hi Heinrich,
On Sun, 13 Mar 2022 at 20:19, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
>
> Use a statically allocated buffer on stack instead of using malloc for
> reading the random bytes. Using a local array is faster than
> allocating heap memory on every initiation of the command.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu
>
Hi Sughosh,
On Mon, 14 Mar 2022 at 05:27, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
>
> hi Simon,
>
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2022 at 03:53, Simon Glass wrote:
> >
> > Hi Sughosh,
> >
> > On Sun, 13 Mar 2022 at 08:49, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> > >
> > > Use a statically allocated buffer on stack instead of using malloc for
> >
hi Simon,
On Mon, 14 Mar 2022 at 03:53, Simon Glass wrote:
>
> Hi Sughosh,
>
> On Sun, 13 Mar 2022 at 08:49, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
> >
> > Use a statically allocated buffer on stack instead of using malloc for
> > reading the random bytes. Using a local array is faster than
> > allocating heap
Hi Sughosh,
On Sun, 13 Mar 2022 at 08:49, Sughosh Ganu wrote:
>
> Use a statically allocated buffer on stack instead of using malloc for
> reading the random bytes. Using a local array is faster than
> allocating heap memory on every initiation of the command.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu
>
Use a statically allocated buffer on stack instead of using malloc for
reading the random bytes. Using a local array is faster than
allocating heap memory on every initiation of the command.
Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu
---
Changes since V4:
* New patch based on review comments from Simon to
5 matches
Mail list logo