On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 10:04:29AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> In the Makefile there is a line that says this:
>
> # the checker needs the correct machine size
> CHECKFLAGS += $(if $(CONFIG_64BIT),-m64,-m32)
>
> Set CONFIG_64BIT for ARM64 so that we pass -m64 to the static checkers
>
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 02:44:12PM +0100, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> On 04.03.24 08:04, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > In the Makefile there is a line that says this:
> >
> > # the checker needs the correct machine size
> > CHECKFLAGS += $(if $(CONFIG_64BIT),-m64,-m32)
> >
> > Set
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 03:11:04PM +0100, Csókás Bence wrote:
> 2024. 03. 04. 14:44 keltezéssel, Heinrich Schuchardt írta> How about other
> 64bit architectures (sandbox64, x86_64)?
>
> I think that could be its own patchset.
Yes, a follow-up is fine.
>
> > Best regards
> >
> > Heinrich
>
>
2024. 03. 04. 14:44 keltezéssel, Heinrich Schuchardt írta> How about
other 64bit architectures (sandbox64, x86_64)?
I think that could be its own patchset.
Best regards
Heinrich
Bence
P.S., does anyone know why I'm being CC'ed here? Did I participate in
this thread at some point? I only
On 04.03.24 08:04, Dan Carpenter wrote:
In the Makefile there is a line that says this:
# the checker needs the correct machine size
CHECKFLAGS += $(if $(CONFIG_64BIT),-m64,-m32)
Set CONFIG_64BIT for ARM64 so that we pass -m64 to the static checkers
instead of -m32.
Signed-off-by:
In the Makefile there is a line that says this:
# the checker needs the correct machine size
CHECKFLAGS += $(if $(CONFIG_64BIT),-m64,-m32)
Set CONFIG_64BIT for ARM64 so that we pass -m64 to the static checkers
instead of -m32.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter
---
v2: split the patch into
6 matches
Mail list logo
