On 25/01/2022 00.50, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Rasmus,
>
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 at 15:15, Rasmus Villemoes
> wrote:
>>
>> On 24/01/2022 18.57, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
And the thing about "adding the signature" - yes, indeed, _signing_ can
and should be done after building. But that is not at
On 25/01/2022 00.50, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Rasmus,
>
> On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 at 15:15, Rasmus Villemoes
> wrote:
>>
>> On 24/01/2022 18.57, Simon Glass wrote:
>>
And the thing about "adding the signature" - yes, indeed, _signing_ can
and should be done after building. But that is not
Hi Rasmus,
On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 at 15:15, Rasmus Villemoes
wrote:
>
> On 24/01/2022 18.57, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> >> And the thing about "adding the signature" - yes, indeed, _signing_ can
> >> and should be done after building. But that is not at all what this
> >> started with, this is about
On 24/01/2022 18.57, Simon Glass wrote:
>> And the thing about "adding the signature" - yes, indeed, _signing_ can
>> and should be done after building. But that is not at all what this
>> started with, this is about embedding the metadata that U-Boot (or SPL)
>> will need for _verifying_ during
Hi Rasmus,
On Mon, 24 Jan 2022 at 03:42, Rasmus Villemoes
wrote:
>
> On 14/01/2022 17.51, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Rasmus,
> >
> > On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 at 02:08, Rasmus Villemoes
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 26/10/2021 03.28, Simon Glass wrote:
> >>> Hi Rasmus,
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, 28 Sept 2021 at
On 14/01/2022 17.51, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Rasmus,
>
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 at 02:08, Rasmus Villemoes
> wrote:
>>
>> On 26/10/2021 03.28, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> Hi Rasmus,
>>>
>>> On Tue, 28 Sept 2021 at 02:57, Rasmus Villemoes
>>> wrote:
The build system already automatically looks
Hi Rasmus,
On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 at 02:08, Rasmus Villemoes
wrote:
>
> On 26/10/2021 03.28, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Rasmus,
> >
> > On Tue, 28 Sept 2021 at 02:57, Rasmus Villemoes
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> The build system already automatically looks for and includes an
> >> in-tree *-u-boot.dtsi
age-
> From: Simon Glass
> Sent: Friday, November 5, 2021 5:02 AM
> To: Roman Kopytin
> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes ; U-Boot Mailing List
> ; Alex Kiernan ; Masahiro
> Yamada
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] introduce CONFIG_DEVICE_TREE_INCLUDES
>
> Hi Roman,
>
> Good luck!
-
> From: Simon Glass
> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 4:28 AM
> To: Rasmus Villemoes
> Cc: U-Boot Mailing List ; Alex Kiernan
> ; Roman Kopytin ;
> Masahiro Yamada
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] introduce CONFIG_DEVICE_TREE_INCLUDES
>
> Hi Rasmus,
>
> On Tue, 2
: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 4:28 AM
> To: Rasmus Villemoes
> Cc: U-Boot Mailing List ; Alex Kiernan
> ; Roman Kopytin ;
> Masahiro Yamada
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] introduce CONFIG_DEVICE_TREE_INCLUDES
>
> Hi Rasmus,
>
> On Tue, 28 Sept 2021 at 02:57, Rasmus Ville
Hi, all
Currently I am waiting some help from our IT infrastructure department.
-Original Message-
From: Simon Glass
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 4:28 AM
To: Rasmus Villemoes
Cc: U-Boot Mailing List ; Alex Kiernan
; Roman Kopytin ; Masahiro
Yamada
Subject: Re: [PATCH] introduce
On 26/10/2021 03.28, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Rasmus,
>
> On Tue, 28 Sept 2021 at 02:57, Rasmus Villemoes
> wrote:
>>
>> The build system already automatically looks for and includes an
>> in-tree *-u-boot.dtsi when building the control .dtb. However, there
>> are some things that are awkward to
Hi Rasmus,
On Tue, 28 Sept 2021 at 02:57, Rasmus Villemoes
wrote:
>
> The build system already automatically looks for and includes an
> in-tree *-u-boot.dtsi when building the control .dtb. However, there
> are some things that are awkward to maintain in such an in-tree file,
> most notably the
Hi Roman,
On 9/28/21 5:55 AM, Roman Kopytin wrote:
Hi, all
I prepared 3 patches for fdt_add_pubkey adding.
But in our company infrastructure I can't use git send-email. Our IT can't help
me to resolve issue.
It appears that Linux offers email hosting [1] for this purpose. However,
you need
On 28/09/2021 10.56, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> The build system already automatically looks for and includes an
> in-tree *-u-boot.dtsi when building the control .dtb. However, there
> are some things that are awkward to maintain in such an in-tree file,
> most notably the metadata associated to
Rasmus Villemoes
> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2021 11:57 AM
> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Cc: Alex Kiernan ; Simon Glass ;
> Roman Kopytin ; Masahiro Yamada
> ; Rasmus Villemoes
> Subject: [PATCH] introduce CONFIG_DEVICE_TREE_INCLUDES
>
> The build system already automa
Please note that this is not a resubmission of fdt_add_pubkey, I merely
mentioned that in passing (and cc'ed Roman because of his interest in
that) as a previous attempt at solving the problem of getting the public
key info baked into U-Boot's .dtb, an approach that I've since learnt is
not
Hi Roman,
On Tue, 28 Sept 2021 at 03:55, Roman Kopytin
wrote:
>
> Hi, all
> I prepared 3 patches for fdt_add_pubkey adding.
> But in our company infrastructure I can't use git send-email. Our IT can't
> help me to resolve issue.
It might be easier to set up a new gmail account and send it with
The build system already automatically looks for and includes an
in-tree *-u-boot.dtsi when building the control .dtb. However, there
are some things that are awkward to maintain in such an in-tree file,
most notably the metadata associated to public keys used for verified
boot.
The only
; Simon Glass ;
Roman Kopytin ; Masahiro Yamada
; Rasmus Villemoes
Subject: [PATCH] introduce CONFIG_DEVICE_TREE_INCLUDES
The build system already automatically looks for and includes an in-tree
*-u-boot.dtsi when building the control .dtb. However, there are some things
that are awkward
20 matches
Mail list logo
