Re: [PATCH 2/3] Revert "arm64: Use level-2 for largest block mappings when FEAT_HAFDBS is present"

On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 01:23:53PM +1300, Chris Packham wrote: > This reverts commit 836b8d4b205d2175b57cb9ef271e638b0c116e89. This is > part of a series trying to make use of the arm64 hardware features for > tracking dirty pages. Unfortunately this series causes problems for the > AC5/AC5X SoCs.

[PATCH 2/3] Revert "arm64: Use level-2 for largest block mappings when FEAT_HAFDBS is present"

This reverts commit 836b8d4b205d2175b57cb9ef271e638b0c116e89. This is part of a series trying to make use of the arm64 hardware features for tracking dirty pages. Unfortunately this series causes problems for the AC5/AC5X SoCs. Having exhausted other options the consensus seems to be reverting this