Hi Heinrich,
I'm about to send v4 patch series.
> 1) keep if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EFI_SECURE_BOOT)) condition
I chose this option, but I reverted #ifdef statement instead of using
"if (IS_ENABLED)" because I think it is better not to rely on compiler
optimization.
> 2) remove if
On Mon, 10 May 2021 at 11:07, Takahiro Akashi
wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 09:49:03AM +0900, Masahisa Kojima wrote:
> > Hi Heinrich,
> >
> > Sorry for the late reply.
> >
> > On Sat, 8 May 2021 at 23:08, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > >
> > > On 4/28/21 3:16 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 09:49:03AM +0900, Masahisa Kojima wrote:
> Hi Heinrich,
>
> Sorry for the late reply.
>
> On Sat, 8 May 2021 at 23:08, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> >
> > On 4/28/21 3:16 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > > On 28.04.21 14:19, Masahisa Kojima wrote:
> >
> > >> /**
> >
Hi Heinrich,
Sorry for the late reply.
On Sat, 8 May 2021 at 23:08, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>
> On 4/28/21 3:16 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> > On 28.04.21 14:19, Masahisa Kojima wrote:
>
> >> /**
> >>* cmp_pe_section() - compare virtual addresses of two PE image sections
> >>*
On 4/28/21 3:16 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 28.04.21 14:19, Masahisa Kojima wrote:
/**
* cmp_pe_section() - compare virtual addresses of two PE image sections
* @arg1: pointer to pointer to first section header
@@ -504,6 +565,9 @@ static bool efi_image_authenticate(void
On 28.04.21 14:19, Masahisa Kojima wrote:
> This is preparation for PE/COFF measurement support.
> PE/COFF image hash calculation is same in both
> UEFI Secure Boot image verification and measurement in
> measured boot. PE/COFF image parsing functions are
> gathered into efi_image_loader.c, and
This is preparation for PE/COFF measurement support.
PE/COFF image hash calculation is same in both
UEFI Secure Boot image verification and measurement in
measured boot. PE/COFF image parsing functions are
gathered into efi_image_loader.c, and exposed even if
UEFI Secure Boot is not enabled.
This
7 matches
Mail list logo