Hi Bin, Simon,
On 21/03/05 10:03:p, Bin Meng wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 10:31 PM Simon Glass wrote:
> > If I previously reviewed it you can add my tag.
I wasn't sure of the correct etiquette when a large rearrangement of the
patches had been done; I'll keep this in mind.
> > I think
Hi Asherah,
On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 10:31 PM Simon Glass wrote:
>
> Hi Asherah,
>
> On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 21:16, Asherah Connor wrote:
> >
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> > On 21/03/04 11:03:p, Simon Glass wrote:
> > > This looks sensible but it really is a huge patch. Can it be split up a
> > > bit?
> >
>
Hi Asherah,
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021 at 21:16, Asherah Connor wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 21/03/04 11:03:p, Simon Glass wrote:
> > This looks sensible but it really is a huge patch. Can it be split up a bit?
>
> This is a rejig of v4 previously Reviewed-by: you, see
>
Hi Simon,
On 21/03/04 11:03:p, Simon Glass wrote:
> This looks sensible but it really is a huge patch. Can it be split up a bit?
This is a rejig of v4 previously Reviewed-by: you, see
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=230778=%2a.
Bin Meng suggested the patch be reworked
Hi Asherah,
On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 at 01:35, Asherah Connor wrote:
>
> We move qfw into its own uclass and split the PIO functions into a
> specific driver for that uclass. The PIO driver is selected in the
> qemu-x86 board config (this covers x86 and x86_64).
>
> A sandbox driver and test are
We move qfw into its own uclass and split the PIO functions into a
specific driver for that uclass. The PIO driver is selected in the
qemu-x86 board config (this covers x86 and x86_64).
A sandbox driver and test are added for the uclass, and a test in QEMU
added for qfw functionality to confirm
6 matches
Mail list logo
