Hi Stefano,
Could you please check the status of this patchset and confirm if a v3
is required?
On 19/4/20 01:24, Walter Lozano wrote:
Hi Stefano,
I noticed that this series has state = Changes Requested, but not sure
what are the changes need.
Could you please clarify? There is a silly h
Hi Stefano,
I noticed that this series has state = Changes Requested, but not sure
what are the changes need.
Could you please clarify? There is a silly hunk but Baruch suggested
that this no requires a v3. However if you prefer a v3, I can prepare it
Please confirm.
On 16/3/20 15:56, Walt
Hi Baruch,
On 16/3/20 15:11, Baruch Siach wrote:
Hi Walter,
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 02:53:58PM -0300, Walter Lozano wrote:
On 16/3/20 14:25, Baruch Siach wrote:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 02:05:57PM -0300, Walter Lozano wrote:
On 16/3/20 13:28, Baruch Siach wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 01:52
Hi Walter,
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 02:53:58PM -0300, Walter Lozano wrote:
> On 16/3/20 14:25, Baruch Siach wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 02:05:57PM -0300, Walter Lozano wrote:
> > > On 16/3/20 13:28, Baruch Siach wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 01:52:13PM -0300, Walter Lozano wrote:
>
Hi Baruch,
On 16/3/20 14:25, Baruch Siach wrote:
Hi Walter
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 02:05:57PM -0300, Walter Lozano wrote:
On 16/3/20 13:28, Baruch Siach wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 01:52:13PM -0300, Walter Lozano wrote:
Thanks for sharing.
On 12/3/20 02:02, Baruch Siach wrote:
Hi Walter
Hi Walter
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 02:05:57PM -0300, Walter Lozano wrote:
> On 16/3/20 13:28, Baruch Siach wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 01:52:13PM -0300, Walter Lozano wrote:
> > > Thanks for sharing.
> > >
> > > On 12/3/20 02:02, Baruch Siach wrote:
> > > > Hi Walter,
> > > >
> > > > On We
On 16/3/20 13:28, Baruch Siach wrote:
Hi Walter,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 01:52:13PM -0300, Walter Lozano wrote:
Hi Baruch,
Thanks for sharing.
On 12/3/20 02:02, Baruch Siach wrote:
Hi Walter,
On Wed, Mar 11 2020, Walter Lozano wrote:
In SPL legacy code only one MMC device is created, bas
Hi Walter,
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 01:52:13PM -0300, Walter Lozano wrote:
> Hi Baruch,
>
> Thanks for sharing.
>
> On 12/3/20 02:02, Baruch Siach wrote:
> > Hi Walter,
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 11 2020, Walter Lozano wrote:
> > > In SPL legacy code only one MMC device is created, based on BOOT_CFG
>
Hi Baruch,
Thanks for sharing.
On 12/3/20 02:02, Baruch Siach wrote:
Hi Walter,
On Wed, Mar 11 2020, Walter Lozano wrote:
In SPL legacy code only one MMC device is created, based on BOOT_CFG
register, which can be either SD or eMMC. In this context
board_boot_order return always MMC1 when con
Hi Walter,
On Wed, Mar 11 2020, Walter Lozano wrote:
> In SPL legacy code only one MMC device is created, based on BOOT_CFG
> register, which can be either SD or eMMC. In this context
> board_boot_order return always MMC1 when configure to boot from
> SD/eMMC. After switching to DM both SD and eMM
In SPL legacy code only one MMC device is created, based on BOOT_CFG
register, which can be either SD or eMMC. In this context
board_boot_order return always MMC1 when configure to boot from
SD/eMMC. After switching to DM both SD and eMMC devices are created
based on the information available on DT
11 matches
Mail list logo
