On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 10:49:19AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 06:18:08AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > On 04.10.23 14:15, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > > On 22:26-20231003, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > >> From: Jan Kiszka
> > >>
> > >> Since commit [1] A53 u-boot proper is broken. This i
On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 10:00:53AM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> Since commit [1] A53 u-boot proper is broken. This is because nodes
> marked as 'bootph-pre-ram' are not available at u-boot proper before
> relocation.
>
> To fix this we mark all nodes in u-boot.dtsi as 'bootph-all'.
>
> [1]
> 9
On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 06:18:08AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 04.10.23 14:15, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > On 22:26-20231003, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> From: Jan Kiszka
> >>
> >> Since commit [1] A53 u-boot proper is broken. This is because nodes
> >> marked as 'bootph-pre-ram' are not available at u
On 06:18-20231005, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 04.10.23 14:15, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> > On 22:26-20231003, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> From: Jan Kiszka
> >>
> >> Since commit [1] A53 u-boot proper is broken. This is because nodes
> >> marked as 'bootph-pre-ram' are not available at u-boot proper before
> >
On 04.10.23 14:15, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 22:26-20231003, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> From: Jan Kiszka
>>
>> Since commit [1] A53 u-boot proper is broken. This is because nodes
>> marked as 'bootph-pre-ram' are not available at u-boot proper before
>> relocation.
>>
>> To fix this we mark all nodes a
On 22:26-20231003, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> From: Jan Kiszka
>
> Since commit [1] A53 u-boot proper is broken. This is because nodes
> marked as 'bootph-pre-ram' are not available at u-boot proper before
> relocation.
>
> To fix this we mark all nodes as 'bootph-all'.
>
> [1] 9e644284ab812 ("dm: cor
Hi Jan,
On 03/10/2023 23:26, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> From: Jan Kiszka
>
> Since commit [1] A53 u-boot proper is broken. This is because nodes
> marked as 'bootph-pre-ram' are not available at u-boot proper before
> relocation.
>
> To fix this we mark all nodes as 'bootph-all'.
>
> [1] 9e644284ab81
From: Jan Kiszka
Since commit [1] A53 u-boot proper is broken. This is because nodes
marked as 'bootph-pre-ram' are not available at u-boot proper before
relocation.
To fix this we mark all nodes as 'bootph-all'.
[1] 9e644284ab812 ("dm: core: Report bootph-pre-ram/sram node as pre-reloc
after
On 02/10/2023 18:00, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> Since commit [1] A53 u-boot proper is broken. This is because nodes
> marked as 'bootph-pre-ram' are not available at u-boot proper before
> relocation.
>
> To fix this we mark all nodes in u-boot.dtsi as 'bootph-all'.
>
> [1]
> 9e644284ab812 ("dm:
Since commit [1] A53 u-boot proper is broken. This is because nodes
marked as 'bootph-pre-ram' are not available at u-boot proper before
relocation.
To fix this we mark all nodes in u-boot.dtsi as 'bootph-all'.
[1]
9e644284ab812 ("dm: core: Report bootph-pre-ram/sram node as pre-reloc after
relo
10 matches
Mail list logo