On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 08:38:21PM -0500, Samuel Holland wrote:
> On 10/21/20 1:56 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 10:37 AM Samuel Holland wrote:
> >>
> >> There are two different publicly-released revisions of the PinePhone
> >> hardware, versions 1.1 and 1.2; and they need
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 7:08 AM Samuel Holland wrote:
>
> On 10/21/20 1:56 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 10:37 AM Samuel Holland wrote:
> >>
> >> There are two different publicly-released revisions of the PinePhone
> >> hardware, versions 1.1 and 1.2; and they need different
On 10/21/20 1:56 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 10:37 AM Samuel Holland wrote:
>>
>> There are two different publicly-released revisions of the PinePhone
>> hardware, versions 1.1 and 1.2; and they need different device trees.
>> Since some GPIO pins were rerouted, we can use that
On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 10:37 AM Samuel Holland wrote:
>
> There are two different publicly-released revisions of the PinePhone
> hardware, versions 1.1 and 1.2; and they need different device trees.
> Since some GPIO pins were rerouted, we can use that to distinguish
> between them.
>
>
On 03/09/2020 06:07, Samuel Holland wrote:
Hi,
> There are two different publicly-released revisions of the PinePhone
> hardware, versions 1.1 and 1.2; and they need different device trees.
> Since some GPIO pins were rerouted, we can use that to distinguish
> between them.
Nice one. I once had
There are two different publicly-released revisions of the PinePhone
hardware, versions 1.1 and 1.2; and they need different device trees.
Since some GPIO pins were rerouted, we can use that to distinguish
between them.
Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland
---
arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig | 7 +++
6 matches
Mail list logo