[U-Boot] Question regarding Problems with CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_LBA in disk/part_efi.c

2012-12-10 Thread David Purdy
In the current source tree, in disk/part_efi.c , we see: /* * Problems with CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_LBA: * * struct disk_partition.start in include/part.h is sized as ulong. * When CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_LBA is activated, lbaint_t changes from ulong to uint64_t. * For now, it is cast back to ulong at

[U-Boot] Support for drives larger than 2.1TB with U-Boot Kirkwood

2012-06-02 Thread David Purdy
Hello, Does anyone in the community here have experience (first-hand, preferably) knowledge regarding the use of drives larger than 2.1TB? It is my understanding that CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION and CONFIG_SYS_64BIT_LBA both required - but is there anything else that needs to be switched on?

[U-Boot] EFI/GPT support in U-Boot : real-world tests

2012-05-23 Thread David Purdy
Hi folks, I'm hoping that a few of you (perhaps Kirkwood users in particular) can tell me of their own personal experiences (hopefully all good) when using EFI/GPT partitions w/ U-Boot. Does it work as advertised? Is it just a matter of setting CONFIG_EFI_PARTITION in the config? Any

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] kwboot: boot Marvell Kirkwood SoCs over a serial link

2012-05-09 Thread David Purdy
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Daniel Stodden daniel.stod...@googlemail.com wrote: Have you tried to put the bootrom in the debug mode ? https://doukki.net/doku.php?id=wiki:tutoriels:u-boot.uart#boot_from_uart0 Réfs :

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] kwboot: boot Marvell Kirkwood SoCs over a serial link

2012-05-08 Thread David Purdy
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:38 PM, Daniel Stodden daniel.stod...@googlemail.com wrote: On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 20:16 -0500, David Purdy wrote: On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Daniel Stodden Hey. Unfortunately I only have a couple Buffalo boards and a Qnap, all essentially the same chip

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] kwboot: boot Marvell Kirkwood SoCs over a serial link

2012-05-08 Thread David Purdy
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 4:23 PM, David Purdy david.c.pu...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:38 PM, Daniel Stodden daniel.stod...@googlemail.com wrote: On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 20:16 -0500, David Purdy wrote: On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 6:40 PM, Daniel Stodden Will try out that short

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] kwboot: boot Marvell Kirkwood SoCs over a serial link

2012-05-06 Thread David Purdy
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Luka Perkov ub...@lukaperkov.net wrote: The kwboot program boots boards based on Marvell's Kirkwood platform via Xmodem over their integrated UART. Signed-off-by: Daniel Stodden daniel.stod...@googlemail.com Acked-by: Luka Perkov ub...@lukaperkov.net ---

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fix IDE_BUS(dev) macro

2012-04-21 Thread David Purdy
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 1:38 AM, Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.b...@aribaud.net wrote: Hi Dave, Not my main area of expertise here, but I am not sure how this plays on Marvell non-kirkwood platforms (e.g., orion5x). ISTR it is not the first time we deal with the whole IDE number of bus /

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fix IDE_BUS(dev) macro

2012-04-18 Thread David Purdy
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Luka Perkov ub...@lukaperkov.net wrote: IDE_BUS assumes that each bus has two devices and thus returns the first bus even when the second one should be probed. Signed-off-by: Simon Baatz gmbno...@gmail.com Tested-by: Luka Perkov ub...@lukaperkov.net ---

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v7] kirkwood: add NAS62x0 board support

2012-04-17 Thread David Purdy
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Luka Perkov ub...@lukaperkov.net wrote: Hi Simon! Hi Prafulla! On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 02:14:23AM -0700, Prafulla Wadaskar wrote: #define IDE_BUS(dev) (dev / (CONFIG_SYS_IDE_MAXDEVICE / CONFIG_SYS_IDE_MAXBUS)) in ide.h fixes the problem for me and

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] kirkwood: add support for Cloud Engines Pogoplug E02

2012-04-15 Thread David Purdy
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 2:41 AM, Prafulla Wadaskar prafu...@marvell.com wrote: -Original Message- From: David Purdy [mailto:david.c.pu...@gmail.com] Sent: 15 April 2012 00:54 To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar; albert.u.b...@aribaud.net Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] kirkwood

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5] kirkwood: add support for Cloud Engines Pogoplug E02

2012-04-14 Thread David Purdy
Hi Wolfgang, Prafulla, Albert all, Any chance to push this in 2012.04 release? thanks, regards, Dave On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 3:05 AM, Prafulla Wadaskar prafu...@marvell.com wrote: -Original Message- From: Dave Purdy [mailto:david.c.pu...@gmail.com] Sent: 28 March 2012 07:31

Re: [U-Boot] Marvell/Kirkwood: 6192 vs. 6281 - does U-Boot correctly distinguish between the two?

2012-04-04 Thread David Purdy
. . . From: David Purdy [mailto:david.c.pu...@gmail.com] Sent: 02 April 2012 17:04 To: Prafulla Wadaskar Subject: Re: Marvell/Kirkwood: 6192 vs. 6281 - does U-Boot correctly distinguish between the two? Prafulla, This is what I see... On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Prafulla Wadaskar

[U-Boot] Problem w/ SATA/IDE on Kirkwood _88F6281_ board:

2012-04-02 Thread David Purdy
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Prafulla Wadaskar prafu...@marvell.com wrote: I remember there was some delay issue on SATA, since processor in this platform is running at lower clock, (may be) this could be one of parameter to be considered. May be Albert can have some more inside on this.

[U-Boot] Problem w/ SATA/IDE on Kirkwood _88F6281_ board:

2012-04-01 Thread David Purdy
Problem w/ SATA/IDE on Kirkwood 88F6281 board: I've got U-Boot 2011.12 working well on a 8192 Kirkwood board, _except_ for a nagging SATA problem. Currently, it loads and executes U-Boot fine, it boots fine from a USB drive, but I'm unable to get the SATA port to function correctly. Any insight

[U-Boot] Marvell/Kirkwood: 6192 vs. 6281 - does U-Boot correctly distinguish between the two?

2012-04-01 Thread David Purdy
I've found either a bug, a feature or a misunderstanding of my own. I've researched it before posting as much as I could, but since there are __no__ 6192 Kirkwoods in mainline (AFAICS), there isn't much to compare to... _Marvell's_ U-Boot running on a Pogoplug V4, with its 6192_A1 ... shows

Re: [U-Boot] Problem w/ SATA/IDE on Kirkwood _88F6281_ board:

2012-04-01 Thread David Purdy
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 4:24 PM, David Purdy david.c.pu...@gmail.com wrote: Problem w/ SATA/IDE on Kirkwood 88F6281 board: To clarify, this is actually a _6192_ board. I double-checked, there are no 6192 boards in include/configs/ . The contents in arch/arm/arch-kirkwood/ certainly

[U-Boot] mixed case DATA lines in kwbimage.cfg, and other file : cosmetic?

2012-03-28 Thread David Purdy
Hi Prafulla all, I understand that lower case hexadecimal for DATA lines is preferred for kwbimage.cfg (in Kirkwood). For a mixed-upper-and-lower-case kwbimage.cfg that is already in U-Boot, should I first submit a [PATCH][cosmetic] to change it to all lower case DATA? Or should this sort of

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4][resend?] kirkwood: add support for Cloud Engines Pogoplug E02

2012-03-21 Thread David Purdy
still have access to it? Thank you, regards, Dave -- Forwarded message -- From: Dave Purdy david.c.pu...@gmail.com Date: Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 1:25 PM Subject: [PATCH v4] kirkwood: add support for Cloud Engines Pogoplug E02 To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Cc: David Purdy david.c.pu

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] kirkwood: add support for Cloud Engines Pogoplug E02

2012-03-15 Thread David Purdy
Hi Prafulla, You comments are very clear and helpful. I'll try to get the v3 patch in sometime over the weekend. thanks regards, Dave On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 3:12 AM, Prafulla Wadaskar prafu...@marvell.com wrote: -Original Message- From: David Purdy [mailto:david.c.pu

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] kirkwood: add support for Cloud Engines Pogoplug E02

2012-03-15 Thread David Purdy
...@marvell.comwrote: -Original Message- From: David Purdy [mailto:david.c.pu...@gmail.com] Sent: 14 March 2012 23:32 To: Prafulla Wadaskar Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; albert.u.b...@aribaud.net Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kirkwood: add support for Cloud Engines Pogoplug E02 Thank you Prafulla

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] kirkwood: add support for Cloud Engines Pogoplug E02

2012-03-14 Thread David Purdy
... actually it is probably closest to the Seagate Dockstar (which is supported in U-Boot stable since 2010.12 IIRC), but there are enough differences that the Dockstar's u-boot binary will not work correctly in the Pogoplug E02. Signed-off-by: David Purdy david.c.pu...@gmail.com Cc: prafu...@marvell.com

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Revert nand: make 1-bit software ECC configurable

2012-03-03 Thread David Purdy
Thank you, gentlemen, the patch worked a treat... U-Boot 2011.12-00374-g54e9668-dirty (Mar 03 2012 - 11:08:23) Pogoplug E02 SoC: Kirkwood 88F6281_A0 DRAM: 256 MiB WARNING: Caches not enabled NAND: 128 MiB ``` Dave On Sat, Mar 3,

[U-Boot] CONFIG_MTD_ECC_SOFT not enabled breakage/change

2012-03-02 Thread David Purdy
While finishing some work on support for a new machine, a build based on the latest git, I see this: ... U-Boot 2011.12-00374-g54e9668-dirty (Mar 02 2012 - 14:48:48) Pogoplug E02 SoC: Kirkwood 88F6281_A0 DRAM: 256 MiB WARNING: Caches not enabled NAND: