On Mon, 2009-10-19 at 16:45 -0600, John Rigby wrote:
Regarding 512x psc register maps:
The register map for 5125 does not just change the size of the registers.
Some registers change locations. The issue is that the hardware guys
decided to fix the old broken register access. The 5200,
Yes but the default has constants like CONFIG_SYS_MICRON_INIT_DEV_OP
... must I then declare this if I am using
CONFIG_SYS_ELPIDA_INIT_DEV_OP ?
Well, the ideas was that this was the default setting that fits most
boards, and if it doesn't fit it will be overwritten by another array.
Dear Martha,
can you _please_ fix your mailer and make sure to keep the In-reply-to:
and References: mail headers in place and working, so threading of
messages works? Thanks.
In message 200910200953803.sm05...@[206.180.163.89] you wrote:
Well, the ideas was that this was the default
Dear John,
In message 4b73d43f0910191545x3127cba5w7fdec3f638213...@mail.gmail.com you
wrote:
The register map for 5125 does not just change the size of the registers.
Some registers change locations. The issue is that the hardware guys
decided to fix the old broken register access. The
Regarding 512x psc register maps:
The register map for 5125 does not just change the size of the registers.
Some registers change locations. The issue is that the hardware guys
decided to fix the old broken register access. The 5200, 5121, 5123 had
some registers that were:
Function A when
Dear Martha,
In message 200910131345510.sm02...@[206.180.163.89] you wrote:
We should avoid adding stuff to asm-offsets.h; instead, we should
finally auto-generate this file from the respective C structs as it's
done in Linux. Do you dare to tackle this?
I can't do this any time soon
Dear Martha Stan,
In message 1254987657-10103-1-git-send-email-mm...@silicontkx.com you wrote:
Signed-off-by: Martha Stan mm...@silicontkx.com
---
MAINTAINERS |5 +
MAKEALL |1 +
Makefile|
Hi Wolfgang,
I had to chuckle when I read your opening paragraph – let me say that I have
never thought of myself as a victim – even at the hands of these FSL silicon
guys!!! But I did get a pretty raw deal – yes.
Now I am going to respond a little before I go and resubmit.
Very Best
Message-
From: Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de
Sent 10/3/2009 6:43:51 PM
To: Martha M Stan mm...@silicontkx.com
Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add mpc5125ads board and processor to the mpc512x
family
Dear Martha M Stan,
do you plan to send an updated patch for this release
Dear Martha,
umm... your mail header still says m marx.
In message 20091004102089.sm01...@[206.180.163.89] you wrote:
I am planning to resubmit this patch very soon - by Tuesday perhaps.
Considering there is some differences in the memory layout esp for the
iopin struct (going from 32-bit
Dear Martha M Stan,
do you plan to send an updated patch for this release?
In addition to Fabio's comments here a few more:
In message 12535648622828-git-send-email-mm...@silicontkx.com you wrote:
...
diff --git a/board/freescale/mpc5125ads/mpc5125ads.c
Hi Martha,
--- On Mon, 9/21/09, Martha M Stan mm...@silicontkx.com wrote:
From: Martha M Stan mm...@silicontkx.com
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Add mpc5125ads board and processor to the mpc512x
family
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Cc: Martha M Stan mm...@silicontkx.com
Date: Monday, September 21
12 matches
Mail list logo
