On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 09:37:12AM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 05:30, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> >
> > Dear Frédéric,
> >
> > In message <9b0b5776-cb47-dfb2-ab77-36c89dc64...@collabora.com> you wrote:
> > >
> > > But, when debugging kernel crashes occurring either
Hi,
On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 05:30, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>
> Dear Frédéric,
>
> In message <9b0b5776-cb47-dfb2-ab77-36c89dc64...@collabora.com> you wrote:
> >
> > But, when debugging kernel crashes occurring either early in boot or
> > hard crashes later, it can be helpful to be able to retrieve
Dear Frédéric,
In message <9b0b5776-cb47-dfb2-ab77-36c89dc64...@collabora.com> you wrote:
>
> But, when debugging kernel crashes occurring either early in boot or
> hard crashes later, it can be helpful to be able to retrieve logs using
> the U-Boot session.
Full agreement, and we had such a
Dear Wolfgang,
On 20/03/2020 11:35, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Frédéric,
In message <03674974-2a2c-3804-ce02-4f3d38ff0...@collabora.com> you wrote:
I understand what Linus has is one-way, only focussing on crash
dump, i. e. it does not allow to pass information from U-Boot to Linux?
Yes,
Dear Frédéric,
In message <03674974-2a2c-3804-ce02-4f3d38ff0...@collabora.com> you wrote:
>
> > I understand what Linus has is one-way, only focussing on crash
> > dump, i. e. it does not allow to pass information from U-Boot to Linux?
>
> Yes, currently it is not possible to pass information
Hi Wolfgang, Heinrich, Heiko,
On 20/03/2020 09:08, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Heinrich,
In message you wrote:
To me this sounds very much like what you are adding here (plus a
few features more). Does it make sense to unify such code?
It seems you are relating to
Hello Wolfgang, Heinrich,
Am 20.03.2020 um 09:08 schrieb Wolfgang Denk:
Dear Heinrich,
In message you wrote:
To me this sounds very much like what you are adding here (plus a
few features more). Does it make sense to unify such code?
It seems you are relating to
Dear Heinrich,
In message you wrote:
>
> > To me this sounds very much like what you are adding here (plus a
> > few features more). Does it make sense to unify such code?
>
> It seems you are relating to
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/844oyrqvvb@sauna.l.org/t/
No, I'm not. I was talking
On 3/19/20 9:37 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Frédéric,
In message <20200319175737.10166-1-frederic.da...@collabora.com> you wrote:
This serie of patches adds a new pstore command allowing to display or save
ramoops logs (oops, panic, console, ftrace and user) generated by a previous
kernel
Dear Frédéric,
In message <20200319175737.10166-1-frederic.da...@collabora.com> you wrote:
> This serie of patches adds a new pstore command allowing to display or save
> ramoops logs (oops, panic, console, ftrace and user) generated by a previous
> kernel crash.
> PStore parameters can be set in
This serie of patches adds a new pstore command allowing to display or save
ramoops logs (oops, panic, console, ftrace and user) generated by a previous
kernel crash.
PStore parameters can be set in U-Boot configuration file, or at run-time
using "pstore set" command. For kernel using Device Tree,
11 matches
Mail list logo
