On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 3:46 PM Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
> Tom, if this is not going to be settled soon (till Friday), I ask to revert
> it.
Tom, Jagan fixed the issue, I would expect a fix in the release.
Thanks!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 9:11 PM Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 12:21 AM Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 2:41 PM Tom Rini wrote:
...
> > Sorry to answering here (I already removed rc4 announce).
> >
> > The commit 6b7ebff00190649d2136b34f6feebc0dbe85bfdc
> >
Hi Andy,
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 12:21 AM Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 2:41 PM Tom Rini wrote:
> >
> > Hey all,
> >
> > It's release day and here is v2020.01-rc5. At this point, we should be
> > just seeing regression fixes, and preferably to ones introduced this
> >
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 2:41 PM Tom Rini wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> It's release day and here is v2020.01-rc5. At this point, we should be
> just seeing regression fixes, and preferably to ones introduced this
> cycle rather than older regressions too.
>
> Once again, for a changelog,
> git log
Hey all,
It's release day and here is v2020.01-rc5. At this point, we should be
just seeing regression fixes, and preferably to ones introduced this
cycle rather than older regressions too.
Once again, for a changelog,
git log --merges v2020.01-rc4..v2020.01-rc5
and as always, I ask for more
5 matches
Mail list logo