On 15-11-13 14:55, James Chargin wrote:
Is there an existing mailing list for some other open source project
that uses a gerrit server in something like what would be a model for
the way U-Boot would use it?
Coreboot?
oliver
It might be instructive to watch that list to see how the interactio
From: Oliver Schinagl
One of the parameters that gets passed to the Linux kernel is the
physical continuous RAM size. The type for this datum is phys_size_t
which is hiding its real data type, unsigned long.
get_ram_size however returns long and thus can not only report negative
memory, it also
From: Oliver Schinagl
This is a resond of the previous patch I offered as an RFC. There was some
talk on the list but nothing related to the code in question.
This patchset is split in two, one that modifies get_ram_size() and a second
one that updates all invocations of get_ram_size
On 10/19/13 01:25, Scott Wood wrote:
On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 18:25 -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
On Sat, 2013-10-19 at 01:07 +0200, Oliver Schinagl wrote:
On 10/18/13 18:43, Scott Wood wrote:
On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 02:04 +0200, Oliver Schinagl wrote:
So now that that's settled, any
On 10/19/13 01:25, Scott Wood wrote:
On Sat, 2013-10-19 at 01:07 +0200, Oliver Schinagl wrote:
On 10/18/13 18:43, Scott Wood wrote:
On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 02:04 +0200, Oliver Schinagl wrote:
So now that that's settled, anything fundamentally wrong with my patch? :)
Did you see my other
On 10/18/13 22:26, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Scott Wood,
In message <1382114601.7979.843.ca...@snotra.buserror.net> you wrote:
Did you see my other mail in this thread? This patch is sort of OK for
raising the get_ram_size() limit from 1 GiB to 2 GiB (with an increased
risk of false positives
On 10/18/13 18:43, Scott Wood wrote:
On Fri, 2013-10-18 at 02:04 +0200, Oliver Schinagl wrote:
So now that that's settled, anything fundamentally wrong with my patch? :)
Did you see my other mail in this thread? This patch is sort of OK for
Sorry I did and I got distracted fr
On 17-10-13 08:27, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Scott,
On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:57:33 -0500, Scott Wood
wrote:
On Tue, 2013-10-15 at 09:12 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Oliver,
On Mon, 07 Oct 2013 04:41:31 +0200, Oliver Schinagl
wrote:
Hey all,
Having not received any feed back at all, I
Hey all,
I just yesterday received my CubieTruck (cubieboard3) with 2 GiB of Ram
and added support for it to the sunxi-u-boot branch. While I know this
isn't merged into the main u-boot tree (yet), I ran into the following
problem.
At the end of the dram init code, it is customary to call ge
9 matches
Mail list logo
