In message 1285752572-2107-1-git-send-email...@denx.de you wrote:
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de
---
doc/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 29 -
1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Applied (with fixes as discussed here).
Best regards,
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de
---
doc/feature-removal-schedule.txt | 29 -
1 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/doc/feature-removal-schedule.txt
index 5fe21e8..3879cb4 100644
---
On 2010/09/29 11:29 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
+Why: The implementation of U-Boot for the ARM architecture has
+ been reworked to support relocation. This allows to
+ efficiently use the same U-Bot binary image on systems with
U-Bot?
Rogan
___
In message 1285752572-2107-1-git-send-email...@denx.de I wrote:
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de
...
---
+What:CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RELOC option
+When:After Release 2010.03
That should be After Release 2011.03, of course.
[Will fix when I
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:29:32AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
[...]
---
+What:CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RELOC option
+When:After Release 2010.03
should this be 2011.03, or did I misunderstand anything?
+
+Why: The implementation of U-Boot for the
Dear Rogan Dawes,
In message 4ca308ae.9060...@dawes.za.net you wrote:
On 2010/09/29 11:29 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
+Why: The implementation of U-Boot for the ARM architecture has
+ been reworked to support relocation. This allows to
+ efficiently use the same U-Bot binary image
Dear Wolfgang Wegner,
In message 20100929093901.ga26...@leila.ping.de you wrote:
+What: CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RELOC option
+When: After Release 2010.03
should this be 2011.03, or did I misunderstand anything?
Yes, no.
+ Support for CONFIG_SYS_ARM_WITHOUT_RELOC will be
7 matches
Mail list logo
