Re: [PATCH 3/5] spi: spi-uclass: Block dm_scan_fdt_dev with OF_CONTROL to prevent build failures

2020-09-10 Thread Jagan Teki
On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 4:48 PM Faiz Abbas wrote: > > There are devices which don't use OF_CONTROL or OF_PLATDATA but instead > rely on statically defined platdata. Block dm_scan_fdt_dev() with both > configs to avoid build failures under this condition. > > Signed-off-by: Faiz Abbas > --- >

Re: [PATCH 3/5] spi: spi-uclass: Block dm_scan_fdt_dev with OF_CONTROL to prevent build failures

2020-09-07 Thread Lokesh Vutla
Jagan, On 02/09/20 4:48 pm, Faiz Abbas wrote: > There are devices which don't use OF_CONTROL or OF_PLATDATA but instead > rely on statically defined platdata. Block dm_scan_fdt_dev() with both > configs to avoid build failures under this condition. > > Signed-off-by: Faiz Abbas Can you ack

[PATCH 3/5] spi: spi-uclass: Block dm_scan_fdt_dev with OF_CONTROL to prevent build failures

2020-09-02 Thread Faiz Abbas
There are devices which don't use OF_CONTROL or OF_PLATDATA but instead rely on statically defined platdata. Block dm_scan_fdt_dev() with both configs to avoid build failures under this condition. Signed-off-by: Faiz Abbas --- drivers/spi/spi-uclass.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1