In message <1285752572-2107-1-git-send-email...@denx.de> you wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk
> ---
> doc/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 29 -
> 1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Applied (with fixes as discussed here).
Best regards,
Wolfgang D
Dear Wolfgang Wegner,
In message <20100929093901.ga26...@leila.ping.de> you wrote:
>
> > +What: CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RELOC option
> > +When: After Release 2010.03
>
> should this be 2011.03, or did I misunderstand anything?
Yes, no.
> > + Support for CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RELOC
Dear Rogan Dawes,
In message <4ca308ae.9060...@dawes.za.net> you wrote:
> On 2010/09/29 11:29 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > +Why: The implementation of U-Boot for the ARM architecture has
> > + been reworked to support relocation. This allows to
> > + efficiently use the same U-Bot binary
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:29:32AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
[...]
> ---
> +What:CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RELOC option
> +When:After Release 2010.03
should this be 2011.03, or did I misunderstand anything?
> +
> +Why: The implementation of U-Boot for
In message <1285752572-2107-1-git-send-email...@denx.de> I wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk
...
> ---
> +What:CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RELOC option
> +When:After Release 2010.03
That should be "After Release 2011.03", of course.
[Will fix when I apply,
On 2010/09/29 11:29 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> +Why: The implementation of U-Boot for the ARM architecture has
> + been reworked to support relocation. This allows to
> + efficiently use the same U-Bot binary image on systems with
U-Bot?
Rogan
_
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk
---
doc/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 29 -
1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/doc/feature-removal-schedule.txt
index 5fe21e8..3879cb4 100644
--- a/doc/feature-removal-sched
7 matches
Mail list logo
