Re: [PATCH v2] dm: uclass: don't assign aliased seq numbers

On 03. 02. 20 18:16, Michael Walle wrote: > Hi Simon, > > Am 2020-01-30 03:16, schrieb Simon Glass: >> Hi Michael, >> >> On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 at 06:29, Michael Walle wrote: >>> >>> If there are aliases for an uclass, set the base for the "dynamically" >>> allocated numbers next to the highest

Re: [PATCH v2] dm: uclass: don't assign aliased seq numbers

Hi Simon, Am 2020-01-30 03:16, schrieb Simon Glass: Hi Michael, On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 at 06:29, Michael Walle wrote: If there are aliases for an uclass, set the base for the "dynamically" allocated numbers next to the highest alias. Please note, that this might lead to holes in the

Re: [PATCH v2] dm: uclass: don't assign aliased seq numbers

Hi Michael, On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 19:16, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 at 06:29, Michael Walle wrote: > > > > If there are aliases for an uclass, set the base for the "dynamically" > > allocated numbers next to the highest alias. > > > > Please note, that this

Re: [PATCH v2] dm: uclass: don't assign aliased seq numbers

Hi Michael, On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 at 06:29, Michael Walle wrote: > > If there are aliases for an uclass, set the base for the "dynamically" > allocated numbers next to the highest alias. > > Please note, that this might lead to holes in the sequences, depending > on the device tree. For example if

[PATCH v2] dm: uclass: don't assign aliased seq numbers

If there are aliases for an uclass, set the base for the "dynamically" allocated numbers next to the highest alias. Please note, that this might lead to holes in the sequences, depending on the device tree. For example if there is only an alias "ethernet1", the next device seq number would be 2.