Hi Albert,
Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.b...@aribaud.net writes:
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 08:19:57 -0400, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:23:54AM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote:
With v2013.07-rc3, we are now at 376344B (~ 96% of 384KiB) for
openrd_ultimate when built on Debian
Hi Sascha,
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 08:19:57 -0400, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:23:54AM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote:
Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.b...@aribaud.net writes:
The situation has gotten better recently and U-Boot fits into the
previous partition size of
Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.b...@aribaud.net writes:
The situation has gotten better recently and U-Boot fits into the
previous partition size of 384KiB again. So it isn't broken on OpenRD
anymore and the above would seem like a good approach.
How well does it fit again, and do you have any idea
Hi Sascha,
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 11:23:54 +0200, Sascha Silbe
t-ub...@infra-silbe.de wrote:
Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.b...@aribaud.net writes:
The situation has gotten better recently and U-Boot fits into the
previous partition size of 384KiB again. So it isn't broken on OpenRD
anymore and
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:23:54AM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote:
Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.b...@aribaud.net writes:
The situation has gotten better recently and U-Boot fits into the
previous partition size of 384KiB again. So it isn't broken on OpenRD
anymore and the above would seem like a
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:41:59AM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Sascha,
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:42:53 +0200, Sascha Silbe
t-ub...@infra-silbe.de wrote:
Hello Albert, hello Tom,
Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.b...@aribaud.net writes:
[Move environment to account for increase in U-Boot
Hi Tom,
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:15:50 -0400, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:41:59AM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Sascha,
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:42:53 +0200, Sascha Silbe
t-ub...@infra-silbe.de wrote:
Hello Albert, hello Tom,
Albert ARIBAUD
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 07:40:28PM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Tom,
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:15:50 -0400, Tom Rini tr...@ti.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:41:59AM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
Hi Sascha,
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:42:53 +0200, Sascha Silbe
Hi Sascha,
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:42:53 +0200, Sascha Silbe
t-ub...@infra-silbe.de wrote:
Hello Albert, hello Tom,
Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.b...@aribaud.net writes:
[Move environment to account for increase in U-Boot size]
This patch is for 2013.10, not 2013.07, but I prefer raising the
Hello Albert, hello Tom,
Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.b...@aribaud.net writes:
[Move environment to account for increase in U-Boot size]
This patch is for 2013.10, not 2013.07, but I prefer raising the issue
as early as possible.
If there is no way to make things smoother, then I think the
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 12:00:19 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD
albert.u.b...@aribaud.net wrote:
Hi Sascha,
On Mon, 27 May 2013 11:42:26 +0200, Sascha Silbe
t-ub...@infra-silbe.de wrote:
U-Boot has become slightly larger than where the environment sector
was previously located. Saving the
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 11:29:59AM +0200, Albert ARIBAUD wrote:
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 12:00:19 +0200, Albert ARIBAUD
albert.u.b...@aribaud.net wrote:
Hi Sascha,
On Mon, 27 May 2013 11:42:26 +0200, Sascha Silbe
t-ub...@infra-silbe.de wrote:
U-Boot has become slightly larger than
Hi Sascha,
On Mon, 27 May 2013 11:42:26 +0200, Sascha Silbe
t-ub...@infra-silbe.de wrote:
U-Boot has become slightly larger than where the environment sector
was previously located. Saving the environment would brick the device.
Relocate the environment to where it is with the stock (i.e.
U-Boot has become slightly larger than where the environment sector
was previously located. Saving the environment would brick the device.
Relocate the environment to where it is with the stock (i.e. Marvell
USP) U-Boot version. That should give plenty of room for U-Boot to
grow, including local
14 matches
Mail list logo
