On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 05:00:26PM +0200, Wolfgang Wallner wrote:
> -"Andy Shevchenko" schrieb: -
> > Betreff: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: acpi: Fix calculation of DSDT length
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 04:08:17PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > >
Hi Andy,
-"Andy Shevchenko" schrieb: -
> Betreff: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: acpi: Fix calculation of DSDT length
>
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 04:08:17PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 02:33:20PM +0200, Wolfgang Wallner wrote:
> &g
On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 at 06:33, Wolfgang Wallner
wrote:
>
> Currently, the calculation for the length of the DSDT table includes any
> bytes that are added for alignment, but those bytes are not initialized.
>
> This is because the DSDT length is calculated after a call to
> acpi_inc_align(). Split
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 04:08:17PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 02:33:20PM +0200, Wolfgang Wallner wrote:
> > Currently, the calculation for the length of the DSDT table includes any
> > bytes that are added for alignment, but those bytes are not initialized.
> >
> >
On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 02:33:20PM +0200, Wolfgang Wallner wrote:
> Currently, the calculation for the length of the DSDT table includes any
> bytes that are added for alignment, but those bytes are not initialized.
>
> This is because the DSDT length is calculated after a call to
>
Currently, the calculation for the length of the DSDT table includes any
bytes that are added for alignment, but those bytes are not initialized.
This is because the DSDT length is calculated after a call to
acpi_inc_align(). Split this up into the following sequence:
* acpi_inc()
*
6 matches
Mail list logo
