Hi André,
On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 08:27, André Przywara wrote:
>
> On 28/04/2020 18:57, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> sorry for the delay, found this, slightly mouldy already, in my draft
> folder.
>
> First, thanks for the review! I saw the Tom merged this already, but
> wanted to come back to t
On 28/04/2020 18:57, Simon Glass wrote:
Hi,
sorry for the delay, found this, slightly mouldy already, in my draft
folder.
First, thanks for the review! I saw the Tom merged this already, but
wanted to come back to the DT hacks:
> Hi Andre,
>
> On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 at 12:18, Andre Przywara wrot
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 07:17:59PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Even though the PL011 UART driver claims to be DM compliant, it does not
> really a good job with parsing DT nodes. U-Boot seems to adhere to a
> non-standard binding, either requiring to have a "skip-init" property in
> the node, o
Hi Andre,
On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 at 12:18, Andre Przywara wrote:
>
> Even though the PL011 UART driver claims to be DM compliant, it does not
> really a good job with parsing DT nodes. U-Boot seems to adhere to a
> non-standard binding, either requiring to have a "skip-init" property in
> the node,
Even though the PL011 UART driver claims to be DM compliant, it does not
really a good job with parsing DT nodes. U-Boot seems to adhere to a
non-standard binding, either requiring to have a "skip-init" property in
the node, or to have an extra "clock" property holding the base
*frequency* value fo
5 matches
Mail list logo
