Hello Albert, hello Andreas,
any news if this two patches can get accepted?
Cheers, Markus
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Markus Hubig wrote:
> In order to use the serial interface on the PortuxG20 we need to enable the
> level converter first by setting the PC9 pin to high. The
| DRAM: 64 MiB
| WARNING: Caches not enabled
| NAND: 128 MiB
| In:serial
| Out: serial
| Err: serial
| Net: macb0
| Hit any key to stop autoboot: 0
Signed-off-by: Markus Hubig
Cc: Andreas Bießmann
---
board/taskit/stamp9g20/stamp9g20.c | 21 +
include/configs
The board_postclk_init() function can be used to perform operations
that requires a working timer early within the U-Boot init_sequence.
Signed-off-by: Markus Hubig
Cc: Albert ARIBAUD
---
arch/arm/lib/board.c |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm
board_early_init_f() so we
enable the serial output early within board_postclk_init().
Unfortunately the board_postclk_init() function was not called in the
init_sequence of arch/arm/lib/board.c so the first patch will added it there.
---
Markus Hubig (2):
arm: Adds board_postclk_init to the init_sequence
Hi Andreas,
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 05:33:26PM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> On 16.08.2012 17:07, Markus Hubig wrote:
> > But it definitly dosn't work here. I checked with an oscilator, if I toggle
> > the pin in board_init() I can nicely see it going high and low but i
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 02:03:55PM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> On 14.08.2012 11:08, Markus Hubig wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 08:22:11AM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> >> On 27.07.12 11:16, Markus Hubig wrote:
> >>> Has anyone an ideea how to fix this?
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 08:12:51PM -0400, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
> On 08/13/2012 07:17 AM, Markus Hubig wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 08:15:43AM -0400, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
> >> On 07/27/2012 05:16 AM, Markus Hubig wrote:
>
> >> 2) The line before the garb
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 08:22:11AM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> On 27.07.12 11:16, Markus Hubig wrote:
> > one minor Problem I often read about in this list is some crappy /
> > unreadable
> > console output at beginning of the U-Boot start procedure. Now I have the
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 08:15:43AM -0400, Jerry Van Baren wrote:
> On 07/27/2012 05:16 AM, Markus Hubig wrote:
> > one minor Problem I often read about in this list is some crappy /
> > unreadable
> > console output at beginning of the U-Boot start procedure. Now I have the
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 11:44:18AM +0530, Thirumalesha N wrote:
> I'm porting u-boot for mpc8280 based CPU board by taking mpc8260ads
> reference, its hanging at some some point. i enabled debug mode.
> U-Boot 1.3.1 (Aug 8 2012 - 09:19:16)
> New Stack Pointer is: 1ffa0f48
>
> please can you sugg
This adds support for the AT91SAM9G20 boards by taskit GmbH.
Both boards, Stamp9G20 and PortuxG20, are integrated in one
file. PortuxG20 is basically a SBC built around the Stamp9G20.
Signed-off-by: Markus Hubig
Cc: Andreas Bießmann
---
Changes for v2:
- Added myself to the MAINTAINERS
This adds support for the AT91SAM9G20 boards by taskit GmbH.
Both boards, Stamp9G20 and PortuxG20, are integrated in one
file. PortuxG20 is basically a SBC built around the Stamp9G20.
Signed-off-by: Markus Hubig
Cc: Andreas Bießmann
---
Changes for v2:
- Added myself to the MAINTAINERS
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 03:01:40PM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> On 06.08.2012 11:11, Markus Hubig wrote:
> >
> > +static unsigned int saved_state[3] = {STATUS_LED_OFF,
> > + STATUS_LED_OFF, STATUS_LED_OFF};
> > +
> > +void coloured_LED_init(void)
>
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 02:49:51PM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> On 02.08.2012 16:14, Markus Hubig wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 11:58:22AM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> >> On 30.07.12 20:01, Markus Hubig wrote:
> >
> > PC9 is somewhat strange. If I set
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 03:49:22PM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> On 06.08.2012 15:46, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> >
> > One more thing to mention!
>
> and some more ;)
> Please test your code with the MAKEALL script before sending.
| $ ./MAKEALL portuxg20 stamp9g20
| Configuring for portuxg2
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 03:46:49PM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> Dear Markus Hubig,
>
> One more thing to mention!
> stamp9g20.c: In function 'stamp9G20_macb_hw_init':
> stamp9g20.c:113:2: warning: suggest parentheses around arithmetic in
> operand of '|
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 03:01:40PM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> On 06.08.2012 11:11, Markus Hubig wrote:
> > This adds support for the AT91SAM9G20 boards by taskit GmbH.
> > Both boards, Stamp9G20 and PortuxG20, are integrated in one
> > file. PortuxG20 is basically a
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 11:05:03AM +0200, Markus Hubig wrote:
> This adds support for the AT91SAM9G20 boards by taskit GmbH.
> Both boards, Stamp9G20 and PortuxG20, are integrated in one
> file. PortuxG20 is basically a SBC built around the Stamp9G20.
Ignore this. I started a new th
This adds support for the AT91SAM9G20 boards by taskit GmbH.
Both boards, Stamp9G20 and PortuxG20, are integrated in one
file. PortuxG20 is basically a SBC built around the Stamp9G20.
Signed-off-by: Markus Hubig
Cc: Andreas Bießmann
---
MAINTAINERS| 16 ++-
board
This adds support for the AT91SAM9G20 boards by taskit GmbH.
Both boards, Stamp9G20 and PortuxG20, are integrated in one
file. PortuxG20 is basically a SBC built around the Stamp9G20.
Signed-off-by: Markus Hubig
Cc: Andreas Bießmann
---
MAINTAINERS| 16 ++-
board
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 03:28:30PM +0200, Markus Hubig wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 10:21:04PM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> > On 01.08.12 21:28, Markus Hubig wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 11:58:22AM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> > >>> + /*
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 11:58:22AM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> On 30.07.12 20:01, Markus Hubig wrote:
> >
> > +int board_early_init_f(void)
> > +{
> > + struct at91_pmc *pmc = (struct at91_pmc *)ATMEL_BASE_PMC;
> > +
> > + /* Enable c
This adds support for the AT91SAM9G20 boards by taskit GmbH.
Both boards, Stamp9G20 and PortuxG20, are integrated in one
file. PortuxG20 is basically a SBC built around the Stamp9G20.
Signed-off-by: Markus Hubig
Cc: Andreas Bießmann
---
MAINTAINERS| 16 ++-
board
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 10:21:04PM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> On 01.08.12 21:28, Markus Hubig wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 11:58:22AM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> >>> + /* Need to reset PHY -> 500ms reset */
> >>> + writel(A
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 10:59:10PM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> On 01.08.12 21:57, Markus Hubig wrote:
> > +Markus Hubig
> > +
> > + STAMP9G20 ARM926EJS
> > +
> > Ilko Iliev
>
> unfortunately Ilko Iliev is wrong here ... this is the PPC sect
This adds support for the AT91SAM9G20 boards by taskit GmbH.
Both boards, Stamp9G20 and PortuxG20, are integrated in one
file. PortuxG20 is basically a SBC built around the Stamp9G20.
Signed-off-by: Markus Hubig
Cc: Andreas Bießmann
---
MAINTAINERS|4 +
board/taskit
Signed-off-by: Markus Hubig
Cc: Andreas Bießmann
---
arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/at91sam9260_devices.c |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/at91sam9260_devices.c
b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/at91sam9260_devices.c
index 62f76fa
at91 boards but I wonder how we
> should handle these while-loops without content.
Oh I didn't recognice there is a version of checkpatch provided with
u-boot. I used the one from kernel.org which didn't put a warning out
for this one ...
> On 30.07.12 20:01, Markus Hubig wrote
This adds support for the AT91SAM9G20 boards by taskit GmbH.
Both boards, Stamp9G20 and PortuxG20, are integrated in one
file. PortuxG20 is basically a SBC built around the Stamp9G20.
Signed-off-by: Markus Hubig
Cc: Andreas Bießmann
---
board/taskit/stamp9g20/Makefile| 52
board
Hi @all,
one minor Problem I often read about in this list is some crappy / unreadable
console output at beginning of the U-Boot start procedure. Now I have the same
"visual" Problem.
| H�NAND: 128 MiB
| *** Warning - bad CRC, using default environment
|
| In:serial
| Out: serial
| Err:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 05:43:28PM +0200, Markus Hubig wrote:
> I looked at every single byte on the internet an I found some information
> that in order to get this bad-ass relocation to work, one needs to adapt
> at91bootstrap to work with u-boot. Could this be my problem? At the mom
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 12:03:25AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Markus Hubig,
>
> In message <20120720142655.gb20...@imko.de> you wrote:
> >
> > And the only setting I found in my board support code (stamp9g20.h)
> > that is obviously realated to this &quo
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 03:08:51PM +0200, Markus Hubig wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 03:21:00PM +0200, Markus Hubig wrote:
> > Hmm OK I disabled the watchdog and enabled debugging and now this
> > is what I get at the first boot after flashing:
> >
> > | RomBOOT
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 03:21:00PM +0200, Markus Hubig wrote:
> Hmm OK I disabled the watchdog and enabled debugging and now this
> is what I get at the first boot after flashing:
>
> | RomBOOT
> |
> |
> | U-Boot 2012.04.01-3-gab465ef-dirty (Jul 18 2012 - 15:08:22)
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 01:04:46AM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> On 12.07.12 17:49, Markus Hubig wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:28:13AM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> >> On 11.07.2012 21:28, Markus Hubig wrote:
> >>> Now I'm in the process of adapti
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 08:07:17AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> In message
> you
> wrote:
>
> > I include the old patch (portuxg20.patch) and the three patches I made in
> > this
> > email. My patches are based on u-boot v2012.04.01.
>
> Sorry, but it doesn't work like that. We don't read s
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:28:13AM +0200, Andreas Bießmann wrote:
> On 11.07.2012 21:28, Markus Hubig wrote:
> > as part of my bachelor thesis I'm working with the stamp9g20 / portuxg20
> > board from taskit (http://www.taskit.de/produkte/stamp9g20/index.htm). I
> >
37 matches
Mail list logo
