Hi York,
> -Original Message-
> From: York Sun
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2018 8:43 AM
> To: Prabhakar Kushwaha
> Cc: Jagdish Gediya ; u-boot@lists.denx.de;
> o...@buserror.net
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH][v2] mtd: nand: fsl_ifc: Fix nand waitfunc return
> v
> On Apr 26, 2018, at 19:58, Prabhakar Kushwaha
> wrote:
>>
>
> Even though there are 2 bytes.
> But NAND sub-system only consume 1 byte because all NAND flash has 1 byte
> status register.
>
Then the commit message should describe the position of primary status field,
instead of sayi
Hi York,
> -Original Message-
> From: U-Boot [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of York Sun
> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2018 2:31 AM
> To: Jagdish Gediya ; u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Cc: o...@buserror.net
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH][v2] mtd: nand: fsl_ifc:
On 03/20/2018 10:24 PM, Jagdish Gediya wrote:
> As per the IFC hardware manual, Most significant 2 bytes in
> nand_fsr register are the outcome of NAND READ STATUS command.
>
> So status value need to be shifted and aligned as per the nand
> framework requirement.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jagdish Gediy
As per the IFC hardware manual, Most significant 2 bytes in
nand_fsr register are the outcome of NAND READ STATUS command.
So status value need to be shifted and aligned as per the nand
framework requirement.
Signed-off-by: Jagdish Gediya
Reviewed-by: Prabhakar Kushwaha
---
Changes for v2:
5 matches
Mail list logo
