Re: [PATCH 1/4] bootm: Allow ignoring the load address with kernel_noload

2023-11-06 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Tom, On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 13:15, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 12:58:46PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 11:30, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 10:25:00AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > > > On

Re: [PATCH 1/4] bootm: Allow ignoring the load address with kernel_noload

2023-11-06 Thread Tom Rini
On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 12:58:46PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > > On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 11:30, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 10:25:00AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > Hi Tom, > > > > > > On Sun, 5 Nov 2023 at 14:19, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 05,

Re: [PATCH 1/4] bootm: Allow ignoring the load address with kernel_noload

2023-11-06 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Tom, On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 11:30, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 10:25:00AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > On Sun, 5 Nov 2023 at 14:19, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 05, 2023 at 01:03:51PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > > > This image type is

Re: [PATCH 1/4] bootm: Allow ignoring the load address with kernel_noload

2023-11-06 Thread Tom Rini
On Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 10:25:00AM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Sun, 5 Nov 2023 at 14:19, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Sun, Nov 05, 2023 at 01:03:51PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > > > This image type is supposed to ignore the load address. But at present > > > it fails if the load

Re: [PATCH 1/4] bootm: Allow ignoring the load address with kernel_noload

2023-11-06 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Tom, On Sun, 5 Nov 2023 at 14:19, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 05, 2023 at 01:03:51PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > > This image type is supposed to ignore the load address. But at present > > it fails if the load address is missing. If it is zero, the image is > > loaded at address 0,

Re: [PATCH 1/4] bootm: Allow ignoring the load address with kernel_noload

2023-11-05 Thread Tom Rini
On Sun, Nov 05, 2023 at 01:03:51PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > This image type is supposed to ignore the load address. But at present > it fails if the load address is missing. If it is zero, the image is > loaded at address 0, which may not work on all boards. > > Make use of the kernel_addr_r

[PATCH 1/4] bootm: Allow ignoring the load address with kernel_noload

2023-11-05 Thread Simon Glass
This image type is supposed to ignore the load address. But at present it fails if the load address is missing. If it is zero, the image is loaded at address 0, which may not work on all boards. Make use of the kernel_addr_r environment variable, instead, since this seems to be a more reliable