul: Add NFS boot support

Add script for retrieving the kernel via TFTP and mounting the rootfs via NFS. Signed-off-by: Diego Dorta --- include/configs/pico-imx6ul.h | 26 +- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/configs/pico-imx6ul.h

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 7/9] libfdt: Add overlay application function

> On Jun 15, 2016, at 4:23 AM, Pantelis Antoniou > wrote: > The correct way is to get cracking on the machine readable yaml based bindings > and enforce it through there. Machine readable bindings with enforcement would be enabling technology to solve a lot of

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: board: cm-fx6: fix mmc for old revisions of utilite

Hi Nikita, On 06/15/2016 05:15 PM, Nikita Kiryanov wrote: > Hi CHristopher, > > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 09:02:36PM +0200, Christopher Spinrath wrote: >> Old revisions of Utilite (based on cmfx6) do not have a dedicated >> card detect pin. But the card is removable by the user and card >>

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] configs: Re-sync BOOTDELAY changes

Hi, On 06/14/2016 04:24 PM, Tom Rini wrote: With updated moveconfig.py and an better default, re-generate the migration of BOOTDELAY to the defconfig. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini Series looks good to me, thank you for fixing this: Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] clk: clk-uclass: Add post binding for CLK uclass

Hi Wenyou, On 15 June 2016 at 19:08, Yang, Wenyou wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: s...@google.com [mailto:s...@google.com] On Behalf Of Simon Glass >> Sent: 2016年6月10日 8:34 >> To: Yang, Wenyou >> Cc: U-Boot Mailing List

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] clk: clk-uclass: Add post binding for CLK uclass

> -Original Message- > From: s...@google.com [mailto:s...@google.com] On Behalf Of Simon Glass > Sent: 2016年6月10日 8:34 > To: Yang, Wenyou > Cc: U-Boot Mailing List ; Andreas Bießmann > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2]

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] pci: Make load_oprom and run_oprom independent

On 14 June 2016 at 02:02, Bin Meng wrote: > At present should_load_oprom() calls board_should_run_oprom() to > determine whether oprom should be loaded. But sometimes we just > want to load oprom without running. Make them independent. > > Signed-off-by: Bin Meng

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] common: image-fit: Cleanup spelling mistakes

On 15 June 2016 at 16:00, Andreas Dannenberg wrote: > The comments in the source file are riddled with spelling mistakes. Be > a good citizen and take a stab at cleaning up some of the more obvious > ones. > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Dannenberg > --- >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] pci: Add board_ prefix to should_load_oprom() and make it weak

On 14 June 2016 at 02:02, Bin Meng wrote: > For consistency with board_should_run_oprom(), do the same to > should_load_oprom(). Board support codes can provide this one > to override the default weak one. > > Signed-off-by: Bin Meng > --- > >

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC PATCH V3] common: image-fdt: support dts from the second address of android image

Hi Michael, On 13 June 2016 at 13:53, Michael Trimarchi wrote: > > We can support dts load from the second address of android image. > This let us to boot board (aka freescale) > > Signed-off-by: Michael Trimarchi > --- > Changes: >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] pci: Remove CONFIG_ALWAYS_LOAD_OPROM

On 14 June 2016 at 02:02, Bin Meng wrote: > This option is defined at nowhere. Remove it. > > Signed-off-by: Bin Meng > --- > > drivers/pci/pci_rom.c | 2 -- > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Simon Glass

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/9] libfdt: Add new headers and defines

Hi Maxime, On 13 June 2016 at 03:28, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Hi David, > > On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 08:30:35PM +1000, David Gibson wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 05:03:36PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: >> > Hi Maxime, >> > >> > > On May 27, 2016, at 12:13 ,

Re: [U-Boot] arc: axs103 compile broken ?

Hi Alexey, On 14 June 2016 at 01:15, Alexey Brodkin wrote: > Hi Heiko, > > On Tue, 2016-06-14 at 07:07 +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote: >> Hello Sjoerd, >> >> as I just write a tbot testcase, which checks patches, which moves >> a config option to Kconfig, I tested also

Re: [U-Boot] socfpga 2016.05, CV socdk Rev E1, SPL and u-boot fail when booting from QSPI

On 06/15/2016 12:06 PM, Christian Didriksson wrote: > Trying again. Hi! > I have reverted back to a vanilla u-boot-2016.05, added the > not-enter-quad-mode patch What's this patch ? Can you share it ? > and changed the SPI address where the SPL should load the u-boot from Can you share this

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v6 1/2] common: usb_storage: Make common function for usb_stor_read/usb_stor_write

On 06/15/2016 09:00 AM, Rajesh Bhagat wrote: > Performs code cleanup by making common function for usb_stor_read/ > usb_stor_write. Currently only difference in these fucntions is call > to usb_read_10/usb_write_10 scsi commands. > > Signed-off-by: Rajesh Bhagat > --- >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] usb: ehci: only shutdown opened controller

On 06/15/2016 07:15 AM, Peng Fan wrote: > If the usb controller is not running, no need to shutdown it, > otherwise `usb stop` complains about: > "EHCI failed to shut down host controller". > > To i.MX7D SDB, there are two usb ports, one Host, one OTG. > If we only plug one udisk to the Host port

[U-Boot] [PATCH] common: image-fit: Cleanup spelling mistakes

The comments in the source file are riddled with spelling mistakes. Be a good citizen and take a stab at cleaning up some of the more obvious ones. Signed-off-by: Andreas Dannenberg --- common/image-fit.c | 30 +++--- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+),

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] i.MX6 nand bootupdate

On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, Stefano Babic wrote: Hi, Hi Sergey, On 14/06/2016 20:32, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: Here is the initial support for writing i.MX6 NAND U-Boot into NAND with all FCB and DBBT stuff as required. This is a very interesting feature missing in U-Boot. Up now we are

[U-Boot] [RFC 0/9] Secure Boot by Authenticating/Decrypting SPL FIT blobs

This is an RFC for a method that uses a "weak" post-process function call that's injected into the SPL FIT loading process after each blob has been extracted (U-Boot firmware, selected DTB) which is populated with a platform specific function. In case of TI high-security (HS) device variants a ROM

[U-Boot] [RFC 5/9] arm: omap5: add secure ROM signature verify API

From: Daniel Allred Adds an API that verifies a signature attached to an image (binary blob). This API is basically a entry to a secure ROM service provided by the device and accessed via an SMC call, using a particular calling convention. Signed-off-by: Daniel Allred

[U-Boot] [RFC 1/9] spl: fit: add support for post-processing of images

From: Daniel Allred The next stage boot loader image and the selected FDT can be post-processed by board/platform/device-specific code, which can include modifying the size and altering the starting source address before copying these binary blobs to their final desitination.

[U-Boot] [RFC 9/9] ti: omap-common: Update to generate secure FIT

From: Daniel Allred Adds commands so that when a secure device is in use and the SPL is built to load a FIT image (with combined u-boot binary and various DTBs), these components that get fed into the FIT are all processed to be signed/encrypted/etc. as per the operations

[U-Boot] [RFC 3/9] arm: omap-common: add secure smc entry

From: Daniel Allred Adds an interface for calling secure ROM APIs across a range of OMAP and OMAP compatible devices. Signed-off-by: Daniel Allred Signed-off-by: Andreas Dannenberg --- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/lowlevel_init.S | 47

[U-Boot] [RFC 7/9] arm: am4x: add secure ROM signature verify API

From: Madan Srinivas Adds an API that verifies a signature attached to an image (binary blob). This API is basically a entry to a secure ROM service provided by the device and accessed via an SMC call, using a particular calling convention. This API is common across AM3x HS and

[U-Boot] [RFC 2/9] arm: cache: add missing dummy functions for when dcache disabled

From: Daniel Allred Adds missing flush_dcache_range and invalidate_dcache_range dummy (empty) placeholder functions to the #else portion of the #ifndef CONFIG_SYS_DCACHE_OFF, where full implementations of these functions are defined. Signed-off-by: Daniel Allred

[U-Boot] [RFC 4/9] arm: omap-common: add secure rom call API for secure devices

From: Daniel Allred Adds a generic C-callable API for making secure ROM calls on OMAP and OMAP-compatible devices. This API provides the important function of flushing the ROM call arguments to memory from the cache, so that the secure world will have a coherent view of those

[U-Boot] [RFC 8/9] arm: am4x: add FIT image post process function

From: Madan Srinivas Adds a board specific FIT image post processing function when u-boot is compiled for the high-secure (HS) device variant. Signed-off-by: Madan Srinivas Signed-off-by: Andreas Dannenberg --- board/ti/am43xx/board.c | 7

[U-Boot] [RFC 6/9] arm: omap5: add FIT image post process function

From: Daniel Allred Adds a board specific FIT image post processing function for when CONFIG_SECURE_BOOT is defined. Also update the omap common config header to enable CONFIG_SECURE_BOOT always for secure TI devices (CONFIG_TI_SECURE_DEVICE is defined). Signed-off-by: Daniel

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/6] sunxi: Add NAND controller driver

Hi, On 15-06-16 21:09, Boris Brezillon wrote: Hello, This patch series is adding the normal sunxi NAND controller driver to u-boot. It's based on the Linux driver, with a few adaptions to make it work in Linux. Hans, Scoot, this series contains 2 new patches to support the NAND flash we have

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/8] sunxi: Add missing macros to configure the NAND controller clk

We need some macros to manipulate the NAND controller clock. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon Acked-by: Hans de Goede --- arch/arm/include/asm/arch-sunxi/clock_sun4i.h | 5 + 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/7] spl: nand: sunxi: implement auto-detection

On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 10:16:55 +0200 Boris Brezillon wrote: > Hello, > > This patch series aims at adding support for NAND auto-detection to > the sunxi SPL NAND driver. > > As explained in patch 7, this auto-detection is nothing more than a > dumb "trial and

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 7/8] sunxi: nand: Increase CONFIG_SYS_NAND_MAX_ECCPOS value

On some sunxi boards we have NANDs exposing 1664 OOB bytes per page. Define the CONFIG_SYS_NAND_MAX_ECCPOS value accordingly. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon --- include/configs/sunxi-common.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 8/8] sunxi: Enable NAND controller on the CHIP

Enable the NAND controller in the sun5i-r8-chip.dts. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon Acked-by: Hans de Goede --- arch/arm/dts/sun5i-a10s.dtsi | 14 ++ arch/arm/dts/sun5i-a13-olinuxino.dts | 15 +++

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 6/8] mtd: nand: Increase the max OOB size

Some NANDs are now exposing 1664 OOB bytes per page. Adjust the NAND_MAX_OOBSIZE value accordingly. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon --- include/linux/mtd/nand.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/nand.h

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 5/8] mtd: nand: Add a full-id entry for the H27QCG8T2E5R‐BCF NAND

Add a full-id entry for the H27QCG8T2E5R‐BCF NAND. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon Acked-by: Hans de Goede --- drivers/mtd/nand/nand_ids.c | 4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_ids.c

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/8] mtd: nand: add common DT init code

From: Brian Norris These are already-documented common bindings for NAND chips. Let's handle them in nand_base. If NAND controller drivers need to act on this data before bringing up the NAND chip (e.g., fill out ECC callback functions, change HW modes, etc.), then

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/6] sunxi: Add NAND controller driver

Hello, This patch series is adding the normal sunxi NAND controller driver to u-boot. It's based on the Linux driver, with a few adaptions to make it work in Linux. Hans, Scoot, this series contains 2 new patches to support the NAND flash we have on the CHIP. The patches simply increase

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 4/8] sun5i: Add NAND controller to the sun5i DTSI

From: Maxime Ripard Add the NAND controller definition to sun5i.dtsi. Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon --- arch/arm/dts/sun5i.dtsi | 49

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/8] mtd: nand: Add the sunxi NAND controller driver

We already have an SPL driver for the sunxi NAND controller, now add the normal/standard one. The source has been copied from Linux 4.6 with a few changes to make it work in u-boot. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon Acked-by: Hans de Goede

[U-Boot] [PATCH] mtd: nand: Patch remaining places where nand_to_mtd() should be used

Some drivers are still directly accessing the chip->mtd field. Patch them to use nand_to_mtd() instead. Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon --- doc/README.nand | 2 +- drivers/mtd/nand/am335x_spl_bch.c | 2 +- drivers/mtd/nand/atmel_nand.c

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/7] mtd: nand: Add+use mtd_to/from_nand and nand_get/set_controller_data

On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 12:39:50 -0500 Scott Wood wrote: > On Wed, 2016-06-15 at 10:07 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 09:59:15 +0200 > > Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > > > Hi Scott, > > > > > > On Thu, 09 Jun 2016

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/7] mtd: nand: Add+use mtd_to/from_nand and nand_get/set_controller_data

On Wed, 2016-06-15 at 10:07 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 09:59:15 +0200 > Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > Hi Scott, > > > > On Thu, 09 Jun 2016 21:07:00 -0500 > > Scott Wood wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 2016-06-06 at 18:02

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] pico-imx6ul: Add a README file

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Vanessa Maegima wrote: > Add a README file to help users to install U-boot binary into the eMMC. > > Signed-off-by: Vanessa Maegima Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] pico-imx6ul: Add DFU support

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Vanessa Maegima wrote: > DFU is a convenient way to program U-boot binary into the eMMC. > > Add support for it. > > Signed-off-by: Vanessa Maegima Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] pico-imx6ul: Add DFU support

DFU is a convenient way to program U-boot binary into the eMMC. Add support for it. Signed-off-by: Vanessa Maegima --- configs/pico-imx6ul_defconfig | 8 include/configs/pico-imx6ul.h | 8 +++- 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] pico-imx6ul: Add a README file

Add a README file to help users to install U-boot binary into the eMMC. Signed-off-by: Vanessa Maegima --- board/technexion/pico-imx6ul/README | 57 + 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+) create mode 100644

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] common: add new boot media kconfig entry

Hello Peng, Am 15.06.2016 um 08:15 schrieb Peng Fan: Add CONFIG_{SD|NOR|NAND|ONENAND|SPI|QSPI|SATA}_BOOT kconfig entries. SoCs supports loading U-Boot from different medias to DRAM, such as i.MX6/7 supports loading U-Boot to DRAM from sd/emmc/nand/qspi/spi/sata and etc. For i.MX, imximage will

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: board: cm-fx6: fix mmc for old revisions of utilite

Hi CHristopher, On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 09:02:36PM +0200, Christopher Spinrath wrote: > Old revisions of Utilite (based on cmfx6) do not have a dedicated > card detect pin. But the card is removable by the user and card > detection can be realized with polling (e.g. supported by Linux). > > Add

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/18] various Gateworks Ventana fixes and enhancements

Hi Tim, On 15/06/2016 15:40, Tim Harvey wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Tim Harvey wrote: >> This series represents a large chunk of patches in my queue for Gateworks >> Ventana boards based on the IMX6 Soc's. >> >> Tim Harvey (18): >> imx: ventana: config:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] common: add new boot media kconfig entry

Hi Peng, On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 1:15 AM, Peng Fan wrote: > Add CONFIG_{SD|NOR|NAND|ONENAND|SPI|QSPI|SATA}_BOOT kconfig entries. > > SoCs supports loading U-Boot from different medias to DRAM, such as > i.MX6/7 supports loading U-Boot to DRAM from

[U-Boot] [PATCH] x86: Add Advantech SOM-DB5800/SOM-6867 support

Add support for Advantech SOM-DB5800 with the SOM-6867 installed. This is very similar to conga-qeval20-qa3-e3845 in that there is a reference carrier board (SOM-DB5800) with a Baytrail based SoM (SOM-6867) installed. Currently supported: - 2x UART (From ITE EC on SOM-6867) routed to COM3/4

Re: [U-Boot] [ANN] U-Boot v2016.05 is released

Hi, On 16 May 2016 at 12:51, Tom Rini wrote: > Hey all, > > Due to some odds and ends, I ended up taking in some code a bit close to > the original release date, so I ended up just pushing things out a week. > I think moving forward, I really should say that in public, sorry.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] configs: Re-sync BOOTDELAY changes

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:14:48PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Hi. > > 2016-06-15 13:40 GMT+09:00 Wolfgang Denk : > > Dear Tom Rini, > > > > In message <1465914280-5420-2-git-send-email-tr...@konsulko.com> you wrote: > >> With updated moveconfig.py and an better default,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] x86: baytrail: acpi: Hide internal UART per GNVS setting

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Bin Meng wrote: > Hi George, > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 9:57 PM, George McCollister > wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:33 AM, Bin Meng wrote: >>> If global NVS says internal UART is not

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] x86: baytrail: acpi: Hide internal UART per GNVS setting

Hi George, On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 9:57 PM, George McCollister wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:33 AM, Bin Meng wrote: >> If global NVS says internal UART is not enabled, hide it in the ASL >> code so that OS won't see it. >> >> Signed-off-by:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] x86: baytrail: acpi: Hide internal UART per GNVS setting

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:33 AM, Bin Meng wrote: > If global NVS says internal UART is not enabled, hide it in the ASL > code so that OS won't see it. > > Signed-off-by: Bin Meng > > --- > > arch/x86/include/asm/arch-baytrail/acpi/lpc.asl | 19

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] x86: acpi: Pack global NVS into ACPI table

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:33 AM, Bin Meng wrote: > Now that platform-specific ACPI global NVS is added, pack it into > ACPI table and get its address fixed up. > > Signed-off-by: Bin Meng > --- > > arch/x86/include/asm/acpi_table.h | 4

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] x86: baytrail: Introduce ACPI global NVS

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:33 AM, Bin Meng wrote: > This introduces baytrail-specific ACPI global NVS structure, defined in > both C header file and ASL file. > > Signed-off-by: Bin Meng > --- > > arch/x86/cpu/baytrail/acpi.c | 26 >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/18] various Gateworks Ventana fixes and enhancements

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Tim Harvey wrote: > This series represents a large chunk of patches in my queue for Gateworks > Ventana boards based on the IMX6 Soc's. > > Tim Harvey (18): > imx: ventana: config: add env vars for disk and part > imx: ventana: config:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] configs: Re-sync BOOTDELAY changes

Hi. 2016-06-15 13:40 GMT+09:00 Wolfgang Denk : > Dear Tom Rini, > > In message <1465914280-5420-2-git-send-email-tr...@konsulko.com> you wrote: >> With updated moveconfig.py and an better default, re-generate >> the migration of BOOTDELAY to the defconfig. > > There are a number of

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] x86: conga-qeval20-qa3: Add support for internal UART

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Stefan Roese wrote: > This patch adds support to enable and use the internal BayTrail UART > instead of the one integrated in the Super IO Winbond chip. For this, > a 2nd defconfig file is added. > > This is useful for tests done for the congatec SoM

[U-Boot] [PATCH] x86: conga-qeval20-qa3: Add support for internal UART

This patch adds support to enable and use the internal BayTrail UART instead of the one integrated in the Super IO Winbond chip. For this, a 2nd defconfig file is added. This is useful for tests done for the congatec SoM used on baseboards without such a Super IO chip. Signed-off-by: Stefan

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] x86: baytrail: Introduce a Kconfig option for the internal UART

On 15.06.2016 06:33, Bin Meng wrote: There are quite a number of BayTrail boards that uses an external SuperIO chipset to provide the legacy UART. For such cases, it's better to have a Kconfig option to enable the internal UART. So far BayleyBay and MinnowMax boards are using internal UART as

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] x86: fsp: Wrap setup_internal_uart() call with CONFIG_INTERNAL_UART

On 15.06.2016 06:33, Bin Meng wrote: For any FSP enabled boards that want to enable debug UART support, setup_internal_uart() will be called, but this API is only available on BayTrail platform. Change to wrap it with CONFIG_INTERNAL_UART. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 1/3] mmc: fsl: reset to normal boot mode when eMMC fast boot

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 11:53 PM, Peng Fan wrote: > When booting in eMMC fast boot, MMC host does not exit from > boot mode after bootrom loading image. So the first command > 'CMD0' sent in uboot will pull down the CMD line to low and > cause errors. > > This patch cleans

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH V2 2/3] fsl_esdhc: Update clock enable bits for USDHC

On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 11:53 PM, Peng Fan wrote: > From: Ye Li > > The USDHC move the 4 clock bits CARD_CLK_SOFT_EN, IPG_PERCLK_SOFT_EN, > HCLK_SOFT_EN, and IPG_CLK_SOFT_EN from sysctl register to vendorspec > register. The driver uses RSTA to replace the

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] imx6ulevk: fix LCD_nPWREN setting

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Peng Fan wrote: > Q901 is PMOS, LCD_nPWREN should be at low voltage then output is 3V3. > If LCD_nPWREN is high, output is 2.4V which is not correct. > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan > Cc: Stefano Babic > Cc:

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] imx: mx6ulevk: change QSPI PAD DSE to 120ohm

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Peng Fan wrote: > The current pad DSE for QSPI is 60ohm. This setting cause > too strong drive to clock and data signals. Need to change > the DSE to 120ohm for better signal quality. > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] mx7dsabresd: Fix LCD_PWR_EN output setting

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Peng Fan wrote: > From: Ye Li > > LCD_PWR_EN controls the G pin of Q13 PMOS which needs low voltage to connect > D to S for outputting LCD 3.3V. If LCD_PWR_EN is high, we measured the LCD 3v3 > is actually 1.2V. > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] imx6ulevk: fix 74LV OE usage

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Peng Fan wrote: > Fix 74LV OE gpio index. gpio index is wrong, > so gpio output will not have effect, since we > use wrong GPIO5_IO18, but not correct GPIO5_IO8. > > And at the end of the initialization of 74lv init, should > keep OE voltage

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 7/9] libfdt: Add overlay application function

Hi David, > On Jun 15, 2016, at 13:19 , David Gibson wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:34:00PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: >> Hi David, >> >>> On Jun 15, 2016, at 06:14 , David Gibson >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 7/9] libfdt: Add overlay application function

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:34:00PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > Hi David, > > > On Jun 15, 2016, at 06:14 , David Gibson > > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:22:23PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: > >> Hi David, > >>> On Jun 14, 2016, at 03:25 ,

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] i.MX6 nand bootupdate

Hi Sergey, On 14/06/2016 20:32, Sergey Kubushyn wrote: > Here is the initial support for writing i.MX6 NAND U-Boot into NAND > with all FCB and DBBT stuff as required. > This is a very interesting feature missing in U-Boot. Up now we are constrained to update the bootloader from user space

Re: [U-Boot] socfpga 2016.05, CV socdk Rev E1, SPL and u-boot fail when booting from QSPI

Trying again. I have reverted back to a vanilla u-boot-2016.05, added the not-enter-quad-mode patch and changed the SPI address where the SPL should load the u-boot from and it does not work. My question: Has anyone else tested SPL/u-boot on an Altera CV socdk Rev E1 board recently (like

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 7/9] libfdt: Add overlay application function

Hi David, > On Jun 15, 2016, at 06:14 , David Gibson wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:22:23PM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: >> Hi David, >>> On Jun 14, 2016, at 03:25 , David Gibson >>> wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at

[U-Boot] [RESEND] common: block: fix compiler error with CONFIG_FASTBOOT_FLASH_MMC_DEV

This fixes the following compiler error: common/fb_mmc.c: In function ‘fb_mmc_erase’: common/fb_mmc.c:209:17: error: ‘struct blk_desc’ has no member named ‘block_erase’ Signed-off-by: Ziyuan Xu --- common/fb_mmc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot-x86 sf probe fail

+Simon On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 4:42 PM, Hilbert Tu(杜睿哲_Pegatron) wrote: > Hi Bin, > > Thanks for your information. > > The SPI address I mentioned was dumped from pch_get_spi_base(). But I have no > idea where to check my memory mapping. You need check your SoC

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/2] armv8: Support loading 32-bit OS in AArch32 execution state

> On 15.06.16 10:08, Huan Wang wrote: > >>> Am 15.06.2016 um 05:04 schrieb Huan Wang : > >>> > >>> Hi, Alex, > >>> > > On 06/08/2016 07:14 AM, Alison Wang wrote: > > To support loading a 32-bit OS, the execution state will change > > from > > AArch64 to AArch32

[U-Boot] [PATCH] cmd, nand: add an option to disable the verification when writing in raw mode

Modern NANDs do not guarantee that data written in raw mode will not contain bitflips just after writing them. This is fine since the number of bitflips should be rather low and thus fixable by the ECC engine, but since we are reading data in raw mode to verify if they match the input data we

[U-Boot] [PATCH] common: block: fix error with CONFIG_FASTBOOT_FLASH_MMC_DEV

This fixes the following compiler error: common/fb_mmc.c: In function ‘fb_mmc_erase’: common/fb_mmc.c:209:17: error: ‘struct blk_desc’ has no member named ‘block_erase’ Signed-off-by: Ziyuan Xu --- common/fb_mmc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 5/5] fastboot: sparse: improve CHUNK_TYPE_FILL write performance

On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 11:19:39AM -0700, Steve Rae wrote: > - increase the size of the fill buffer > - testing has shown a 10x improvement when the sparse image > has large CHUNK_TYPE_FILL chunks > > Signed-off-by: Steve Rae > --- > > Changes in v2: None > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/5] fastboot: sparse: implement reserve()

On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 11:19:38AM -0700, Steve Rae wrote: > In order to process the CHUNK_TYPE_DONT_CARE properly, there is > a requirement to be able to 'reserve' a specified number of blocks > in the storage media. Because of the special handling of "bad blocks" > in NAND devices, this is

Re: [U-Boot] x86: acpi: Disabling SoC functions defined in ASL on a per board basis

Hi George, On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:46 PM, George McCollister wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 8:45 PM, Bin Meng wrote: >> Hi George, >> >> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:12 AM, George McCollister >> wrote: >>> On

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] x86: acpi: Pack global NVS into ACPI table

Now that platform-specific ACPI global NVS is added, pack it into ACPI table and get its address fixed up. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng --- arch/x86/include/asm/acpi_table.h | 4 .../x86/include/asm/arch-baytrail/acpi/platform.asl | 3 +++

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] x86: baytrail: acpi: Hide internal UART per GNVS setting

If global NVS says internal UART is not enabled, hide it in the ASL code so that OS won't see it. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng --- arch/x86/include/asm/arch-baytrail/acpi/lpc.asl | 19 --- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4] x86: acpi: Introduce ACPI global NVS support

ACPI global NVS is an area in system memory with various platform defined variables that can be utilized between U-Boot and ACPI ASL codes. U-Boot set these variables at runtime, so that ASL codes can test these variables to provide some runtime flexiblity. Tested on MinnowMax with

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] x86: quark: Introduce ACPI global NVS

This introduces quark-specific ACPI global NVS structure, defined in both C header file and ASL file. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng --- arch/x86/cpu/quark/acpi.c | 7 +++ arch/x86/include/asm/arch-quark/acpi/global_nvs.asl | 12

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] x86: baytrail: Introduce ACPI global NVS

This introduces baytrail-specific ACPI global NVS structure, defined in both C header file and ASL file. Signed-off-by: Bin Meng --- arch/x86/cpu/baytrail/acpi.c | 26 ++ .../include/asm/arch-baytrail/acpi/global_nvs.asl | 13

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/2] armv8: Support loading 32-bit OS in AArch32 execution state

On 15.06.16 10:08, Huan Wang wrote: >>> Am 15.06.2016 um 05:04 schrieb Huan Wang : >>> >>> Hi, Alex, >>> > On 06/08/2016 07:14 AM, Alison Wang wrote: > To support loading a 32-bit OS, the execution state will change from > AArch64 to AArch32 when jumping to

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/5] fastboot: sparse: resync common/image-sparse.c (part 1)

On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 11:19:36AM -0700, Steve Rae wrote: > This file originally came from upstream code. > > While retaining the storage abstraction feature, this is the first > set of the changes required to resync with the > cmd_flash_mmc_sparse_img() > in the file > aboot.c > from > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] sunxi: Add defconfig for Olinuxino Lime 2 EMMC version

On Wed, 2016-06-15 at 05:29 +0200, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: Please include a short description of the board, in this case explaining the distinction (and defconfig differences) from the non- EMMC version would be useful. Have a look at some of the previous patches which add defconfig (e.g. those

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 1/2] armv8: Support loading 32-bit OS in AArch32 execution state

> > Am 15.06.2016 um 05:04 schrieb Huan Wang : > > > > Hi, Alex, > > > >>> On 06/08/2016 07:14 AM, Alison Wang wrote: > >>> To support loading a 32-bit OS, the execution state will change from > >>> AArch64 to AArch32 when jumping to kernel. > >>> > >>> The architecture

Re: [U-Boot] u-boot-x86 sf probe fail

Hi Hilbert, On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Hilbert Tu(杜睿哲_Pegatron) wrote: > Hi Simon, > > I have checked the SPI base address in coreboot and u-boot. They are > different. I am not sure is it due to the memory remapping. > In coreboot, the SPI address is

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/7] mtd: nand: Add+use mtd_to/from_nand and nand_get/set_controller_data

On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 09:59:15 +0200 Boris Brezillon wrote: > Hi Scott, > > On Thu, 09 Jun 2016 21:07:00 -0500 > Scott Wood wrote: > > > On Mon, 2016-06-06 at 18:02 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > On Mon, 30 May 2016 13:57:56 -0500 >

  1   2   >