On Mon, 4 Nov 2013 15:28:39 -0200
Fabio Estevam feste...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Tapani,
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de wrote:
We are worried that we might not familiar enough with u-boot development
to get
such changes accepted in reasonable time.
I do
Hi Tapani,
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de wrote:
We are worried that we might not familiar enough with u-boot development to
get
such changes accepted in reasonable time.
I do not know what you mean for a reasonable time. Merge window is
closed, that is
On 11/04/2013 10:28 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Hi Tapani,
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de wrote:
We are worried that we might not familiar enough with u-boot development to get
such changes accepted in reasonable time.
I do not know what you mean for a reasonable
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Eric Nelson
eric.nel...@boundarydevices.com wrote:
On 11/04/2013 10:28 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Hi Tapani,
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de wrote:
We are worried that we might not familiar enough with u-boot development
to get
Hi Eric,
On 04/11/2013 18:37, Eric Nelson wrote:
On 11/04/2013 10:28 AM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
Hi Tapani,
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de wrote:
We are worried that we might not familiar enough with u-boot
development to get
such changes accepted in reasonable
Hi Tapani,
On 04/09/2013 13:21, Tapani wrote:
Are the strict rules written down somewhere, so people less involved in
u-boot development can read them before submitting?
As far as I know, there is not such documentation ;-(
Sure, we might do it for the mmdc. But long term
Stefano,
On Fri, 30 Aug 2013 16:43:28 +0200 Stefano Babic sba...@denx.de wrote:
Hi Tapani,
On some things we probably need some clarification, see inlined responses
to some of your questions.
I hope I can help you.
Well, we start to get it. Correct us if we are wrong.
Ma
Hi Tapani,
On 08/29/2013 10:07 PM, Tapani Utriainen wrote:
Stefano,
Thank you for reviewing this patch, and for the constructive comments.
Most of your comments are taken on board, and we will re-submit updated patches
in the near future.
On some things we probably need some clarification,
Hi Tapani,
On 30/08/2013 07:07, Tapani Utriainen wrote:
Stefano,
Thank you for reviewing this patch, and for the constructive comments.
Most of your comments are taken on board, and we will re-submit updated
patches
in the near future.
On some things we probably need some
Stefano,
Thank you for reviewing this patch, and for the constructive comments.
Most of your comments are taken on board, and we will re-submit updated patches
in the near future.
On some things we probably need some clarification, see inlined responses
to some of your questions.
---
Eric,
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 16:26:44 +0200
Eric Bénard e...@eukrea.com wrote:
Le Wed, 28 Aug 2013 19:23:33 +0800,
Tapani tap...@technexion.com a écrit :
Add support for TechNexion edm-cf-imx6 SoM
The edm1-cf-imx6 SoM comes in three variants, one with imx6 solo cpu,
one
Add support for TechNexion edm-cf-imx6 SoM
The edm1-cf-imx6 SoM comes in three variants, one with imx6 solo cpu,
one with an imx6 dual lite cpu and one with an imx6 quad cpu.
This patch adds basic support for the module that utilizes SPL boot
mechanism for detecting imx6
Hi Tapani,
Le Wed, 28 Aug 2013 19:23:33 +0800,
Tapani tap...@technexion.com a écrit :
Add support for TechNexion edm-cf-imx6 SoM
The edm1-cf-imx6 SoM comes in three variants, one with imx6 solo cpu,
one with an imx6 dual lite cpu and one with an imx6 quad cpu.
aren't these
Hi Tapani,
On 28/08/2013 13:23, Tapani wrote:
Add support for TechNexion edm-cf-imx6 SoM
The edm1-cf-imx6 SoM comes in three variants, one with imx6 solo cpu,
one with an imx6 dual lite cpu and one with an imx6 quad cpu.
This patch adds basic support for the module that
14 matches
Mail list logo
