Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] [NEXT] arm926ejs: add split relocation support

2010-09-18 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Albert ARIBAUD, In message 4c90b904.9020...@free.fr you wrote: So far we've been using ISO8859-1 It is not clear to me whether you're expressing a coding rule or just a statement of fact, so I'll ask more precise questions: 1) is UTF-8 allowed or not in u-boot? 2) if UTF-8 is

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] [NEXT] arm926ejs: add split relocation support

2010-09-18 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Le 18/09/2010 22:45, Wolfgang Denk a écrit : Dear Albert ARIBAUD, In message4c90b904.9020...@free.fr you wrote: So far we've been using ISO8859-1 It is not clear to me whether you're expressing a coding rule or just a statement of fact, so I'll ask more precise questions: 1) is UTF-8

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] [NEXT] arm926ejs: add split relocation support

2010-09-18 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Albert ARIBAUD, In message 4c952b3d.9000...@free.fr you wrote: So far this has not been officially decided yet. My personal preference is ISO-8859-1, so if nobody protests I suggest we add a [i18n] commitencoding = ISO-8859-1 to the .git/config file. ... Thanks -- as promised, I will

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] [NEXT] arm926ejs: add split relocation support

2010-09-18 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Le 18/09/2010 23:18, Wolfgang Denk a écrit : Thanks -- as promised, I will compile the list of u-boot files currently encoded in UTF-8 and will provide a patch to reencode them to ISO-8895-1. Please wait a couple of days so others have sufficient opportunity to comment... All right, I will.

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] [NEXT] arm926ejs: add split relocation support

2010-09-15 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Albert ARIBAUD, In message 4c905f6d.7010...@free.fr you wrote: Both encodings are present in u-boot. I figure UTF-8 seems a better choice, but if there is a coding rule about encodings, I'll happily follow it, of course. So far we've been using ISO8859-1 Best regards, Wolfgang Denk

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] [NEXT] arm926ejs: add split relocation support

2010-09-15 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Le 15/09/2010 08:59, Wolfgang Denk a écrit : Dear Albert ARIBAUD, In message4c905f6d.7010...@free.fr you wrote: Both encodings are present in u-boot. I figure UTF-8 seems a better choice, but if there is a coding rule about encodings, I'll happily follow it, of course. So far we've been

[U-Boot] [PATCH] [NEXT] arm926ejs: add split relocation support

2010-09-14 Thread Albert Aribaud
Many arm926ejs-based SoCs boot at 0x. Currently these last 64 KB of flash are wasted just for a jump to the location where u-boot was flashed. This commit provides split relocation where the first part of u-boot is stored from the reset address to the end of the flash, and the second part

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] [NEXT] arm926ejs: add split relocation support

2010-09-14 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Le 14/09/2010 20:25, Albert Aribaud a écrit : Sorry, the patch posted is against master, not next, and thus does not take Heiko's relocation work. I'm rebasing / updating the patch and will provide a V2 of it that will. Amicalement, -- Albert. ___

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] [NEXT] arm926ejs: add split relocation support

2010-09-14 Thread Rogan Dawes
On 2010/09/14 8:47 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Le 14/09/2010 20:25, Albert Aribaud a écrit : Sorry, the patch posted is against master, not next, and thus does not take Heiko's relocation work. I'm rebasing / updating the patch and will provide a V2 of it that will. Amicalement, You

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] [NEXT] arm926ejs: add split relocation support

2010-09-14 Thread Albert ARIBAUD
Le 14/09/2010 22:28, Rogan Dawes a écrit : On 2010/09/14 8:47 PM, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: Le 14/09/2010 20:25, Albert Aribaud a écrit : Sorry, the patch posted is against master, not next, and thus does not take Heiko's relocation work. I'm rebasing / updating the patch and will provide a V2