Hello Masahiro,
On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:52:56 +0900, Masahiro Yamada yamad...@jp.panasonic.com
wrote:
My main motivation for this commit:
[1] Follow the arch/arm/Makefile style of Linux Kernel
[2] Maintain compiler options systematically
Currently, we give -march=* and -mtune=* options
Albert,
2015-02-27 2:43 GMT+09:00 Masahiro YAMADA yamad...@jp.panasonic.com:
Hi Albert,
2015-02-26 6:14 GMT+09:00 Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.b...@aribaud.net:
I'm fine with the patch's goal and principle, but it does not seem to
apply properly to u-boot-arm/master. Can you have a look?
Hi Albert,
2015-02-26 6:14 GMT+09:00 Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.b...@aribaud.net:
I'm fine with the patch's goal and principle, but it does not seem to
apply properly to u-boot-arm/master. Can you have a look?
Sure.
I've just posted v2:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/444028/
It should
Hello Masahiro,
On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:52:56 +0900, Masahiro Yamada
yamad...@jp.panasonic.com wrote:
My main motivation for this commit:
[1] Follow the arch/arm/Makefile style of Linux Kernel
[2] Maintain compiler options systematically
Currently, we give -march=* and -mtune=* options
My main motivation for this commit:
[1] Follow the arch/arm/Makefile style of Linux Kernel
[2] Maintain compiler options systematically
Currently, we give -march=* and -mtune=* options inconsistently:
Only some of the CPUs pass -march=* and -mtune=* options.
By collecting flags into the
On Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 11:52:56 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
My main motivation for this commit:
[1] Follow the arch/arm/Makefile style of Linux Kernel
[2] Maintain compiler options systematically
Currently, we give -march=* and -mtune=* options inconsistently:
Only some of
On 10.02.2015 11:52, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
My main motivation for this commit:
[1] Follow the arch/arm/Makefile style of Linux Kernel
[2] Maintain compiler options systematically
Currently, we give -march=* and -mtune=* options inconsistently:
Only some of the CPUs pass -march=* and
7 matches
Mail list logo