Re: [RFCv1] doc: develop: Describe using CONFIG vs CFG for values

2022-07-31 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Tom, On Sun, 31 Jul 2022 at 05:46, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 07:27:31PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 07:20, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > > Document how and when to use CONFIG or CFG namespace for options. There > > > are times where Kcon

Re: [RFCv1] doc: develop: Describe using CONFIG vs CFG for values

2022-07-31 Thread Tom Rini
On Sat, Jul 30, 2022 at 07:27:31PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 07:20, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > Document how and when to use CONFIG or CFG namespace for options. There > > are times where Kconfig is not a great fit for our needs, so we want to > > use the CFG nam

Re: [RFCv1] doc: develop: Describe using CONFIG vs CFG for values

2022-07-30 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Tom, On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 at 07:20, Tom Rini wrote: > > Document how and when to use CONFIG or CFG namespace for options. There > are times where Kconfig is not a great fit for our needs, so we want to > use the CFG namespace instead. > > Signed-off-by: Tom Rini > --- > RFCv1: > - This is ess

Re: [RFCv1] doc: develop: Describe using CONFIG vs CFG for values

2022-07-28 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
Am 28. Juli 2022 19:53:34 MESZ schrieb Tom Rini : >On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 06:44:56PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: >> >> >> Am 28. Juli 2022 15:20:46 MESZ schrieb Tom Rini : >> >Document how and when to use CONFIG or CFG namespace for options. There >> >are times where Kconfig is not a g

Re: [RFCv1] doc: develop: Describe using CONFIG vs CFG for values

2022-07-28 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 06:44:56PM +0200, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote: > > > Am 28. Juli 2022 15:20:46 MESZ schrieb Tom Rini : > >Document how and when to use CONFIG or CFG namespace for options. There > >are times where Kconfig is not a great fit for our needs, so we want to > >use the CFG namesp

Re: [RFCv1] doc: develop: Describe using CONFIG vs CFG for values

2022-07-28 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
Am 28. Juli 2022 15:20:46 MESZ schrieb Tom Rini : >Document how and when to use CONFIG or CFG namespace for options. There >are times where Kconfig is not a great fit for our needs, so we want to >use the CFG namespace instead. > >Signed-off-by: Tom Rini >--- >RFCv1: >- This is essentially my

Re: [RFCv1] doc: develop: Describe using CONFIG vs CFG for values

2022-07-28 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 03:34:43PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > On Thursday 28 July 2022 09:20:46 Tom Rini wrote: > > Document how and when to use CONFIG or CFG namespace for options. There > > are times where Kconfig is not a great fit for our needs, so we want to > > use the CFG namespace instead.

Re: [RFCv1] doc: develop: Describe using CONFIG vs CFG for values

2022-07-28 Thread Pali Rohár
On Thursday 28 July 2022 09:20:46 Tom Rini wrote: > Document how and when to use CONFIG or CFG namespace for options. There > are times where Kconfig is not a great fit for our needs, so we want to > use the CFG namespace instead. > > Signed-off-by: Tom Rini > --- > RFCv1: > - This is essentiall

[RFCv1] doc: develop: Describe using CONFIG vs CFG for values

2022-07-28 Thread Tom Rini
Document how and when to use CONFIG or CFG namespace for options. There are times where Kconfig is not a great fit for our needs, so we want to use the CFG namespace instead. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini --- RFCv1: - This is essentially my idea on how to better handle the problem of CONFIG values t