Re: [U-Boot] PATCH: bugfix for nand erase failure with bad blocks

2009-06-19 Thread Michele De Candia (VT)
Scott Wood wrote: > Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Dear Scott, >> >> In message <4a39685f.6030...@freescale.com> you wrote: >>> Hmm... perhaps check the alignment? If "end" is supposed to be the >>> last to-be-erased byte, not the first not-to-be-erased byte, then if >>> the low bits are 0 it's a size

Re: [U-Boot] PATCH: bugfix for nand erase failure with bad blocks

2009-06-17 Thread Michele De Candia (VT)
Scott Wood wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 09:44:41AM +0200, Michele De Candia (VT) wrote: > >> Moreover, I think that if you want to erase a specific NAND area, the >> correct way to use 'nand erase' command would be: >> >> 'nand erase start end

Re: [U-Boot] PATCH: bugfix for nand erase failure with bad blocks

2009-06-17 Thread Michele De Candia (VT)
Michele De Candia (VT) wrote: > Scott Wood wrote: > >> Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> >>> Dear "Michele De Candia (VT)", >>> >>> In message <4a37f7bf.2090...@valueteam.com> you wrote: >>> >>>>>> t

Re: [U-Boot] PATCH: bugfix for nand erase failure with bad blocks

2009-06-17 Thread Michele De Candia (VT)
Michele De Candia (VT) wrote: > Scott Wood wrote: > >> Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> >>> Dear "Michele De Candia (VT)", >>> >>> In message <4a37f7bf.2090...@valueteam.com> you wrote: >>> >>>>>> t

Re: [U-Boot] PATCH: bugfix for nand erase failure with bad blocks

2009-06-17 Thread Michele De Candia (VT)
Scott Wood wrote: > Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Dear "Michele De Candia (VT)", >> >> In message <4a37f7bf.2090...@valueteam.com> you wrote: >>>>> this patch fixes a bug for 'nand erase' command: when bad blocks >>>>> ar

Re: [U-Boot] PATCH: bugfix for nand erase failure with bad blocks

2009-06-16 Thread Michele De Candia (VT)
Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear "Michele De Candia (VT)", > > In message <4a3798c4.8000...@valueteam.com> you wrote: > >> this patch fixes a bug for 'nand erase' command: when bad blocks are >> present into erasing area, they were skipped but the e

[U-Boot] PATCH: bugfix for nand erase failure with bad blocks

2009-06-16 Thread Michele De Candia (VT)
Hi all, this patch fixes a bug for 'nand erase' command: when bad blocks are present into erasing area, they were skipped but the erased size was updated anyway. Regards, Michele Jr De Candia Signed-off-by: Michele Jr De Candia diff -Naur u-boot-trunk-orig/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_util.c u-bo

Re: [U-Boot] RAM Probing for ads5121rev4

2009-03-31 Thread Michele De Candia (VT)
Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear "Michele De Candia (VT)", > > In message <49d23e30.4060...@valueteam.com> you wrote: > >> The issue concerns the possibility to identify DDR chips type (e.g. by >> VendorId) before initialize them. >> It doesn't co

Re: [U-Boot] RAM Probing for ads5121rev4

2009-03-31 Thread Michele De Candia (VT)
Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Emanuele Placidi, > > In message <7c4b93310902180021o56da8320w2084e6a8c09c9...@mail.gmail.com> you > wrote: > >>In your opinion it is possible to probe the ram before initialize it? >> Unfortunately there are some rev4 which are equipped with different ram >> mod