Dear "Premi, Sanjeev",
In message you
wrote:
>
> > Do you still need to remove the $(sort) call for the LIBS? That
> > should NOT be done.
...
> I know it shouldn't be done - but just trying to take problem one by
> one. Unless you want me to report the problems onl after I have a fix
> for the
> -Original Message-
> From: Wolfgang Denk [mailto:w...@denx.de]
> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 5:09 PM
> To: Premi, Sanjeev
> Cc: Albert ARIBAUD; u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARMv7: Fix linker errors across
> toolchain versions
>
Dear "Premi, Sanjeev",
In message you
wrote:
>
> Just posted the patch. The u-boot comes up on the EVM - only after
> sort related change in the Makefile. Haven't debuged it yet.
Could you ***please*** be a bit more precise?
What EXACTLY was that "sort related change"?
Do you still need to re
> -Original Message-
> From: Albert ARIBAUD [mailto:albert.arib...@free.fr]
> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 2:12 PM
> To: Premi, Sanjeev
> Cc: Wolfgang Denk; u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARMv7: Fix linker errors across
> toolchain ver
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message <4cf7583c.7000...@free.fr> you wrote:
>
> > Does it help when you change the "*(.bss)" in
> > "arch/arm/cpu/armv7/u-boot.lds" into "*(.*bss)"
> > (so it also includes any .sbss objects) ?
>
> No change.
Hm... Maybe it is indeed not a good idea to mix short object
Hi Sanjeev,
Le 02/12/2010 09:30, Premi, Sanjeev a écrit :
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Albert ARIBAUD [mailto:albert.arib...@free.fr]
>> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 1:57 PM
>> To: Wolfgang Denk
>> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Premi, Sanjeev
>> Subj
> -Original Message-
> From: Albert ARIBAUD [mailto:albert.arib...@free.fr]
> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 1:57 PM
> To: Wolfgang Denk
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Premi, Sanjeev
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARMv7: Fix linker errors across
> toolchain vers
Le 02/12/2010 09:13, Wolfgang Denk a écrit :
> Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
>
> In message<4cf74fed.2030...@free.fr> you wrote:
>>
>> BTW... Why on Earth is it an uint8? Probably a space saving measure, but
>> one I think is not really fruitful, because of probable paddings and
>> alignments; making it an
> -Original Message-
> From: Albert ARIBAUD [mailto:albert.arib...@free.fr]
> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 12:30 PM
> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Cc: Premi, Sanjeev; Wolfgang Denk
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARMv7: Fix linker errors across
> toolchain versio
> -Original Message-
> From: Albert ARIBAUD [mailto:albert.arib...@free.fr]
> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 1:21 PM
> To: Wolfgang Denk
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; Premi, Sanjeev
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARMv7: Fix linker errors across
> toolchain vers
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message <4cf74fed.2030...@free.fr> you wrote:
>
> BTW... Why on Earth is it an uint8? Probably a space saving measure, but
> one I think is not really fruitful, because of probable paddings and
> alignments; making it an int would allow using smsc_id directly as
> value
Hi Wolfgang,
Le 02/12/2010 08:34, Wolfgang Denk a écrit :
> Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
>
> In message<4cf743e6.60...@free.fr> you wrote:
>>
>> Starting with the fact that the linker issue is only for one board,
>> omap3_evm, I looked up the board-specific code. First thing that I
>> noticed was
>>
>>
Dear Albert ARIBAUD,
In message <4cf743e6.60...@free.fr> you wrote:
>
> Starting with the fact that the linker issue is only for one board,
> omap3_evm, I looked up the board-specific code. First thing that I
> noticed was
>
> static u8 omap3_evm_version;
>
> I changed this to
>
>
Le 01/12/2010 22:39, Albert ARIBAUD a écrit :
> This one is a conundrum.
>
> Using 2010q1, building omap3_evm causes a linker warning
> "arm-none-linux-gnueabi-ld: u-boot: section .bss vma 0x8003e8f0 overlaps
> previous sections" while building omap3_beagle does not cause any linker
> warning.
>
>
This one is a conundrum.
Using 2010q1, building omap3_evm causes a linker warning
"arm-none-linux-gnueabi-ld: u-boot: section .bss vma 0x8003e8f0 overlaps
previous sections" while building omap3_beagle does not cause any linker
warning.
Both boards use the same armv7 u-boot.lds and have a .bss
Dear "Premi, Sanjeev",
In message you
wrote:
>
> 1) why the current metod produces different errors across
> different toolchain versions.
Different tool chains may prvide different quality of optimizations
(and bugs), resulting in differnt variable locations. With one memory
map y
Dear "Premi, Sanjeev",
In message you
wrote:
>
> The u-boot built after this change alone gets stuck somewhere after
> dram_init(). However, removing the "sort" from LIBS (as suggested
> by Wolfgang), the u-boot comes up fine on the omap3_evm.
I did NOT suggest that. This was just intended as d
> -Original Message-
> From: Albert ARIBAUD [mailto:albert.arib...@free.fr]
> Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 12:07 AM
> To: Premi, Sanjeev
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARMv7: Fix linker errors across
> toolchain versions
[snip]..
Le 01/12/2010 19:19, Premi, Sanjeev a écrit :
>> If you find another way to do this overlay yet end up producing a
>> different binary, I'll be interested in the result, but I
>> honestly don't
>> think you will find any.
>
> [sp] I am trying on this. Getting back to linker scripts after many
>
Le 01/12/2010 19:23, Premi, Sanjeev a écrit :
> [sp] Had a quick question - hence separate mail.
>
> Do we really need to preserve section ".dynsym" in the final
> binary. OR are we okay with single section that contains
> contents from both?
A single section should be OK.
Amic
> -Original Message-
> From: Albert ARIBAUD [mailto:albert.arib...@free.fr]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 11:02 PM
> To: Premi, Sanjeev
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARMv7: Fix linker errors across
> toolchain versions
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Albert ARIBAUD [mailto:albert.arib...@free.fr]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 11:02 PM
> To: Premi, Sanjeev
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARMv7: Fix linker errors across
> toolchain versions
>
>
Le 01/12/2010 18:19, Premi, Sanjeev a écrit :
>> Nak -- what we want to overlay is .bss on one hand, and
>> .rel.dyn *plus*
>> .dynsym on the other hand; OVERLAY { ... } does not allow this.
>
> [sp] From the earlier discussion, I inferred the overlay was supposed
> to be .rel.dyn and .bss.
> -Original Message-
> From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de
> [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Albert ARIBAUD
> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 10:43 PM
> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] ARMv7: Fix linker errors across
&g
Le 01/12/2010 16:17, Sanjeev Premi a écrit :
> This patch fixes the linker problems noticed while
> building the omap3_evm with Codesourcery toolchains
> 2009q1, 2009q3 and 2010q1.
>
> The compilation was tested as success for both
> omap3_evm and omap3_beagle with toolchain versions
> 2009q1 and 2
> -Original Message-
> From: Premi, Sanjeev
> Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 8:47 PM
> To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
> Cc: Premi, Sanjeev
> Subject: [PATCH] ARMv7: Fix linker errors across toolchain versions
>
> This patch fixes the linker problems noticed while
> building the omap3_evm wi
This patch fixes the linker problems noticed while
building the omap3_evm with Codesourcery toolchains
2009q1, 2009q3 and 2010q1.
The compilation was tested as success for both
omap3_evm and omap3_beagle with toolchain versions
2009q1 and 2010q1.
[1] http://marc.info/?l=u-boot&m=129104332808386&
27 matches
Mail list logo
