Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: zynq: load u-boot.img whether CONFIG_OF_SEPARATE is defined or not

2016-05-05 Thread Michal Simek
Hi, On 4.5.2016 16:50, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Hi Michal, > > Does this patch look good? > or does it have impact on your customers? Sorry I missed it. Yes it looks good. Applied. Thanks, Michal ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: zynq: load u-boot.img whether CONFIG_OF_SEPARATE is defined or not

2016-05-04 Thread Masahiro Yamada
Hi Michal, Does this patch look good? or does it have impact on your customers? 2016-04-14 6:52 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada : > Since commit ad1ecd2063da ("fdt: Build a U-Boot binary without device > tree"), u-boot-dtb.img is identical to u-boot.img, so SPL can

[U-Boot] [PATCH] ARM: zynq: load u-boot.img whether CONFIG_OF_SEPARATE is defined or not

2016-04-13 Thread Masahiro Yamada
Since commit ad1ecd2063da ("fdt: Build a U-Boot binary without device tree"), u-boot-dtb.img is identical to u-boot.img, so SPL can always load u-boot.img whether CONFIG_OF_SEPARATE is defined or not. Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada ---