On 01/22/2016 02:20 AM, Ashish Kumar wrote:
> Return value of ffs64() different to that of __ffs64(),
> ffs64(0x8000) = 0x20
> __ffs64(0x8000) = 0x1f,
>as result of this change -1 from start_align needs to be removed.
> Incorrect DDR law was created in case of B4860qds
>
>
On 01/22/2016 02:20 AM, Ashish Kumar wrote:
> Return value of ffs64() different to that of __ffs64(),
> ffs64(0x8000) = 0x20
> __ffs64(0x8000) = 0x1f,
>as result of this change -1 from start_align needs to be removed.
> Incorrect DDR law was created in case of B4860qds
>
>
Return value of ffs64() different to that of __ffs64(),
ffs64(0x8000) = 0x20
__ffs64(0x8000) = 0x1f,
as result of this change -1 from start_align needs to be removed.
Incorrect DDR law was created in case of B4860qds
Signed-off-by: Ashish Kumar
---
*
3 matches
Mail list logo