Re: [PATCH v4 12/17] riscv: Add a bypass clock for K210

Hi Sean > On 2/18/20 1:35 AM, Rick Chen wrote: > > Hi Sean > > > > This patch is relative about clock driver. > > It shall be named as clk instead of riscv > > Thanks > > Rick > > Should the other clock patches adding k210 clock support be prefixed > "clk:" as well? Sure, patch 11 and 13 as well

Re: [PATCH v4 12/17] riscv: Add a bypass clock for K210

On 2/18/20 1:35 AM, Rick Chen wrote: > Hi Sean > > This patch is relative about clock driver. > It shall be named as clk instead of riscv > Thanks > Rick Should the other clock patches adding k210 clock support be prefixed "clk:" as well? --Sean

Re: [PATCH v4 12/17] riscv: Add a bypass clock for K210

Hi Sean This patch is relative about clock driver. It shall be named as clk instead of riscv Thanks Rick > This is a small driver to do a software bypass of a clock if hardware > bypass is not working. I have tried to write this in a generic fashion, so > that it could be potentially broken out

[PATCH v4 12/17] riscv: Add a bypass clock for K210

This is a small driver to do a software bypass of a clock if hardware bypass is not working. I have tried to write this in a generic fashion, so that it could be potentially broken out of the kendryte code at some future date. For the K210, it is used to have aclk bypass pll0 and use in0 instead