On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 7:16 PM wrote:
>
> From: Benjamin Szőke
>
> Technexion PICO-IMX7 SoM is supporting USDHC3 (eMMC or micro SD on SoM)
> and USDHC1 (SD on carrier board) to use on any carrier board like
> PICO-NYMPH. Based on the U-Boot version from Technexion it adds
> baseboard SD card
://lore.kernel.org/u-boot/
Eredeti levél
Feladó: Dragan Simic
Dátum: 2023 november 29 22:34:25
Tárgy: Re: [PATCH 1/1] pico-imx7d: add baseboard SD card boot
detect
Címzett: Szőke Kálmán Benjamin
On 2023-11-29 22:12, Szőke Kálmán Benjamin wrote:
https
tem. I saw no benefits, though. >> Eredeti levél
>> >> Feladó: Dragan Simic >> >> Dátum: 2023
november 29 05:47:55 >> >> Tárgy: Re: [PATCH 1/1] pico-imx7d: add baseboard SD
card boot >> detect >> >> Címzett:
: add baseboard SD card boot
detect
Címzett: Szőke Kálmán Benjamin
On 2023-11-29 00:35, Szőke Kálmán Benjamin wrote:
Sorry i can not fix it, this is an average e-mail service provider
that provides the expected tech level in 2023.Please upgrade your
u-boot list website engine to able
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/main Eredeti levél Feladó:
Dragan Simic Dátum: 2023 november 29 05:47:55Tárgy: Re:
[PATCH 1/1] pico-imx7d: add baseboard SD card boot detectCímzett: Szőke Kálmán
Benjamin On 2023-11-29 00:35, Szőke Kálmán Benjamin
wrote: > Sorry i can not fix
On 2023-11-29 00:35, Szőke Kálmán Benjamin wrote:
Sorry i can not fix it, this is an average e-mail service provider
that provides the expected tech level in 2023.Please upgrade your
u-boot list website engine to able to support e-mail
formats/technologies from 2020s ages. I suggest to use
Sorry i can not fix it, this is an average e-mail service provider that
provides the expected tech level in 2023.Please upgrade your u-boot list
website engine to able to support e-mail formats/technologies from 2020s ages.
I suggest to use similar what Yocto project has:
On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 23:26:08 + (GMT)
Szőke Kálmán Benjamin wrote:
> It was absolutely conform, i supressed the potentional warning. Once again i
> say, i will not remove it, if you do not liket it you can remoce as a
> maintainer. My patch is ready and final. Let's do something to improve
It was absolutely conform, i supressed the potentional warning. Once again i
say, i will not remove it, if you do not liket it you can remoce as a
maintainer. My patch is ready and final. Let's do something to improve i.MX
family as a maintainer. I am realy sad to see in last 2-3 years there
On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 4:55 PM Szőke Kálmán Benjamin
wrote:
>
> Unused function parameters should be removed
> https://rules.sonarsource.com/c/tag/based-on-misra/RSPEC-1172/
>From this same URL:
"Exceptions
There are some cases when you want to have an unused parameter
(usually because the
Unused function parameters should be
removedhttps://rules.sonarsource.com/c/tag/based-on-misra/RSPEC-1172/Quaility
means the full SW has no any functions with unused paramteres. Unfortunatelly
it seems u-boot and kernel source code are not best, it is time to improve it.
You can see, i did it,
Hi Benjamin,
On Sun, Nov 26, 2023 at 8:17 PM Szőke Kálmán Benjamin
wrote:
>
> It can happen when will -Wall be enabled as in others SW projects. My patches
> are final, ready and works. I will not remove this "supression", it must be a
> part of it if the target is to provide code in good
It can happen when will -Wall be enabled as in others SW projects. My patches
are final, ready and works. I will not remove this "supression", it must be a
part of it if the target is to provide code in good quality. If you have any
further whishes you can edit my patch and you can be a
On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 8:47 PM Szőke Kálmán Benjamin
wrote:
>
> It will warn, if warning levels is set correctly. I will do not remove it.
How can it happen if U-Boot uses
warning-1 := -Wextra -Wunused -Wno-unused-parameter ?
It will warn, if warning levels is set correctly. I will do not remove
it.https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3599160/how-can-i-suppress-unused-parameter-warnings-in-cbtwSorry
for "top-post" i am using an e-mail servicer which is not prepared to
following the 1990s styles which is need for
Hi Benjamin,
[Please do not top-post]
On Sun, Nov 19, 2023 at 6:08 PM Szőke Kálmán Benjamin
wrote:
> (void)(devno); is need because devno arguments is an unused variable, need to
> use this solution to suppress any potential warnings.
No, devno is a function parameter. There is no warning if
Hi,All previouse stage/patches was a "blind alley" solution because finally i
found, many code parts are ready from freesacle sources. So needed to refactor
the full codes, which seems now a totally new code/solution for it.So, I don't
see the point in describing them in a changelog, useless to
Hi Benjamin,
You should have indicated that this is v7.
The subject should be:
[PATCH v7] pico-imx7d: add baseboard SD card boot detect
No need for adding 1/1 for a single patch.
On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 7:16 PM wrote:
>
> From: Benjamin Szőke
>
> Technexion PICO-IMX7 SoM is supporting USDHC3
From: Benjamin Szőke
Technexion PICO-IMX7 SoM is supporting USDHC3 (eMMC or micro SD on SoM)
and USDHC1 (SD on carrier board) to use on any carrier board like
PICO-NYMPH. Based on the U-Boot version from Technexion it adds
baseboard SD card boot detect to able to boot from selected USDHC1
or
19 matches
Mail list logo