Re: [U-Boot] Add a new command to U-Boot

Excellent, but... Deepak Gopalakrishnan wrote: [snip] > this is the content of firrst u-boot command i wrote: > > cmd_dgprint.c > > /* > * (C) Copyright 2005 > * Wolfgang Denk, DENX Software Engineering, w...@denx.de. > * > * See file CREDITS for list of people who contributed to this > *

Re: [U-Boot] Add a new command to U-Boot

Deepak Gopalakrishnan wrote: > HI > I am working with Freescale MPC8313E-RDB and with it comes their BSP. This > provides a u-boot. I want to understand how the u-boot commands work as in > where are they defined and in which files. > My utlimate goal is to add new u-boot commands and to modify the

Re: [U-Boot] QUESTION: How do I generate an assembly listing?

Jonathan Haws wrote: > I need to generate an assembly listing that contains all the assembly > code generated by the compiler. I have tried putting the standard > GCC options in ppc_config.mk, but cannot get the results I am looking > for. > > What I need is a listing file that contains the addre

Re: [U-Boot] MII register display

Hi Jon, Jon Smirl wrote: > On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Jon Smirl wrote: >> Why is "speed selection = 10 Mbps" when both sides support 100Mb? >> Is uboot decoding this register correctly? >> >> uboot> mii dump 0 0 >> 0. (1000) -- PHY control register -- >> (8000:) 0.15

Re: [U-Boot] AMCC 405EX Trap

Jonathan Haws wrote: >> On Thursday 30 April 2009, Jonathan Haws wrote: >>> I am certain that it is a hardware failure that is causing the machine >>> check because I can use the exact same binary on another (identical) >> board >>> and have it boot just fine. That tells me that all the EBC and SD

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] include/ns16550.h: Unify structure declaration for registers

Detlev Zundel wrote: > Hi Jerry, > >> Detlev Zundel wrote: >>> Hello Shinya, >>> Detlev Zundel wrote: > As I said, I understand now why there were different data-types involved > although this was kind of non-obvious. So I take it, you had a working > configuration with REG_SIZE

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] include/ns16550.h: Unify structure declaration for registers

Detlev Zundel wrote: > Hello Shinya, > >> Detlev Zundel wrote: >>> As I said, I understand now why there were different data-types involved >>> although this was kind of non-obvious. So I take it, you had a working >>> configuration with REG_SIZE = 4, correct? >> I might be unclear. I used to use

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot ARM merge strategy, was: there are non-DM6446 DaVinci chips

Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear David Brownell, > > In message <200904250105.41050.davi...@pacbell.net> you wrote: >> Yes. The issue is needing to guess what's up ... so for >> example, I seem to observe that "merge window closed" must >> not be the same as "first RC is out", which isn't how the >> L

Re: [U-Boot] [ANNOUNCE] Kconfig support

Wolfgang Denk wrote: [snip] > There are broken boards around, too - of course. There are those > board maintainers who simply dump their stuff on us and then never > show up again with any contributions any more. > > I don't know how we could prevent that. It's probably happening with >

Re: [U-Boot] Kconfig menu layout

Jon Smirl wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Jon Smirl wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Kumar Gala >> wrote: >>> On Apr 20, 2009, at 5:01 PM, Jon Smirl wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > In chatting w/Wolfgang on IRC he felt that we sh

Re: [U-Boot] [ANNOUNCE] Kconfig support

Robert Schwebel wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 10:42:08AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> U-Boot-v2 is used here to do real work in our projects. If it isn't >>> what you need, it is perfectly fine if you ignore it. >> my concern isnt really narrow to the Blackfin port. i was using it as >> a pr

Re: [U-Boot] Problem in relocate_code on Xilinx FPGA

Seyyed Mohammad Sajjadi wrote: > Hi > > I am trying to use u-boot on a Xilinx V4FX12 FPGA, in which a ppc405 > system is running. The board includes an ST SPI Flash, which I have > to use as the only non-volatile memory available (in case important, > its Atmark Techno suzaku_v sz410). > > I have

Re: [U-Boot] Linux hangs when uncompressing kernel image: linux-2.6.26

0b board is, see point #2), in which case the standard .dts should work. What debug capability do you have? Can you dump the linux log buffer (from memory) after a failed boot? <http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/DULG/LinuxPostMortemAnalysis> I'm out of easy answers. Good luck, gvb &g

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/7] Remove individual I2C commands and cleanup

Heiko Schocher wrote: > Hello Peter, > > Peter Tyser wrote: >> This patch series removes the "individual" I2C commands (and the >> CONFIG_I2C_CMD_TREE define) and migrates all boards to the newer >> "tree style" I2C commands. >> >> A small amount of cleanup was performed before and after removing

Re: [U-Boot] Linux hangs when uncompressing kernel image: linux-2.6.26

Marco Antônio Possamai wrote: > Hello > > I've been working on building a 2.6.26 linux kernel to the mpc5200Lite > PowerPc board. However, I am unable to boot the system using the > generated image. > > I am using what seems to be the latest U-Boot for the job. Got it from > www.denx.de/git/u-boo

Re: [U-Boot] PPC + NatSemi dp83640 phy?

Hi Nathan, Nathan French wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been tasked with bringing up a new board next week for my company > that is essentially a Kilauea with a National Semiconductor DP83640 > ethernet phy. We have U-Boot working on our previous board rev which > used the Marvell 88E ethernet ph

Re: [U-Boot] incremental environment updating

Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Jerry Van Baren, > > In message <49e335bb.4050...@ge.com> you wrote: >>> - it works only on NOR flash, not on any media that can be accessed >>> only in blocks >> Not true: the offset merely needs to be aligned to the next blo

Re: [U-Boot] incremental environment updating

Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 13 April 2009 08:12:44 Jerry Van Baren wrote: >> Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> On Monday 13 April 2009 06:15:24 Wolfgang Denk wrote: >>>> In message Mike wrote: >>>>> currently the env code will erase the entire env stor

Re: [U-Boot] incremental environment updating

Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Jerry Van Baren, > > In message <49e32c3c.8090...@ge.com> you wrote: >> Since flash can change 1s to 0s, but cannot change them back, you could >> redefine the env storage to be >>[undefined] >> (note the added at the

Re: [U-Boot] incremental environment updating

Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 13 April 2009 06:15:24 Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> In message Mike wrote: >>> currently the env code will erase the entire env storage before writing >>> back out the current env, even if the env storage has enough empty space >>> to store the current env. for example

Re: [U-Boot] use of C99

Kumar Gala wrote: > I'm glad to see I started this week's flame thread :) > > - k Wolfgang will have to add a new stat to his releases statistics: originator of the longest threads (top 10, sorted by length). :-P gvb ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@li

Re: [U-Boot] Which U-Boot releases have Device Tree support

cmfai...@rockwellcollins.com wrote: > We bought a MPC8360E-RDK development kit to develop applications under > MontaVista CGE5.0. We were toldby the consultant whose doing our board LSP > that the U-Boot version that came with the development kit did not have > device tree support. The consultan

Re: [U-Boot] use of C99

Pink Boy wrote: [snip] > Pops out of hole, looks at shadow, 6 more weeks till we ship... > > Um... my feeling is that if one is going to declare a variable > inside a #ifdef then that variable ought to be called something > like > > int indx_CONFIG_COOL_FEATURE > > and > > u32 indx_CONFI

Re: [U-Boot] use of C99

Hi Wolfgang, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Kumar Gala, > > In message <4a0b9aaa-4714-4c27-84a7-22fce4d91...@freescale.com> you wrote: >> I was wondering if there was any reason we avoid C99 features in u- >> boot source. >> >> Specifically the ability to declare variables in the middle of >> fun

Re: [U-Boot] Multiple device support -- sorry state :(

k...@koi8.net wrote: > OK, this is _NOT_ just multiple I2C adapters... The entire thing is > fundamentally broken. > > One supposed to have _THE_ device and only this device is somehow supported. > > Now it is USB. Each and every USB driver exports the same set of functions, > submit_XXX_msg(...)

Re: [U-Boot] dtb merge

Hi Andre, Andre Schwarz wrote: > Any ideas on how to merge device tree binaries from slave devices ? > > Having a PowerPC based board with various extension boards on e.g. the > local bus with each board having some kind of PROM device (I2C, SPI > etc.) containing a dtb ... is it possible to me

[U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-fdt

Dear Wolfgang, Please pull git://git.denx.de/u-boot-fdt.git master. These are bugfixes from dtc/libfdt and resynchronizes us. Thanks, gvb The following changes since commit ed9953d6903c9673135a96ae1644f61cb0eac5ce: Wolfgang Denk (1): Merge branch 'master' of git://git.denx.de/u-boo

Re: [U-Boot] pending patches website

Jerry Van Baren wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On Thursday 02 April 2009 08:32:00 Detlev Zundel wrote: >>>> not so long ago there was some custom thingy that was running on the >>>> u-boot website that'd automatically grab patches from the mailing list

Re: [U-Boot] pending patches website

Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thursday 02 April 2009 08:32:00 Detlev Zundel wrote: >>> not so long ago there was some custom thingy that was running on the >>> u-boot website that'd automatically grab patches from the mailing list >>> and try to file them away so they wouldnt get lost. but i cant see

[U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] libfdt: Fix C++ compile-time cast error on gnu 4.2.1

Allow the inclusion of libfdt.h in C++ source. Signed-off-by: Laurent Gregoire Acked-by: David Gibson --- include/libfdt.h |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/libfdt.h b/include/libfdt.h index ce374fd..d23d40e 100644 --- a/include/libfdt.h +++ b/inc

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] Fix a possible overflow case detected by gcc 4.3.2

.../dtc/libfdt/fdt_sw.c: In function 'fdt_end_node': .../dtc/libfdt/fdt_sw.c:81: error: assuming signed overflow does not occur when assuming that (X + c) < X is always false Signed-off-by: Emil Medve --- libfdt/fdt_sw.c |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] libfdt: Rework/cleanup fdt_next_tag()

Currently, callers of fdt_next_tag() must usually follow the call with some sort of call to fdt_offset_ptr() to verify that the blob isn't truncated in the middle of the tag data they're going to process. This is a bit silly, since fdt_next_tag() generally has to call fdt_offset_ptr() on at least s

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] libfdt: Rework fdt_next_node()

Currently fdt_next_node() will find the next node in the blob regardless of whether it is above, below or at the same level in the tree as the starting node - the depth parameter is updated to indicate which is the case. When a depth parameter is supplied, this patch makes it instead terminate imm

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4] libfdt: Catch up with upstream dtc/libfdt

The following series of patches are bugfixes from dtc/libfdt. gvb ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] Maillist issue of u-boot@lists.denx.de

Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Wednesday 01 April 2009 06:12:21 Marco wrote: >> Mmmmand I receive your post just now...maybe a problem with the list >> that doesn't send the post to the author, the most important thing is >> however that everybody can read it. > > ive received both of the imls uti

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 4/7] rtc: add support for 4543 RTC (manufactured by e.g. EPSON)

Anatolij Gustschin wrote: > Detlev Zundel wrote: [snip] >> So I really ask you to reconsider your critique. > > Ok, your and Wolfgang's arguments show me, that being consistent with > something is often brain-damaged. Sorry for the noise. A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.

Re: [U-Boot] Size of external u-boot commands

Jon Smirl wrote: > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Jerry Van Baren > wrote: >> Jon Smirl wrote: >>> My networking hardware needs microcode loaded into it before it will >>> function. What's the best method to load this code? It's 70KB. >>> >&g

Re: [U-Boot] Size of external u-boot commands

Jon Smirl wrote: > My networking hardware needs microcode loaded into it before it will > function. What's the best method to load this code? It's 70KB. > > My current u-boot image is 170KB. I started working with the code in > examples and api_examples. But the "hello world" programs built using

Re: [U-Boot] minicom garbled

SlinceArm wrote: > Hi , Wolfgang Denk > > Thank for your reply : ) > >> U-Boot 1.1.4 is prehistoric, please use reacent code. And minicom is >> officially unsupported (see the repective entry in the U-Boot manual). > > Ok , i will try to install u-boot-2009-03 in my board > > But , is any oth

Re: [U-Boot] CONFIG_SERVERIP

E Robertson wrote: > Hi all, > In the current git source, I have the serverip config set but tftp > complains about serverip not being set. > I didn't see any changes to the source here. Am I missing something? > >> printenv > baudrate=115200 > ipaddr=192.168.0.200 > serverip=192.168.0.100 > gatew

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] 8313erdb: Set guarded bit on BAT that covers the end of the address space.

Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday 17 March 2009 14:18:13 Scott Wood wrote: >> Mike Frysinger wrote: [snip] >> I don't know of any amount of "nop" instructions that would be >> architecturally guaranteed to avoid this -- they're no-ops, not syncs >> (despite how some other architectures use them)

Re: [U-Boot] Cleaning up new port

Hi Remco, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Remco Poelstra, > > In message <49bf9ea5.5040...@duran-audio.com> you wrote: >> I fully understand. The problem is that there is a special Ethernet PHY >> on the board which is under a NDA, so I cannot publish code surrounding >> it. I can publish the gener

Re: [U-Boot] Building u-boot on a PowerPC host

David Saada wrote: > Hello, > Is there a recommended toolchain for building U-Boot on a PowerPC host? I've > used ELDK on x86 hosts in the past for this purpose, and it worked fine, but > now I need to perform it on a PowerPC host. As far as I could see, ELDK > wasn't supported on PowerPC hosts.

Re: [U-Boot] Mirror to github

Jon Smirl wrote: > Six people have various modifications to u-boot hosted on github. > These projects aren't linked to each other. > > I just talked to the github people. To fix this the main u-boot repo > needs to be pushing a clone of itself to github. This is free to do, > just make a git hub a

Re: [U-Boot] LXT972 issue on MPC8247: tx error

Hi Sauce.Cheng, Sauce.Cheng wrote: > my code run on the board reveal the info as following: > > Board: Motorola MPC8272ADS > DRAM: 32 MB > FLASH: 512 kB > In:serial > Out: serial > Err: serial > Net: FCC1 ETHERNET > bb_miiphy_write() > Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0 > => > > after

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Add bank configuration to FSL spd_sdram.c

The routine assumed 4 bank SDRAMs, enhance to configure for 4 or 8 bank SDRAMs. Signed-off-by: Gerald Van Baren --- V2: Do both sets of chip selects. D'oh! The cpu/mpc83xx/spd_sdram.c routine /almost/ worked for me. It turns out my DIMM stick has 8 banks which was being ignored (hard-coded fo

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add bank configuration to FSL spd_sdram.c

Liu Dave-R63238 wrote: >> The routine assumed 4 bank SDRAMs, enhance to configure for 4 >> or 8 bank SDRAMs. >> >> Signed-off-by: Gerald Van Baren >> --- >> >> I haven't made much headway on adapting the cpu/mpc8/ddr >> routines to the 83xx (8360). It has some 85xx (86xx) >> assumptions in

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Add bank configuration to FSL spd_sdram.c

The routine assumed 4 bank SDRAMs, enhance to configure for 4 or 8 bank SDRAMs. Signed-off-by: Gerald Van Baren --- I haven't made much headway on adapting the cpu/mpc8/ddr routines to the 83xx (8360). It has some 85xx (86xx) assumptions in that needs to be pulled out. Meanwhile, the cpu/m

Re: [U-Boot] Multiple device support - none at all?

k...@koi8.net wrote: > Hi, everyone. > > I wonder if I'm dreaming or the U-Boot is fundamentally broken... Well... broken can be a relative term. I like to think of it as an opportunity to stand on the shoulders of giants. ;-) > It looks like there is no support for multiple devices of a same

Re: [U-Boot] How to Remove the padding bits from u-boot.bin

kuldeep nigam wrote: > Hi All, > I am using MIP405T board and trying to reduce the size of u-boot.bin > by disabling the drivers that i didn't need. But the image size is not > changing because it is padding all 1's at the end of the image. Can anyone > tell me how to remove these padding b

Re: [U-Boot] Uboot and DMA

Hi Nikhil, praveen G wrote: > Hi, > Any updates?? > > Nikhil > On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 11:25 AM, praveen G wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Please let me know if Uboot uses DMA for any of its operations during board >> bootup. U-Boot supports quite a

Re: [U-Boot] FSL DDR @ 83xx

Andre Schwarz wrote: > Kumar Gala schrieb: >> On Dec 9, 2008, at 12:01 PM, Andre Schwarz wrote: >> >>> Jon Loeliger schrieb: On Mon, 2008-12-08 at 18:02 +0100, Andre Schwarz wrote: > Kim, > > I'd like to change my DDR setup code since it looks like my computed > values are

Re: [U-Boot] Ethernet PHY LAN8700

00 and U-boot version used is 1.3.0. 1.3.0 is getting pretty old. :-/ Any chance of using the latest release? > -Thanks > Rupesh > > > Jerry Van Baren-7 wrote: >> Please don't top quote. >> >> rudresh wrote: >>> HI gvb >>> >>>

Re: [U-Boot] Ethernet PHY LAN8700

culate on how/why/what could be set up wrong from the far end of a mail list). You didn't say what version of u-boot you are basing your code off of nor what processor you are using. I don't have expertise w/ the tsec or your PHY, perhaps if you are more specific someone with real ex

Re: [U-Boot] Ethernet PHY LAN8700

rudresh wrote: > Hi, > > In Ethernet PHY LAN8700 driver having some issues, during tftp the large > file of more than 2MB of the binary file , some time its hangup & sometime > its reset the board. same driver is working in evaluation board with same > PHY & interface . if i tried in customize b

Re: [U-Boot] Some question about uboot

loody wrote: > Dear all: > While porting uboot, I find there are too many things I don't need at > all, like net, i2c etc. > How could I remove them from my uboot binary to minimize the size of > uboot, my flash limitation is 6k? If 6K is truly what you have, you aren't going to get there with u-b

Re: [U-Boot] Error uncompressing kernel image

Alemao wrote: > Hi all, > > I have two JFFS2 images, both with the _same_ kernel inside. > > But the images differs in size, cause one is for debugging and has > some additional apps: > > debug.im = 13 MB > release.im = 6.2 MB > > > Im loading kernel and dtb via fsload: > > fsload 200 u

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/6] fdt_support, usb: Move fdt_fixup_dr_usb() routine to drivers/usb/

Anton Vorontsov wrote: > In subsequent patches we'll use FSL-specific functions in > fdt_fixup_dr_usb(), so let's move the routine to a more appropriate > place. > > So far fsl_dr_usb.c isn't actually an USB driver, but eventually it > will turn into one, let's hope. ;-) > > Also rename CONFIG_HA

Re: [U-Boot] flow of u-boot

ABIRAMA SUNDARI wrote: > hi > thanks for your answer. but i am getting you properly.pls tell me the > things in detail.(what you meant by _start ). _start is a label in the source code. You need to understand what happens when you release your processor from reset: how and where it starts

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] tsec: Wait for auto-negotiation to complete without link

Andy Fleming wrote: > On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Jerry Van Baren > wrote: >> Andy Fleming wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Jerry Van Baren >>> wrote: >>>> Peter Tyser wrote: [snip] >> My experience is that "The second case as

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] tsec: Wait for auto-negotiation to complete without link

Andy Fleming wrote: > On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 7:32 AM, Jerry Van Baren > wrote: >> Peter Tyser wrote: > >>>> The problem is that you don't always know which interface you have >>>> hooked up. So u-boot tries the one set in ethact, and then the next,

Re: [U-Boot] powerpc flush_cache() roll over bug

Kumar Gala wrote: > My brian stopped working but I figured I'd send my issue and hopefully > I'll wake up and someone will have a solution for me. Talk about sweet dreams! :-D > The problem is we can call flush_cache(0xf000, 0x1000) which will > never exit the loop: > > void flush_cache

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] tsec: Wait for auto-negotiation to complete without link

Peter Tyser wrote: > On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 17:07 -0600, Andy Fleming wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: >>> Dear Andy Fleming, >>> >>> In message <2acbd3e40902041320l3bce93c1p989c4c33ca8e...@mail.gmail.com> you >>> wrote: HmmmI made that change for a reason.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] tsec: Wait for auto-negotiation to complete without link

Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Scott Wood, > > In message <498a0d5c.5060...@freescale.com> you wrote: >> Andy Fleming wrote: >>> HmmmI made that change for a reason. Waiting for autonegotiation >>> to finish on a tsec with no link was quite tiresome. If you've hooked >>> up the 4th tsec, and tr

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Fix whitespace damage: double space changed to a tab

At some point an intentional double space at the end of the sentence got changed into a tab in the GPL header line: * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the This patch fixes the damage. Signed-off-by: Gerald Van Baren --- drivers/usb/usb_ohci.c|2 +- drivers/

Re: [U-Boot] Preparing a patch for u-boot

Daniel Jabbour wrote: > Hi, > > After reading over the U-Boot patch submission guidelines, I want to That's novel, reading the manual first. ;-) > ask the list before I go ahead and prepare a patch. I am working with > a hardware vendor using the XBurst CPU SOC (system on chip). It's > ba

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] Allow board specific overwriting of library code

Michael Roth wrote: > Enables to overwrite any library code by defining EXTRABOARDOBJS > in the board specific config.mk. > Those listed object files get linked directly into the u-boot binary > right after the start objects and before any archives. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Roth Hi Michael, S

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add support for the digsy MTC board.

Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Grzegorz Bernacki, > > In message <49816f40.3000...@semihalf.com> you wrote: [snip] * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of - * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR

Re: [U-Boot] IP_t should be a "packed" struct

Ben Warren wrote: > Luigi 'Comio' Mantellini wrote: >> Hi ML, >> >> I'm working on a mips target and I used qemu_mips target to simulate my >> target >> (that I hope to have in the next week...) >> >> Following my activities I noticed that IP_t structure is no defined with >> attribute "packed".

Re: [U-Boot] Custom MPC8548 boot using FDT problem (more info)

Pieter wrote: > Jerry Van Baren wrote: >> Pieter wrote: >>> Hi all >>> >>> I have been working on booting our custom MPC8548 board using a FDT. >>> The board boots up to the point where "controll is passed to Linux" >>> and t

Re: [U-Boot] Custom MPC8548 boot using FDT problem

Pieter wrote: > Hi all > > I have been working on booting our custom MPC8548 board using a FDT. > The board boots up to the point where "controll is passed to Linux" and > then nothing happens. I have plased the final part of the console output > at the bottom of this message. > > Does anyone ha

Re: [U-Boot] Kernel loading and memory layout

Vinay Venkataraghavan wrote: > Greetings, > > I am new to using uboot but have gone through the code to a certain > degree but still have some questions. > > 1. Where does uboot transfer control to the linux kernel. By this I > mean which file in the source code would I look for this. > > Would

Re: [U-Boot] Fw: TFTP fails when using network switch

Loren A. Linden Levy wrote: > Hi Jerry, > > Your gonna love this. I was setting the hardware MAC address to be > FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF. When i changed this everything magically started > working. I guess this MAC has some meaning like the device is a > router. Anyway, i learned a lot while trying to f

Re: [U-Boot] Fw: TFTP fails when using network switch

Loren A. Linden Levy wrote: > Hi Jerry, > > It looks to me like for the M%282 board the PHY address is determined > by querying the MII interface: > > include/configs/M5282EVB.h > > #define CONFIG_MCFFEC > #ifdef CONFIG_MCFFEC > # define CONFIG_NET_MULTI 1 > # define CONFIG_M

Re: [U-Boot] Fw: TFTP fails when using network switch

Hi Loren, Please don't top post. It annoys us curmudgeons. Loren A. Linden Levy wrote: > Hi All, > > I still have not found a solution and I am a bit desperate. I did not > seem to be able to send any packets (using ping) from the FECO on the > M5282Lite board to the tftp host, however pings fr

Re: [U-Boot] [MPC8272ADS/BDI2000]Can not program my u-boot into Flash

Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote: [snip] * Verify the SIMM is x32. >>> Huh ? How ? >> It's x32 unless I'm really confused. > Yes, I mean, how can I *verify* that it is x32 ? > > Thx again. > Regards > JM It's in the manual:

Re: [U-Boot] [MPC8272ADS/BDI2000]Can not program my u-boot into Flash

Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote: >>> No, it is not. I would say, the first byte is OK (I don't have the >>> board with me right now). >> OK, if the chip isn't erased properly, you aren't going to make any headway >> programming. You have to solve the erase problem first. >> >> Is the block you are tryi

Re: [U-Boot] [MPC8272ADS/BDI2000]Can not program my u-boot into Flash

Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote: > 2009/1/19 Jerry Van Baren : >> Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote: >> >> [snip] >> >>> The error in programming tells that it couldn't write the second byte >>> of the u-boot file. Indeed, I have displayed the memory before

Re: [U-Boot] [MPC8272ADS/BDI2000]Can not program my u-boot into Flash

Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote: [snip] > The error in programming tells that it couldn't write the second byte > of the u-boot file. Indeed, I have displayed the memory before and > after the prog command, and the first byte is correctly written. > I can't understand where my problem is. > > Thx and

Re: [U-Boot] [MPC8272ADS/BDI2000]Can not program my u-boot into Flash

Jean-Michel Hautbois wrote: > Hi everybody ! > > I am currently trying to flash u-boot into my MPC8272ADS board, but it > is not working. > When I am launching the "PROG" command, it tells: > "Programming u-boot.bin , please wait > # Programming flash memory failed at 0x" [snip] > P

Re: [U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-fdt.git

Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Jerry Van Baren, > > In message <20090117230126.ga26...@cideas.com> you wrote: >> Please pull u-boot-fdt.git to pick up a bugfix for 2009-01. > > And I thought we'd have a release this WE... Sorry, I was a slow getting the

[U-Boot] Pull request: u-boot-fdt.git

Dear Wolfgang, Please pull u-boot-fdt.git to pick up a bugfix for 2009-01. Thanks, gvb The following changes since commit fadad1573fb16c90025f08a2861d6047d093cba7: Mike Frysinger (1): ncb: use socklen_t are available in the git repository at: git://git.denx.de/u-boot-fdt.git master

[U-Boot] Any outstanding FDT patches?

Hi all, I picked up Peter Korsgaard's patch "[U-Boot] [PATCH] fdt_resize(): fix actualsize calculations with unaligned blobs". Are there any other FDT patches that should go into the 2009-01 release that I've overlooked? Thanks, gvb ___ U-Boot mailin

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] fdt_resize(): fix actualsize calculations with unaligned blobs

Peter Korsgaard wrote: > The code in fdt_resize() to extend the fdt size to end on a page boundary > is wrong for fdt's not located at an address aligned on a page boundary. > What's even worse, the code would make actualsize shrink rather than grow > if (blob & 0xfff) was bigger than the amount of

Re: [U-Boot] Resubmitting plus update.

Thomas Delbeke wrote: > Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:29:37 + > From: "Thomas Delbeke" > Subject: [U-Boot] Winphlash > To: u-boot@lists.denx.de > Message-ID: ><799cc56a0901151429j3c58d3aydca1c12caca93...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi

Re: [U-Boot] Fw: TFTP fails when using network switch

L. A. Linden Levy wrote: > Can someone tell me how to use the mii command? I have the following > from a dump: > > uBOOT=>> mii dump > MII not complete > 0. () -- PHY control register -- > (8000:8000) 0.15= 1reset > (4000:4000) 0.14= 1loopback > (

Re: [U-Boot] dtc/u-boot tool naming, "ftdump", "mkimage"

Hi Matt, Matt Sealey wrote: > Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:57:42AM -0600, Matt Sealey wrote: >>> I just noticed (was told by an affiliate) that the DTC compiler tools >>> shares a tool name "ftdump" with the Freetype project. I was doing a >>> lazy packaging effort to get a

Re: [U-Boot] Fw: TFTP fails when using network switch

Ulf Samuelsson wrote: > ons 2009-01-07 klockan 07:52 -0500 skrev Jerry Van Baren: >> Wolfgang Denk wrote: >>> Dear Ulf Samuelsson, >>> >>> In message <1231282371.32308.276.ca...@elrond.atmel.com> you wrote: >>>> It was tracked down to the auto

Re: [U-Boot] Fw: TFTP fails when using network switch

Loren A. Linden Levy wrote: > On Wed, 07 Jan 2009 07:52:58 -0500 > Jerry Van Baren wrote: > >> Wolfgang Denk wrote: >>> Dear Ulf Samuelsson, >>> >>> In message <1231282371.32308.276.ca...@elrond.atmel.com> you wrote: >>>> It was tracked

Re: [U-Boot] RV: Question about U-Boot for MPC5121

Marco Donadio wrote: > Good morning, > > our team is working on a new telematic platform using MPC5121 device. > Our Boar has some features of ADS512101 evaluacion board. Good. You have a starting point. > We are not familiar with boot loader system because it's the first > time that we develop

Re: [U-Boot] Fw: TFTP fails when using network switch

Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Ulf Samuelsson, > > In message <1231282371.32308.276.ca...@elrond.atmel.com> you wrote: >> It was tracked down to the autoconfiguration of the >> Ethernet PHY, so one of the PHYs ended up in >> 100 Mbps Half Duplex (think that was the switch) >> while the other PHY e

Re: [U-Boot] Fw: TFTP fails when using network switch

Hi Alex, Loren A. Linden Levy wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > I am having an interesting problem with am m5282Lite Dev Kit. I had > done all of the previous development work by connection the card > directly to a spare ethernet card in my PC via a cross-over > cable. This worked just fine and the tftp

Re: [U-Boot] Seeking PPC BDM resources for MPC860, docs for old MPC860 Eval Board

Alex Perez wrote: > Hi Wolfgang, > > On Jan 4, 2009, at 12:28 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote: [snip] > I realize this. The board itself is quite well built, and in all > likelihood, it has some sort of integrated ROM monitor. The serial > ports are strangely on RJ11 connectors, and I don't know wh

Re: [U-Boot] [RFC] Build errors in u-boot mainline and daily builds

Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Remy, > > In message <3efb10970901030310r7cfc1245g97ac0db4375dd...@mail.gmail.com> you > wrote: >> I started a server to do only daily builds of all U-boot board >> configurations. (currently on a old slow box, but it works, it takes >> about 2 hours to build all board

Re: [U-Boot] no kernel console output !

Hi Tony, tjzkzs wrote: > I use at91sam9260ek board, forgot to mention this. last time I said: > > hi all, > when i use u-boot 1.1.5 boot kernel 2.6.22, no kernel console output, > development enviorment i use: > cross_compiler: arm-2007-eldk.iso No console output can be caused by several things,

Re: [U-Boot] Reg. working with uboot

Vanee S wrote: > Hi, > im new to uboot. i need to know what software are required to incorporate > uboot for hardware based on ARM architecture. it would be great if i can get > the step by step procedure to incorporate uboot. Hi Vanee, 1) Use git to clone u-boot: git clone git://git.denx.de/u

Re: [U-Boot] [mpc8313] objcopy generates huge binary

Matthew L. Creech wrote: > Using the latest toolchain from CodeSourcery (4.3-50), I can't seem to > build U-Boot for the MPC8313 ERDB platform. I've tried this with both > 2008.10 and 2009.01-rc1. Grabbing a fresh copy of U-Boot and doing > "make MPC8313ERDB_33_config && make" seems to work at fi

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] i2c: merge all i2c_reg_read() and i2c_reg_write() into inline functions

k...@koi8.net wrote: > On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Timur Tabi wrote: > >> k...@koi8.net wrote: >> >>> That looks messy... Why would we use two different versions if we can >> make >>> everything uniform? >> Because we already have something that makes it uniform, and it's >> broken. The >> idea of havin

Re: [U-Boot] [U-Boot-Users] TFTP server support in U-boot

Ben Warren wrote: > Hello Santosh, > > santosh pattar wrote: >> Dear All, >> >> As of now in the U-boot only TFTP client is supported. I am planning >> to have TFTP server support in the u-boot. Can you please help me in >> this regarding? >> >> Please provide me few links if this has been done al

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] cmd_sf: rename "speed" to "hz"

Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thursday 11 December 2008 18:59:46 Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> In message Mike Frysinger you wrote: >>> The term "hz" is used everywhere else when talking about the frequency of >>> the SPI bus, so have the sf command use it as well to stay consistent. >>> It even presents i

<    1   2   3   4   5   >